Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden Volume XLVIII 1961 Published quarterly at Galesburg, Illinois, by the Board of Trusi Entered as second-class matter at the post-office at Galesburg, I Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden A quarterly journal containing scientific contributions from the Missouri Botanical Garden and the Henry Shaw School of Botany of Washington University in affiliation with the Missouri Botanical Information February, May, September, and November. Four TABLE OF CONTENTS Morphology and Anatomy of the Saururaceae. I. Floral Anatomy and Embryology M. V. S. Raju Index of Orchid Names — 1960.. Preliminary Revision of the Genus Drymari Sanango: New Amazonian Genus of Loganiaceae George S. Bunting and Jai Two New Members of the Genus Scolecopteris R. Bradley Ewart 275- A Synopsis of Poinsettia (Euphorbiaceae)- General Index to Volume XLVIII Robert L. Dressier MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES President Robert Brookings Smith Vice-President Howard F. Baer Henry Hitchcock EX-OFFICIO Raymond R. Tucker, Mayor of the City of St. Louis • — - , ..... . • . Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden ARY, 1961 -i f PiP.ama F IV Fasd . 4 Annals Missouri Botanical Garden A Quarterly Journal containing Missouri Botanical Garden and the Henry Sh.iv School i Contents o£ previ Company. FLORA OF PAN AM A ROBERT E. WOODSON, Jr. AND ROBERT W. SCHERY AND COLLABORATORS PART IV Fascicle 4 CHENOPODIACEAE (J. A. Duke) AMARANTHACEAE (J. A. Duke) NYCTAGINACEAE BATIDACEAE PHYTOLACCACEAE (K. Raeder) AIZOACEAE (L. I. Nevling, Jr.) PORTULACACEAE (L. I. Nevling, Jr CARYOPHYLLACEAE (J. A. Duke) Annals OF THE Missouri Botanical Garden FEBRUARY, 19(51 FLORA OF PANAMA Part IV. Fascicle 4* CHENOPODIACEAE By JAMES A. DUKE Flowers perfect or unisexual, monoecious, polygamous or dioecious, sessile or shortly pedicellate, often bracteate and bibracteolate, the bracts mostly herbaceous. Perianth uniseriate, of (0-) 2-5 lobes, usually hypogynous, the lobes discrete or basally connate, usually greenish. Corolla absent. Stamens as many as or fewer than the sepals, the filaments mostly discrete, the anthers 2-4-locellate, usually introrse and dorso-medially attached. Ovary superior, unilocular, uniovulate, the ovule erect on a short funicle or pendulous from an elongate funicle; styles 1-3, the stigmata capitate or elongate or the stigmata 2-5 and elongate. Fruit a 1 -seeded indehiscent or circumscissile utricle, the perianth often and the sepals occasionally adherent to the seed; seeds erect, horizontal or inverted, lenticular, cochlea te, subglobose or ellipsoid; embryos circular or hippocrepiform and more or less encircling the endosperm or spirally coiled and nearly filling the seed. Herbs, rarely shrubs or small trees, with simple alternate or opposite exstipulate leaves, these often farinose or glandular. Flowers glomerulate in axillary or terminal spikes, racemes, panicles or cymes, or rarely solitary and axillary, or embedded in the strobiloid axis of the inflorescence. Embracing about a hundred genera and more than a thousand species, the chenopods are a rather cosmopolitan family containing many weeds and halophytes in addition to a few vegetables such as the beet, spinach and swiss chard, the first of which is sometimes grown around the Canal Zone. Three weedy species of Chenopodium occur in Panama, one probably native, the other two known only as weedy advents on San Jose Island. 1. CHENOPODIUM L. Chenopodium L. Sp. PL 218. 1753. Morocarpus Adans. Fam. 2:261. 1763. Anserina Dumort. Fl. Belg. 21. 1827. Teloxys Moq. in Ann. Sci. Nat. 2 T :289. 1834. 2 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Agathophytum Moq. loc. cit. 2 1 :291. 1834. Roubieva Moq. loc. cit. 2 1 :292. 1834. Oligandra Less, in Linnaea 9:199. 1834. non Oligandra Less. 1832. i T. Ness, Gen. Fl. Germ. Dicot. 1: pi. 57. 183 5. Ambrina Spach, Hist. Veg. 5:295. 1836. Botrydium Spach, loc. cit. 5:298. 1836. Lipandra Moq. Chenop. Enum. 19. 1840. Gandriloa Steud. Nom. Bot. 2 1 :662. 1840. Oligatitbera Endl Gen. 1377. 1841. Oxybash Kar. & Kir. in Bull. Soc. Nat. Mosc. 1841 :738. 1841. Orthospermum Opiz, Seznam 70. 1852. Vulvar* Bubani, Fl. Pyren. 1:174. 1897. Botrys Nieuwl. in Am. Midi. Nat. 3 :274. 1914. Flowers perfect or rarely unisexual, sessile or subsessile, ebracteate. Sepals (3-) 5, hypogynous, free or basally united, herbaceous, subequal, often strongly 1-ribbed and cucullate. Stamens 5 or fewer, occasionally varying in number in different flowers of the same inflorescence, the flattened filaments free or basally connate, the anthers mostly suborbicular, introrse, dorso-medially attached. Ovary sub- globose, the stigmata 2 (-5), filiform or subulate, mostly sessile or subsessile. Fruit an indehiscent utricle, ovoid to subglobose, the pericarp membranaceous to carnose, free or adherent to the single seed; seeds mostly cochleate-lenticular, smooth to roughened, vertically or horizontally oriented. Annual or perennial often strong- scented herbs. Leaves alternate, entire to pinnatifid, the lowermost at least usually petiolate, frequently glandular or farinose. Inflorescences of terminal or axillary glomerules, the glomerules variously arranged. Consisting of about a hundred weedy species, Chenopodium is a rather cosmo- politan assemblage of meager economic importance. Various species are used in Central America and elsewhere as potherbs, condiments and vermifuges. Three easily differentiated species are presently known to occur in Panama, but several others occur in Central America north of Panama. linear to oblong, entire; sepals Chenopodium murale L. Sp. Pi. 219. 1753. triplex muralh Crantz, Inst. 1:206. 1766. lenopodium guineense Jacq. Coll. 2:346. 1788. levnpodium cartbagencnse Zucca^ni, in Roem. Coll. 133. 1: wnopodtum murale p albescens Moq. Chenopod. Enum. 32. icnopodtum murale 7 carthageneme Moq. loc. cit. 32. 1840 flora of Panama (Chenopodiaceae) Chcnopodium murale sphsidentatum Murr, in Magyar Bot. Lap. 2:11. 190). Erect or ascending annuals to as much as 6 dm. tall, the branches ascending, often deeply sulcate, occasionally farinose, especially toward the extremities. Leaves somewhat lustrous and occasionally bullate above, glabrous to rather densely farinose below, deltoid to rhomb-ovate, marginally irregularly and .\cuteh dentate, apically acuminate to attenuate and often mucronate, basally acute to truncate, 2.5-8 cm. long, 2-5 cm. broad, the petioles mostly 3-70 mm. long, sometimes quite as long as the blades. Flowers irregularly disposed in glomerules, the glomerules sessile along the dichotomously branching rhachises, these axillary and terminal, distally farinose. Sepals 5, subequal, ovate, obtuse, cucullate, 1-ribbed, slightly if at all carinatc, farinose, basally connate, 1-1.5 mm. long; stamens 5, caducous, the filaments flattened, the anthers orbicular, exserted; ovary subglobose, the style quite short, the 2 (-3) stigmata ca. twice as long, spreading, irregularly glandular. Utricle partially enclosed by the sepals, the seed lenticular-cochleate, minutely tuberculate, dull reddish-brown, 1.2-1.5 mm. broad, horizontal, the pericarp adherent. Presumably a native of Europe, Asia and Africa, now widely advent ive in America as far north as Canada; in Panama known only as a lawn weed in San Jose Island. Champodium ( 'htuopodium Nov. 26:1 Chcnopodium Chenopodium 64. 1943. petiolare var. Uptophylloides Murr. in Bull. Herb. Boiss. 2':994. 1904. bdfang & Aellen, in Feddo, Rep. Spec. 34. 1929. pratericola var. leptopbylloiJes Aellen, in Ostenia 100. 1933. Pratericola ssp. pratericola var. hptopbylloides Aellen, in Am. Midi. Nat. 3 0: ascending ai muals to as much as 3 dm. h iigh, the br inches ascending, usually mull :isulcate, bi< :olored, bullate or farinose, especially distally. Leaves yellowish-gre late, basally en above, whitish and densely farinose itire or rarely subhastatulate, apically ob below, narrowly oblong to -10 mm. broad, the petioles 2-10 mm. long. Flowers sessile in dense glomerules, the glomerules in panicled interrupted spikes, the rhachises densely farinose. Sepals 5, subequal, ovate, sub- acute, cucullate, strongly carinate, farinose, basally connate, ca. 1 mm. long; stamens 5, the flattened filaments included, the anthers orbicular; ovary subglobose, the 2 stigmata sessile or subsessile, spreading, irregularly glandular. Utricle com- pletely embraced by the sepals, the seed lenticular-cochleate, smooth, lustrous, reddish-brown, 1-1.2 mm. broad, horizontal, loosely embraced by the pericarp. Western United States to Mexico; Argentina; probably adventive on San Jose Island as it is in the eastern United States. (345) THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 046) FLORA OF PANAMA (ChetlOpodh corral, San Jose Island, Perlas Archipelago, Gulf of Panama, ca. : of this species as a weed on San Jose Island would tend to sub- stantiate I. M. Johnston's claim (in Sargentia 8:30. 1949) that the weeds were introduced from Texas in unclean hay. The two related taxa [C. pratericola ssp. pratericola var. thellungianum Aellen, with linear leaves, and C. pratericola ssp. desiccatum (A. Nelson) Aellen, a semi-prostrate form] were unknown in Texas at the time of Aellen's monograph (in Fedde, Rep. Spec. Nov. 26: 1 19. 1929) . It must be noted that Aellen (in Am. Midi. Nat. 30:64. 1943) has reduced C. dessi- catum to a subspecies of C. pratericola, a very peculiar mishap since C. desiccatum antedates C pratericola by 10 years and seems not to be homonymous. If they do indeed prove to be mere subspecies of the same species, several new combinations will be required, but I will leave these for the monographer. 3. Chenopodium ambrosioides L. Sp. PL 219. 1753. Chenopodium anthelminticum L. Sp. PL 220. 1753. Atriplex ambrosioides Crantz, Inst. 1:207. 1766. Atriplex anthelmintica Crantz, loc. cit. 1:207. 1766. Chenopodium suffruticosum Willd. Enum. 290. 1809. Chenopodium spathulatum Sicber, Fl. Martin. 92. 1825. Chenopodium santa-maria Veil. FL Flum. 126. 1825. Chenopodium chilense Schrad. Ind. Sem. Hort. Gotting. 1832:2. 1832. non Pers. 1805. Orthosporum ambrosioides Kostel. Allg. Med.-Pharm. FL 1433. 1835. Orthosporum suffrutim urn Kostol. loc. cit. 1433. 1835. \mhrina chil >, k Spach. Hi«. Veg. 5:297. 1836. Ambrina ambrosioides Spach, loc. cit. 5:297. 1836. Ambrina anthelmintica Spach, loc. cit. 5:298. 1836. Roubieva anthelmintica H. & A. Bot. Beech. Voy. 387. 1840. :37. 1856. 'icum A. Gray, Manual 2:364. 1856. Ambrina andicola Phil, in Anal. Univ. Sant. 91:442. 1895. Chenopodium querciforme Murr, in Mag. Bot. Lap. 3:37. 1904. Blitum ambrosioides G. Beck, in Reichenb. Ic. FL Germ. 24:118. 1908. Botrys ambrosioides Nieuwl. in Am. Midi. Nat. i:275. 1914. Botrys anthelmintica Nieuwl. loc. cit. 3:275. 1914. Chenopodium vagans Standi, in N. Am. FL 21:26. 1916. Also numerous other infraspecific names; see Aellen (in Am. Midi. Nat. 30:51. 1943). Erect or ascending ill-scented perennials to as much as 15 dm. high, the branches ascending, usually multisulcate, bicolored, often lignescent, glabrous to tomentulose or villose about the inflorescence. Leaves yellowish green, puberulent, villosulous or glabrate, glandular, with amber-colored secretions, lanceolate to rhomb-elliptic, entire to coarsely and irregularly sinuate-dentate or sinuate- pinnatifid, apically acute, basally attenuate, 2-12.5 cm. long, 0.5-5.5 cm. broad. Flowers sessile, usually in dense glomerules, these contiguous or not and paniculately disposed, interspersed with reduced or rather large leaves, the rhachises glandular and villosulous to glabrate. Sepals (3-) 5, subequal, narrowly ovate, cucullate, very slightly carinate if at all, connate for about one third their length, 047) 6 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN ca. 1 mm. long; stamens (3-) 5, the flattened filaments about as long as the sepals, the anthers orbicular, slightly exserted; ovary subglobose, the sessile or subsessile stigmata spreading, irregularly glandular. Utricle completely embraced by the sepals, the seed lenticular-cochleate, smooth, lustrous, reddish-brown, 0.6-0.8 mm. broad, horizontal and vertical, loosely embraced by the pericarp. A cosmopolitan weed, perhaps indigenous in Mexico and Central America. chiriqui: Alto Lino, 4200 ft., Bro. Maurice 882. Panama: Juan Diaz, Standley 30529- Polymorphically perplexing, this species, or some of its subspecies, varieties or forms, is quite cosmopolitan. Colloquial names applied to the wormseed in Central America are almost as numerous as the Latin names. In Panama only the name "paico" has been encountered. The plant is used medicinally as a vermifuge, a poultice and reputedly even as a soporific; it is also used as a culinary flavoring. AMARANTHACEAE By JAMES A. DUKE Flowers perfect or unisexual, monoecious, polygamous or dioecious, mostly pentamerous, usually bracteate and bibracteolate, sessile or short-pedicellate. Calyx uniseriate or biseriate, commonly hypogynous; sepals (2-) 5, discrete or partially connate, scariose, whitish or variously colored. Corolla absent. Stamens (2-) 5, rarely more, hypogynous or perigynous, the filaments discrete or flattened and united below into a tube, the tube often with filamentous pseudostaminodia inserted between the filaments; anthers 2- to 4-locellate, usually introrse and dorso-medially attached. Ovary superior, unilocular, uniovulate (multiovulate in Pleuropetalum, Celosia and allied genera) ; ovules campylotropous on mostly elongate flattened funicles; styles 1-8; stigmata capitate or filiform. Fruit a 1 -seeded utricle or rarely a several-seeded capsule, often circumscissile; seeds usually cochlea te-orbiculate, the embryo excentric in a mealy endosperm. Herbs, shrubs, small trees or clambering vines with alternate or opposite mostly entire exstipulate leaves. Inflorescences of solitary flowers, spikes, glomes, glomerules, or thyrses simply, racemosely or corymbosely disposed. This largely tropical and subtropical family, of some 50 genera and 500 species, is represented in Panama by eleven of the twelve genera thus far reported for Central America. The twelfth genus, represented in Central America by Froe- lichia interrupta, has not yet been reported between Guatemala and Colombia. Many of the Panama species are cultivants or anthropochorous weeds of disturbed habitats. Several species in several genera are employed as potherbs and species of Amaranthus are a source of grain. Species of Iresine, Celosia, Amaranthus and Gomphrena are planted as ornamentals in Central America and other places. (348) flora of Panama ( Am araii thaceae) (in Panama) 2. CtLOMA reddish brown, I dd. Flowers perfect; filaments basally connate; seeds ai . Leaves opposite; fruit a 1 -seeded indehiscent utricle; si e. Inflorescences of elongate sj 4-loceIlate: style 1, with a, >m>„,I> s 5. glomerules or short congested spp.); anthers 2-loceItate; ityks nflorescences of spikes in mucr ■: - -3, if 1, bilabiate; erect herbs, s . Flowers perfect; stigma 1, broader than tin tube between b or exceeding the ^han'These'al B (349) 8 ANNALS OF THE C35o; flora of Panama (Amaranthaceae) 9 1. PLEUROPETALUM Hook. f. Pleuropetalum Hook. f. in Proc. Linn. Soc. 1:278, and in Lond. Jour. Bot. 5: l Hook. Gen. 3:24. 1880. Flowers perfect, subsessile to pedicellate, unibracteate and bibracteolate. Sepals 5, discrete, hypogynous, concave, subequal, many-ribbed. Petals absent. Stamens 5-8, hypogynous, connate about half their length forming an exappendiculate tube shorter than the ovary; filaments flattened; anthers 4-locellate, introrse, medially attached. Ovary subglobose, 1-locular, multi-ovulate; ovules cam- pylotropous; funicles flattened or filiform, exarillate, with free central placenta- tion; style 1; stigmata mostly 3-6, at anthesis scarcely distinguishable, ultimately reflexed. Fruits at first baccate, later developing into circumscissile or irregularly dehiscent capsules; seeds cochleate-orbiculate, black, lustrous, reticulate. Glabra te sparingly branched erect suffruticose herbs or shrubs. Leaves alternate, entire, petiolate, lanceolate to rhombic-ovate, glabrous to minutely strigillose, deciduous Inflorescences of terminal and axillary racemes, panicles or corymbs, with or without foliar leaves. Inhabiting moist forests of low elevations, thil genus, of perhaps three species, ranges from Jalisco to Peru and the Galapagos Islands. The type species, P. daruinii Hook, f., endemic to the Galapagos Islands, was reluctantly assigned to the Portulacaceae by Bentham & Hooker (Gen. 1:157. 1862.). The two other species ally unimportant genus are both found in Panama. 1. Pleuropetalum sprucei (Hook, f.) Standi, in N. Am. Fl. 21:96. 1917. Melanocarpum sprucei Hook. f. in Benth. & Hook. Gen. 3:24. 1880. Pleuropetalum costaricense Hort. Kew, ex Hemsl. Biol. Centr. Am. Bot. 3:12. 1882. Pleuropetalum tucurriquense Donn. Smith, in Bot. Gaz. 61:387. 1916. Pleuropetalum calospermum Standi, in Jour. Wash. Acad. Sci. 13:368. 1923. Erect sparingly branched subglabrous suffruticose herbs or shrubs to 3 m. high. Leaves glabrous to minutely strigillose on the veins below, broadly lanceolate to rhombic-ovate, often falcate, apically attenuate, basally acute to subrounded, 3-15 cm. long, 1-6 cm. broad; petioles 5-20 mm. long. Inflorescences of mostly terminal corymbose racemes, the rhachises usually glandular. Flowers perfect, on pedicels 1-10 mm. long; bracts and bracteoles subequal, ovate to orbicular, carinate, 0.5-1 mm. long; sepals 5, subequal, ovate, concave, glabratc or scurfy, rounded to subacute, ultimately spreading, 2-4 mm. long, 1-2 mm. broad, with 7-13 (-17) ribs; stamens 5-8; filaments 2-3 mm. long; filament tube 1-2 mm. long; anthers oblong; ovary globose; style 1, about 0.5 mm. long; stigmata mostly 3-4, longer than the style, ultimately reflexed. Fruit an irregularly dehiscent capsule exceeding 10 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN the sepals, 4-7 mm. long, 3-6 mm. broad; seeds cochleate-orbiculate, black, lustrous, reticulate, 1.5-2.2 mm. long, on filiform or flattened funicles becoming 1-3 mm. long. bocas DEL toko: vicinity of Chiriqui Lagoon, von WeJel 1028. chiriqui: Bajo Mono, Boquete District, 4500 ft., Davidson 481; R. Chiriqui Viejo Valley, on island near River, White 15a; valley of the upper Rio Chiriqui Viejo, 1300-1900 m., White 6 White 12. This woodland species ranges from Jalisco to Peru. The Jalisco specimen (Mexia i forest of Quebrada Ancha, 70 m Steyerr.unk * Allen ,. «. CHH | ,...!,,, ,!r. 1000 ft., Allen 5054. darien: Rio Sabana, Leopold 106; Cana and vicinitv. WHIimiU 727. Panama: Cerro Campana, alt. 800 m., Allen 4024. This species is apparently confined to Costa Rica, the type locality, and Panama. It occurs in rather deep woods, especially along streams in ravines and drowned FLORA OF PANAMA (An 2. CELOSIA I.. Cfxosia L. Sp. PI. 205. 1753. Lcstibudesia Thouars, sionally sterile, subsessile or short pedicel- late, unibracteate and bibracteolate. Sepals 5, discrete, hypogynous, concave, variously Petals absent, mate less than appendiculate : strongly ribl Stamens 5, hypogynous, half their length forming or exappendiculate tube shorter than the ovary; filaments flattened; anthers 4- locellate, introrse, medially attached. Ovary subglobose to ellipsoid, 1-locular, multi-ovulate; ovules campy lotropous; funicles flattened, exarillate, with free central placentation; styles 1; stigmata 2- 3. Fruit a 2- to many-seeded circumscissile capsule; seeds cochleate-orbiculate, dark reddish brown to black, reticulate. Gla- brate or pubescent herbaceous of suffruti- cose perennials or annuals. Leaves alternate, entire, subsessile to petiolate, glabrous or pubescent, lanceolate to rhombic-elliptic, deciduous. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary panicles or spikes, with or without foliar leaves. A large genus of some fifty species, this seems to have reached its best development in subtropical regions of America, Africa and Asia. Only one species, the cultivated cockscomb, is so far reported from Panama. 12 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 1. Celosia argentea L. Sp. PI. 205. 1753. Celosia cristata L. loc. cit. 205. 1753. Celosia margaritacea L. Sp. PI. ed. 2:297. 1763. Celosia coccinea L. loc. cit. 297. 1763. Celosia pyramidalis Burm. Fl. Ind. 65. 1768. Lmdica Retz. Obs. Bot. 3:27. 1783. Celosia pallida Salisb. Prodr. 145. 1796. Celosia htittonii Mast, in Card. Chron. 215. 1 872. Amaranthus purpureus Nieuwl. in Amer. Midi. Nat. 3 :279. 1914. Erect glabrous simple or much branched annuals to 1 m. high. Leaves glabrous, linear-lanceolate to rhombic or ovate, apically acuminate to acute, 3-12 cm. long, 0.5-6 cm. broad; petioles 1-30 mm. long. Inflorescence of simple (quite complex, often fascia ted, in cultivated varieties) pedunculate cylindric spikes 2-20 cm. long, 1-2 cm. broad. Flowers perfect, the uppermost occasionally sterile, sessile; bracts and bracteoles subequal, ovate, mucronate, 2-7 mm. long; sepals 5, subequal, ovate, concave, mucronate, white to pinkish (variously colored in cultivated varieties), erect in fruit, 6-10 mm. long; stamens 5, 3-5 mm. long, the tube shorter than the free portions of the filaments; pseudostaminodia minute and deltoid or absent; anthers oblong; ovary ellipsoid; style 1, 3-6 mm. long, usually exceeding the sepals; stigmata 2 (-3), minute. Fruit a circumscissile capsule, shorter than the calyx, 3-4 mm. long; seeds (1-) 3-6 (-9), cochleate-orbiculate, dark reddish brown, about 1.5 mm. broad. Cultivated in many regions, possibly natives of Africa, the cockscombs are reported by Standley (in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 27:172. 1928) to be cultivated in gardens in Panama, where they are called abanico. The cultivants often escape and morphologically approach the natural variety. Backer (in Fl. Mai. 4 2 :74. 1949.) notes that in some escapes, one branch may bear the mark of cultivation with another resembling the wild form. He informs us that the seeds are used by the Chinese for poultices and for adorning cakes, while the leaves furnish an inferior vegetable. In India, where it is used medicinally and as a vegetable, it often appears spontaneously in paddy and ragi fields. Among vernacular names reported from Mexico and Central America are mono, san jose, cresta de gallo, amor seco, mano de leon, flor de mano, amaranto and boria. 3. AMARANTHUS L. Amaranthus L. Sp. PI. 989. 1753. B//7o« Adans. Fam. PI. 2:506. 1763. Koemeria Moench, Meth. 341. 1794. Glomeraria Cav. Descr. 319. 1803. DimeiandraWzi. Neogen. 2. 1825. Scleropus Schrad Ind. Sem. Hort. Gott. 1835.; in Linnaea 11: Litt.-ber. 89. 1837. Dimetanthus Raf. Fl. Tell. 3:41. 1837. Amblogyna Raf. loc. cit. 42. 1837. Euxolus Raf. loc. cit. 42. 1837. Pentrius Raf. loc. cit. 42. 1837. flora of Panama ( Amaranthaceae) Mengea Schauer, in Meyer, Nov. Acta Acad. Leop. 19: Supply. 1 :405. 1843. Pyxidium Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 2 :262. 1849. Sarratia Moq. loc. cit. 262. 1849. Gall/aria Bubani, Fl. Pyren. 1:184. 1897. Flowers monoecious, dioecious or polygamous, sessile or subsessile, unibracteate and bibracteolate. Sepals 3-5, rarely 1, discrete, hypogynous, concave, occasionally basally clawed, equal or subequal, membranaceous, erect and persistent in fruit. Stamens 3-5, rarely 1, hypogynous, discrete; filaments filiform; anthers 4-locellate, introrse, medially attached, oblong. Ovary ovoid to lenticular, 1-locular, 1- ovulate, the ovule campylotropous on a short exarillate funicle, the placentation basal; styles 1-3; stigmata 2-3, usually exceeding the styles. Fruit a utricle, seeds cochleate-orbiculate, smooth to minutely itire to minutely crenulate, long-petiolate. Erect or prostrate, glabrous to pubescent annual herbs. Inflorescences of terminal and/or axillary spicate or paniculate thyrses, in Panama monoecious or polygamous with female flowers basally, hermaphroditic flowers medially, and male flowers distally, the latter tending to have longer, narrower sepals. Widespread in both temperate and tropical regions throughout the world, Amarantbtts consists of perhaps fifty species. Many of them arc inhabitants of open disturbed areas where they may become rather annoying weeds. Some are cultivated for their edible seeds and leaves, and others, with brightly colored inflorescences, are planted as ornamentals. Sauer (Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 37: 561-632. 1950) reports on the detailed ethnological history of the grain-amaranths. Seven species have been reported in Panama, but one, adventive on San Jose Island, apparently no longer persists. cc. Utricle compressed -ovoid; stylopodium 2-3-lobulate in cross section; d. Plants unarmed; axillary inflorescences cylindric. e. Thyrses less than 6 mm. broad; bracts of the pistillate flowers mostly shorter than the sepals, some of the sepals spatulate 4. A. OUBlUs mostly longer than the sepals, giving the spikes a bristly appear- dd. Plants armed; axillary inflorescences globose 6. A. spinosus In addition to the aforementioned, Johnston (in Sargentia 8:124. 1949) adds that A. retroflexus L. was collected on San Jose Island in 1945 (Erlamon l88) , but was unsuccessfully searched for in 1946. I have not seen the specimen. The 055) ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BO TANK A species is separated from the closely allied species A. hybr of the pistillate flowers. [acq. Coll. 2:325. 1788. gracilis Desf . Tabl. Bot. 43. 1804. Mbersia gracilis Webb. & Berth. Phyr. Canar. 3:287. 1836. Euxolns cnudatus Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 2 :274. 1849. t. 1 J 8 :274. 1849. F.uxohs caudatm 7 maximus Moq. loc. cit. 13 2 :274. 1849. Rather delicate glabrous annuals to as much as 1 m. high, the branches ascend- ing. Leaves glabrous, entire to minutely crenulate, deltoid- to rhombic-ovate, apically emarginate to rounded and mucronate, basally truncate to subacute, 1.5-6 cm. long, 1-4 cm. broad, the petioles 0.5-4 cm. long. Inflorescences of thyrses racemosely disposed, the terminal and axillary thyrses cylindric, mostly less than 7 mm. broad. Flowers polygamo-monoecious or monoecious; bracts and bracteoles subequal, lanceolate to ovate, ca. 1 mm. long; sepals 3, linear-oblong to obovate, rounded, mucronate, 1-1.5 mm. long, the midrib dark green, the margins scariose; stamens 3, discrete, 1-1.5 mm. long; ovary compressed-globose; style 1, minute, stigmata 3, longer than the style. Fruit an indehiscent, strongly rugose utricle, 1-1.5 mm. long, 1-1.5 broad; seeds cochleate-orbiculate, dark red to black, dull, minutely pebbled, 1-1.2 mm. broad. Presumably a native of the Old World tropics, this weedy species is adventive around Balboa (fide Standley, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 27:173. 1928). It is also adventive in the eastern United States. The names bledo and calalu are applied to all the species of Panamanian Amarantims, any of which may serve as potherbs. 2. Amaranthus californicus (Moq.) S. Wats. Bot. Calif. 2:42. 1880. Mengea calif ornica Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 2 :270. 1849. Amaranthus carneus Greene, in Pittonia 2:105. 1890. Amaranthus albomarginatus Uline & Bray, in Bot. Gaz. 19:318. 1 894. Prostrate, radially spreading delicate annuals, the branches to as much as 5 dm. long, often tinged with anthocyanins. Leaves glabrous, bullate, entire, often white-margined, ovate to obovate and spatulate, apically emarginate to rounded and mucronate, basally attenuate, 3-25 mm. long, 2-12 mm. broad, the petioles 3-25 mm. long. Flowers in axillary, often leafy, few-flowered clusters, with every node often bearing an inflorescence, these ultimately shorter than the petioles. Flowers monoecious; bracts and bracteoles lanceolate, apically aristate, 1.5-2.5 mm. long; sepals 3 and quite unequal, or 1-2 in the pistillate flowers, linear to lanceolate, acute to obtuse, 0.4-1.0 mm. long; sepals of the staminate flowers 3, subequal; stamens 2, discrete, ca. 1 mm. long; ovary ellipsoid, the stigmata 3, ca. as long as the ovary at anthesis. Fruit a utricle, circumscissile about the middle, rugose, 1-1.5 mm. long, 1-1.5 mm. broad; seeds cochleate-orbiculate, dark reddish-brown, lustrous, minutely pebbled, 0.8-1.1 mm. broad. FLORA OF PANAMA (A* Although the cited specimen was labeled as A. albus L., the prostrate habit, few stamens, and reduced sepals in the pistillate flowers clearly separate it from that species. The small seeds and rugulose utricles also serve to separate it from A. blitoides S. Wats., a very closely related prostrate species. 3. Amaranthus cruentus L. Syst. Veg. 10:1269. 1759. Amaranthus paniculatus L. Sp. PI. 2:1406. 1763. Amaranthus flavus L. loc. cit. 2:1406. 1763. Amaranthus sanguineus L. loc. cit. 1407. 1763. Amaranthus parisiensis Schkuhr, Handb. 3:249. 1808. Amaranthus speciosus Sims, Bot. Mag. pi. 222J. 1821. Amaranthus patiicuUtu* « /',•/•;.>-.,,■./. Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 L ':257. 1849. Amaranthus paniculatus /3 cruentus Moq. loc. cit. 257. 1849. Amaranthus hybridus paniculatus Uline & Bray, in Mem. Torr. Club 5:145. 1894. Amaranthus dussii Sprenger, in Bull. Soc. Tosc. Ort. 3 1 : 178. 1896. Galliaria patula Bubani, Fl. Pyren. 1:187. 1 897. Amaranthus hybridus subsp. cruentus Thcllung, Fl. Adv. Montp. 205. 191 2. Coarse usually pubescent annuals to 2 m. high, simple or with ascending branches. Leaves glabrous above, pubescent or glabrate below, entire to minutely crenulate, ovate to rhombic, apically rounded to acute and mucronate, basally acute to cuneate, 3-15 cm. long, 1-6 cm. broad; petioles 1-8 cm. long. Inflores- cences of thyrses racemosely disposed, the terminal and axillary thyrses cylindric, often drooping, 5-15 mm. broad. Flowers polygamo-monoecious or monoecious; bracts and bracteoles subequal, lanceolate to ovate, 1.5-2.5 mm. long; sepals 5, oblong to ovate, rounded to mucronate apically, 1.5-2 mm. long, the midribs dark green, the margins scariose and tinted with anthocyanins; stamens 5, discrete, 1-2 mm. long; ovary compressed globose, capped by a circular stylopodium; stigmata 3 (-4) , longer than the stylopodium. Fruit a smooth to rugulose subglobose utricle, circumscissile near the middle, about 2 mm. long, usually exceeding the sepals; seeds cochleate-orbiculate, dark reddish brown to black, minutely reticulate, This is the commonly cultivated grain amaranth of Central America. In Panama it is called abanico rhino and calalu, and it is cultivated both as an ornamental and as a potherb. In Mexico and Guatemala the seeds are used in making sweetbreads and mushes. Standley & Steyermark (in Field Mus. Bot. 24*: 153. 1946) point out that A. caudatm L., A. leucosperma Wats, and A. cruentus L. are best treated as one species "rather doubtfully distinct from A. hybridus" Sauer (Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 37:561-632. 1950) on the other hand contends that there are four major grain amaranth species in the Americas, A. leucocarpus Wats., chiefly in Mexico; A. cruentus L., chiefly in Guatemala; A. caudatus L., chiefly in the Andes; and A. ednlfs Spegazzini, chiefly in Argentina. Of the cultivated amaranths, whether they comprise several or one species, he cites only A. cruentus from Panama. ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN us Mart. PL Hort. Erlang. 197. 1814. Hist. Amaranth. 21. 1790. not A. tristis L. illd. Enum. Hort. Berol. suppl.: 64. 1813. hyponymn. Amaranths t\ Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 2 :260. 1849. Amaranthus iristis ~, ficsuosus Moq. loc. cit. 260. 1849. Amaranths t\ q. loc. cit. 260. 1849. Amaranthus dubius B xanthostachys Thellung, in Asch. & Graebn. Syn. Mittel-Eur. Fl. 5: .!;«.■ antb:r luluus C Hexuosus Thellung, loc. cit. 266. 1914. Amaranthus dubius D lepiosiachys Thellung, loc. cit. 266. 1914. Rather delicate mostly glabrous annuals to 1 m. high with ascending branches. Leaves glabrous or glabrate, entire or minutely crenulate, deltoid- to rhombic-ovate, apically rounded to acute, often mucronate, basally rounded to acute, 2-8 cm. long, 1-6 cm. broad; petioles 1-6 cm. long. Inflorescences of thyrses racemosely disposed, the terminal and axillary thyrses mostly cylindric and less than 6 mm. broad. Flowers polygamo-monoecious or monoecious; bracts and bracteoles sub- equal, lanceolate to ovate or obovate, acute to acuminate, 1.5-2 mm. long, the midribs dark green, the margins scariose; stamens discrete, 1-3 mm. long; ovary ovoid; styles (2-) 3, fimbrillate. Fruit a slightly rugose compressed ovoid utricle, circumscissile about the middle, 1.5-2.5 mm. long; seeds cochleate-orbiculate, reddish brown to black, reticulate, 0.8-1.1 mm. broad. bocas del toro: Isla Colon, vicinity of Chiriqui Lagoon, von Wedcl 2854. canal zone: near Gorgas Memorial Laboratory, viciniiv « f Mn it) res, (;. V. bid I IQ; in govern- ment forest along Las Cruces Trail, Hunter & Allen 712; Bohio Soldado, Couell 235. darien: vicinity of Boca de Cupe, ca. 40 m., Allen 874. Panama: Agricultural Exp. Sta. at Matias Hernandez, Pittier 6839. Reputedly the common weed amaranth of the Caribbean, this species extends from Mexico through tropical South America and is adventive in Europe. In Panama, where the leaves and young shoots are employed as potherbs, the names bledo and calalu are applied. The Mayas call it xetz and chactex; Mexicans call the amaranths quelite, a name derived from an Aztec word and used for any pot- herb. The specific epithet is strongly suggestive of its specific status. It is weakly separated from A. hybridvs L., from which it is frequently keyed by the length of the sepals in proportion to the length of the utricles. In individuals of both species, however, the utricles vary from shorter to longer than the sepals. 5. Amaranthus hybridus L. Sp. PL 990. 1753. Amaranthus bypocondriacus L. Sp. PL 991. 1753. Amaranthus beet:. A h. 25. 1790. Amaranthus strictus Willd. loc. cit. 27. 1790. Amaranthus laetus Willd. loc. cit. 28. 1790. Amaranthus chlorostachys Willd. loc. cit. 34. 1790. Amaranthus retroflexus var. hybridus A. Gray, Man. ed. 5:412. 1867. Amaranthus retroflexus var. chlorostachys A. Gray, loc. cit. 412. 1867 Amaranthus chlorostachys var. hybridus S. Wats, in A. Gray, Man. ed. 6:428. 18 89. Amaranthus hybridus var. bypocondriacus B. L. Robinson, in Rhodora 10:32. 1908. G. Beck, in Reichenb. Tc. Fl. Germ. 24:175. 1908. bnda Nieuwl. in Am. Midi. Nat. 3:278. 1914. flora of Panama (Amaranthaccac) \j 18 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Rather coarse often pubescent annuals to 2.5 m. high with ascending branches. Leaves pubescent or glabrous, entire to minutely crenulate, deltoid- to rhombic- ovate, apically rounded to acute, often mucronate, basally acute to rounded, 2-15 cm. long, 1-7 cm. broad; petioles 1-8 cm. long. Inflorescences of congested thyrses racemosely disposed, the terminal and axillary thyrses mostly cylindric, 6-12 mm. broad. Flowers polygamo-monoecious or monoecious; bracts and bracteoles subequal, lanceolate to ovate, 2-4 mm. long, often conspicuously longer than the flowers; sepals lanceolate to ovate or obovate, acute to acuminate, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, the midribs dark green, the margins scariose, rarely tinged with anthocyanins; stamens 5, discrete, 1-3 mm. long; ovary ovoid; styles (2-) 3, conical; stigmata (2-) 3, fimbrillate. Fruit a slightly rugose compressed ovoid utricle, circum- scissile near the middle, 2-2.5 mm. long; seeds cochlea te-orbiculate, reddish brown to black, minutely reticulate, 1-1.3 mm. broad. chiriqui: vicinity of Boquete, 1200-1500 m., Woodson & Schery ?22. This weedy species, frequently forming large stands in old fields, is found throughout temperate and tropical North and South America, and is adventive in many parts of the Old World. Vernacular names reported in Mexico and Central America are quintoniles, calcte, ses, huisquilete and quiec tes, bledo, xtez, quelite and hutsquelite. The leaves and young shoots are often cooked as potherbs. 6. Amaranthus spinosus L. Sp. PI. 991. 1753. Amaranthus diacanthus Raf. Fl. Ludov. 31. 1817. Amaranthus caracasanus H.B.K. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 2:195. 1817. Amaranthus sph:- . Flora 25: litt. 20. 1842. Amaranthus spin | M -. c ; t . litt. 20. 1842. Amaranthus spinosus f pygmaeus Hassk. Cat. PI. Bogor. 83. 1844. Amaranthus spinosus (9 purpurascens Moq. in DC. Prodr. " Amaranthus spinosus i. i 269. 1914. Amaranthus spinosus 77 basiscissus Thellung, loc. cit. 269. 1914. Amaranthus spin i lung, loc. cit. 269. 1914. Galliaria spinosa Nieuwl. in Am. Midi. Nat. 3 -.278. 1914. Rather coarse, mostly glabrous armed annuals to 2 m. high, usually with erect branches. Leaves glabrous or pubescent below, narrowly rhombic-ovate, apically rounded to acute, basally acute to cuneate, 1-12 cm. long, 0.5-5 cm. broad; petioles 0.5-8 cm. long, with 2 thorns in their axils. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary thyrses racemosely disposed, the lower axillary thyrses globose and up to 15 mm. broad. Flowers polygamo-monoecious or monoecious, the bracts and bracteoles rather variable, lanceolate to acicular, 1-5 mm. long, often resembling the thorns, some conspicuously longer than the flowers; sepals 5, lanceolate to oblong, 1-2.5 mm. long, the midribs dark-green, the margins scariose; stamens discrete, 1-2 mm. long; ovary ovoid; styles 3, conical; stigmata 3, fimbrillate. Fruit a slightly rugose compressed ovoid utricle, irregularly to regularly circum- scissile, 1.5-2.5 mm. long; seeds cochleate-orbiculate, reddish brown to black, minutely reticulate, 0.7-1.0 mm. broad. (360) flora of Panama ( Amaranthaceae) 19 canal zone: Monkey Hill and vicinity, Couell IQ. chiriqui: vicinity of Boqucte, 1200-1500 m., Woodson 8 Schery 723; vicinity of Puerto Armuelles, 0-75 m., Woodson d Schery 833. col6n: Culebra, Couell 214. herrera: vicinity of Ocu, 100 m., Allen 4086. Presumably a native of America, this anthropochorous species now has a circumpolar distribution in temperate and tropical countries. In Panama it is probably called bledo and calalii. Other Mexican and Central American names are xtez, kix-xtez, huisqiielite, blcdo macho, ixtez, tsetz, labtzetz and nigna. In spite of the rather formidable thorns this species is also utilized as a potherb. 4. CHAMISSOA HBK. Chamissoa HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 2:196. 1817. Ko*i;i.mtLi WmA. Fast. Pi. Nov. 6. 1771. WadapusKii.Vl. Tell. 3:77. 1837. Xerosiphon Turcz. in Bull. Soc. Nat. Mosc. 16:55. 1843. Xeraea O. Ktze. Rev. Gen. 545. 1891. Amarantoides Maza, Fl. Haban. 94. 1897. Flowers perfect, bracteate and bibracteolate, sessile in spikes or heads. Sepals 5, basally connate or discrete, hypogynous, concave, subequal, colorless or brightly colored. Stamens 5, hypogynous, the filaments connate forming a deep stamen tube, the anthers sessile at the summit of the tube; pseudostaminodia 2-lobate; anthers 2-locellate, introrse, medially attached. Ovary globose to obovoid, 1- locular, 1 -ovulate, the ovule campylotropous on an elongate flattened funicle; style 1, filiform, about as long as the 2 filiform stigmata. Fruit an indehiscent utricle; seeds cochleate-orbiculate. Pubescent erect or decumbent annual or perennial herbs. Leaves opposite, sessile or petiolate, entire, usually pubescent, apparently deciduous. Inflorescences of terminal and occasionally axillary globose to cylindric solitary or clustered heads, usually subtended by foliar leaves. This genus of nearly a hundred species, with some native to tropical America and others to tropical Austral-Asia, seem to reach its best development in South America. Several species are widely cultivated, as is the "bachelor's button", G. globosa, a rather handsome ornamental with edible leaves. Four species are known from Central America but only two are reported from Panama. a. Heads 5-14 mm. in diameter; bracteoles 4-6 mm. long; leaves 1-5 aa. Heads 15-25 nun 7-12 nm long; leaves 2- 10 cm. long 2. G. globosa 1. Gomphrena decumbens Jacq. Hort. Schoenbr. 4:41. 1804. Xeraea decumbens O. Ktze. Rev. Gen. 545. 1891. Gomphrena decumbens f. albiflora Chod. & Hassl. in Bull. Herb. Boiss. 2 3 :389. 1903. Gomphrena decumbens f. roseiflora Chod. & Hassl. be. cit. 389. 1903. (589) ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Gomphrena ixiamensis Rusby, in Bull. N. Y. Bot. Gard. 6:502. 1910. Gomphrena / Rep. Spec. Nov. 11:156. 19 Gomphrena decumbem var. grandifolia Stuchlik, loc. cit. 157. 1912. Gomphrena perennh subsp. pseudodecumbens Stuchlik, loc. cit. 153. 1912. , IoC. or. 153. 1912. Gomphrena dispersa Standi, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 18:91. 1916. Gomphrena decumbem var. carinata Suesseng. in Rep. Sp. Nov. 39:8. 193 5. Prostrate or decumbent pilose annual or perennial herbs, the much branching stems to 50 cm. long, often rooting at the nodes and forming mats. Leaves seri- ceous to strigose, occasionally glabrate, oblong to ovate or obovate, apically acute to rounded and mucronate, basally acute to attenuate, 1-5 cm. long, 0.5-2.5 cm. broad; petioles 1-5 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary ovoid to cylindric whitish or purplish heads, occasionally clustered, 4-20 mm. long, 5-14 mm. broad, subtended by ovate leaves 0.5-2 cm. long. Flowers perfect; bracts (390) flora of Panama (Amaratithaceae) 49 persistent, ovate, acuminate, 1.5-3 mm. long; bracteoles narrowly to broadly cristate, equaling or exceeding the sepals, 4-6 mm. long; sepals 5, subequal, basally connate, cinereous- to rufous-lanate, ultimately indurate and closely embracing the fruit; stamens 5, subequal, the anthers sessile between the 5 2-lobate pseudo- staminodia; stamen tube 3-6 mm. long; ovary globose; style 1, 1-1.5 mm. long; stigmata 2, 1-1.5 mm. long. Fruit an indehiscent areolate utricle 1-2 mm. long; seeds cochlea te-orbiculate, yellowish to reddish brown, ocellate, 1.5-1.7 mm. broad. bocas del toro: Research grounds, region of Almirante, Cooper 138. canal zone: open sunny area next to road, Corrosion Laboratory, vicinity of Miraflores Locks, Stern, mm & Greenman 5015; vicinity of Miraflores Lake, White 8 White 192; Pedro Miguel, Bro. Heriberto 19. chiriquI: vicinity of Puerto Armuelles, 0-75 m., Woodson tf Schery 819. This species ranges from the "West Indies and Mexico to Panama and from Brazil and Bolivia to Argentina. Common names in Guatemala are botoncillo, sangrinaria, sanguinariu, siempreiha and •■<< 373 1 Almirante region, Cooper & Slater 58; Changuinola valley, Cooper & Slater 60, 140; Cricamola, Cooper 491 ■; Fish Creek Mts., Von Wedel 2267; vicinity of Chiriqui Lagoon, Von Wedel roil, 1017; Water Valley, Von Wedel 1 57 4, 1609, 1503, r43 3 , 927. canal zone: hills north of Frijoles, Standley 27427, 27509; Margarita Swamp, south of France Field, Haxon tS Valentine 7048; Gatun, Sutton Hayes 626; railroad relocation between Gorgona and r 2265, 2271 ■; Barro Colorado Island, Frost r23, Kenoyer 491, 638, Aviles 30, Bailey & Bailey 120, 522, Wetmore & Abbe 22, Standley 31310, 31336, 40905, 40955' 4*023, 41013. chiriqui : Progreso, Cooper & Slater 184. cocle: region north of El Valle de Anton, Allen 3732. colon: between France Full -n ! ( *'i\ .1, standley 30182; along Rio Fato, Pittier 3912. darien: trail between Pinogana and Yavisa, Allen 268; forests around Pinogana, Pittier 6347. san blas: forests around Puerto Obaldia, Pittier 4397- (402) flora of Panama (Nyctaginaceae) 61 Neea amplifolia usually can be keyed without difficulty from the two preceding species, particularly by means of the inflorescence characters, the predominantly larger leaves and staminate perianths, and the more frequent and abundant indu- ment. In all respects intermediates occur, nevertheless, and the relative abundance of disparate specimens, particularly from Bocas del Toro, where N. laetevirens also is abundant and variable, provides grounds for strongly suspected hybridization. The proliferation and phyllody of the inflorescence is a frequent and puzzling propensity of this species, the agent of which is obscure. In addition, both in JV. amplifolia and in N. laetevirens, the terminal staminate flowers occasionally develop at the expense of the lateral. 4. GUAPIRA Aubl. Guapira Aubl. Hist. PI. Guian. 1:308; 3: /. Iig. \77">. Gynastrum Neck. Elem. 1:224. 1790. Torrubia Veil. Fl. Flum. 139. 1825; Icon. 3: /. 150. 1827, nun Tul. Dioecious trees and shrubs. Leaves opposite to irregularly approximate. In- florescences terminal, frequently at the tips of short lateral branches, corymbosely thyrsiform. Flowers small, immediately subtended by 1-3 minute bracteoles. Staminate flowers campanulate; stamens usuall} 6-8, unequal, widely exserted, the short tube of the filaments adnate to the stipe of the pistillode. Pistillate flowers tubular to tubular-campanulate, the limb of the perianth erect or spreading, the staminodes about as long as the ovary and with enlarged sterile anthers, the short tube of the filaments adnate to the stipe of the pistil. Anthocarps fleshy, eglandular, the limb of the perianth persistent and rather fleshy. Numerous species in the Antilles, and Central and South America. There can be little doubt that Guapira Aubl. is congeneric with Torrubia Veil, as suggested by Heimerl (in Engl. Nat. Pflanzenfam. ed. 2. 16 ( :127. 1934) and not an indecipherable verbenacea as previously held by many (although questioned by Bentham & Hooker). The specimen illustrated by Aublet obviously is pistillate and, with the understandable error of the four to five minute "leaflets of the calyx [i.e. bracteoles]", is a good representation of Torrubia for its time, particularly with respect to the fruit with its persistent perianth limb ("Drupa monosperma . . coronata denticulis corollae, quae evadit pulposa") , and the persistent style crowned by a penicillate stigma. With the exception of the supernumary bracteoles, the figure of the flower also is good, showing the spreading perianth limb characteristic of so many South American Torrubias, and the widely exserted style and penicillate stigma. The single species described by Aublet, G. guianensis, perhaps is con- specific with Torrubia eggersiana (Heimerl) Standi. Perhaps too many transfers from Pisonia to Torrubia already have been made by Britton and by Standley, and one might be inclined to submit Torrubia as a candidate for conservation over Guapira in order to avoid additional transfers to the latter. I am inclined not to do so, however, for the following reasons. Tor- rubia has not generally been considered as distinct from Pisonia, and consequently (401) 62 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN the transfers to the former are not in wide use; transfer to Guapira therefore would entail little mental adjustment and inconvenience at this date. Both Torrubia and Guapira are based upon rather inadequate antique illustrations, but those of the latter are definitely more capable of critical interpretation than the former; it furthermore will be much easier to associate G. guianensis with a modern species than T. opposita Veil. . (Standi.) Woodson, comb. nov. Torrubia costaricana Standi, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 13:385. 1911. Small dioecious trees to 10 m. tall. Branches moderately stout, glabrous, prominently lenticellate at maturity. Leaves rather crowded, petiolate, the blade predominantly elliptic to oblong-elliptic, acuminate, obtuse at the base, 2.5-10.0 cm. long, 1.5—4.5 cm. broad, subcoriaceous, glabrous, the petiole 0.5—1.0 cm. long. Inflorescences 3-6 cm. long, rather shortly pedunculate, many-flowered, minutely anth campanulate, about 3 mm. long, about 0.5 mm. in diameter at the base and 2 mm. at the orifice, minutely puberulent, greenish white or yellow, the stamens about half exserted. Pistillate flowers tubular-campanulate, the limb slightly spreading, about 2 mm. long and 0.5 mm. in diameter, minutely puberulent- papillate. Anthocarps globose or subglobose, about 7-8 mm. long, black or purple when ripe. Costa Rica and Panama, in forests and savannas, sea level to 1000 m. chiriqui: Boquete, Davidson 68q; David, Pittier 3370. cocle: Vallc enici!late; ovules basal, campylotropous, solitary. Fruit a berry, e, the seeds 1-many. Embryo coiled or bent around the perisperm. 1. PETIVERIA L. Petiveria L. Sp. Pi. 342. 1753. Tall herbs, sometimes woody at the base. Leaves alternate, simple, entire, petiolate, minutely stipulate. Inflorescence an elongate terminal or axillary raceme, the flowers small, subsessile, bracteate and bracteolate. Tepals 4, united into a short tube, the lobes subequal, linear, persistent and erect in fruit. Stamens 8, inserted irregularly on a hypogynous disc at the base of the ovary, the filaments filiform and of varying lengths, the anther linear, dorsifixed. Ovary 1-carpellate, (40 B) flora of Panama (Phytolaccaceae) (409) 68 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN oblong, tomentose, 4- to 6-uncinate, the stigma 1, sessile, penicillate, decurrent along the ventral margin of the ovary, the ovule 1, basifixed. Fruit a linear achene; pericarp coriaceous and adherent to the seed. Seed 1 , linear, the testa membranous, the albumen scanty and mealy, the cotyledons foliaceous. Two species in the Western Hemisphere. 1. Petiveria alliacea L. Sp. PI. 342. 1753. Petiveria octandra L. Sp. Pi. 486. 1762. Petivera foetida Salisb. Prodr. 214. 1796. Moq. in DC Prodr. i5 :: :9. 1849. Petiveria alliacea y octandra (L.) Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Petiveria ochroleuca Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Petiveria paraguayemis Parodi, in Anal. Soc. Cient. Argent. 160. 1878. Petit eria hexandria Sesse & Moc. Fl. Mex. ed. 2. 90. 1894. Tall herbs, often woody at the base, with slender sometimes angled stems, to 5-10 dm. tall, with a strong odor of garlic. Leaves elliptic to obovate, the apex acute or acuminate, often mucronate, the base narrowed, 5.5-16.0 cm. long, about 2-6 cm. broad, slightly pubescent; petioles 1.5-2.0 cm. long. Inflorescence in slender usually sparsely flowered racemes 15-40 cm. long; pedicels up to 1 mm. long. Tepals white or greenish-white, sometimes pale pink, often basally pubescent, about 3-5 mm. long. Stamens 8, free, up to 3 mm. long. Ovary 4-uncinate, the hooks becoming elongate and quite prominent in fruit. Fruit linear, 8 mm. long. United States, Florida to Texas; throughout the West Indies and Central Amer- ica; South America, Colombia to Argentina; common in dry or moist fields and forests, often found near habitations, especially on waste ground, up to 1500 Some of the common names are: Garlic-weed, Obeah-bush, Anomu, and Lagoon, Von Wedel 1 323; Water Valley, Von Wedel 636. , Voodson & Schery 841, OOO; between Remedios and David, P. White 308; Rio Dupi, Pittier 5222. canal zone: Ancon Hill, Standley 26336; Las Cruces Trail, Government forest, Hunter & Allen 73 J, 694. Panama: Taboga Island, Allen 1291; Standley 27838, 27025; Woodson, Allen tf Seibert 1470; Macbride 2791. darien: Pinogana, Allen 940. Petiveria alliacea closely resembles P. tetrandra, a species limited in geographical distribution to Brazil. However, the two may be separated fairly readily by the presence in P. tetrandra of 6 hook-like processes in the ovary and fruit rather than the 4 found in P. alliacea. Furthermore, the flower pedicels in P. tetrandra are about 5 mm. long, whereas those of P. alliacea are so short that the flowers appear 2. PHYTOLACCA L. Phytolacca L. Sp. PI. 441. 1753. Sarcoca Raf . Tell. 3:55. 1837. Pircunia Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 2 :29. 1849. Tall perennial herbs or shrubs. Leaves alternate, simple, entire, petiol; stipulate, generally glabrous. Inflorescence a terminal, or extra-axillary 1 flora of Panama (Phytolaccaccae) 69 70 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN the pedicels basally bracteate, often with 1 or more bracteoles above. Tepals 5, equal, usually glabrous, persistent or deciduous in fruit. Stamens 8-22, inserted at the base of the calyx usually on a hypogynous disc, in 1 or 2 cycles, the filaments free, the anthers dorsifixed. Ovary subglobose, 5- to 16-carpellate, the carpels completely or only partly united, the styles equal in number to the carpels, terminal, generally connivent, often recurved, the ovule solitary in each cavity. Fruit a globose 5- to 16-celled fleshy berry. Seed 1 in each cavity, the endosperm mealy. About 26 species, tropical and subtropical, mostly in the Americas, some in Africa, Asia, and Asia Minor. aa. Carpels completely i erect or spreading in f b. Carpels 6-10; sts to 55 cm. long 3. P. RivmoiDES 1. Phytolacca rugosa Br. & Bouche, Ind. Sem. Hort. Berol. 13. 1851. Linnaea 25:297. 1852. Woody herbs up to 2 ^ m. tall, the glabrous branches erect and angled. Leaves lanceolate-elliptic, the apex acuminate, the base attenuate, 2-5 cm. broad, 4-14 cm. long. Racemes suberect, terminal or extra-axillary, 4-15 cm. long, the flowers fairly crowded; pedicels about 3.5-4.0 mm. long, the bracts about 4 mm. long, the bracteoles about 1 mm. long. Tepals oblong-elliptic, the apex rounded, white or pink, reflexed in fruit, 2-3 (-4) mm. long. Stamens 6-12 in 1 cycle, inserted on a subhypogynous disc, about 1.5-2.0 mm. long. Ovary subglobose, 6- to 8-carpellate, the carpels free at the apex, the styles equal to the number of carpels and free. Fruit a purple berry, 6-8 mm. in diameter. In Panama, appearing at 1200-2000 meters; generally somewhat higher altitudes throughout the rest of the range, Mexico southwards to Colombia. The common name is jaboncillo. bocas del toro: Robalo Trail, northern slopes of Cerro Horqueta, Allen 4998. chi- riqui: trail from Paso Ancho to Monte Lirio, upper valley of Rio Chiriqui Viejo, Allni '.-//; Libert J02; foot of Sierra del Boquete, Maurice 742; vicinity of Oita Alta, Volcan de Chiriqui, Woodson, Allen & Seibert 975; north forested face of Cerro Copete, eastern spur of Volcan de Chiriqui, Allen 4871 ; vicinity of Cillcjon Seco, Volcan dc Chiriqui, Woodson tf Schery 480; trail from Bambito to Cerro Punta, Allen 311. P. rugosa is distinguished from P. icosandra by the incomplete union of the carpels, the shorter racemes, and the tendency towards fewer stamens and carpels. The free apices of the carpels may be observed equally well in flower or in fruit. The styles of the flower are fairly close together, but are definitely free and not connivent; in fruit they are pulled farther apart by the expansion of the seeds within the carpels. The staminal cycle is generally considered to be the inner one, the outer cycle having been suppressed. As in most species of Phytolacca the number of stamens is variable, fluctuating even between flowers of the same inflorescence. (412) flora of Panama (Pbytolaccaceae) 71 2. Phytolacca icosandra L. Syst. ed. 10. 1040. 1849. Phytolacca malabarica Crantz, Inst. 2:484. 1769. Phytolacca mexicana Crantz, loc. cit. 1769. Phytolacca mexicana Gaertn. Fruct. 1:377. 1788. Phytolacca triquetra Moench, Meth. Suppl. 107. 1802. Phytolacca bogotensis HBK. Nov. Gen. et Spec. 2:183. 1823. Phytolacca sessiliflora Kunth & Bouchc, Ind. Scm. Hort. Berol. 15. 1848 Ann. Sci. Nat. III. 11:230. 1849. Phytolacca acuminata Hort. ex Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 2 :33. 1849. Phytolacca longespica Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Phytolacca purpurascens A. Br. & Bouche, Ind. Sem. Hort. Berol. 13. 1851. Linnaea 25: 297. 1852. Phytolacca macrostachya Wiiid. c.\ |. A. Schmidt, in Mart. Fl. Bras. 14 2 :344. 1872. PnU. Bot. 2:41. 1900. Phytolacca icosandra , ar. a , - Pflanzr. 4 M :«. 1909. Phytolacca icosandra var. sessiliflora H. Walt. loc. cit. 1909. Stout herbs 1-2 meters tall, sometimes rather succulent, with sharply angled and often pubescent branches. Leaves narrowly elliptic or sometimes ovate-elliptic, the apex acute, the base narrowed and decurrent along the petiole, 6.5-15 cm. long, 2.3-5.0 cm. broad. Inflorescence an elongate pubescent raceme of densely crowded flowers, 16-30 cm. long; pedicels 1-1.5 mm. long; bracts lanceolate- linear, 3-4 mm. long, the bracteoles about 0.8 mm. long. Tepals broadly elliptic or obovate, the apex rotund, pink, white, or sometimes greenish, occasionally pubescent, 2.5-3.5 mm. long. Stamens 8-20, inserted in 2 cycles on a disc at the base of the perianth, about 3 mm. long. Ovary 6-8 carpellate, the carpels com- pletely united, the styles free but connivent, often recurved. Fruit a subglobosc purple berry 6-8 mm. in diameter. Seed shiny black. Mexico, the West Indies, Central America south to Ecuador. Most commonly found up to 1450 meters in Panama. The common name is jaboncilb. bocas del toro: Changuinoh Valley, Duiilap 401 . The taxonomic controversy over this perplexing species has probably arisen from the variability of the distinguishing characters. The single most distinctive consideration which separates it from P. rugosa is that of whether or not the carpels of the ovary are entirely connate. To the unpracticed eye this is a tricky character, but it is the most reliable. The connivent styles are the best clue to the united carpels, as even in fruit they are closely clustered at the center of the berry in spite of the expansion of the ovary which would tend to pull them outwards. The remaining separative characters are best expressed as strong tendencies. The pedicels vary in length but in the Panamanian representatives are usually about 1 mm. long. The number of carpels may vary from flower to flower in the same inflorescence, but 8- to 9 -carpellate ovaries are the most common. The racemes tend to be longer than those of P. rugosa, and the flowers are often more crowded. Walter recognizes two varieties of which one, P. icosandra var. sessiliflora occurs in a limited range. The subsessile flowers he considers to be important enough to afford varietal status. By "subsessile" it is intended that the pedicel is about 1 mm. in length, as no specimens with a shorter pedicel were found. Nearly all individuals (413) 71 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN examined had pedicels of 1 mm. which would place them in this category, although the typical variety with a pedicel of about 3 mm. is reportedly widespread through- out Panama. Herbarium sheets from adjoining countries show a gradual tendency toward longer pedicels, and it is probable that this character is expressed by gradual Kunth & Bouche, Ind. Sem. Hort. Berol. 15. 1848. Ann. Sci. Nat. III. 11:231. 1849. Phytolacca icosandra Wright, Mem. 268. 1828, non Linn. ( 1759) . Phytolacca bogotensis Miq. Ser. exot. t. 6. 3. 1842, non HBK. (1823). Phytolacca icosandra /3 Frascri Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13-:3 3. 1849. Phytolacca macrostachya Willd. ex Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Phytolacca polystigma Benth. ex Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Phytolacca acuminata Hort. ex Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Phytolacca polystyla Schomb. ex Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Woody herbs or weak shrubs up to 5 m. tall, with angled branches. Leaves the base tending to be decurrent, 4.5-7.0 cm. broad, 9-17 cm. long, the petioles 0.9-4.5 cm. long. Racemes terminal or extra-axillary, the flowers uncrowded along the axis, 30-55 (-70) cm. long; pedicels 7-12 mm. long, the basal bract subulate, about 1.5 mm. long with 2 bracteoles above. Tepals white to red, some- times cream, elliptic, about 2 mm. long, deciduous in fruit. Stamens 9-14 (-22), inserted on a hypogynous disc, about 2 mm. long. Ovary globose, 12- to 16- carpellate, the carpels united throughout their length, the styles as many as carpels, connivent, and recurved. Fruit a purple berry 5-6 mm. in diameter. Throughout the West Indies; Mexico southwards to Bolivia. Found as high as 1680 meters, but generally below 1500 meters. The common name is jaboncillo. bocas del toro: Water Valley, Von Wedel 833, 796; Chiriqui Lagoon, Von Wedel 2079, 2631, 1246, 2460, 2704- Ftf) I 2460; Garay Creek, 2631. chiriqui: Bajo Chorro, Boquete district, Davidson IJ3. Panama: forests near Arraijan, Woodson, Allen (S Seibert 1392. colon: around Dos Bocas, Rio Fato Valley, Pit tier 4205. cocle: El Valle de Anton, along Rio Indio trail, Hunter (3 Allen 313. Although P. rivinoides appears quite distinct from P. icosandra by virtue of its longer pedicels, deciduous tepals, more numerous carpels, smaller fruit and strik- ingly elongate racemes, nevertheless some specimens were examined which are suspiciously a mixture of greater or lesser degree of the two species. The most easily recognized clue to a questionable individual is a tendency for the pedicels to be longer than normal for P. icosandra and shorter than P. rivinoides. In com- bination with this character are usually found intermediate tendencies for raceme length, fruit size, and carpel number. It is interesting to note that even in plants showing extreme tendencies towards P. rivinoides the tepals are always persistent. Furthermore, the leaves of many of these intermediates are sometimes larger than found in either of the two species, although this is not always true. (Vhytolaccaccac) 3. MICROTEA Sw Microtea Swartz, Prodr. 5 3 Schollera Rohr, in Skim, Natu Ancistrocarpus HBK. Nov. Gen Potamophila Schranl . Rar. Horc. Norn. 2. t. 63. 181 Aphanathe Link, Enum. Hort. Bcrol. 1:3 8 3. 1821. Sprawling, decumbent or sometimes spreading annual herb; simple, entire, petiolate or subpetiolate, exstipulate. Infloresi or terminal, racemose, shortly pedicellate, bracteate. Flowers oblong, persistent and erect in fruit. Stamens 5, inserted perianth, alternate with the tepals, the filament filiform, th Tepals 5, dorsifixed. 74 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Ovary globose, 2-carpellate, unilocular, the styles 2, basally connate, the ovule 1, basifixed. Fruit a minute drupe, tuberculate, the pericarp adherent to the seed. Seed 1, the testa crustaceous, the embryo bent, the albumen scanty. About 9 species in the American tropics. 1. Microtea debilis Sw. Prodr. 53. 1788. Scbollera debilh Rohr, in Skirvt, Naturh. Selsk. Kjoeb. 2:210. 1792. Microtea ovata Delile, Hort. Monsp. 1827. ex Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 L ':17. 1849. Microtea d eh. .:. 1849. Microtea debilis /3 rhombifolia Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Decumbent herbs to 50 cm., the stems sharply angled. Leaves elliptic to ovate, the apex acute, sometimes rnucronate, the base attenuate, 1.0-2.3 cm. wide, 1.3-3.6 cm. long, glabrous. Inflorescence a many-flowered raceme 1.5-3.5 cm. long; bracts membranaceous, persistent, about 1 mm. long; pedicels about 1.0 mm. long. Tepals 5, lanceolate, white, about 0.5-0.7 mm. long. Stamens about 0.4 mm. long. Ovary globose, about 0.5 mm. in diameter. Fruit with the tubercles united into a honeycomb like pattern, 1.0-1.5 mm. in diameter. Throughout the West Indies; from Guatemala southward to Peru and Brazil. canal zone: Chagres, Fendler IOO; hills between Rio Grande and Pedro Miguel on road to Arraij . Standby 31470; vicinity of Summit, Standley 30145, 26968; Balboa, Standley 25826; Gatiin, Bro. Ueriberto 115. bocas del toro: Changuinola Valley, Dunlap 402. Panama: Chepo, Pittier 4457; Panama City, Bro. Paul 166; Taboga Island, Standley 27088; L .-. ■;<> 277. darien: Boca de Cupe, Allen 883. Microtea is a striking genus not only because of the extremely minute flowers, but also because the flowers seem to demonstrate a very much simplified flower plan. The relationship of Microtea to the rest of the family is obvious but it also suggests close affinity to some members of the Chenopodiaceae, particularly to the genus Chenopodium. Although the number of stamens are usually equal to and alternate with the petals, occasionally 8 stamens will be found irregularly inserted. The tubercles vary in length, and although usually rather short, may be as long 4. RIVINA L. Rivtna L. Sp. PI. 121. 1753. Tithona L. Syst. ed. 1. 1735. Solanoides Moench, Meth. 307. 1794. Tithonia L. ex O. Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 2:552. 1891, sphalm. Tall often woody herbs, frequently shrub-like, erect or straggling. Leaves alternate, simple, entire, petiolate, exstipulate. Inflorescence a suberect many- flowered terminal or axillary raceme. Flowers small, pedicellate. Tepals 4, sub- equal, obovate-oblong, rounded or pointed at the apex, persistent and erect or spreading in fruit. Stamens 4, inserted at the base of the perianth in 1 cycle alternate with the tepals, the filaments free, the anther dorsifixed. Ovary (416) i-carpellate, the style subterminal, short, curved, the stigma capi Fruit a globose red berry, the pericarp adherent to the seed, the Three species in the Australia. i tropics and subtropics, introduced into Asia and 76 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 1. Rivina humilis L. Sp. PL 122. 1753. Rjt ma humilis a canescens L. Sp. PI. 122. 1753. Khina humilis 5 glabra L. loc. cit. 175^ . Kit in ■. lacvis L. Mant. 41. 1767. Piercea glabra Mill. Gard. Diet. ed. S. Piercea no. 1. 1768. Piercca t entosa Mill. G.mt. Di cJ / no 2. 1768 R/i.'/'wfl viridis Schmidt, in Mayer, Samml. Phys. Aufs. 1:185. 1791. '.an. Bot. 6:63. 1793. SoKr, ,h . / c, Mo i M th 307. 1794. S. lanoiib. ■ hiei is Moench, loc. cit. 1794. Rli hia pallida Salisb. Prod. 67. 1796. . Salisb. Ice. cit. 1796. Solanoides undulata Moench, Meth. Suppl. 106. 1802. Rivina Lireeulata Willd. Enum. Hort. Berol. Suppl. 8. 1813. Rn ma tetrandra Desfl. Tabl. ed. 2. 49. 1815. Rii ma puberula HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 2:184. 1817. Rivina tinctoria Ham. ex G. Don. in Loud. Hort. Brit. Suppl. 1:598. 1832. Rivina poriulei coi it > Nutt. in i Vans. Am. Phil. Soc. II. 5:167. 1837. Rivina acuminata Raf. New Fl. 4:13. 1838, non HBK. (1817). Piercea acuminata Raf. loc. cit. 1838. ■ ■fa Raf. loc. cit. 183 8. Piercea obliquata Raf. loc. cit. 183 8. Rivina canescens G. Don. in Steud. Nom. Bot. ed. 2. 2:460. 1841. Rit imt la: i is ft acuminata Moq. in DC. Prodr. 13 2 :12. 1849. Rivina oricntalis Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Riiiiu hrocuwbcus Ruiz, ex Moq. 1. .,. cit. 13. 1849. Rivina humilis a puberula (HBK.) Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Rii hid luivul '• < i tcscem (G. Don.) Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Rii ind humilis ' plumbaginijolia Willd. ex Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Rivina uurantiaca Warsz. ex Schenk, Ind. Sem. Werceburg. 1861. Rivina lacvis var. pubescent Griscb. Fl. Brit. W. Ind. 59. 1864. Rivina vhiJiflora Be!, An.ii. Soc. F.sp. Hist. Nat. 12:105. 1883. 'arodi, in Anal. Soc. Cient. Argent. 5:206. 1878. Tithnnia humilis O. Kuntze, Rev. Gen. 552. 1891. Titbonia humilis var. canescens f. albiflora O. Kuntze, loc. cit. 1891. Tithnnia humilis var. glabra O. Kuntze, loc. cit. 1891. Rii ma bvmilh m. Publ. Bot. 2:41. 1900. Rivina humilis var. orientalis (Moq.) H. Walt, in Engl. Pflanzenr. 4 83 :105. 1909. Straggling shrubs or tall herbs sometimes woody at the base, up to 10 meters high. Leaves elliptic to ovate or lanceolate, the apex acute to acuminate, the base rounded or truncate, 2-6 cm. wide, 4-12 cm. long; petioles 0.6-11.0 cm. long. Flowers small, drooping; pedicels 3 mm. in flower, elongating to about 7 mm. in fruit; bracts lanceolate, about 2 mm. long; tepals 4, white or pinkish white, 2.0- 3.5 mm. long; stamens 4, inserted at the base of the perianth, about 1.5 mm. long. Fruit a scarlet or red berry, about 4.0-4.5 mm. in diameter. Florida to Oklahoma and Texas; throughout Mexico and southward to Argen- tina; West Indies. In Costa Rica found up to 1040 meters elevation. Particularly common on waste ground, often on coastal rocks. Among the common names are Wild Tomato, Bloodberry, and cartnin. bocas DEL toro: region of Almirante, Cooper 77; location not stated, Carleton $2; vicinity of Nievecita, Woodson 6 Schery 1023; Woodson, Allen (3 Seibert 1 807; Water (418) flora of Panama (Vhytolaccaceae) 77 Valley, Von Wedel 609; Chiriqui Lagoon, vicinity of Little Bocat, Vom Wtiti 2>20; vicinity of Chiriqui Lagoon, Big Bight, Von Wedel jSSj. ruihiQui: v.illcv of upper Rio ( hiriqui Yiejo, P. .; C. V ■''•:/,■ SS. ( oc 1 1 : mountains bvvond 1 .. I'mt.uh. Hunter tf Allen 579- darien: near mouth of Rio Yapd, Allen .?.,V>; vicinity of Boo Jc Cu P c, .4//<« ,Wu. Walter recognizes three varieties of Rivina humilis based on glabrity or degree of pubescence. R. humilis var. orientalh is in Asia, presumably escaped from culti- vation as the genus is probably not indigenous to the region. R. humilis var. canescens is recognized by the tomentose stems and densely pilose leaves and petioles, and is cited as found in Brazil and the lesser Antilles. R. humilis var. glabra is, as the names implies, completely glabrous, and is widely distributed from Texas to Argentina. Use of pubescence as a distinguishing varietal character is unconvinc- ing; consequently the specimens examined have been treated as a single species with a wide range of variation in the degree of relationship between pubescence and glabrity of any part of a plant. The synonymy has likewise been regarded as pertaining to a single species. 5. TR1CHOSTIGMA A. Rich. Trichostigma A. Rich, in Sagra, Hist. Cuba 10:306. 1 845. Villamilla R. & B. ex Benth. & Hook. Gen. Pi. 3:81. 1880. Woody vines, shrubs. Leaves alternate, simple, entire, petiolate; stipules minute and deciduous. Inflorescence a many-flowered terminal or extra-axillary raceme, the bracts deciduous. Tepals 4, subequal, persistent and reflexed in fruit. Stamens 8-10 (—12), inserted on a hypogynous disc, the filaments free, the anther dorsi- fixed. Ovary 1-carpellate, unilocular, subglobose, the stigma sessile or subsessile, often penicillate, the ovule 1. Fruit a globose drupe, the pericarp adherent to the seed. Seed 1, the testa crustaceous. Three species in tropical America. 1. Trichostigma octandrum (L.) H. Walt, in Engl. Pflanzenr. 4 8S :109. 1909. Rivina humilis p scan Jens L. Sp. PI. 122. 1753. Rivina octandra L. Cent. PI. 2:9. 1756. }Rivina dodecandra Jacq. Obs. Bot. 1 :6. 1764. Rivina scandens Mill. Gard. Diet. ed. 8. Rivinia no. 2. 1768. Rivina Mutisii WillJ. ex Schult. Mant. 3:305. 1827. Rivina americana Raf. Fl. Tell. 3:56. 1837. Trichostigma rh inoides A. Rich, in Sagra. Hist. Cuba. 10:306. 1845. Rivina octandra £ obtusifolia Moq. in DC. Prodr. 1 3 2 : 1 1 . 1849. Rivina Ehrenbergiana Klotzsch, ex Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Rivina Moritziana Klotzsch, ex Moq. loc. cit. 1849. Villamilla octandra Hook. f. in Benth. & Hook. Gen. Pi. 3:81. 1880. Decumbent or suberect shrubs or woody vines up to 10 meters. Leaves oblong to elliptic, the apex acute to acuminate, the base rounded or acute, 3.8-5.5 cm. broad, 12.4-14.7 cm. long; petioles 2.4-3.7 cm. long, glabrous. Inflorescence a (419) 78 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Fig. 131. Trichostigma polyandrum flora of Panama (Phytolaccaceae) 79 fairly dense many-flowered raceme, about 5.0-6.5 (-11.0) cm. long; pedicels 3-9 mm. long; bracts lanceolate, 2 mm. long, deciduous, the bractlets triangular, 0.5 mm. long. Tepals white to whitish-green, 2-3 mm. long. Stamens 8-12, inserted irregularly at the base of the perianth, 3-4 mm. long. Fruit a subglobose drupe, United States (southern peninsular Florida and the Keys); West Indies; throughout Mexico and Central America; South America (Venezuela to Argen- canal zone: drowned forest of upper Rio Pequeni between Salamanca Hydro- graphic Station and Rio Boqueron, Allen 17279. darien: Tucuti, M. E. tf R. A. Terry 1396. The Terrys have stated on the specimen label that T. octandrum is a tree, but there are no other indications that trees are even found in this genus. T. octandrum occurs as a woody shrub or liana sprawling over adjacent shrubs 2. Trichostigma polyandrum (Loesener) H. Walt, in Engl. Pflan 1909. Rivin, Villa* Weak shrubs up to 5 meters, or woody vines climbing on shrubs. Leaf blades elliptic to ovate, the apex acute to attenuate, the base rounded or acute, 7.0-16.8 cm. long, 3.5-6.6 cm. broad, the petioles 1.0-3.0 cm. long, glabrous. Inflorescence a long uncrowded raceme, about 8.0-21.0 cm. long; pedicels 8-16 mm. long; bracts lanceolate, 1.5-2.0 mm. long, deciduous, the bractlets about 0.5 mm. long. Tepals white in flower, red, purple or purplish-pink in fruit, 4.0-9.0 mm. long. Stamens 20-25 inserted at the base of the perianth. Ovary subglobose, the style very short. Fruit a drupe, purple or red, 4.5-5.5 mm. in diameter. Central America (Nicaragua, Costa Rica and Panama). bocas del toro: Pumpkin River near Chiriqui Lagoon, Von Wedel 2 57 1; Water Valley, Von Wedel 926, 1439, 714, 1547, 940; Woodson, Allen & Scibert 1832; Almirante, Cooper 133. Panama: Rio Juan Diaz above Juan Diaz, Allen 944. Trichostigma appears to have close affinities with Rivina. However the two may easily be distinguished by the more numerous stamens, the tepals reflexed in fruit, the terminal stigma, the deciduous stipules, and the drupaceous fruit of Trichostigma. The genera have been treated as one genus by some authors, but recently they have been regarded as separate. 80 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN AIZOACEAE By LORIN I. NEVLING, Jr. Annual or perennial herbaceous or suffruticose plants, prostrate or upright, often succulent. Leaves usually simple, alternate, opposite or pseudoverticellate, often fleshy, sometimes reduced to scales, entire; stipules scarious or absent. In- florescences axillary or terminal, modified cymes or the flowers solitary. Flowers bisexual, polygamodioecious or unisexual, actinomorphic, often small. Perianth monochlamydeous, usually 4- or 5 -parted, free or connate, sometimes appendaged on the outer surface, often persistent in fruit. Stamens (3), 4, 5 or many, the outermost often sterile and petaloid (but not in our species), the filaments free or variously connate at the base into fascicles or into a monadelphous sheath, free or adnate to the perianth, the anthers oblong or linear, small, dehiscing longi- tudinally. Pistil 1, the ovary superior to inferior, 1-5 (-20) loculate, the placenta- tion axile, parietal or basal, the ovules solitary to many per locule, anatropous or campylotropous, the styles as many as the locules. Fruit a loculicidal or circum- scissile capsule or indehiscent and either baccate or nut-like; seed with mealy endosperm, sometimes strophiolate, the embryo curved. A large weedy family particularly well-developed in South Africa. Three genera are represented in Panama, each by a single species. A fourth genus, Glinus, with a single species [G. radiatus (Ruiz & Pav.) Rohrb.] has been reported from Panama. I have been unable to locate a voucher for this record but have included the genus in the key to genera. This study is based primarily on the work of F. Pax and K. Hoffman (in Natur- Pflanzenf. 16 c :179-233. 1934) and P. Wilson (in North Amer. Fl. 21:267-277. 1932). distinct to the base, without appendages; spatulate; flowers sessile or short-pedicellat -eaves opposite, fleshy; tepals connate, with appendages on i urface beneath the apex; fruit a circumscissile capsule, oculate; seeds estrophiolate. . Leaves obovate to rounded-spatulate, strikingly unequal; 1. MOLLUGO L. Mollugo L. [Gen. 356. 1737]; Sp. Pi. 89. 1753. Galiastrum Heist, ex Fabricius, Enum. PI. Hort. Helmst. 1 Lampetia Raf. Fl. Tellur. 3:34. 1836. (422) FLORA OF PANAMA (AtZOaceae) Herbaceous or suffruticose plants, glabrous throughout. Leaves simple, basal or pseudoverticellate, generally linear; stipules deciduous. Inflorescences axillary, cymose. Flowers bisexual, pedicellate. Perianth 5 -parted, distinct to the base, imbricate, scarious at the margins, lacking appendages. Stamens 3-10, united at the base. Ovary superior, 3- to 5-loculate, the ovules campylotropous, numerous on the axile placenta. Capsule loculicidal; seeds generally numerous, small, estrophiolate. About 2 5 species in the temperate and tropical regions of both hemispheres. L. Sp. PI. I7«m Pharnaceum hoffmannseggianum Roem. & Schult. Syst. Veg. 6:692. 1820. Mollugo dichotoma Schrank, PI. Rar. Hort. Monac. /. 64. 1821. Mollugo arenaria HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 6:20. 1823. Mollugo schrankii Ser. loc. cit. 391. 1 824. Pharnaceum verticellatum (L.) Spreng. Syst. 1:949. 1825. Pharnaceum arenarium (HBK.) Spreng. loc. cit. 1825. Mollugo juncea Fenzl, in Ann. Wien Mus. 1:378. 1836. Mollugo diffusa Willd. ex Fenzl. loc. cit. 377. 1836, nom. nud. in syn. Mollugo spergulaefolia Willd. ex Fenzl, loc. cit. 378. 1836, nom. nud. in syi Mollugo triphylla Schrank, ex Steud. Nom. ed. 2. 2:154. 1841, nom. nud. L Mollugo gracillima Anders, in Vet. Akad. Handl. Stockh. 1853:226. 1855. Pharnaceum cerviana Mart, ex Rohrb. in Mart. Fl. Bras. 14 2 :241. 1872, no Mollugo axillaris Schlecht. ex Rohrb. loc. cit. 242. 1872, nom. nud. in syn. 82 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Annuals, prostrate to ascending, often falsely dichotomously branched. Leaves pseudoverticellate, 3-6 per node, unequal, generally oblong-linear, 1-3 cm. long, 1-2 mm. broad, more or less acute at the apex, gradually tapered to the base; sessile. Inflorescence axillary, modified cymose; pedicel 3-5 mm. long. Flowers with the tepals elliptic, about 2.0-2.5 mm. long, 0.5-0.75 mm. broad, persistent and subtending the fruit, glabrous; stamens 3, the filaments filiform, to 2 mm. long, connate at the very base, the anthers ovoid, about 0.25 mm. long and broad; ovary ovoid, 3-loculate, 1.0-1.5 mm. long, the styles 3, 0.5-0.75 mm. long, spreading. Capsule ovoid, 2-3 mm. long, about 1.5 mm. in diameter; seeds numerous, reni- form, about 0.5 mm. long and broad, the testa with several distinct ridges along the back and sides, brown. Cosmopolitan weeds in the temperate and tropical regions of the world. This species has a rather large and complex synonomy involving numerous infraspecific categories which are not included here in the synonymy. canal zone: Chagres, Fendle r IT. Panama: San Jose Island, Johnston 1 232. 2. TRIANTHEMA L. Trianthema L. Sp. PI. 223. 1753. Rf/w? Adans. Fam. 2:245. 1763. Zaleya Burm. f. Fl. Ind. 110, t. 31. 1768. Papularia Forsk. Fl. Aegypt.-Arab. 69. 1775. Rocama Forsk. loc. cit. 71. 1775. Portulacastrum Juss. ex Medic. Phil. Bot. 1:99. 1789. Zallia Koxh.Fl Ind. 3:74. 1832. Ancistrostigma Fenzl, in Ann. Wien Mus. 2:293. 1839. Kacoma Willd. ex Steud. Norn. ed. 2. 2:429. 1841. Zaleia Steud. loc. cit. 795. 1841. Pomatotheca F. Mull. Fragm. 10:72. 1876. Herbaceous or suffruticose plants, branched, upright or prostrate. Leaves simple, opposite, strikingly unequal, fleshy, obovate to rounded-spatulate, the petioles connate into a petiolar sheath surrounding the stem; stipulate. Inflores- cences axillary, cymose or the flowers solitary. Flowers bisexual, sessile or pedicel- late. Perianth 5 -parted, connate below, the lobes appendaged on the outer surface beneath the apex, imbricate. Stamens 5 or more, inserted on the perianth tube or free and monadelphic. Ovary superior, 1- or 2-loculate, the ovules campylo- tropous, few on the axile placenta, the styles 1 or 2. Capsule circumscissile; seeds few, reniform, the testa often wrinkled, estrophiolate. About 15 species of the tropics and subtropics. 1. Trianthema portulacastrum L. Sp. Pi. 223. 1753. Trianthema monogynum L. Mant. 69. 1767. Trianthema procumbens Mill. Gard. Diet. ed. 8. no. 1. 1768. Portulacastrum monogynum (L.) Medic. Phil. Bot. 1:99. 1789. Trianthema flexuosa Schum. & Thonn. Beskr. Guian. Pi. 241. 1828. (424) FLORA OF PANAMA (A'lZOCtCeac) Herbaceous annuals, erect or prostrate, the young stems sometimes with a decurrent line of hairs from the interpetiolar stipules to the node below and glabrescent, often alternately branched by the development of the axillary bud subtended by the smaller leaf of the nodal pair. Leaves of any pair strikingly unequal, the larger at least twice as large as the smaller, obovate to rounded- spatulate, 1-3 cm. long, 0.5-2.0 cm. broad, acute, obtuse, refuse and often mucronulate at the apex, cuneate at the base, glabrous above and below; petiole 0.3-1.5 cm. long, at the base connate into a sheath surrounding the stem, the interpetiolar stipule deltoid, 1-2 mm. long, remotely serrate or entire. Inflorescence ssile. Flowers with the perianth tube campanulate, iated with the petiolar sheath of the subtending leaves, the n. long, 1 mm. broad, glabrous, appendage horn-like, , long; stamens 10, inserted at the orifice of the perianth filiform, about 1.5 mm. long, glabrous, the anthers ovoid, about 0.5 mm. long and broad; ovary turbinate, about 1 mm. long, 1 mm. in diameter, truncate and irregularly fleshy-lobed at the apex, glabrous, the style 1, about 1 mm. long. Capsule almost enclosed in the petiolar sheath, turbinate, about (425) 84 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 4.5 mm. long, 3.5 mm. in diameter, sessile, truncate and crested at the apex, circumscissile at about the middle; seeds 2-5, reniform, 1.5-1.75 mm. in diameter, the testa wrinkled, reddish-brown to black. A pantropic species. canal zone: Fort Clayton, Standley 29003. 3. SESUVIUM L. Sesuvium L. Syst. ed. 10. 1058. 1759. Squibbia Raf . New Fl. 4 : 1 6. 1838. Diplochonium Fenzl, Nov. Stirp. Dec. 57. 1839. Pyxipoma Fenzl, in Ann. Wien Mus. 2:293. 1839. Psammanthe Hance, in Walp. Ann. 2:659. 1852. Halimus O. Ktze. Rev. Gen. 1:263. 1891. Herbaceous or suffruticose plants, upright or prostrate, sparsely branched. Leaves simple, opposite, more or less equal, fleshy, generally linear, elliptic or narrowly obovate, the petioles clasping or connate and surrounding the stem; estipulate. Inflorescence axillary or rarely terminal, glomerules or the flowers solitary. Flowers bisexual, sessile or pedicellate. Perianth 5 -parted, connate below, the lobes generally appendaged on the outer surface beneath the apex, imbricate. Stamens 5, free and alternitepalous, or numerous, and inserted on the perianth tube. Ovary superior, 3- to 5-loculate, the ovules campylotropous, many on the axile placenta, the styles 3 to 5. Capsule circumscissile; seeds numerous, reniform, the testa smooth, estrophiolate. Six to eight species, tropical and subtropical strand plants of both hemispheres. 1. Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. Syst. Nat. ed. 10. 1058. 1759. Portulaca portulacastrum L. Sp. PI. 446. 1753. Sesuvium revolutt folium Ortega, Dec. 19. 1797. Sesuvium ortegae Spreng. Bot. Gart. Halle Nachtr. 1:36. 1801. Sesuvium pedunculatum Pers. Syn. PI. 2:39. 1806. Sesuvium sessile Pers. loc. cit. 1806. Sesuvium sessiliflorum Domb. ex Rohrb. in Mart. Fl. Bras. 14 2 :3 10. 1872, nom. nud. in syn. Halimus portulacastrum (L.) O. Ktze. Rev. Gen. 1:263. 1891. Herbaceous perennials, glabrous throughout, the branches trailing and often rooting at the nodes, sometimes rather stout. Leaves linear, elliptic or narrowly obovate, 1-5 cm. long, 0.2-1.0 cm. broad, subacute to acute at the apex, gradually tapered to the base; petiole 1-5 mm. long, dilated at the base and clasping the stem but the sheaths not connate. Inflorescence axillary, the flowers solitary, pink; pedicel 2-11 mm. long. Flowers with the perianth tube obconic to subcampanu- late, 1.5-3.0 mm. long, the lobes ovate, 4-7 mm. long, 3.0-4.5 mm. broad, some- what auriculate at the perianth tube orifice, persistent and somewhat reflexed in fruit, appendage horn-like, 1.0-1.5 mm. long; stamens numerous, inserted at the orifice of the perianth tube, free or subconnate, the filaments 1.5-3.5 mm. long, gradually tapering to the apex, the anthers oblong, 0.5-0.75 mm. long, 0.25-0.5 mm. broad; ovary ovoid to subglobose, 3.0-3.5 mm. long, 2.5-3.0 mm. in diameter, (426) flora of Panama (Portulacaceac) 85 1.5-3.5 mm. long spreading < umscissile below the i 8-30, lenticular-renifo Circumtropical. bocas del toro: bar mouth, Changuinola Valley, Dunlap 139, Stork 139. zone: Cristobal, Artamanofi s. n.; Balboa, Standby 25625, 30882; railroad and do at Balboa, Macbriie & Featherstone 24; vicinity of Fort Sherman, Standley 31180. vicinity of Palenque, Pittier 41 18. Panama: Pearl Islands, Johansen III; Sabog; Allen 2634, Miller 1965; near Punta Paitilla Military Reservation outskirts of Panai Bro. Maurice 754; San Jose Island, Erlanson 173. san blas: forests around Obaldia, Pittier 4400. PORTULACACEAE By LORIN I. NEVLING, Jr. Herbs, subshrubs or shrubs, more or less succulent, often glabrous. Leaves alternate, opposite or in basal rosettes, simple, terete, subterete or plane, often fleshy, pinnately veined; stipules scarious, fimbriate, tufted or rarely absent. In- florescence terminal or axillary, paniculiform, racemose, cymose or the flowers solitary. Flowers bisexual, often insignificant. Sepals (involucxal bracts) 2 or 86 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN rarely 4-8, connate at the base or free, persistent or caducous, scarious or herba- or free, deciduous or rarely calyptrate, imbricate. Stamens often as many as the petals and opposite them, sometimes fewer or more, free or basally adnate to the corolla, the filaments filiform, the anthers 2 -celled, dehiscing longitudinally, introrse. Pistil 1 ; ovary superior to inferior, becoming uniloculate, the placentation central, basal, the ovules (1-) 2-many, campylotropous; styles and stigmas 1-9, united below or free. Fruit capsular, circumscissily or loculicidally dehiscent, rarely indehiscent and nut- like; seeds 1-many, generally reniform-round, com- pressed, the embryo curved, endosperm mealy. A family of weedy plants composed of 15-25 genera. Only 2 genera are represented in Panama. or estipulate, the stipules scarious, 1. TALINUM Adai Talinum Adans. Fam. 2:245. 1763. Krides Medik. Phil. Bot. 1:95. 1789. Phemeranthus Raf. in Med. Repos. N. Y. 5:3 50. 1808. Talinium Raf. in Amer. Monthly Mag. 175. 1818. Litanum Nieuwl. in Amer. Midi. Nat. 4:90. 1915. Herbs, subshrubs or shrubs, often succulent. Leaves alternate or approximate, terete to plane, fleshy; estipulate. Inflorescence terminal or rarely axillary, paniculi- form, cymose or the flowers solitary. Sepals 2, opposite, deciduous or rarely persistent. Petals 5, rarely more, connate at the base or free, deciduous. Stamens 5-30, in antipetalous fascicles. Ovary superior, sessile or short-stipitate, the ovules numerous, the styles 3, more or less united, filiform. Capsule loculicidal, 3-valved, splitting from the apex to the base, chartaceous; seeds reniform-round, numerous, the embryo incompletely annular, the testa smooth, striate or tuberculate, distinctly or indistinctly strophiolate. A genus of about 50 species of which only 1 is found in Panama. 1. Talinum paniculatum (Jacq.) Gaertn. Fruct. 2:219. 1791. Portulaca paniculata Jacq. Enum. PI. Carib. 22. 1760. Portulaca patens L. Mant. 242. 1771. Koelingia patens (L.) Ehrh. Beitr. 3:135. 1788. 7 tlinum r« ; v«;,. Civ. k. 1:1. 1791. 1 chotomum Ruiz & Pav. Syst. Veg. 118. 1798. Talinum patens (L.) Willd. Sp. Pi. 2:863. 1800. Portulaca reftexa (Cav.) Haw. Misc. Nat. 141. 1803. Talinum fruticosum Macfad. Fl. Jam. 2:169. 1850. Talinum sarmentosum Englm. in Bost. Journ. Nat. Hist. 6:153. 1850. Talinum spathulatum Englm. in Gray, PI. Wright. 1:14. 1852. Talinum purpureum Hort. ex Englm. loc. cit. 1852. (428) Ii s . 13S. Talin Mch, ex Rohrb. in Mart. Fl. Bras. 14*:295. 1872. Talinum roseum Klotzsch, ex Rohrb. loc. cit. 1872. Talinum patens var. sarmentosum (Englm.) Gray, in Proc. Amer. Acad. 22:275. 1887. Claytonia patens (L.) O. Ktze. Rev. Gen. 1:56. 1891. Claytonia paniculata (Jacq.) O. Ktze. loc. cit. 57. 1891. Claytonia reflexa (Cav.) O. Ktze. loc. cit. 1891. Claytonia sarmentosa (Englm.) O. Ktze. loc. cit. 1891. Talinum chrysanthum Rose & Standi, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 13:288. 1911. Talinum panicuhium var. wmentosum (Englm.) v. Poellnitz, in Deut. Bot. Gessel. Herbaceous plants, erect, slender, glabrous throughout, the root often thick and fleshy. Leaves alternate, broadly elliptic to obovoid, rarely oblanceolate, 4-13 cm. long, 1.5-5.5 cm. broad, acute to obtuse at the apex, cuneate or attenuate at the base, plane, petiole 3-15 mm. long. Inflorescence terminal, compound, lax, 10-60 cm. long, 6-20 cm. broad, the lateral simple or compound cymes racemosely arranged on the primary rhachis, bracteate; pedicel 6-25 mm. long, dilated distally. Sepals ovate, 1.5-3.0 mm. long and broad, connate at the base, slightly keeled, reflexing and deciduous; petals elliptic, 3.0-4.5 mm. long, about 1 mm. broad; stamens 15 or more, the filaments 1.5-2.0 mm. long, free, the anthers ovoid, to 0.5 mm. long and broad; ovary sessile, globose, about 1 mm. long, 1 mm. in diameter. Capsule ovoid to globose, 3-5 mm. long, 3-5 mm. in diameter; seeds (429) 88 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN strongly reniform, 0.75-1.0 mm. in diameter, the testa minutely striate, black, indistinctly strophiolate. Southern United States, Central and South America, West Indies, southern Asia and the East Indies. Panama: Isla Taboga, Woodson, Allen & Seibert 1491. 2. PORTULACA L. Portulaca L. [Syst. ed. 1. 1735]; Sp. Pi. 445. 1753. Meridiana L. f. Suppl. 248. 1781. Lemia Vand. Fl. Lus. & Bras. Sp. 3 5, /. 2. f. 75. 1788. Merida Neck. Elem. 2:3 82. 1790. PortulaccaHzw. Synop. 121. 1812. Lamia Vandelli ex Endl. Gen. 949. 1 840. Annual or perennial herbs, succulent. Leaves alternate ( to plane, often whorled about the flowers; stipules scarious, fimbriate or tufted, sometimes very small, rarely absent. Inflorescence near the stem apex, crowded, the flowers sometimes solitary, yellow to red. Sepals 2, opposite, connate below, the anterior larger than the posterior, usually persistent. Petals 4-6, connate at the base or free, somewhat auto-deliquescent. Stamens 4 to many, inserted at the base of the petals, the filaments often hairy below. Ovary half to wholly inferior, the ovules numerous, the styles 3- to 9-parted, rarely simple. Capsule circumscissile, chartaceous; seeds reniform to cochleate, numerous, the testa smooth or minutely tuberculate. enus in tropical and subtropical areas of the world, about Portulaca parvifolia Haw. Syn. Pi. Succ. 122. 1812. Portulaca marginata HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 6:58. 1823. Portulaca oleracea p parviflora (Haw.) Griseb. Fl. Brit. W. Ind. 57. 1864. Portulaca oleracea a macrantha Eggers, Fl. St. Croix 27. 1879. Portulaca oleracea p micrantha Eggers, loc. cit. 1879. Plants herbaceous, radially spreading and prostrate or somewhat ascending, glabrous throughout, the roots fibrous. Leaves alternate, elliptic to obovoid, 1-3 cm. long, 0.5-1.0 cm. broad, generally obtuse at the apex, cuneate at the base, plane; petiole 1-8 mm. long, the stipules fimbriate, inconspicuous. Inflorescence with the flowers crowded, the flowers sessile or essentially so, yellow. Perianth tube crateriform, 1 mm. long, 1.5 mm. in diameter; sepals ovate, 3.0-4.5 mm. long, 3-4 mm. broad, strongly keeled, connate at the base, generally persistent and enclosing the operculum of the fruit; petals 4, 3.0-4.5 mm. long, 1.5-3.0 mm. broad; stamens 6-15, the filaments 1.5-1.75 mm. long, the anthers globose, to 0.5 mm. long and broad; ovary half -inferior, short-conical, the style lobes 4-6. Capsule ovoid to fusiform, 6-9 mm. long, about 2.5 mm. in diameter, circumscissile (430) flora of Panama (Portulacaceae) slightly below the middle; seeds almost cochleate, about 0.5-0.75 i Known as verdolaga in P: Bot. 18:429. 1937) the plai ding to Standley (Field Mus. Nat. Hist, pot herb throughout Central America. (431) CARYOPHYLLACEAE By JAMES A. DUKE Annual or perennial herbs or subshrubs, often with swollen nodes. Leaves opposite and decussate or verticillate, the petioles often amplexicaul, some with conspicuous stipules. Flowers commonly bisexual, actinomorphic, 5- or 4-merous, in dichasial cymes, or solitary in the axils, or solitary and terminal (Githago). Sepals 5-4, separate or connate, often scarious, persistent. Petals as many as the sepals, rarely absent, hypogynous or slightly perigynous, entire, bifid or lacerate, usually white, pink or red. Stamens 2-10, mostly 5 or 10; filaments filiform or flattened, occasionally united into a short tube below; anthers usually versatile, 2-celled, and longitudinally dehiscent. Carpels 2-5, the ovary 1-locular, with 1- many campylotropous ovules on basal, central or free central placentae, styles 2-5, free or united below. Fruit a utricle or a capsule longitudinally dehiscing into as many entire or deeply emarginate valves as there are styles; seeds 1-many, strophiolate or estrophiolate, smooth or tuberculate, the embryo curved about the This family, with about 75 genera, mostly in temperate areas, is of little Dianthus, which may ultimately be found in Panama gardens. Several weedy genera, of more or less cosmopolitan distribution, despairingly need monographic research, worldwide in scope. Five such weedy genera occur in Panama. a. Leaves longer than broad; stipules absent; stamens usually 10, rarely 4 or 5; capsule splitting into 2-5 usually 2 -cleft valves; styles not united. Leaves ovate or cordate; capsules ovoid, straight, with ( ves shorter or longer than broad; stipules present, o to 3 entire val ally united at least half their length, -eaves broader than long, opposite, the ochraceous stip 'ugaceous; seeds 1-50, tuberculate in lines (in Panama) .eaves longer than broad, verticillate, the argentate sti istent; seeds 2-6, merely corrugated 1. ARENARIA L. Arenaria L. [Rupp. ex L. Syst. ed. 1. 1735] Sp. PI. 423. 1753. Moehringia L. [Syst. ed. 2:22. 1740] Sp. Pi. 359. 1753. Uinuartia L. Sp. PI. 89. 1753 Gypsophytum Adans. Fam. 2:256. 1763. Ammodenia Patrin, ex Gmel. Fl. Sibir. 4:160. 1769. Alsine Scop. Fl. Cam. ed. 1:496. 1772. not L. 1753. Honkenya Ehrh. Beitr. 2:180. 1788. "irh. loc.cit. 4:147. 1789. flora of Panama (Caryopbyllaccac) Spergulastrum Michx. Fl. Bor. Am. 1:275. 1803. in pare. Gouffeia Robill. '& Cast, in Lam. & DC. Fl. Fr. 5:609. 1815. llalunthus Pries, Fl. Holland 75. 1817. Adenarium Raf. in Dcsv. Jour. Phys. 89:249. 1818. Bigelovia Raf. in Jour. Phys. 89:289. 1819. Siebera Hoppe, in Flora 2:24. 1819. Somerauera Hoppe, loc. cit. 2:26. 1819. Merckia Reichb. ex Cham. & Schlecht. in Linnaca 1:59. 1826. Brachystemma D. Don, Prodr. Fl. Ne P . 216. 182 8. \\ //Vv/w ,u Reichb. Consp. 206. 1 828. OJiHitostt mma Benth. in Wall. Cat. ;;. 64$. 1828. Sabulina Reichb. Fl. Germ. Excurs. 78 5. 1832. Eremogone Fenzl, Verbr. Alsin. 1 3 : 1 8 . 183 3. Chetrophh Raf. Fl. Tell. 3:80. 1836. Dolophragma Fenzl, in Ann. Wien. Mus. 1:63. /. ". 1836. Merkia Reichb. Handb. 298. 1837. Dufou rea Gren. in Act. Soc. Linn. Bord. 9:25. 1837. / />•> rodiclh Fenzl, in Fndl. Gen. 966. 1 840. M'.iininthf Reichb. R. ! 1. Germ. 5:29. 1841. facchinia Reichb. loc. cit. 5:29. 1841. Neumayera Reichb. loc. cit. 5:30. 1841. Pcttera Reichb. Norn. 205. 1841. Tryphane Reichb. loc. cit. 205. 1841. Wicrzbickia Reichb. loc. cit. 205. 1 84 1 . Greniera J. Gay, in Ann. Sci. Nat. 3 ' :27. 1845. Rbodahine J. Gay, loc. cit. 3 4 :25. 1845. St, ■■:■:■■„, Dulac. Fl. Hautes-Pyr. 247. 1867. Xeralsine Fourr. in Ann. Soc. Linn. n. s. 16:347. 1868. F.uthalia Rupr. Fl. Caucas. 220. 1 869. Ahinopsh Small, Fl. S. E. U. S. 419 & 1330. 1903. Annual, biennial or perennial herbs, glabrous or pubescent, prostrate and cespitose to diffuse and spreading, the stems somewhat resilient and occasionally suffruticose below. Leaves opposite, petiolate to sessile and slightly amplexicaul, exstipulate, subulate and coriaceous to broadly elliptic and membranaceous. Flowers axillary or terminal, solitary or in dichasial cymes. Sepals 5, connate only at the base if at all. Petals 5, rarely lacking, white or occasionally red, entire or shallowly emarginate. Stamens 10, rarely 5; anthers versatile; 2-celled, longitudinally dehis- cent; filaments flattened and usually united below to form a slightly perigynous disk. Ovary superior, 3- (2-5-) carpellate with 3 (2-5) filiform styles free to their bases; ovules numerous on basal placentae. Capsule dehiscing into as many entire to deeply emarginate valves as there are styles; seeds numerous, cochleate, smooth to tuberculate, estrophiolate, the embryo curved about the perisperm. A weedy genus containing nearly 200 species, this nearly cosmopolitan genus is in the tropics largely restricted to high altitudes. Fernald (in Rhodora 21:1. 1919) presents adequate reasons for retaining Arenaria sensu lato instead of main- taining several poorly separated generic segregates. Three intergrading units, best treated as subspecies of one polymorphic species, A. lanuginosa, are found in Panama. (433) Maguire, in Am. Midi. Nat. 48:498. Micropetalum lanuginosum (Michx.) Pers. Syn. Pi. 1:509. 1805. in Mag. Gesells. Nat. Freund. Berl. 7:201. 11816. Stellaria elongata Nutt. Gen. 1:289. 1818. Arenaria diffusa Ell. Sketch. Bot. S. C. & Ga. 1 :519. 1821. Arenaria nemorosa HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 6:3 5. 1823. Arenaria nemorosa a quitensis DC. Prodr. 1 -.409. 1824. .\> en.ru >.< ^r. < < amb ex > 2:126. 1829. Arenaria scabra Vahl, ex St. Hilaire, loc. cit. 2:126. 1829. Arenaria paradoxa Bart. Rel. Haenk. 2:15. 1831. SA llaria lanuginosa (Michx.) Torr. & Gray, Fl. Amer. Bor. 1:187. 1840. Arenaria lanuginosa a genuina Rohrb. in Linnaea 37:260. 1872. Arcnnir:.! lanuginosa p diffusa Rohrb. loc. cit. 37:263. 1872. Arenaria lanuginosa diffusa (Ell.) Macloskie, Rep. Princeton Univ. Exped. Patag. 8:394. 1905. Stellaria laxa Muschl. in Bot. Jahrb. 45:443. 1911. Arenaria lanuginosa var. longipedunculata Duncan, in Phytologia 3 :282. 1950. Herbaceous puberulent laxly spreading perennials. Leaves opposite, lanceolate, oblanceolate or narrowly elliptic, apically attenuate and mucronulate, basally sub- sessile and attenuate, 5-20 mm. long, 2-5 mm. broad, scantily to densely puberulent with a whitish indumentum, often ciliate on the margins. Flowers solitary in the axils, the puberulent pedicels much longer than the subtending leaves. Sepals lanceolate to ovate, attenuate, puberulent 2-4.5 mm. long; petals 5, occasionally absent, obovate, entire, 2-4.5 mm. long; stamens 10, the filaments 1-4 mm. long; ovary sessile or short-stipitate, ovoid; styles 2-4. Capsule ovoid, 3-5 mm. long, the 2-4 valves deeply emarginate; seeds numerous, on basal placentae, cochleate, dark reddish brown to black, smooth or minutely tuberculate, ca. 0.75 mm. broad. Southeastern U. S. to Peru and Bolivia, in Central America only at moderate CHlRiQuf: vicinity of "New Switzerland", central valley of Rio Chiriqui Viejo, 1800- 00 m., Allen 1414; vicinity of Boquete, 1200-1500 m., Woodson 8 Schery 802. The typical species was originally described as apetalous, as are most specimens >m the southeastern United States, the type locality. In Mexico and Central nerica however, where the ranges of several subspecies overlap, the large majority (434) flora of Panama (Caryopbyllaceae) 93 of specimens, obviously referable to this "apetalous" subspecies, have petals nearly or quite as long as the sepals. MacBride (in Field Mus. Bot. 13 2 :601. 1936-8) reports that in Peru, where the plant is called ccledonia and tauchchalli, it is the source of an astringent used for hemorrhages of the uterus. 2. Arenaria lanuginosa ssp. saxosa (A. Gray) Maguire, in Am. Midi. Nat. 48: 498. 1951. Arenaria saxosa var. cinerascens Robinson, in Proc. Am. Acad. 29:293. 1894. Arenaria confusa Rydb. in Bull. Torr. Club 28:275. 1901. Arenaria mcarnsii Wool. & Standi, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 16:121. 1939. 29:475. 1939. Herbaceous (occasionally subligneous at the base) puberulent cespitose perennials, some of the branches occasionally proliferating and spreading. Leaves opposite, mostly linear-lanceolate, apically attenuate and mucronulate, basally subsessile and rounded to acute, 5-18 mm. long, 1-3 mm. broad, scantily to densely puberulent with a whitish indumentum, often ciliate on the involute margins. Flowers solitary in the axils, the puberulent pedicels longer or occasion- ally shorter than the subtending leaves. Sepals lanceolate to ovate, attenuate, glabrous, 3-5 mm. long; petals 5, obovate, entire, 4-6 mm. long; stamens 10, the filaments 1—4 mm. long; ovary sessile or short-stipitate, ovoid; styles 2—4. Capsule ovoid, 3-5 mm. long, the 2-4 valves deeply emarginate; seeds numerous, on basal placentae, cochleate, dark reddish brown, usually tuberculate, ca. 0.75 mm. broad. Southwestern U. S. to Mexico; Panama to northwestern South America, at rather high elevations. chiriqui: Potrero Muleto, Volcan Chiriqui, Boquete District, 10,400 ft., Davidson 1041 & 1051; Potrero Muleto to sumn -00-4000 m., Woodson & Schery 405 8 434; Loma Larga to summit, Volcan Chiriqui, 2500-3380 m., Woodson, 3. Arenaria lanuginosa ssp. guatemalensis (Standi. & Steyerm.) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov. Arenaria guatemalensis Standi. & Steyerm. in Field Mus. Bot. 23:50. 1944. Herbaceous puberulent laxly spreading perennials. Leaves opposite, lanceolate, apically attenuate and mucronulate, basally subsessile and attenuate, 10-40 mm. long, 2-6 mm. broad, irregularly puberulent with a whitish indumentum, often ciliate on the margins. Flowers solitary in the axils, the puberulent ebracteate pedicels 10-40 mm. long, usually exceeding the subtending leaves. Sepals lanceolate to ovate, attenuate, strongly puberulent on the costa, 4-6 mm. long; petals 5, obovate, entire, 5-8 mm. long; stamens 10, the filaments 3-6 mm. long; ovary sessile or short-stipitate, globose or ovoid; styles 2-4. Capsule ovoid, 5-8 mm. long, the 3 valves deeply emarginate; seeds numerous, on basal placentae, cochleate, (435) ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN chiriqui: rain forest, Bajo Chorro, Boquete District, 6000 ft., Davidson J - of Finca Lerida, 1750 m., Woodson (3 Schery 214; vicinity of Casita Alta, V qui, ca. 1500-2000 m., Woodson, Allen & Seibert 8lO; valley of the upper R •v of Monte Lirio, 1300-1900 m., Seibert 2QJ; in grassy sunny places, vicinity of Cerro Punta, 1500-2000 m., Seibert 260. Other variants of the lanuginosa complex are found in Mexico and Central America and could conceivably occur in Panama. In the subspecies guatemalensis, the variety ensifolia, with linear leaves and exerted petals, is so far reported only from southern Mexico. Characterized by ovate leaves, cuneate to cordate leaf bases and exerted petals, the variant currently passing as A. mcgalantha (Rohrb.) flora of Panama (Caryophyllaccac) 95 F. N. Williams would probably better be treated as a lanuginosa subspecies, ranging from southern Mexico to Guatemala. The original description of A. gut t e mgJe nsil would have been more edifying had it been contrasted with A. lanuginosa instead of A. megalantha, for although intergrades occur between all three, they are more frequent and perplexing between the first two. The relative constancy of these three taxa, where their ranges are distinct, coupled with limited intergradations near the commissures of their ranges, seems to justify their relegation to the subspecific level, in accord with the heirarchy established by Maguire (in Am. Midi. Nat. 46:493. 1951) in his monograph of the North American species of 2. CERASTIUM L. Cerastium L. Sp. PI. 437. 1753. Prevotia Adans. Fam. 2:256. 1763. Centunculm Adans. loc. cit. 2:256. 1761. '.!••. nchit Ehrh. Beitr. J: 177. 1788. Qiiatfrn t -lla Ehrh. loc. cii. 4:149. 1789. DoerrU H» liorkh. in Rhein Mag. 1:528. 1793. Myosotis Tourn. ex Moench, Meth. 224. 1794. EsmarcbU Reichb. Fl. Germ. Excurs. 793. 1832. Doerricra Steud. Nom. 2 1 :522. 1840. I »UpU Rci.hh. l/li. Germ. 5:37. /. 22J. 1841. Dicbodnn Bartl. ex Reichb. Nom. 205. 1841. Annual or perennial, usually pubescent, erect or decumbent herbs. Leaves opposite, usually sessile or subsessile, exstipulate, often viscid. Flowers few in dichasial cymes, white. Sepals 5, rarely 4, not connate. Petals as many as the sepals, rarely absent, emarginate or 2-cleft, white. Stamens 10, occasionally less; anthers versatile, 2 -celled, longitudinally dehiscent; filaments flattened, scarcely if at all connate to form an obscurely glandular annulus. Ovary superior; carpels 5, rarely fewer, with as many distinct styles, the many campylotropous ovules arising from basal or central placentae. Capsule often arcuate (hence the generic name), dehiscing longitudinally into as many deeply emarginate valves as there are styles; seeds numerous, cochleate, usually tuberculate, estrophiolate, the embryo coiled about the perisperm. Of this weedy cosmopolitan, temperate genus, only one of about fifty species 1. Cerastium viscosum L. Sp. Pi. 437. 1753. Cerastium glomeratum Thuill. Fl. Paris 225. 1799. and usually mucronulate, basally attenuate, 5-25 mm. long, 3-15 mm. broad, the winged petioles less than 5 mm. long. Flowers few in terminal dichasial cymes with reduced foliaceous bracts at the major dichotomies, the lanate to villous pedicels becoming 5-10 mm. long, exceeding the subtending bracts. Sepals 5, ovate to lance-oblong, acute to attenuate, villous, 3-5 mm. long; petals 5, rarely none, oblong, deeply 2-cleft, 3-5.5 mm. long; stamens 10, the flattened filaments 2-4 mm. long; ovary sessile or short-stipitate, ovoid; styles usually 5, 1.5-2 mm. long, glandular throughout; ovules many, campylotropous on central placentae. Capsule subcylindric, arcuate, 6-8 mm. long, the 5 valves deeply 2-cleft; seeds numerous, cochleate, light brown, minutely tuberculate, ca. 1 mm. broad. Naturalized from Europe, now rather common throughout temperate and chiriquI: Potrero Muleto to Schery 472-, vicinity of Boq Stellaria L. Sp. PI. 421 flora of Panama (CaryophyUaceae) 1814. In part. Urbrea St. Hilaire, in Mem. Mus. Par. 2:287. 1815. \Utlachium Fries, Fl. Halland. 77. 1817. Ballarion Raf. in Am. Month. Mag. 266. 1818. }.v.ti-on'n is similar to that of S. ccmuus with, however, a few deviations. Stamen traces arise as branches from the dorsal traces of carpels. The ventral trace invariably merges in the stigmatic region with the dorsal trace to form a thick common trace. Unlike S. cernuus, there is no conspicuous style in S. chinemh. Houttuynia.—The naked flowers are trimerous and bracteate (Fig. 9). The vascular bundle from the inflorescence axis extends into the cortex and becomes the trace for the flower. It branches to form two traces, one leading into the bract and the other into the flower proper (Figs. 32, 33). The bract trace may or may not ramify depending on whether the bract is "leaf-like" or scaly. The remaining trace branches at different levels to form three independent carpellary traces which show a spiral arrangement (Fig. 32). Each carpellary trace gives rise to a dorsal and two ventral traces (Figs. 32, 34-39). The ventral traces of adjacent carpels fuse together to form "compound ventral trace" or placental trace. Each placental trace gives off branches which supply the ovules. The placental trace when it reaches the style bases separates and extends into the respective styles. Ventral traces together with the dorsal trace go into the style and all three remain separate. No instance of their fusion at the tip of style was found. Placentation is parietal and ovules are present only in placental region where the ventral traces have fused to form the placental trace. Stamen traces are formed much later than the ventral traces and arise about the middle of the pistil from the carpellary dorsal trace (Figs. 32,40-48). Anemopsis. — Quibell (1941) has given in sufficient detail the vascular anatomy of the flower. As in other genera, a single trace from the inflorescence axis diverges and branches to form a bract trace and a "flower trace" (Figs. 49-52). Although the bract is adnate to the pistil, the bract-trace is free throughout (Figs. 49-66). Each "flower trace" branches to form ventral and dorsal traces. Each carpel receives two ventral traces and a dorsal trace. As in Houttuynia, ventral traces of adjacent carpels immediately fuse to form the placental trace whose branches supply the ovules. At about the base of style, the placental traces separate to give ventral traces which pass into the respective styles. Each ventral trace, on its way 112 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN RAJU MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY OF SAURURACEAE 113 114 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN ; to the base of the style, is connected with the dorsal trace. The dorsal trace with the other two ventral traces extend into the style (Figs. 58-66). At the base of style the dorsal bundle gives off branches to one or two stamens. Placentation is parietal as in Houttuynia. Carpels and Placentation A considerable variation has been found in the structure of carpels and in the organization of pistils in the Saururaceae. Carpels in Saururus cernuus are free throughout except at the base, a little above the short pedicel where they show a lateral concrescence (Figs. 17-22). They arise in a spiral fashion, a fact clearly seen in serial sections. There is considerable elongation above the ovule-bearing region. In Houttuynia, Gymnotheca and Anemopsis, clearly recognizable stylar regions are found. Furthermore, in all these three genera, the pistil is "compound" (in the sense that the ovary is syncarpous and the styles are free) (Figs. 6, 7, 10, 11). In Sauntrus cernuus, the folded laminae are conspicuous and the ventral traces are present away from the carpellary margins. During organization of the pistil, these laminar margins of adjacent carpels undergo concrescence which is to a considerable extent mistaken for axile placentation; placentation here is actually laminar. The lateral concrescence of adjacent carpels may be attributed to a case of "incipient syncarpous tendency" (Bailey and Swamy, 1951). The compound pistil of Houttuynia and Anemopsis is formed as a result of lateral approximation and concrescence of carpellary margins of adjacent carpels. This concrescence is also accompanied by fusion of ventral traces of adjacent carpels. Only in this region of concrescence of carpellary margins and also of lateral or ventral traces is parietal placentation organized. The sterile margins of carpels also undergo concrescence to form septa; as a result the compound pistil appears to be three-loculed (Figs. 23-31). This kind of incomplete septation is found in the upper part of the pistil of Houttuynia cordata; it extends almost half the depth of the pistil in Anemopsis. Embryology .e gametophyte. — The wall of a .., hypodermal layer, middle layer ither wall has an epidermis with : fibrous thickening and T «t Fig. 5. 67. A portion of anther wall showing cpid dermal layer with crushed middle layer, and a tepetal layer, X 333. Figs. - ■ . ' megaspore mother cell, X 666. Fig. 74. Same at a later stage with a dyad, X 666. Fig. 75. Shows division of lower dyad cell, X 666. Fig. 7>,. r ■ "triad", the lowermost being the megaspore, X 666. Fig. 77. Degeneration of middle cell of a linear "triad". Note vacu- olation in the lowermost cell, X 666. Fig. 78. The upper iw„ cell of a "triad" have degenerated embryo, cellular endosperm and a lower 'caecum containing" a hypertrophic^ nucleus, X 147- F * ellular endosperm, embryo and perisperm (Emb, embryo; En, endosperm; Nu, nucellus RAJU MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY OF SAURURACEAE 115 116 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN tapetal layer with binucleate cells (Fig. 67). The sporogenous cells differentiate themselves into microspore mother cells which undergo meiosis and form first microspore tetrads and then microspores (Figs. 68-71). Megasporogenesis and female gametophyte. — The crassinucellate ovules are orthotropous-bitegmic and borne on laminar placentae (Figs. 3, 4, 19-21). The micropyle is organized by both the integuments. The outer integument is two layered; the inner is three layered. A single hypodermal archesporial cell is differ- entiated in a young ovular primordium. It undergoes a transverse division to form primary sporogenous and parietal cells (Fig. 72). The primary parietal cell, by anticlinal and transverse divisions, forms a parietal tissue of about 8 superposed cells (Figs. 73-78). The primary sporogenous cell divides meiotically to form a dyad (Fig. 74). During further development, the lower dyad cell divides and the upper does not (Figs. 75-76). Thus, the dyad gives rise to a "triad" or a linear row of three cells (Figs. 76, 77) . Of these three cells, the upper two degenerate and the lower- most develops into the embryo-sac (Figs. 77-79). The antipodal cells are ephem- eral and seldom seen in a mature embryo sac. The egg apparatus is situated at the micropylar end and no case of fertilization was observed. Endosperm. — The endosperm nucleus divides transversely to form a micropylar chamber and a chalazal chamber. The chalazal chamber behaves as a haustorium and the nucleus becomes hypertrophied. The mature seed encloses massive peri- sperm and a little endosperm surrounding the developing embryo (Figs. 80-82). Houttuynia cordata. — Microsporogenesis and male gametophyte. — Microsporo- genesis and male gametophyte development follow the sequence given for Satirurus cernuus, but with some differences. Division of the microspore mother cell shows various cytological abnormalities resulting in the formation of sterile pollen. Frequently, micronuclei are seen in microspore tetrads. Very rarely free micro- spores are observed (Figs. 83-88). Megasporogenesis and female gametophyte. — The bitegmic orthotropous ovules are borne on parietal placentae (Figs. 25, 26, 89-90, 99). The ovular primordium shows a hypodermal archesporium (Figs. 89, 90). Similar to S. cernuus, the outer integument is made up of two layers and inner of three layers (Fig. 99). Again, the micropyle is organized by both the integuments (Fig. 99). An archesporial cell of hypodermal origin functions directly as the megaspore mother cell (Figs. si,„v\ e ,, dermal layer, c: rushed middle layer i ; odermal layer; , .' . >ther cell, X 666. Fig. 87. the movem, Ovulu ''% A lkrf. ..agC ,,: ihc rz*»A \ it division of arches RAJU MORPHOLOGY AND SAURURACEAE 117 118 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 91-98). The megaspore mother cell divides meiotically to give a linear row of three cells of which the lowermost is the megaspore that develops into the embryo sac (Figs. 91-98). Antipodal cells in the mature embryo sac are epheremal but in some cases these cells are seen in mature embryo sacs (Figs. 96-97). The egg apparatus in the micropylar end is made up of an egg cell and two hooked synergid cells (Fig. 96). Here, also, fertilization stages were not observed. Endosperm.— The endosperm behaves as in S. cernuus (Fig. 98). In mature seeds often only endosperm and perisperm were observed. The embryo was not Anemopsis californica. — Microsporogenesis and sporogenesis and development of male gametophyt< cernuus and Houttuynia cordata (Figs. 100-105). Megasporogenesis and female gametophyte. — The orthotropous bitegmic ovules are found on parietal placentae as in H. cordata (Figs. 6-7, 30-31) . A hypodermal archesporial cell is differentiated and divides to form a parietal cell and primary sporogenous cell (Fig. 106). The primary sporogenous cell divides meiotically to give a row of three cells as in other genera (Fig. 107). The lowermost cell functions as the megaspore and develops into an embryo sac (Figs. 107-110). Stages in fertilization have not been observed. Endosperm. — The earlier stages of endosperm development are like those of Houttuynia and Saururus cernuus. In the mature seed, massive perisperm, degen- erated embryo and endosperm were observed. In Saururus simple pistils organize the fruit. The pericarp becomes dry-fleshy enclosing a single seed. No case of fruit dehiscence has been observed. Further- more, there is no stony endocarp developed in the pericarp. On the other hand, seed coat becomes very hard and often closely abutting the inner wall of pericarp. The fruit is here interpreted as a berry. In Houttaynia and Anemopsis the fruits are dehiscent capsules with many smaller seeds. The dehiscence of fruit occurs at the apical region by the disinte- gration of fused ventral margins in the middle region of three free styles. In a dehisced fruit a circular port is seen at the top of the ovary leaving the styles free. Discussion Observations on inflorescence of the six species of Saururaceae show an inter- esting evolutionary trend, probably guided by two processes: 1. reduction, and 2. cohesion and adnation. Of the four genera, Saururus shows the least change by the above processes. The "common stalk" of flower and bract shows various degree of reduction. In Saurt ' is much elongated and shows stages c tion. Further reduction of the same has resulted in a condition seen in Houttuynia in possessing a recognizable "common stalk" (Figs. 12, 13, 15). Anemopsis, on the other hand, shows the final culmination where the pistils appear embedded in the "inflorescence axis" and the bract appears to be situated at the top of the ovary (Figs. 16, 49). In all genera this process of reduction is associated with RAJU MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY OF SAURURACEAE 119 concomitant cohesion and adnation of floral parts. By a process of reduction in the number and cohesion of carpels, the polycarpellate condition seen in Saururtis has resulted in the three or four carpelled syncarpous condition found in the other genera. This change has been accompanied by the adnation of stamens to carpels and is exhibited by Houttuynia, Gymnotheca and Anemopsis. The genus Anemop- sis has an inferior ovary, a feature that has resulted by their "sinking into" the 120 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN The phenomena mentioned above may also be explained in the light of floral anatomy. Although the bract appears to be a simple structure, it is very difficult to see where the bract begins and where it ends. It is morphologically intriguing to consider the trace of the "common stalk" as a "compound" one of bract and flower pedicel. This condition has been interpreted in Saururus cernuus as a case of adnation of flower to bract, by Murthy (1959). Present observations show that only the pedicel of the flower is adnate to the bract; this feature is evidenced by vascular anatomy of Houttuynia and Gymno- theca. In Saururus, Houttuynia and Gymnotheca, the bract tends to remain free from the flower proper. But, in the case of Anemopsis, however, the bract is adnate to the pistil. This feature is of secondary derivation for the bract trace is completely free from the flower. This secondary condition is, probably, due to "development sinking-in" of the pistil. It can also be interpreted as a case of lateral concrescence of compound pistils in the inflorescence. In Saururus cernuus, stamen traces are formed before the carpellary traces are differentiated. But in S. chinensis, vascular anatomy indicates that stamens have originated subsequently from the dorsal carpellary trace. This specialization has proceeded in increasing degree in Houttuynia, Gymnotheca and Anemopsis where the stamens are perigynous or epigynous. In Saururus ventral traces are as prominent as the dorsal traces; they remain free from one another throughout their course except at the stylar tip where they show signs of fusion. Similar behavior of ventral and dorsal traces is seen in Houttuynia and Anemopsis; their fusion in the stylar tip is seldom observed. Besides, in these two latter genera, ventral traces of adjacent carpels fuse to form a placental trace. Anemopsis shows a unique feature in that the ventral trace has independent connections with the dorsal trace (Fig. 49). The exact significance of these connections is not known. To begin with, the flower gets a single trace from the inflorescence axis in Saururus, Houttuynia and Anemopsis. Such a feature has been reported in many angiosperms. Puri (1951) in his review paper suggested that highly reduced flowers received just one trace. Whether this condition is simple by primitiveness or by reduction remains to be critically examined. As far as the present observa- tions go, it seems that traces of different organs have undergone fusion to form a single composite trace. The Saururaceae show both hypogenous and epigynous conditions. The prob- lem then arises as to how the epigynous condition has been achieved. The problem of origin of the inferior ovary has been highly debated for a long time. Douglas (1944) in her comprehensive review has discussed different views regarding morphology of the inferior ovary. Of the many views postulated, only two have remained prominent; they are appendicular and axial views. It is beyond doubt that in all genera of Saururaceae except Saururus cernuus stamens have fused with the carpels. In Houttuynia and S. chinensis stamens are situated half way up on the pistil. Anemopsis and Gymnotheca have their stamens on the ovary just below the styles. These clearly show that concrescence of certain RAJU MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY OF SAURURACEAE 121 floral parts (here stamens) with the pistils has given rise to epigyny. This is in support of the views expressed by van Tieghem (see Puri, 1951, 1952; Eames, 1931). In Anemopsis, besides the fusion of stamens with the ovary, there is develop- mentally a concrescence of pistils resulting in a massive spike. This condition has given an impression that pistils have "sunken". Adnation of the bract, with its free trace, to the pistil is an additional evidence to show that the ovary wall is made up of tissues other than that of the ovary wall itself. Prior to syncarpy and epigyny, profound morphological and anatomical changes have taken place in flowers of the Saururaceae. These changes have been well preserved in the genus Saururus. The carpels with their respective stamens are arranged "spirally". The last-formed carpel does not possess a stamen or stamens. This detail suggests that the flowers of S. cernuus, adnate to bracts, are not actually simple; they are, probably, derived from a structure similar to an "inflorescence". Absence of an axial tissue, development of a terminal normal or abortive carpel with or without a stamen or stamens, and close telescoping of simple pistils suggest that the flower is of the "sympodial type". Each flower then represented by a carpel with its own stamen or stamens. A similar analogy can be traced in the flowers of Chloranthaceae (Cardemoy, 1863; Hooker, 1890). However, this idea has been contradicted on the basis of the absence of supernumerary structures in the flowers of Chloranthaceae (Swamy, 1953). The successive arrangements of simple pistils with their associated stamen or stamens lead to two problems — nature of epigyny or perigyny in a simple pistil and same in compound pistil. In the case of StntntTUS cbmensk the stamen or stamens are perigynous. This can be interpreted as a case of adnation. Syncarpous gynoecium also shows perigynous and epigynous conditions. It is difficult to say whether the cohesion of carpels appeared first or adnation of stamens to carpels. Available evidences, however, show in the Saururaceae that adnation of stamens to carpels appeared first as exemplified by S. chinensis. So, the flowers of Hauttuynia and Anemopsis suggest that they are made up of three independent flowers which have undergone phylogenetic fusion. This is also amply evidenced by floral anatomy. The above interpretations further lead to the problem whether the pistil is appendicular or axial. Vascular anatomy shows that there is nowhere in the ovary a residual trace or an axis around which carpels are arranged. The vascular elements are completely used up by the differentiated carpels. It is on this basis that flowers of Saururaceae have been interpreted as condensed inflorescence of the "sympodial type" simulating to a considerable extent vegetative branches where sympodial growth prevails. Anatomical evidences do not, however, give a correct picture of inferior ovary. Developmental studies are necessary for the interpreta- tion of inferior ovary in some members of Saururaceae. The trends of specialization postulated by Bailey and Swamy (1951) for the ranalian carpel have recently been useful in interpreting some primitive carpels. Although carpels of Houttuynia and Anemopsis are quite specialized, the condupli- cate nature is still present in their styles which have flared-out stigmatic crests. 122 Although ontogenetic studies have not been made, available observations indicate that the ovule-bearing capacity of the carpel has brought several modifications in its train. The closure of carpels has occurred in the basal or ovule-bearing part leaving behind an extensive stigmatic crest. The stigmatic crest is supplied by both dorsal and ventral bundles. This feature is seen in Saurtirus, Houttuynia and Anemopsis. In some of the carpels, particularly of S. cernuus, retraction of ventral traces from stigmatic region toward the ovule-bearing part may be noticed. This retraction leaves a short style between ovary and stigma. In the case of S. chinen- sis, the stigmatic crest is supplied by both ventral and dorsal traces; it is situated just above the ovule-bearing part. This progressive phylogenetic specialization leading to the formation of a style between stigma and ovary is exhibited by the carpels of Saururus, Houttuynia and Anemopsis. Superimposed on the evolutionary specialization mentioned above there is con- comitant lateral concrescence of carpels resulting in a compound pistil. Further- more, the "spiral" arrangement of carpels becomes less and less clear. Thus, in the development of pistils, simple or compound, several independent trends of speciali- zation have occurred simultaneously in the Saururaceae. Placentation in the Saururaceae is of two types, laminar and parietal. Laminar placentation is found in Saururus and parietal placentation in Houttuynia and Anemopsis. Bailey and Swamy (1951) after an extensive survey of carpels in the Ranales have come to the conclusion that carpels with laminar placentation are primitive and show various trends of specialization leading toward other types of placentation, A detailed study of carpels of Saururus has shown not only a laminar placentation but also different degrees of incipient syncarpous tendencies. The carpellary margins undergo concrescence or close approximation. This con- crescence of carpellary margins does not occur at one level since they are arranged spirally. Axial tissue that is seen at the base of carpels is actually a composite of different carpellary margins. As a consequence, the pistil appears to be compound with more than one locule. In fact, this condition probably led several taxonomists to interpret this placentation as axile (Bailey, 1958; Lawrence, 1951; Benson, 1957). From this basic laminar placentation, parietal placentation of Houttuynia and Anemopsis can be derived. The presence of free styles in the pistils of the above two genera shows that lateral concrescence of adjacent carpels has occurred in the ovule-bearing parts of carpels. Closely approximated partitions appear in the locule of the ovary of Houttuynia and Anemopsis. These partitions are the fused ventral carpellary margins. In the ovule bearing part, ventral parts of carpels have been retracted considerably apparently to accommodate the ovules developing inside. In the organization of syncarpous ovary from simple carpels in Saururaceae, the so-called classical "torus" is not involved. The evolutionary trend of specializa- tion from laminar to parietal placentation involves: firstly, the fusion of ventral margins of adjacent carpels; and secondly, lateral concrescence of the same carpels. These are further influenced greatly by the ovule bearing capacity of a syncarpous ovary. In Houttuynia and Anemopsis the ovary becomes "multilocular". The RAJU MORPHOLOGY AND ANATOMY OF SAURURACEAE 123 retraction of partitions within the ovary in the lower part may be due to the acquisition of ovule-bearing capacity of ovary. Normally, the ovaries of genera mentioned above show multilocular nature in the upper part of ovary and uni- locular in the lower part. Intermediate conditions showing various stages of phylogenetic retraction of partitions are not infrequent. Eichler (1875-78) interpreted the flowers of Saururus and Houttuynia as obdi- plostemonous; flowers which had two whorls of three stamens each and the outer whorl had aborted. In the present investigation the above-said feature has not been observed. In Anemopsis and Gymnotheca, each flower is usually associated with six stamens. Anatomy of flower has shown that traces for stamens arise from the dorsal bundle of carpels. In addition to the above feature, the first formed carpels of Saururus usually possess two stamens each, the last formed does not develop stamens. The absence of correlation between the number of carpels and stamens, negates the possibility of recognizing two whorls of stamens. A similar view has also been advanced by Nozeran (1955). In his comparative survey of floral structures Nozeran (1955) writes that "the spike of Houttuynia is not entirely an inflorescence and is not still a flower". Furthermore, he hypothesized that the lowermost bracts transform into perianth lobes. He also observed in inflorescence several instances of reduction in number of stamens and carpels. On the basis of above details, he derived the spike of Houttuynia from a homogeneous inflorescence which was composed probably of trimerous flowers. In the present investigation, however, all the details given by Nozeran (1955) were not found. There is no doubt that at the tip of the inflores- cence, an overy was often borne, but there has not been enough evidence at present to support Nozeran's hypothesis. Embryological investigations show great similarities among the three species, Saururus cernuus, Houttuynia cordata and Anemopsis. Development of both male and female gametophytes are very similar. During development of female gameto- phyte the archesporial cell gives rise to parietal cells in Saururus and Anemopsis. These parietal cells are absent in Houttuynia. The development of the female gametophyte in all three species studied conforms to the monosporic type (as here interpreted). Some stages in the development of endosperm were observed in Houttuynia and Saururus cernuus. In both cases the endosperm is of the cellular type. The above two genera also show endosperm haustoria. The embryo in S. cernuus suggests that the first division of the zygote should be transverse. Seeds enclose a massive perisperm and a little endosperm surrounding the small embryo. Similar embryological features have been recorded by Johnson (1900) for Summary An account of floral anatomy and embryology suggests that the genera of Saururaceae are closely interrelated. Structure and morphology of inflorescence and flower are discussed in the light of anatomy. Anatomical details indicate that the inflorescence-type seen in Anemopsis is more specialized than the type seen in Saururus or other genera. This has been 124 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN achieved, according to the evidences advanced, by processes of reduction, adnation and cohesion of various floral entities. Some of the morphological aspects of ovary, carpels and placentation have been discussed. Embryological details are similar in all the genera investigated here. I am greatly indebted to Dr. N. H. Nickerson, for his kindness and generosity and valuable guidance during the course of this investigation. I am also highly thankful to Dr. R. E. Woodson, Jr., for generously placing some of the material used here at my disposal and for helpful suggestions. Literature Cited 1 oi cultivated plants". Revised Edition, McMillan Co., N. Y, ssification". D. C. Heath and Co., Boston. Lawrence, G. H. ,(1952). Placentation in Angiosperms. Bot. Rev. 18:603-651. Quibell, C. H. (1941). Floral anatomy and morphology of Anemopsis calif ornica H. & A. , B. G. L. HEPATICITES DEVONICUS LIVERWORT FROM THE DEVONIAN OF NEW YORK 1 - 2 FRANCIS M. HUEBER Introduction The record of the Hepaticae in the Paleozoic is very meager. One may readily expect this to be the case owing to the small size and the delicate nature of the members of this group of plants. Up until now the oldest occurrence of undoubted hepatics was that of four species from the Upper Carboniferous of Shropshire, England (Walton, 1925, 1928). They are Hepaticites Kidstoni, H. lobatus, H. Langi (Walton, 1925), and H. Metzgerioides (Walton, 1928). These four fossil forms have been compared with the living genera Trcubia, Fossombronia, Kiccardia (Aneura) and Metzgeria respectively. In all cases the remains are of sterile shoots only and on the basis of their morphology it has been assumed that all of the forms are of the anacrogynous series of the Jungermanniales (Walton, 1925, 571). Definite conclusions can not be made until reproductive organs are found. Materials and Methods The plant remains which are described here occur as compressions associated with other plant remains in a fine-grained, dark-gray shale. The specimens were collected from a small quarry located on the northwest slope of South Mountain, Schoharie County, New York, 1.1 miles west of the Schoharie-Greene County line Livingston 7' 30" map at 74° 16' 30" E., 42° 23' 55" N. and at an elevation of 2180 feet. The horizon at which the quarry is located is very close to the base of the Onteora "red beds" which are the continental equivalent to the lowermost two- thirds of the marine Finger Lakes stage, Senecan series (Frasnian) of central and western New York. The beds are therefore lowermost Upper Devonian. The plants with which the specimens of Hepaticites are associated, that is in the same beds and at the same quarry, are Psilophyfon princeps Dawson 1871, Schizopodium Harris 1929, Cladoxylon Unger 1856, Pseudosporochnus Potonie and Bernard 1904, Eospermatopteris (Dawson) Goldring 1924, Callixylon Zalessky 1911, and two new genera all of which are to be described in future papers. While preparing transfers of other plant remains, thin fragments of plant material were seen in the sludge derived from the dissolution of the shale. The fragments at first were thought to be epidermal layers from plants contained in the shale. However, after they were washed, dehydrated and mounted, they were 126 found to possess the characteristics of the genus Hepaticites. Additional prepara- tions were made using the bulk maceration technique (Harris, 1926). Pieces of rock in which large quantities of plant remains are evident are placed into poly- ethylene or polystyrene plastic containers. Concentrated hydrofluoric acid (48%) is poured over the specimens until they are completely immersed in the acid. From ten to twenty- four hours are generally required for dissolution of the rock; the time is of course dependent upon the size of the specimen being dissolved. Frequent observations of the progress of the reaction are necessary in order that any freed plant material which is either floating on the surface of the acid or lying in the sludge can be removed. The remains are easily removed by slipping a flat, wooden rod under the specimen and then carefully raising the rod out of the solution. The specimen is "floated" onto the rod in the way that one floats specimens of algae onto paper for the preparation of herbarium sheets. The writer has found that the wooden labels used for flower pots are very satisfactory for lifting the specimens from the solution. The plant material is floated off of the rod into a container of water and washed through three or four changes of water. The wash water is either decanted or siphoned off. After the specimen is washed, it is floated onto a glass slide and positioned on the slide by the use of brushes cut down to a single bristle. The slide is gradually raised from the water, keeping the slide inclined. A drop or two of liquid detergent added to the water will help reduce surface tension and facilitate the removal of the specimen. Any water remaining on the slide and around the specimen is carefully removed with blotting paper. After the specimen has partially dried, it is saturated with a 1 % aqueous solution of gum arabic which when dried serves to hold the specimen in place on the surface of the slide. The gum arabic solution is applied with a fine-tipped brush. When the specimen is fully dried, a drop of Harleco Synthetic Mounting Medium or Canada balsam dissolved in xylene is placed on top of it and a coverslip lowered over the surface. At this point, if the specimen were not fixed to the surface of the slide with gum arabic, it would migrate to the edge of the coverslip or be broken by the flow of the viscous mounting medium. The mounting medium is dried and the prepara- tion is ready for study. Nearly eighty fragments were prepared in this way. Genus HEPATICITES Walton 1925 Hepaticites devonicus sp. nov. — Description The thallus is very simply differentiated into two parts, a rhizomatous portion and a thallose region. The latter is differentiated into two parts, an axial or costal region composed of elongate parenchymatous cells and marginal wings or lamellae composed of polygonal parenchymatous cells (figs. 1-5). The axial region aver- ages 0.56 mm. in width. It is two to several cells thick; the actual number is impossible to determine because of the complex reticulum formed by the outlines of the cells. A midrib composed of very elongate cells and averaging 0.22 mm. in width forms the central portion of the axial region. The midrib is in turn sur- rounded by a zone of elongate cells which are transitional in size between the midrib and the cells of the wings. The cells are elongate parallel to the long axis of the thallus and are 14 to 26 ,i in diameter. Because of the incomplete preserva- HUEBER HEPATICITES DEVONICUS 127 tion of the end walls, the full length of any one of the cells of the midrib is unknown. The cells which form the transition zone between the midrib and the wings average 140 /i in length. No rhizoids are evident along the axial region. The wings are only one cell thick and vary from 1.3 to 1.75 mm. in width. The cells are 46.8 to 73.2 /j. in diameter and are polygonal in outline. Scattered through the tissue of the wings are dark cells (fig. 5). The contents may indicate that some of them were storage or secretory cells. Some, however, may be darkened due to the activity of fungi, for fungal hyphae are commonly observed adhering to the surfaces of the thallus. The margins of the wings are serrate, the teeth are spaced at intervals of 0.18 mm. (figs. 6, 7), but otherwise the margins show no well pronounced lobing. Dichotomous branching of the thallus is evidenced in three specimens, two of which are illustrated in figs. 2 and 3. Fragments of the wings are still attached to the axial regions beyond the dichotomy. Growth of the plant was apparently the result of the divisions of a single apical cell borne in a notch at the apex of the thallus. A fragment of the thallus illustrating what may be interpreted as an example of the apical notch is shown in fig. 4. The rhizomatous portion of the plant (fig. 8) varies from 0.58 to 1.7 mm. in width and is composed wholly of elongate parenchymatous cells. The midrib racial from 0.15 to 0.28 mm. in width; the cells of which it is composed vary from 14 to 29 fi in diameter and as in the midrib of the thallus portion their length is unknown. The cells which surround the midrib are approximately the same diameter as those in the midrib and they vary from 136 to 220 fi in length. Numerous rhizoids arise from the cells on the surface of the rhizome (figs. 8 and 9). They are nonseptate and average 21 /x in diameter just above the broadened base. The tips of the rhizoids are broken off and therefore the full length of any one individual is not known. The largest fragment is 0.56 mm. in length. It must be stated here that no rhizomatous portion has been found in direct organic connection with the thallose portion of the plant. Both parts were isolated from the same matrix and since the part which is here referred to as the rhizome has the same general form and structure of the axial region of the thallose segment, the writer feels justified in considering them parts of the same plant. A comparsion of the illustrations of Hepaticites devonicus with those for the species H. Metzgerioides (Walton, 1928, Plate XII, Figs. 1-6) will show how similar the thallose portion of H. devonicus is to one which has already been included in the genus Hepaticites. The finely serrate margin, the lack of rhizoids on the thallose portion of the plant, and the differentiation of a rhizome bearing rhizoids, all characteristics of H. devonicus, are the evident morphological differ- ences between the two species. The difference in the gross size between the two (H. devonicus is perhaps four to five times larger than H. Metzgerioides) may be of specific value, but the similar size of the constituent cells in the two plants suggests that the difference is probably one of growth form. As in H. Metzgerioides, H. devonicus shows a clear distinction between midrib and wing which is also characteristic of the modern genera Pallavicinia Gray, corr. Carruthers and Metzgeria Raddi. Hepaticites devonicus combines characteristics 128 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN of both of the modern genera. It is similar to Pallavicinia in the width of the thallus (3 to 4 mm.) and may represent a plant like Pallavicinia Zollingeri (Gottsch.) Schiffn. (See Smith, 1938, especially Fig. 32 and Campbell and Williams, 1914, especially Fig. 4) in which there is differentiation of a prostrate portion bearing rhizoids and an erect, branched portion on which rhizoids are not present. The small marginal teeth of the thallus in H. devonicus is another char- acter which is shared with Pallavicinia Zollingeri. Hepaticites devomcm differ! from Pallavicinia in having a less differentiated central strand and larger central cells in the strand. Hepaticites devonicus and Metzgeria are similar in their slightly differentiated central strands, in the size of the cells in the central strand, the size of the cells in the wings, and the possibility that the teeth on H. devonicus are homologous to the hairs on the margins of the thallus in Metzgeria. They differ in that Metzgeria is smaller (1 to 2 mm. wide) and bears rhizoids along its midrib. Ifepaticites devonicus resembles Metzgeria in cellular details but resembles Palla- vicinia in size and form. Reproductive structures are not known for H. devonicus but on the basis of its similarity in habit and the many details of structure which it shares with mem- bers of the Anacrogynae the writer suggests that it be classed with this group until such a time as further evidence of its relationship is obtained. The occurence in Devonian sediments of remains assignable to the genus Hepaticites extends the range of the Hepaticae even further back in geologic time, and it emphasizes that this class of plants had evolved to a high order of organiza- tion far earlier than heretofore recorded. Hepaticites devonicus Hueber sp. nov. Diagnosis: Dichotomously branching thallus differentiated into rhizomatous por- tion bearing rhizoids and thallose portion composed of axial region averaging 0.56 mm. in diameter and wings one cell in thickness ranging from 1.3 to 1.75 mm. in width. Cells of the axial region elongate, 14 to 26 /x in diameter, length of central cells undetermined, length of transitional cells averaging 140 fi. Cells of the wings polygonal, 46.8 to 73.2 p. in diameter. Margins of wings finely serrate, lobing indefinite. Rhizomatous portion 0.58 to 1.7 mm. in diameter, cells elongate as in axial region of thallose portion, numerous non septate rhizoids averaging 21 p. in diameter borne on surface of rhizome. Holotype number 23, specimen 1579-294, slides 6-12, paleobotanical collections of the Department of Botany, Cornell University, New York. Locality: Northwest slope South Mountain, Schoharie County, New York. Horizon: Base of the Onteora "red beds" lowermost Upper Devonian. A new species of Hepaticites, H. devonicus, is described from the lowermost Upper Devonian of New York. The plant is differentiated into two parts, a rhizomatous portion and a thallose region. The latter is differentiated into two parts, an axial region composed of elongate parenchymatous cells and marginal wings which are one cell thick and composed of polygonal parenchymatous cells. HUEBER HEPATICITES DEVONICUS 129 The margins of the wings are finely serrate and show no lobing. There are no rhizoids borne on the thallose portion of the plant. The rhizome is composed wholly of elongate parenchymatous cells and resembles the axial region of the thallose portion of the plant. Rhizoids occur over the entire surface of the rhizome. No reproductive structures are known. The plant is compared with Pallavicinia Zollingeri and Metzgeria and placed for the time being with the fossil forms of the Anacrogynae. The report constitutes the earliest record of the Hepaticae in the geologic column. The writer wishes to express his sincere appreciation to Dr. Harlan P. Banks for his supervision and guidance during the course of the research which resulted in the discovery of a diverse flora in the Devonian of eastern New York. Special acknowledgement is extended to the National Science Foundation for the support afforded by graduate fellowships for the years 1957-1958, 1958-1959 and 1959- 1960 during which time the research was carried to completion. Thanks arc extended to Dr. Rudolph Schuster for his suggestions concerning the specimens of Hepaticites and to Mrs. J. Douglas Grierson for the photographic prints used to illustrate the present paper. Literature Cited Scria 15:1-44. Harris, T. M. (1926). Note on a New Method for the Investigation of Fossil Plants. New Phytol. Smith, G. M. (1938). Cryptgamic Botany, Vol. II: Bryophytes and Pteridophytes. (First Ed. ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Slide 8, Fig. 3. Portion of the thallose region of the plant showing a dicho The marginal wings are folded over the midrib in upper portions of the s Fig. 4. Apex of the thallose portion of the plant. Slide 11, X 58. Fig. 5. Detail of the marginal wing of the thallose portion of the darkened cells which may have been storage or secretory cells. Slide 10, A-. Mo. Bo,.C,,k„. V 01. -is. 19*] r 1 IS! * 1 K ■m *i If j ] * 1 r - / ^' ^ «Xv »11 a*n * ft 4 ^l^V HUEBER— HEPATICITE HUEBER HEPATICITES DEVONICUS Explanation 01 Plate PLATE II Hcpaticites dev nicus Jr° s t°°£° Ltinr 8 SUden 2 7. the thallose regie the plant illustra Detail of one of the marginal teeth s hown on the speL men in Fig. 6. S Fragment of the rhizomatous portion of the plant N te the dense cove ! rhizoids. The tips c INDEX OF ORCHID NAMES— 1960 ROBERT L. DRESSLER As an aid to ourselves and others studying the orchids, we have started an index of new orchid names, to be published annually. It is felt that such an index may be of value to the many botanists and others interested in this large and complex family. For new taxa we have indicated the country or origin and the location of type material (using the standard abbreviations), if this is known. For new combinations, new names or changes in rank, we cite the basionym with the new name. "We have abbreviated the authors' names less than is customary, as we feel that a saving of only one or two spaces does not justify the loss of clarity. A few names which were published in mimeographed news letters are purposely omitted. Such publication is of dubious validity under the rules of nomenclature, and certainly should be avoided. We would be very glad to receive corrections or additions to the index, to be appended to the Index for 1961. Subfamily Cypripedioideae Garay, Bot. Mus. Leafl. 19:86. Type genus: Cypripedium L. Subfamily Epidendroideae Dressier, Taxon 9:213. Based on Kerospbaeroideae Subfamily Kerosphaeroideae Garay, Bot. Mus. Leafl. 19:87. Type genus: Epidendrum L. This name is not legitimate under the Rules of Nomenclature. Subfamily Neottioideae Garay, Bot. Mus. Leafl. 19:86. Type genus: Neottia Sw. Subfamily Ophrydoideae Garay, Bot. Mus. Leafl. 19:87. Type genus: Orchis L. This name is not legitimate under the Rules of Nomenclature; this subfamily must be known as the Orchidoideae. Aeranthes albidiflora Toilliez-Genoud, Ursch & Bosser, Not. Syst. Paris 16: 205. Madagascar (TAN). Aeranthes ambrensis Toilliez-Genoud, Ursch & Bosser, Not. Syst. Paris 16: 209. Madagascar (TAN). Aeranthes carnosa Toilliez-Genoud, Ursch & Bosser, Not. Syst. Paris 16: 209. Madagascar (TAN). Aeranthes denticulata Toilliez-Genoud, Ursch & Bosser, Not. Syst. Paris 16: 207. Madagascar (TAN). Aeranthes neoperrieri Toilliez-Genoud, Ursch & Bosser, Not. Syst. Paris 16: 212. Madagascar (TAN). Aeranthes orthopoda Toilliez-Genoud, Ursch & Bosser, Not. Syst. Paris 16: 212: Madagascar (TAN). Bletia purpurea var. alba Ariza- Julia & Jimenez, Rhodora 62:256. Dominican Republic. Bulbophyllum jacquetii var. rosea Guillaumin, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris II 32: 189. Annam (P?). Bulbophyllum rugosibulbum Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:138. Northern Rhodesia (K). ull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris II 32: (133) 134 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Chroniochilus virescens (Ridley) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:273. Sarcochilus vires- cens Ridley. Clehostoma tixieri Guillaumin, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris II 32:369. Annam (P?). Cypripedium X andrewsii nm. favillianum (J. T. Curtis) Boivin, Naturaliste Canadien 87:32. Cypripedium X favillianum J. T. Curtis. Cypripedium X andrewsii nm. landonii (Garay) Boivin, Naturaliste Canadien 87: 32. Cypripedium X landonii Garay. Cyrtorchh arcuata ssp. leonensis Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:149. Sierra Leone (K). Cyrtorchh arcuata ssp. variabilis Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:148. Tanganyika Terr. (K). Cyrtorchh arcuata ssp. whytei (Rolfe) Summerh., Kew Bull 14:147. Ustrosta- chys whytei Rolfe. Cyrtorchh neglecta Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:149. Tanganyika Terr. (K.) Dactylorhiza— Sod (Ann. Univ. Scient. Budapest. Eotvos Biol. 3:335-357) gives a synopsis of Dactylorhiza (Dactylorchh) which includes many apparent new combinations for species, subspecies and hybrid populations. "We do not list these here because there is not "a full and direct reference to its author and original publication" with the basionyms. Further, it is quite unclear just which names Soo intends to publish as new combinations. It seems unlikely that one would intentionally publish so many new combinations in Dactylorhiza while recommending that Dactylorchh be considered for conservation. Diaphananthe section Rhipidoglossum (Schltr.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:141. Rhipidoglossum Schltr. Diaphananthe brevifolia (Summerh.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:143. Rhipido- glossum brevifolium Summerh. Diaphananthe cuneata Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:141. Uganda (K). Diaphananthe densiflora (Summerh.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:143. Rhipido glossum densiflorum Summerh. Diaphananthe erecto-calcarata (De Wild.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:143 Angraecum erecto-calcaratum De Wild. Diaphananthe globoso-calcarata (De Wild.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:142. An graecum glohoso-calcaratum De Wild. Diaphananthe laxiflora (Summerh.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:141. Rhipidoglos- sum laxiflorum Summerh. Diaphananthe longicalcar (Summerh.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:142. Rhipido glossum longicalcar Summerh. Diaphananthe microphylla (Summerh.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:142. Rhipido- glossum microphyllum Summerh. Diaphananthe obanensis (Rendle) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:142. Angraecum ohanense Rendle. Diaphananthe peglerae (Bolus) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:143. Mystacidium peglerae Bolus. Diaphananthe rohrii (Reichb. f.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:140. Angraecum rohrii Reichb. f . DRESSLER INDEX OF ORCHID NAMES 1960 135 Diaphananthe rutila (Reichb. f.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:143. Aeranthus rutilus Reichb. f. Diaphananthe xanthopollinia (Reichb. f.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:143. Aeran- thus xanthopollinius Reichb. f. Dinklageella minor Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:156. Liberia (K). Epidendrum hioramii Acuiia & Alain, Mem. Soc. Cubana Hist. Nat. 24:110. Cuba (SV). Epipactis thunbergii forma subconformis Sakata, Jour. Jap. Bot. 35:224. Japan (Herb.T.Sakata). Eulophia laurentii (De Wild.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:139. Lissochilus laurentii De Wild. Habenaria section Kryptostoma Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:135. Type species: H. tentaculigera Reichb. f . Habenaria gonatosiphon Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:134. Tanganyika Terr. (K). Habenaria magnirostris Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:132. Tanganyika Terr. (K). Habenaria richardsiae Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:131. Tanganyika Terr. (K). Holothrix brachycheira Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:127. Northern Rhodesia (K). Holothrix papillosa Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:128. Tanganyika Terr. (K). Holothrix pentadactyla (Summerh.) Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:129. Deroemera pentadactyla Summerh. Laeliopsis domingensis var. alba Ariza-Julia & Jimenez, Rhodora 62:236. Domini- can Republic. Luisia acutilabris Guillaumin, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris II 32:188. Laos (P?). Masdevallia horrida Teuscher & Garay, Amer. Orchid Soc. Bull. 29:23. Costa Rica (AMES) . MaxiUaria imbraicata var. carinata (Rodr.) Pabst, Orquidea (Brazil) 22: 134. Maxillaria carinata Rodr. MaxiUaria imbricata var. iguapensis (Hoehne & Schltr.) Pabst, Orquidea (Bra- zil) 22: 134. Maxillaria iguapensis Hoehne & Schltr. Oberonia attenuata Dockrill, No. Queensland Naturalist 29:4. Australia (BRI). Oberonia recurva var. Hngmalensis (Blatt. & McC.) Sant. & Kapadia, Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 57:259. Oberonia Hngmalensis Blatt. & McC. Oberonia santapaui Kapadia, Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 57:265. Oberonia lindleyana Wight, 1851, not O. lindleyana Duperr., 1834. Oberonia trullaelabris Guillaumin, Bull. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris TI 32:115. Annam (P>). Orchis rotnndifolia forma beckettii Boivin, Naturaliste Canadien 87:42. Canada (DAO). Peristylus densus (Lindley) Santapau & Kapadia, Jour. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 57: 128. Coeloglossum densum Lindley. Polys tachya bella Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:137. Kenya Colony (K) . Polystachya testuana Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:136. Gabon (Herb. Le Testu). Pteroceras alatum (Holttum) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:269. Sarcochilus alatum Holttum. Pteroceras appendiculatum (Bl.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:269. Dendrocolla appendiculata Bl. 136 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Pteroceras berkeleyi (Reichb. f.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:269. Thrixspermum berkleyi Reichb. f . Pteroceras biserratum (Ridley) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:269. Sarcochilus bi- serratus Ridley. Pteroceras caligare (Ridley) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:269. Sarcochilus caligaris Ridley. Pteroceras carrii (L. ¥ras.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:269. Sarcochilus carrii L. Vms. Pteroceras ciliatum (Ridley) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:269. Dendrocolla ciliata Ridley. Pteroceras compressum (Bl.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:270. Dendrocolla com- pressa Bl. Pteroceras ecalcaratum (Holttum) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:270. Sarcochilus ecalcaratus Holttum. Pteroceras emarginatum (Bl.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:270. Dendrocolla emar- ginata Bl. Pteroceras fasciculatum (Carr) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:270. Sarcochilus fas- ciculatus Carr. Pteroceras hirsutum (Hooker f.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:270. Sarcochilus hirsutus Hooker f. Pteroceras johorense (Holttum) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:270. Sarcochilus johorensis Holttum. Pteroceras minutiflorum (Ridley) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:270. Asochilus minutiflortis Ridley. Pteroceras pallidum (Bl.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14: 270. Dendrocolla pallida Bl. Pteroceras siamense (Ridley) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:271. Asochilus tkmentk Ridley. Pteroceras stenoglottis (Hooker f.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:271. Sarcochilus stenoglottis Hooker f . Pteroceras sauveolens (Roxb.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:271. Aerides suaveolens Roxb. Pteroceras tanyphyllum (Ridley) Holttum, Kew Bull 14:271 Sarcochilus tany- phyllus Ridley. Pteroceras teres (Bl.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:271. Dendrocolla teres Bl. Pteroceras teysmannii (Miq.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:271. Aerides teystnannii Miq. Pteroceras violaceum (Ridley) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:272. Sarcochilus viola- ceus Ridley. Pteroceras viridiflorum (Thw.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:272. Aerides viridiflora Thw. Pteroceras zollingeri (Reichb. f.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:272. Dendrocolla zollingeri Reichb. f . Schizochilus lepidus Summerh., Kew Bull. 14:130. Mozambique (Southern Rho- desia Gov. Herb.). Schomburgkia X parkinsonian H. G. Jones, Jour. Barbados Mus. Hist. Soc. 28: 4. Barbados (parent species introduced). Thrixspermum pygmaeum (King & Prantl.) Holttum, Kew Bull. 14:275. Sarcochilus pygmaeus King & Prantl. PRELIMINARY STUDIES IN THE GENUS STANHOPEA (ORCHIDACEAE) C. H. DODSON and G. P. FRYMIRE Phylogeny and Pol! The d tributi n .1 tlu -.r-ivie , J i . - l ' t ,;i„nship of the genus sidered and it is believed that Stanhopea is derived from plants similar to members of Skvekhtgh. The development of the advanced and complex species from the simpler To say that the genus Stanhopea is poorly understood is an unders Rather it is in a state of taxonomic chaos. Before we can say that a genus is under- stood it is expected that an individual plant, taken at random from a population of similar plants, can be fitted into a species concept. That is to say, it should be possible for a trained botanist to determine whether an individual belongs to a known species or is new and unknown. At the present time the only way to deal with most individual plants of this genus is to name them as new species, thus defeating the whole precept of taxonomy. Throughout its range of distribution Stanhopea is characterized by populations which are extremely variable. The van- in which are represented many kinds of Stanhopea hitherto considered as different Because of the plant to plant variability within a single population, a great number of species have been described from single specimens growing in European greenhouses. Often the origin of these plants was not even known. Only the fact that they were different from the other known specimens was taken into consider- ation and that difference was considered sufficient reason for a new species descrip- tion. It has been estimated that at least 500 names have been proposed in Stanhopea (Ames and Correll, 1953). This estimate is high, actually only slightly over 100 names have been published. Recent works have reduced that number to between 25 and 50 which are considered as even reasonably valid. One of the problems involved in the classification of this group is that the flowers are large and fleshy and of intricate structure. They do not preserve well as herbarium specimens and many of the structures of the lip in particular are destroyed or altered in drying. The flowers are not long lasting and seldom persist on the plant for more than three or four days. They are therefore difficult to study (137) 138 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN in the field since not many flowers can be seen at any one time within a population. Their period of flowering is often extended over a period of from five to seven months and a plant which is not large will generally flower only once in a given Since they are difficult to study in the he only way to straighten out the taxonomic persistent field work. Our work bears out this suggestion and we do not as yet feel qualified to publish a revision of the genus even though we have studied a considerable number of large populations. We have also studied most of the available herbarium material, but find it hopelessly unrewarding. Such large fleshy flowers as are found in this group do not, as a general rule, make good specimens when crushed and dried. Even after boiling, the critical characters are often lost and determination is difficult. Our experience indicates that dried specimens made from the same plants on different occasions are so altered in drying that they can easily be given separate species designations. This situation is particularly true in certain of the critical species groups which are separated on small differences in structure of the fleshy parts of the lip. Perhaps all is not as hopeless as it appears on the surface. A number of workers have made limited regional studies for orchid floras. A survey of their work reveals that though they do not all agree, they do not seriously disagree in respect to the majority of the species. In fact, some species appear to be remarkably distinct and do not demonstrate significant variation within their populations. Therefore they are given recognition by each of these workers when they occur in regions treated by them. When the species in which the problems occur are separated from the ones which are distinct we find that the latter group is not a difficult one. Each species has a distinct distribution and to a certain degree a distinct habitat. Within the problem group the species vary tremendously yet they are in many respects remark- ably alike, particularly in morphological characteristics. We feel that this is the key to the problem. They are not only remarkably alike, they are alike and only represent variations of a pattern If these complexes were treated as representing fewer species each of which may vary considerably within a particular population, then the genus probably could be treated taxonomically and could be understood. Morphology Let us consider just what combination of characteristics place a plant in the genus Stanhopea. The vegetative characters are surprisingly uniform, so much so that it is nearly impossible to distinguish species without flowers. All are epiphytic or lithophytic. The pseudobulbs are usually large, ovoid, ribbed and unifoliate. The leaves are broad, elliptic-lanceolate, contracted into a petiole at the base and are strongly veined and plicate. The inflorescence consists of a short pendulous raceme with several broad, papery bracts. The flowers are large, long pedicellate and shielded by a papery bract, this often brightly colored and generally similar in aspect to the sepals and petals. Nearly all species produce a strong fragrance, some being agreeable and others not. The sepals are membranaceous and concave, the dorsal sepal is free and erect and the lateral sepals broad, reflexed and connate at DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STAN HOPE A the base. The petals in most species are membranaceous, subequal to the dorsal sepal and recurved. The principal characters which separate the species are to be found in the labellum. In general, the lip consists of three parts: the hypochile or globular, concave part nearest the base of the flowers; the mesochile, which is short and often projected on each side to form horns; and the articulated epichile, which is variously shaped but usually ovate. Certain of the species, such as S. ecornuta Lehm. and S. pulla Rchb. f., simply have a saccate, entire lip which would corre- spond to the hypocile of the more complex forms. These should perhaps be con- sidered as the more primitive forms and later discussion will attempt to show why. The column is rather similar in most of the species and is elongate and rather slender with or without broad lateral wings. The anther is ventral, incumbent and two-celled. The pollen apparatus consists of a lanceolate viscidium which rests on an elongate spine-like rostellum, a stipe which is long and narrow, and the two pollinia which are elongate, quite thin, and recurved. The stigma forms a pocket under the rostellum. Distribution The genus is distributed from central Mexico through Central America and into southern Brazil The plants are generally ome shade is afforded and where they will rarely >rthern South ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN become dry. They can withstand prolonged periods of moderate drouth but need considerable water during their growing season. Figure 1 shows the distribution of the genus. Stanhopea lewhae Ames & Correll occurs in Guatemala and Costa Rica. Stanhopea ecornuta Lindl. occurs in Hon- duras, Guatemala, Nicaragua and Costa Rica and S. cirrhata Lindl. is found in Nicaragua and Costa Rica. Stanhopea pulla Rchb. f. is found in Costa Rica and Panama. Stanhopea grandi flora Lindl.* extends from Trinidad through Venezuela, northern Brazil and the Amazon drainage region of Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. Stanhopea rodigasiana Hort. and S. reichenbachiana Roezl. ex Rchb. f. are little known species which occur in Colombia. Stanhopea connata Kl. occurs in eastern Ecuador and Peru and S. tricornh Lindl. is restricted to coastal Ecuador and southern Colombia. The remaining species in the genus fall into two major com- plexes. The first of these groups include S. insignis Frost, S. tigrina Batem., S. martiana Batem. ex Lindl. and S. saccata Lindl. The second group is composed of S. oculata Lindl., S. bucephalus Lindl., S. wardii. Lodd. ex Lindl., and a considerable number of lesser known forms which are quite similar. These two groups occur throughout the range of the genus from Mexico to southern Brazil; however, certain forms are restricted to geographic regions. Phylogeny The genus Stanhopea was taken by Bentham (1881) as the type of the subtribe and thus the name Stanhopeinae should be used in place of Gongorinae Schltr. (See Dressier and Dodson, 1960). As close allies Stanhopea has the following genera: Sievekingta, Polycycnis, Paphinia, Cirrhea and Gongora and perhaps Peristeria and Houlletia. All of the species within these genera have a labellum which is more DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA ; divided into a hypochile and an epichile. Figure 2 illustrates a possible phylogenetic series demonstrating the relationships of the genera within the Stanhopeinae. We do not feel that a discussion of the phylogenetic relationships of the other members of the Stanhopeinae would fall within the purpose of this paper and therefore will only discuss those genera which seem to be directly involved with Stanhopea in a stepwise progression from the simple to the complex. The genera placed at the center of the diagram in Figure 2 have a rather simple labellum and as the list radiates outward toward the more advanced genera the lip becomes more complicated. Figure 3 demonstrates our concepts of the origin and development of the Stanhopeas from the poorly known genus Sievekingia, a genus of about seven species. In general the plants are very similar to small immature Stanhopeas and for this reason are often neglected by collectors. Very few specimens of these plants are in herbaria and in several instances the type is the only specimen in existence. Members of this genus were not discovered until late in the 19 th Century and thus did not receive so many generic names as some of the earlier discovered members of the subtribe. Without doubt certain of the species placed in Sievekingia show fewer morphological relationships to each other than do the genera to each other: Acineta, Lycomormium, Teristeria, Coeliopsis, 142 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN d d Neomoorea, Lacaena and Lueddemania. The flowers of the Sievekingias are for the most part less complex than the Stanhopeas. Stevekingia shepbeardii Rolfe has a semierect inflorescence with rather simple flowers which have only a slightly lobed, truncate lip with a simple fimbriate callus in the center. This is certainly the most primitive known species at least in respect to the labellum. Stevekingia suavis Rchb. f. and S. peruviana Rolfe have somewhat larger, erect side lobes which form a concave hypochile at the base of the lip. From this point the close relationships of the more primitive Stanhopeas are obvious. It is a simple step from Sievekingia to Stanhopea ecomuta and S. pulla in which the lip is saccate and without the complicated mesochile and epichile of the more advanced Stanhopeas. Stanhopea cirrhata (Fig. 8) is probably an advancement from a plant similar to S. ecomuta (Fig. 6) or S. pulla (Fig. 7) through the development of lobes along the upper edge of the hypochile. In other respects S. cirrhata is rather similar to the two primitive species except for the narrow, caudate wings formed along each Eulaema bomboidt side of the column. This may be the basic form from which the two major branches of Stanhopea have developed. On one side, S. reichenbachiana (Fig. 10) could have been derived from S. cirrhata and could well have been the form from which Stanhopea grandi flora (Fig. 11) developed. Stanhopea grandi flora has a fairly complex lip with short horns produced from the hypochile rather than from the mesochile as in many species. Stanhopea cirrhata could also be considered as similar to the ancestral form from which S. lewisae (Fig. 13) developed. Stanhopea lewisae has very small, slightly developed horns on the mesochile. Most of the advanced species with well developed horns on the mesochile may well have been derived from S. lewisae or a similar form. Stanhopea tricornis (Fig. 9) shows little relationship to the other species in the genus. The petals are thick and fleshy and are held parallel to the lip and column. The lip has a hypochile which is only slightly saccate, no true mesochile and a very thick and fleshy epichile. The horns are produced as an extension of the hypochile and a sharp spine-like callus forms a third horn between the two lateral horns in the place of a mesochile. Two possibilities can be postulated for the origin of this unique species. First, it could have developed through evolution from the other known species of primitive Stanhopea as an isolated form. No intermediates are known, however, between this species and the other known Stanhopeas. The second hypothesis may seem a bit far-fetched, but there is some morphological evidence for derivation of S. tricornis from a species of Sievekingia, S. trollii Mansf., recently encountered as sympatric with this Stanhopea. This Sievekingia has petals similar to S. tricornis. The plant is so similar that it doubtless has been passed over by previous collectors (including ourselves) as a young Stanhopea. A colored slide taken of this species, without a scale to indicate size, was at first 144 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN determined as a highly floriferous form of S. tricornis. The lip of this Sievekingia is saccate at the base, has two side lobes which flare outward and an epichile very similar to S. tricornis. The callus of the lip is in some respects similar to the center horn of S. tricornis. It seems feasible that S. tricornis may have been derived by way of this species of Sievekingia. Stanhopea tricornis may possibly have been derived as a result of hybridization between Sievekingia trollii or a similar form and some Stanhopea sympatric with it in distribution. Stanhopea bucephalus, S. tricornis and Sievekingia trollii are sympatric along the western slopes of the Andes in Ecuador. If chance pollination of Stanhopea bucephalus by the Sievekingia should occur the resulting intermediate hybrid might well be visited by a pollinator not utilized by either parental species and thereby be stabilized as a species. When an attempt is made to draw an intermediate between the morpho- logical characteristics of the Sievekingia and Stanhopea bucephalus the result is surprisingly similar to the labellum of S. tricornis. Stanhopea rodigasiana (Fig. 12) is unique in the genus. The strictly one- flowered inflorescence, ovoid, smooth pseudobulbs, bifid rostellum, round viscidium and unique horns on the lip are characters not found in any other Stanhopea. In some respects it suggests a possible relationship to Paphinia, but it is certainly close to Stanhopea. It is surprising to us that this species was never placed in a mono- typic genus. Although it is obviously closely related to Stanhopea it is sufficiently different from the other species in the genus to allow any taxonomist with a narrow generic concept to separate it without qualms of conscience. The reason for its not having been so separated is very likely that it was not discovered until after the been discovered 50 years earlier when Peristeria, Acineta, Lycomormium, and other closely allied genera, were being separated, it would surely have been considered as generically distinct. We do not believe that it warrants special distinction nor do we believe that so many genera should be recognized in the Peristeria complex. We hope that through more careful study of the entire subtribe Stanhopeinae we will be able to develop a useful revision of its members. The above mentioned species of Stanhopea are for the most part easily recog- nized, have distinct morphological characters and distributional patterns. They present no serious problems to the taxonomist. The remaining species within the genus form the difficult portion. All of them have a more complex labellum than the species previously discussed. The hypochile is saccate and of various sizes but it follows a similar pattern in all of the species. The mesochile is short and inserted on the apex of the hypochile with two lateral, elongate horns of various sizes. The epichile is articulated to the apex of the mesochile and while it may vary in size and proportions, they are all similar. Two major groups can be separated and while we are not yet prepared to present a formal revision of the genus we feel that some designation is necessary in order to be able to group the excessively large number of species names in such a way that they can be discussed with relative ease. We will use the terms "oculata complex" for those plants similar to S. oculata, and "insignis complex" for the plants allied to S. insignis. The "oculata complex" will therefore comprise those concepts which have a rather long narrow or rectangular FRYMIRE THE GENUS STAN HOPE A hypochile, large mesochile horns and always have an entire, acute or apiculate epichile. The "oculata complex" comprises such taxa as: S. xvardii Lodd. ex Lindl., (Fig. 21), S. oculata (Lodd.) Lindl. (Fig. 19), S. bucephalus Lindl, (Fig. 20), S. haseloviana Rchb. f., S. platyceras Rchb. f., etc. The "insignis complex" will consist of those forms which have a saccate or globular hypochile, large mesochile horns and either entire, acute or three-lobed epichiles. The "insignis complex" comprises such species as S. tigrina Batem. ex Lindl. (Fig. 16), S. martiana Batem. ex Lindl. (Fig. 17), S. insignis Frost (Fig. 15), S. saccata Batem. (Fig. 18) and S. devoniensis Lindl. Stanhopea quadricornis Lindl., if such a species exists, has a lip which is within the variation pattern of S. oculata with the exception that the base of the thicken- ings of the margin of the hypochile are projected into short horns. Apparently only one specimen was collected and was named by Lindley. It is quite possible that it was only an aberrant specimen or a hybrid and was not representative of any population. It seems apparent that Stanhopea is a rather terminal group in evolution, with Coryanthes, a genus often said to be closely allied to Stanhopea, having a derivation 146 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN from some similar ancestor, but one probably more closely allied to Peristeria than to Stanhopea. Cirrhea and Gongora appear to be the termination of a separate line. In general, the Orchidaceae appears to be a rather recent but rapidly evolving family in which less extinction is evident than in older families. Such a situation often makes classification difficult due to the intergrading forms, but on the other hand, it makes the tracing of phylogeny easier since closely related groups are still present. We do feel that the Stanhopeas were derived from ancestors very much like some of the species of Sievekingia which are known today. The species of Sievekingia are not particularly successful, as is evident from their extreme rarity, but may be considered as relict forms locally preserved in relatively hospitable habitats. Such forms would very likely become extinct and be removed from the record if they were members of plant families subjected to more stringent environ- POLLINATION This paper is perhaps somewhat premature in one respect, that is, the pollinators and pollination mechanisms are not as yet known for all the species. However it may be many years before all the information can be gathered. We feel that the major worth of the paper lies in its discussion of the problems within the genus. The pollination mechanisms and pollinators of two species have been well worked out and photographed. Pollination studies of the other species will be described when they are known. We have witnessed the pollination of both Stanhopea tricornis and S. bucephalm in Ecuador. A future revision of this genus may well be based in large part upon the ideas gained from observations of pollination. Polymorphic genera are often difficult to understand and when confusion is compounded by having highly variable popula- tions, the naming of which has been multiplied on an unrealistic basis, such a genus FRYMIRE THE beco nes chaotic. Occas standpoint, can provide f polli nation mechanisms o and learly made obviou gem . The first system s the flower after lar sionally new techniques or observations from a different lashes of insight for the investigator. The totally different oi these kinds of Stanhopeas, when observed, immediately is certain of the reasons for the polymorphism within the is typical of most orchids in which the pollinator simply nding on the expanded labellum. The transfer of pollinia occurs as a result of proper positioning of the column and its sexual apparatus in relation to the size and conformity of the particular pollinator. The majority of the species of Stanhopea are of this type. These species are not extremely variable and are easily recognized. The second is a highly complex system in which the flight characteristics of the bee are used in the pollination of the flower. After landing, the bee is clumsy and has difficulty in regaining balance in flight. The bee, unable to grasp the slick surfaces of the pendant labellum, falls through the flower. This characteristic flight habit of the bee probably has contributed to the evolution of an entirely different system of pollination. Though this kind of flower is distinct, it apparently has been unable to preclude occasional hybrids within the related forms but has simply led to more variation. Color and morphology of the unessential flower parts appear to have been subject to little selection pressure for uniformity, and may vary considerably from plant to plant within a given population. The resulting confusion, caused by attempts to name every variant in cultivation, has not only increased out of all proportion but has tended to make the genus nearly impossible taxonomically. Stanhopea tricornis occurs frequently in old epiphyte covered cacao trees in the region of Quevedo in central, coastal Ecuador. The species generally succeeds best in fairly dense shade and on a large plant the pendant two-flowered racemes are pro- duced throughout the year. Several racemes may be produced by one pseudobulb. 148 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL In late January of 1960 we succeeded in finding a plant which had two open flowers (both had been pollinated) and two mature buds which would open the following day. We removed the plant and carefully carried it to our hotel room. Before dawn of the next morning we found the flowers to be open and emitting a heavy perfume very similar to "Diorissimo" manufactured by the Christian Dior Company of position where it could be easily photographed. At about 9 a.m. a large male bee, Eulaema meriana (Oliv.) (tribe Euglossini, family Apidae, E. dimidiata is a syno- nym) came to the flowers, which he proceeded to investigate, apparently searching for the source of the strong fragrance. Meanwhile a second bee of the same species arrived; neither bee seemed familiar with the flower and each searched for some time before discovering the tunnel-like opening, formed by the petals, column and lip, and entering the flower. It might be noted that this is the only species of Stan- hopea in which the petals are fleshy and held closely appressed to the column. The bee forced upward past the rostellar spine and entered the inner portion of the flower to the hypochile (see Fig. 4). The bee did not attempt to extract food. In backing out the bee encountered the rostellar spine once again. This time the rostellar spine slid under the posterior projection of the metathorax of the bee, and his struggles dislodged the lance-shaped viscidium of the pollinia, which immedi- ately became cemented to the underside of the metathorax. In further backing out he pulled the pollinia from the anther cap. The bee then flew away. Even if the bee had entered the other flower, pollination could not have been accomplished immediately for the stigmatic pocket of Stanhopea does not open sufficiently for insertion of pollinia until several hours after the pollinia have been removed. The following morning what appeared to be a different bee but one with pollinia attached to his metathorax visited the flowers. The pollinia became lodged in the stigma and were removed from the back of the bee, thus effecting pollination. In total, five instances of pollination of Stanhopea tricornis were observed with six bees, all E. meriana, involved. Other species of Eulaema were noted in the immediate vicinity and were quite curious about the camera, approaching to examine it, but showed no interest in the Stanhopea tricornis flowers only a foot or so away. These species were E. tropica (Linne) and E. cingulata (Fab.)* both of which are responsible for pollinating numerous other orchids including several species of Catasetum, Cycnoches, Sobralia violacea Lindl., Maxillaria grandiflora Lindl, Aspasia epidendroides Lindl. and Pescatoria wallisii Linden & Rchb. f. From these observations we can glean the following important points: 1. Eulaema meriana appears to be the specific pollinator of S. tricornis. 2. Eulaema tropica and E. cingulata are sympatric but showed no interest in S. tricornis. 3. Eulaema meriana is attracted to the fragrance emitted by S. tricornis and without prior experience with the flower must search to find the entrance. FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA 149 Flower color and structure are certainly secondary if evei the actual attraction of the bee. Flowers of S. tricornis were carefully examined for nectaries structures which would offer food for the bee. None was found. The fragrance is produced in the hypochile; the other parts, when removed from the flower, have little or no fragrance. The inside of the hypochile is covered with long fleshy hairs which the bee might eat but in the flowers entered by E. meriana these hairs did not appear to have been disturbed. It appears then, that the bee is attracted strictly on the basis of fragrance and does not receive food. He apparently does not expect to receive food for he does not lower his tongue, which is so long that it must be lowered and swung forward before a narrow flower is entered. This pattern has been observed in other members of the Catasetinae and Stanhopeinae in which male Eulaemas are attracted by the fragrance and the bees do not appear to receive food of any kind. In all of these orchids the flowers are generally not long lasting but produce their strong, heady, spicy fragrance in such quantity that they can be detected by 150 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI the human nose, a notably weak olfactory organ, at distances of more than thirty feet. The bees are usually quite wary when they first come to the flowers but after being around them for some time seem to become drugged for they fly erratically and can be approached easily. Only the male bees of Eulaema appear to be attracted to this type of flower; the females, which are busy with nest building and food gathering to provision the nests, do not approach these flowers. The male bees have never been observed taking part in nest building or care of the nest and seem to leave the nest as soon as possible and live a vagabond life. They secure food from many of the same flowers as the female bees but also visit Stanhopeas, Cata- setums, Cycnoches and other flowers which offer only the heady and seemingly intoxicating fragrances. It is possible that the female bees are not attracted to these flowers because they cannot sense them. It is known that female bees of Apis mellifera, the domestic bee, have fewer olfactory pits in their antennae than do the males. The only orchids in which both male and female bees were noted were Sobralia violacea and Maxillaria grandiflora. Sobralia is a rather primitive orchid which does provide nectar for the bee and which is visited by several bees of different families. Maxillaria grandiflora provides starchy hairs at the base of the lip. One morphological feature found in the male bees of the Euglossini which is not present in the females is the presence of chemoreceptive hairs on the tarsi of the front legs. The male bees brush these pads through the scratched surface of the labellum of the orchids which they visit. Stanhopea bucephalus is pollinated in a somewhat different manner. This vari- able species is distributed along the western slopes of the Andes from elevations of about 400 meters up to 1200 meters and is to be found on the summits of the coastal mountains where they rise to these elevations. It is sympatric with S. tri- cornis in the region of Quevedo and the two species appear to be sympatric for at least 60 kilometers to the south. Pollination of this species was observed during the month of March at Olimpo on the railroad from Guayaquil to Quito. Unlike S. tricornis this species has thin, narrow petals which became retracted and curl up around the dorsal sepal shortly after the flower opens. The horns are not produced as an extension of the hypochile as in S. tricornis but are larger and developed from a definite mesochile. Thus there is left a large open space between the lip and the column at the level of the hypo- chile. The lower part of the column is effectively surrounded, to form a tunnel, by the horns of the mesochile, the epichile and the wings of the column. The pollinator of this species is also a male Eulaema, E. bomboides Friese, but this one is only about two thirds as large as E. meriana. Eulaema bomboides is a little larger than either E. cingulata or E. tropica. Eulaema bomboides is attracted by the fragrance of this Stanhopea which is honey-sweet, quite unlike S. tricornis. The bees come to the flower of S. bucephalus but immediately fly into the space between the column and the hypochile and attempt to land on the hypochile, or they land on the side of the hypochile and attempt to crawl around and enter the hypochile to reach the source of the fra- grance. The surfaces of all parts of the Up are waxy and extremely slick, so that the bee can not successfully land and hold fast. He falls down and is guided FRYMIRE T GENUS STANHOPEA by the column and its wings at his back, the horns of the mesochile at his sides and the slick epichile beneath him so that he falls directly through the tunnel. At the lower end of the tunnel, almost at its exit, the rostellar spine with the viscidum of the pollinia on its outer surface projects into the path of the falling bee and is caught under the posterior projection of his thorax as in S. tricornis. The bee hits the rostellar spine with such force that it gives way and allows the bee to fall through. In doing so the viscidium of the pollinia is cemented firmly into place under the thorax (see Fig. 6). The bee is apparently disturbed and tends to fly away but he repeats the process when he encounters another flower. If the flower is older with an open stigma the pollinia are this time placed in the stigmatic pocket during his fall and pollination is effected. The pollination of S. bucephalus is in many respects quite similar to the pollina- tion of Gongora maculata Lindl. as reported by Allen (1956), with the exception that the Gongora is pollinated by species of Euglossa. Euglossa is a genus of bees which is very closely related to Eulaema and is also responsible for the pollination of Coryanthes (Allen 1950). In Gongora the bee, hanging upside down loses its hold on the slick surfaces of the lip, falls and is guided down the pendant column during his fall with the result that he also makes contact with the viscidium of the pollinia much in the same manner as Eulaema in S. bucephalus. Several plants of this Stanhopea were brought back to the garden of the Insti- tuto Botanico where quantities of Eulaema tropica and E. cingulata are common and at no time did any of these bees show interest in the flowers. Even when flowering plants of Catasetum were placed in the immediate proximity the Eulaemas ignored the Stanhopea flowers completely. 152 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN From these observations we can add the following facts: 1. Eulaema botnboides appears to be the specific pollinator of S. bucepbalus in the region studied. 2. Stanbopea bucepbalus is pollinated on an entirely different principle from S. tricornh. 3. Eulaema bomboides is attracted by the fragrance of S. bucepbalus which is different from the fragrance of S. tricornis. 4. If E. bomboides does not visit S. tricornis then S. tricornis and S. bucepbalus are effectively isolated genetically. The last point is by far the most important. Eulaema meriana is too large to fall through S. bucepbalus. If E. bomboides is not attracted by the fragrance of 5. tricornis then the possibilities of the two species of Stanbopea forming hybrids are effectively nil. This appeared to be the case. Stanbopea tricornis shows very little variability throughout its populations. The sympatric species S. bucepbalus is quite variable but shows no characters indicating introgression from S. tricornis. If S. tricornis evolved in this region with E. meriana as its pollinator and S. bucepbalus was dependent upon a different insect pollinator and a different pollina- tion procedure the two would not hybridize. If by accident a bee of E. bomboides did enter S. tricornis and effect a hybridization between the two species of Stan- bopea, and it is feasible that this might occur, then the resulting hybrids would probably find no effective pollinator. If such a pollinator did exist then the chances might be better for development of a completely different, stable species with its own characteristics and its own structurally isolated population. Interestingly enough, perhaps not all Stanhopeas are pollinated by members of the genus Eulaema. The type locality of Euglossa viridissima Friese is given as "at Stanbopea tigrina at Cordoba and Orizaba in Mexico". If this report is correct, and there is no reason to doubt its validity, it indicates that perhaps some of the species are even more widely separated ecologically than are S. tricornis and S. bucepbalus. Our observations indicate, at least in Ecuador, that Euglossas and Eulaemas are not mutually attracted to the same orchid flowers. Where they are attracted to orchid species of the same genus (i.e., Eulaema cingulata is attracted to Cycnocbes lebmanii and C. ventricosum while Euglossa viridissima is attracted to C. egertonianum) the flowers are extremely distinct morphologically. The prin- cipal morphological difference between S. tigrina and S. bucepbalus which would be of importance in pollination procedure lies in the extreme closeness of the column and terminal portions of the lip in the former species whereas in the latter these structures are rather open. A large bee like a Eulaema would not be able to fall through S. tigrina due to this constriction of parts. On the other hand a Euglossa would fall through S. bucepbalus without touching any of the parts and would be ineffectual in pollination. We feel that the significant factor in this situation does not lie in the morphological form being a deterrent to effective pollination, but rather that the fragrance of the flower does not attract a pollinator which would be ineffective. More likely the morphological structures of the flower have been modified to accommodate the type of pollinator which was attracted to the flower. DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA 153 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN ~Z& . Side view of the lip ( in (X Vi). i. Pollinar Variation We have pointed out that populations of species in Stanhopea are often ex- tremely variable. Unfortunately no extensive analysis of specific populations are yet available; however, we did superficially study two large populations in Ecuador. The first occurs along the western slopes of the Andes from Macuchi in north- western Ecuador to Paccha in the south near the Peruvian border. This population is approximately 400 miles long and ranges from 400 to 1,200 meters in elevation. Near Macuchi some of the plants correspond to a species named by Rolfe as S. anfracta. This species is very close to S. wardii and had been considered by Lindley as S. wardii var. venusta. Schweinfurth (1958) has placed it in synonymy with S. wardii. Other plants are similar to what has been known as S. bucephalus. The population was sampled at four locations through its central portion and was rather uniformly S. bucephalus with only occasional plants occurring which could be considered as referable to S. wardii. However, at Santa Isabela near the southern extension of the population the situation changed considerably. Plants were so DODSON & FRYMIRE— THE GENUS STANHOPEA 155 specimens were found which corresponded precisely to S. anfracta, S. bucepbalus, S. graveolens, S. oculata, S. ivardii, S. haseloviana, S. guttulata, S. ,'. S. platyceras, and S. peruviana. Many plants also occurred in the population which were intermediate between these concepts. Most of these species are actually color forms and many have been relegated to synonymy by other authors. Some of them have been maintained, largely because no botanist knew much about them, for they were described from individual specimens cultivated in Europe and their origins were unknown. Plants from the population at Paccha, about 20 miles south of Santa Isabela were sent to Europe by a number of early collectors. Kruth named a plant which Humboldt and Bonpland had collected here as Epidcndrum grandiflorum. Lindley later named another plant from the same locality as S. buccphalus and it was illustrated in the Botanical Register, plate 24, in 1845. Reichenbach changed the name to S. grandiflora, based on Kunth's name. Another illustration of a plant in the Botanical Magazine, Plate 5278 given as S. bucephalus is so inaccurate that four 156 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN "species" can be identified from the same plate. Plate 8 5 1 7 in the Botanical Maga- zine is actually a plant much nearer S. wardii. More recently S. bucephalus has been reduced to synonymy under S. oculata. This confusion has pointed up the results of describing species from individual specimens without knowledge of the variation within populations. We feel that this situation is not uncommon and clearly demonstrates the need for careful and extensive population studies of the genus. A second variable population of Stanbopea occurs in the valley formed by the headwaters of the Zamora river on the eastern slopes of the Andes in southern Ecuador. The population is extensive and we feel that it demonstrates another of the kinds of phenomena involved in variation of the genus. The upper end of the population reaches a point near Km. 45 on the road from Zamora to Loja, at rains are the rule and temperatures are usually low, around 60° F. Normally the sun breaks through only for an hour or two each day but occa- sional days are sunny. When the sun is out for several hours the temperature rises to as high as 75 ° F. The elevation decreases rapidly to the east and at Zamora, 62 km. from Loja, is about 1000 meters. At Zamora the valley levels out and becomes broader, the normal daily temperature is around 75° F. and occasionally reaches 85° F. The weather conditions change little during the year but less rainfall occurs in November and December. The population was studied as far as Yansasa, about 60 km. northeast of Zamora. Here the elevation is near 800 meters and weather conditions are similar to Zamora. In all, the portion of the population studied extended 85 km. and varied from 1 km. in width at the upper end to 3 km. wide at the lower end. Elevations run from 1800 meters at the upper end to 800 meters at the lower end. Though they are variable in color at the lower end of the population the flowers correspond to Stanbopea anfracta Rolfe. The flowers of plants at the upper end are similar to the species described by Schlechter as S. peruviana and demonstrate little variation. Both of these species have been reduced to synonymy under S. wardii. A cline occurs from the upper end of the population to the lower, the plants in the center having flowers essentially intermediate between the extremes. Variation increases considerably toward the lower end of the population. Vege- tatively the plants are indistinguishable throughout the population. The flowers of the plants at the upper end of the population are morphologically nearly identical to the flowers at the opposite extremes but are colored quite differ- ently and are much thicker in substance. The flowers are completely tangerine- yellow with no other color involved. The sepals and petals have heavy texture and are not reflexed. The flowers usually last for eight days. At the lower end of the population the flowers are thin in substance and have their sepals and petals strongly reflexed. The basal part of the lip, sepals and petals are yellow -orange flecked and spotted with maroon-red, and the extremities of the sepals, petals and lip are white flecked with red. The flowers last only one or two days. Plants from around Zamora had flowers more or less intermediate between the two extremes in all characters. From Zamora to Yansasa bees of the genus Eulaema were very com species in particular was quite common and appeared much like E. They were of the same size but slightly different in color pattern and probably represent E. nivofasciata Friese. Though none was actually observed pollinating Stanhopeas it is probable that they are the pollinators. Eulaema cingulata was also common and while they visited other flowers placed in proximity they showed no interest in Stanhopeas and would not enter them. The bees of this genus are partial to the warmer tropical climates. They nest in hollow limbs or in holes in embankments and their nests have not been encoun- tered at elevations above 1,000 meters in Ecuador. From Zamora to Yansasa they are commonly observed visiting Costus, Inga and Bixa. They are fast flying bees and are capable of long flights. They are seldom seen in the upper end of the valley and then only on the rare, sunny, warm days. It would appear that they do not nest in the upper extensions of the valley. Plants in the lower regions com- monly produce one or two seed capsules indicating considerable visitation by the in- sects. In the upper regions, on the other hand, seed capsules are rarely encountered. 158 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN This population in some respects appears rather typical of the populations of Stanhopea in Ecuador. It is not as complex as the population of Stanhopea on the western slope of the Andes which is extremely variable in the direction of S. wardii in its northern portion, rather stable in its central portion corresponding to S. bucephalus and mixed with typical S. oculata in its southern extension. It is our opinion that this type of variation is typical of S. oculata and allied species through- out their range. It would appear that the relatively stable, heavy substanced, long lasting type of flower at the upper extension of the Zamora population may be due to strong natural selection for that type of flower. In the upper elevations where pollinators are not abundant it would be of more value to the population to have long lived flowers which would have a greater possibility of visitation and pollina- tion. Such flowers may have to wait several days for weather conditions to be satisfactory for bees to reach them. Short lived flowers would stand little chance of being visited and therefore would rarely reproduce. Long life in these flowers depends on thickness of their parts. A selection pressure is therefore exerted for DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA 159 flowers with heavy substance. In the lower regions flowers are normally visited shortly after opening and long lived flowers would offer no selective advantage. Some botanists would attempt to attribute such extreme population variability as is found in Stanhopea to hybridization and introgression. Perhaps this is a partial answer but in many cases the variable populations are so widespread as to preclude hybridization. One might also suggest that the variation is due to high mutation rate. Perhaps this is also a partial answer. It is apparent from what has been pointed out above in the pollination section of this paper that the bees which accomplish the pollination are attracted by the strong fragrance of the flowers. The color, and to a degree, the form of the flower appears to be of minor impor- tance in its pollination. This is also true in the genera related to Stanhopea, such as Gongora and Coryanthes. 160 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN (x :x If the attraction of the fragrance is so strong, color may be a minor factor in selection and the bees will still visit the flowers even if color varies widely. Also form could vary widely in parts which are not essential to the actual mechanisms of pollination, allowing variants due to mutation to remain within the population as fully effective breeding members contributing to the gene pool as a whole. In S. oculata and its allied species the characters which vary the most are the form of the hypochile of the lip and the color of the lip, sepals and petals. These are char- acters which are not actually involved in the mechanisms of pollination, and may not be important in the actual attraction of the pollinator. Selection would not be strong for these characters and a plant which deviated from the norm to a consid- erable extent could still remain a breeding member of the population as long as it retained the character of fragrance to attract the pollinator and the correct propor- DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA 161 tions of the tunnel of the lip, formed by the mesochile and column, to properly place the pollinia for transport by the bee to another flower. The fact that cross-pollination is nearly obligate in these genera may be of importance also. Certainly more variation would be produced, maintained and dispersed in a population of obligate cross-pollinating plants than in a population where self-pollination is possible and often of regular occurrence. Certain of the genera in the Catasetinae, i.e., Catasetum and Cycnoches, are characterized by unisexual flowers which make cross-pollination obligate. These are genera in which the species are notoriously variable. In many of the other genera self- 162 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN incompatibility is the rule. Not a great deal of information is available on this phenomenon but the authors have made numerous attempts to self-pollinate Stanhopea bucephalus and Gongora maculata with no success. The resulting seed pods dropped after a few weeks. In most of these variable genera the flowers are highly fragrant but extremely short lived, seldom lasting more than two or three days. The fragrance ceases very soon after the flower has been pollinated. It would appear that there is a correla- tion involved between the characteristics of powerful fragrance and short lived flowers. These species seem to depend on their fragrance to attract pollinators and are usually very successful, for a considerable portion of the flowers are pollinated. They have developed in the direction of stronger and more attractive fragrances but offer no food or nectar to the pollinator. Selection may even favor short-lived flowers which do not attract bees long after their pollination (i.e., do not compete with the younger flowers). Here there seems to be a strong selection pressure for fragrance for pollinator attraction with lower selection pressure for constancy of morphological characters. Many of the orchids which have long lasting flowers are either not fragrant or are weakly fragrant. These orchids seem to depend on numbers of flowers few of which are ever pollinated. These species for the most part are not as variable as the fragrant types and have developed other mechanisms for attraction of the pol- linator. Where populations of these species are extremely variable, it is usually in a relatively limited geographical area and their variability can often be attributed to introgressive hybridization. SUCCESSFULNESS OF THE GENUS The objective measurement of success in a group of plants is difficult, as too many factors are involved. Obviously, so called weedy species would rate high on the scale. However, to attempt to rate other plants as being highly successful or only fairly successful is scarcely possible. We do feel, however, that we can sub- jectively rate the success of a group of orchids in relation to other orchids. In such a subjective sense we can use extent of distribution and density of populations as measuring tools. Many orchids are highly successful in respect to density of population but are limited in distribution. Others have wide distributions but are seldom encountered in quantity in a given area. The majority of the species of Stanhopea are in one or the other of these categories. The "insignis and oculata complexes" on this basis are highly successful in that they are commonly found in quantity (in undisturbed habitats) and have broad ranges. They are to be encountered in any region of the American tropics which provides the basic needs of the plants. They are found from sea level to 7000 feet and grow as well in either location provided there exists sufficient humidity and shade and the temper- This very success, we feel, contributes to their variability, but on the other hand, may have suppressed speciation. The extremes of the range may be expected to produce forms which are unlike due simply to spatial relations. However isolation is difficult to achieve in a dense and essentially continuous population. In DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA this respect "success" and taxonomic diversity may be mutually incompatible. This situation is by no means limited to Stanhopea. The hooded types of Cata- setum reflect the same phenomena, though not quite to the same degree. In Mexico and middle Central America a form known as C. integerrimum Hook, is common and variable. Further south in Costa Rica and Panama intergrading populations known as C. viridiflavum Hook., C. oerstedii Rchb. f. and C maculatum Kunth occur. From Panama extending through Venezuela, the Guianas and northern Brazil the form known as C. macrocarpum L. C. Rich, is found. In Ecuador C. macroglossum Rchb. f. is common. All of these populations are highly variable and in Ecuador alone, specimens corresponding to all of these "species" may be found. There is little reason to recognize these species when they are now known 5 of one widely distributed and highly successful popula- 164 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN tion. Here, as in Stanbopea, speciation seems to be inhibited by the otherwise highly successful population structure. Gongora maculata Lindl. demonstrates a close parallel. Several species of Cycnoches, Mormodes, Coryanthes, Epidendrum and Oncidium have similar pat- terns. Many other instances of highly successful, widely distributed orchids can be given in which the most striking chracteristic is their extreme variability. We feel that speciation has taken a back seat to success in the sense that development of distinct taxa is inhibited where gene flow is unrestricted and selection is weak. Perhaps the most successful method of handling the great variability in Stan- bopea will be to follow that used by Allen (1952) in his particularly workable and useful revision of Cycnoches. Cycnoches reflects the same kinds of problems encountered in Stanbopea and by placing several closely related, intergrading populations, which had been previously known as species, as subspecies under one inclusive species, Allen was able to indicate the close relationships of these popula- tions. In our opinion this is the most practicable manner to handle the problems of such extreme variability in obviously closely related populations. Certainly, it is folly to attempt to apply species or even subspecies names to all of the variants found; the number would be endless. There may be some difference of opinion as to how many subspecies should be recognized, some authors suggesting more and others less. When numerous well authenticated population studies are accomplished in Stanbopea it is quite possible that certain of the dubious species within the "insignis and oculata complexes" will be found to exist as discrete populations and will be sufficiently distinct to be recognized, others will probably be reduced. Recent correspondence with a rather well informed amateur orchid enthusiast indicates that he has encountered a stable population of a Stanbopea. Specimens which he has kindly forwarded appear near the type form of S. oculata. He main- tains that these are different from typical S. oculata, are stable within what he knows of the population and should therefore be recognized as a new species. Perhaps with exhaustive study this population might be found to be distinct throughout its extent and should therefore be considered as a valid species. Our experience with populations of Stanbopea in Mexico, Guatemala, Costa Rica, Panama, Ecuador and Peru would indicate that this population, throughout its entire range, would very doubtfully represent even a valid subspecies of S. oculata. This case, however, is quite representative of the problems which Stanbopea offers and indicates the necessity of thorough knowledge of large percentages of over-all populations before rash action is taken in applying more epithets in the group. The nomenclature of Stanbopea is badly confused and the efforts made by modern workers to clarify the situation have not always been particularly successful. Many of the early descriptions of the species were not accompanied by illustrations and were at best brief. Several of them are nearly impossible to identify with any particular population. One of the unfortunate pitfalls the modern taxonomist encounters is the tendency to make one of these early descriptions fit his concept of a given species or vice versa. Normally the taxonomist has the type specimen FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA 165 to fall back on and this specimen, when carefully examined, supplies the necessar information to avoid error. Unfortunately, herbarium specimens of Stanhopeas d« not always fulfill this function even when they exist. The critical characters whicl separate species in this genus are for the most part destroyed in the preparatioi of specimens. Many times the type specimen does not reflect the actual structure of the popu lation. An example is to be found in S. wardii in which the type descriptior mentions two teeth produced at the base of the hypochile by the extension of th< falcate lateral margins. This character is common in the specimens from southerr Central America and perhaps to a lesser extent in Guatemala, but actually does no occur in many of the specimens from Mexico, Nicaragua and northern Soutl America, which are certainly referable to this species on every other criterion. T< further complicate the situation, this character does occur occasionally in othei species such as S. oculata and S. bucephalus. Doubtless, the type specimen oi S. wardii did have this character, but the presence or absence of this one character 166 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN since it is not diagnostic of the total population and is found in other species, should not be considered as a criterion for determination. Several other characters help to make this species distinct from S. oculata and S. bucephalus. Allen (1949) has suggested that Lindley was in error in his description of S. oculata and S. bucephalus. Allen placed S. bucephalus in synonymy under S. oculata and re-erected S. grave- olens which had been considered as synonymous with S. bucephalus. We cannot, however, agree with Allen and feel that the epithet, S. bucephalus, should be used in place of S. graveolens. Since Lindley's descriptions are extremely brief and the later illustrations which he used of his species correspond rather well with his descriptions and with actual populations, we feel that Allen has allowed his splendid knowledge of the Central American species to overshadow the variation of these species in other areas. Since the type specimens yield little information it will always be difficult to resolve this situation. Another of the confusing situations involved in the taxonomy of Stanhopea is the use of the name "grandiflora". This name was first used by Kunth when he described and illustrated Epidendrum grandiflorum in 1808. In 1828 Loddiges described another plant and named it Ceratochilus grandiflorus but the name Cera- tochilus had previously been used by Blume for an East Indian orchid. In 1832 Lindley transferred the Loddiges plant to the genus Stanhopea of Frost and described a similar species as Stanhopea eburnea. Later these two plants were found to be conspecific but have been known as S. eburnea to the present time. Lindley's name, S. grandiflora, is valid and must be used in place of S. eburnea. In 1832 Lindley also named a plant which was essentially identical to Kunth's plant as Stanhopea bucephalus. The type specimen was a Ruiz and Pavon collection which, as Rolfe (1912) has pointed out, is marked as being from Mexico. It appears that many of Ruiz and Pavon's specimens were mixed with the Sesse and Mocifio Mexican collections and a great deal of confusion has been caused by this situation. The probable origin of the Ruiz and Pavon specimen was Peru, as it was then called, or what is now Ecuador. It must have come from very near the same locality as Kunth's specimen since the trails of access to the Andes were very few during this period. Reichenbach apparently attempted to clear up the situation by transferring Kunth's plant to Stanhopea and reducing Lindley's S. bucephalus to synonymy under S. grandiflora Rchb. f. Unfortunately, Reichenbach's S. grandiflora is invalid because Lindley's combination precedes it. Another attempt to clarify the situation in the "insignis complex" has been the reduction of the name S. tigrina Batem. to synonymy under S. devoniensis Lindl. by Williams (1951). However, the concept, early descriptions, and illustrations of S. devoniensis and S. tigrina appear to us to be clearly distinct. The plate of S. devoniensis in Lindley's Sertunt Orchidacearum has little resemblance to Bateman's plate of S. tigrina in his Orchids of Mexico and Guatemala and very likely repre- sents either a rarely encountered species or a hybrid form between S. saccata and S. tigrina. The figure very definitely resembles S. saccata in the features of the lip more closely than it does S. tigrina. Williams may have been misled by the color, and was certainly handicapped by the lack of good type material. Occasionally DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA 167 168 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN plants with flowers somewhat like the description and plate (discounting the three- lobed epichile which is lacking in the plate but mentioned in the description) turn up, but are quite rare in comparison to the number of typical S. tigrina found in the Mexican populations. Conclusions This paper has been written as a discussion of Stanhopea preliminary to a formal revision of the genus. Our original intention was to include the revision of Stanhopea with this paper but after examination of herbarium material proved to be disappointing we have concluded that only with further field study of living populations can we accomplish a truly meaningful treatment of the genus. We have also found that to merely revise Stanhopea and leave the other members of the subtribe Stanhopeinae in the condition which they are at the present time would be to do a less than meaningful work. The members of the Stanhopeinae are so closely intermeshed with Stanhopea that revision of the whole group is mandatory. We hope that in the not too distant future such a revision can be accomplished using classical methods of taxonomy combined with modern biosystematic In reality then, this paper can only point up the problems involved in the group; it brings up to date the information that is available from the literature and adds our own limited observations of the natural phenomena occurring in the group. These field observations have pointed out the path, so to speak, that should be followed in the study of such a complex and difficult genus as Stanhopea. It may well be true that similar procedures will need to be used in treating other problem groups in the Orchidaceae. Our experience indicates that future studies of the difficult subtribe Catasetinae can only be approached through field study. Probably parts of the Sobraliinae, Epidendrinae and Pleurothallidinae will prove to Hypochile projected into fleshy lobes on its upper edges; column narrowly winged with the apex of the wings caudate and extended beyond the anther 3. S. CIRR DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA d. Hypochile subsaccate provided with fleshy lobes on each side of the apex; c short, hypochile conspicuously s rell developed, hypochile not a .ist of Species* Stanhopea ecornuta Lem. in Fl. des Serres 2: t. 181. 1846. (Fig. 6). Stanhopea calceolus Hort. ex Rchb. f. Xen. Orch. 1:117. 18 58. Stanhope astrum ecornutum Rchb. f. Xen. Orch. 1:124. 1858. Stanhopea pulla Rchb. f. in Gard. Chron. 7:810. 1877. (Fig. 7). Stanhopea cirrhata Lindl. in Journ. Hort. Soc. 5:37. 1850. (Fig. 8). Stanhopea tricornis Lindl. in Journ. Hort. Soc. 4:236. 1849. (Fig. 9). ^Stanhopea stenochila Lehm. & Kranzl. in Gard. Chron. 369. 1900. t Stanhopea langlasseana Cogn. in Gard. Chron. 426. 1901. Stanhopea convulata Rolfe, in Kew Bull. 366. 1909. Stanhopea reichenbachiana Roezl. ex Rchb. f. in Gard. Chron. 2:40. 18 (Fig. 10). Stanhopea amesiana Hort. ex Gard. Chron. 3 52. 1893. ^Stanhopea lowii Rolfe, in Kew Bull. 63. 1893. Stanhopea suavis Hort. in Ospina, Orquidas Colomb. Stanhopea grandiflora (Lodd.) Lindl. Gen. & Sp. Orch. 158. 1832. (I 11). Ceratochilus grandiflorvs Lodd. in Bot. Cab. t. 1 41 4. 1828. Stanhopea eburnea Lindl. in Bot. Reg. 18: t. 152Q. 1832. Stanhopea calceolata Hort. ex Rchb. f . 1 : 1 1 7. 1858. Stanhopea calceolata Drap. Lenq. Hort. Univ. 2:127 & 264. ^Stanhopea Candida Barb. Rodr. Gen. Spec. Orch. Nov. 1:101. 1877. Stanhopea randii Rolfe, in Kew Bull. 363. 1894. Stanhopea rodigasiana Claes. ex Cogn. in Gard. Chron. 14. Fig. Q. 1 8! (Fig. 12). Stanhopea lewisae Ames & Correll, in Bot. Mus. Leafl. Harv. Univ. 10*:i PI. 10. 1942. (Fig. 13). Stanhopea connata Kl. in Otto & Deitz. Alleg. Gartenz. 22:226. 18; (Fig. 14). Stanhopea graveolens Kl. ex Rchb. f. Xen. Orch. 1:118. 1 879 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN "insignis complex" Stanhopea insignis Frost ex Hook, in Bot. Mag. /. 1948 & 1949. 1829. (Fig. 15). Stanbopea flava Lodd. ex Beer. Prakt. Stud. Fam. Orch. 312. 18 54. Stanbopea atropurpurea Lodd. ex Planch. Hort. Donat. Orch. 215. 1858. Stanbopea odoratissima Hort. ex Planch. Hort. Donat. Orch. 216. 18 58. Stanbopea macrochila Lem. in Illustr. Hort. 4: Misc. 71. 1859. Stanhopea tigrin a Batem. ex Lindl. Sert. Orch. 1.1838. ( Fig. 16). Stanbopea cavendisbii Lindl. ex Batem. Lond. Hort. Brit. Suppl. 3:643. Stanhopea maculosa Knowles & Westc. Flor. Cab. 3: /. 1 21. 1839. Stanhopea nigroviolacea Morren. ex Beer. Prakt. Orch. 313. 18 54. Stanhopea expansa P. N. Don. Hort. Cantab. 13:721. 1845. Stanhopea lyncea P. N. Don. Hort. Cantab. 13:608. 1845. Stanhopea devoniensis Lindl. Sert. Orch. t. I. 1838. Stanhopea martiana Batem. ex Lindl. in Bot. Reg. 26: Misc. 50. 1840. (Fig. 17). Stanhopea velata Morren, in Ann. Soc. Gand. 3. t. 153. 1847. Stanhopea saccata Batem. Orch. Mex. & Guatem. t. 15. 1839. Stanhopea implicata Westc. ex Lindl. Fol. Orch. Stan. 6. 1852. Stanhopea radiosa Lem. Illustr. Hort. 4: Misc. 72. 1859. Stanhopea marshii Rchb. f. Xen. Orch. 1:120. 1879. Stanhopea elegantula Rolfe, in Kew Bull. 161. 1910. Stanhopea intermedia Kl. in Act. Hort. Petrop. 17:142. 1898. "oculata complex" Stanhopea oculata (Lodd.) Lindl. Gen. & Sp. Orch. PI. 158. 1832. (Fig. 19). Ceratochilus oculatus Lodd. in Bot. Cab. t. 1764. 1832. Stanhopea lindleyi Zuccar, Abh. Akad. Muenich 2:320. 1831-33. Stanhopea guttulata Lindl. in Bot. Reg. 29: Misc. 75. 1843. Stanhopea graveolens Morren in Ann. de Gard. 2:55. /. 54. 1846. Stanhopea guttata Kich. Berl. Allg. Gartenz. 364. 1858. Stanhopea ornatissima Lem. in Illustr. Hort. 9:325. 1862. Stanhopea cymbiformis Rchb. f. Xen. Orch. 2:84. t. 124. 1865. Stanhopea minor Schltr. Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Mus. Berlin 6:483. 1917. Stanhopea Bucephalus Lindl. Gen. & Sp. Orch. Pi. 157. 1832. (Fig. 20). Stanhopea graveolens Lindl. in Bot. Reg. 3: Misc. 59. 1840. Stanhopea aurantia Lodd. ex P. N. Don in Hort. Cantab. 608. 1845. Stanhopea jenisbiana Kramer ex Rchb. f. Bot. Zeit. 10:934. 1852. Stanhopea warsceivicziana Kl. in Allg. Gartenz. 20:214. 1852. Stanhopea guttata Beer. Prakt. Orch. 312. 1854. Stanhopea inodora Rchb. f. Xen. Orch. 2:157. 18 58. Stanhopea aurata Hort. ex Planch. Hort. Donat. Orch. 104. 1858. Stanhopea aurata Beer, P HO. 1858. Stanhopea costaricensis Rchb. f. in Hamb. Gartenz. 16:424. 1860. Stanhopea grandiflora Rchb. f. Walp. Ann. 6:587. 1863. Stanhopea (H i. in Acta Hort. Petrop. 17:15. 1898. Stanhopea lietzei Schltr. in Fedde Rep. Sp. Nov. 16:248. 1919. Stanhopea remota Hort. Stanhopea wardh Lodd. ex Lindl. Sert. Orch. t. 20. 1838. (Fig. 21). Stanhopea aurea Lodd. ex Lindl. in Bot. Reg. 4: Misc. 11. 1841. Stanhopea venusta Lindl. in Bot. Reg. 4: Misc. 11. 1841. Stanhopea inodora Lodd. ex Lindl. in Bot. Reg. /. 65. 1845. Stanhopea amoena Kl. in Allg. Gartenz. 20:273. 1852. Stanhopea anfracta Rolfe, in Orch. Rev. 12:357. 1904. Stanhopea pur pus ii Schltr. in Orchis 10:186. 1916. Stanhopea peruviana Rolfe, in Bot. Mag. t. 8417. 1912. DODSON & FRYMIRE THE GENUS STANHOPEA Stanhopea annulata Mansf. in Orchis 16:19. 1938. Stanhopea bicolor C. Koch. Berl. Allg. Gartenz. 209. 1857. Stanhopea deltoidea Lem. in Illustr. Hort. 9:340. 1862. Stanhopea Florida Rchb. f. in Gard. Chron. 615. 1879. Stanhopea fregeana Rchb. f. in Otto & Dietr. Allg. Gartenz. 23:313. 1855. Stanhopea fuerstenbergiae Kranzl. in Gard. Chron. 161. 1899. Stanhopea gibbosa Rchb. f. in Gard. Chron. 1254. 1869. Stanhopea haseloviana Rchb. f. in Otto & Dietr. Alg. Gartenz. 23:322. 1855. Stanhopea hoppii Schltr. in Fedde Rep. Sp. Nov. 27:82. 1924. Stanhopea impressa Rolfe, in Kew Bull. 196. 1898. Stanhopea madouxiana Cogn. in Gard. Chron. 134. 1898. Stanhopea moliana Rolfe, in Lindenia 7:89. /. 331. 1891. Stanhopea nigripes Rolfe, in Kew Bull. 364. 1894. Stanhopea platyceras Rchb. f. in Gard. Chron. 27. 1868. Stanhopea ruckeri Lindl. in Bot. Reg. subt. 44. 1843. Stanhopea schiixeriana Rchb. f. Xen. Orch. 2:158. 1858. Stanhopea shuttleworthii Rchb. f. in Gard. Chron. 795. 1876. Stanhopea uncinata Drap. Hort. Univ. 4:65. 1843. Stanhopea xytriophora Rchb. f. in Gard. Chron. 842. 1868. Dubious species Stanhopea quadricornis Lindl. in Bot. Reg. 24: t. 5. 1838. Stanhopea russelliana Lodd. ex P. N. Don in Donn. Hort. Cantab. 13:721. 1 845. Stanhopea violacea Hort. ex Beer. Beitr. Morph. u Biol. Orch. /. 4 & 8. 1863. Stanhopea wallisii Rchb. f . in Linnaea 41 : 1 09. 1 877. Stanhopea hernandezii (Kunth) Schlechter, Beih. Bot. Centr. 2:490. 1918. LrrERATURE CrTED Allen, P. A. 1949. Flora of Panama (Orchidaecae). Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 36:53-59. . 1951. Pollination in Coryanthes speciosa. Amer. Orch. Soc. Bull. 19:528. . 1952. The Swan Orchids, A Revision of the Genus Cycnoches. Orch. Journ. l 4 ~ s :226. . 1956. Pollination in Gongora maculata. Amer. Orch. Soc. Bull. 24:230. Ames, O. & D. S. Correll. 1952. Flora of Guatemala (Orchidaceae). Fieldiana: Bot. 26 2 :528-536. Dressler.'R. L. & C. H. Dodson. 1960. Classification and Phylogeny in the Orchidaceae. Ann. Mo. Rolfe, R. A. 1912. Stanhopea grandiflora and S. bucephalus. Orch. Rev. 20:172. ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN A. Euiaema bomboides attempting to land on the hypochile of Slanhopea bucephalus. B. Bee falling through the flower and engaging the spine of the rostellum under his meta- thorax. C. Pollinia being inserted into the stigmatic cleft while the bee is falling through the flower. D. Euiaema moriana approaching the flower of S. tricornis. DODSON & FRYMIRE— THE GENUS ST, MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN STAFF Direc Frits W. Went DERSON, John D. Dwyer, Henry N. Andrews, Norton H. Nickerson, Bunting, Trifon von Schrenk, Hugh C. Cutler, Owen J. Sexton, Carroix W. Dodge, George B Robert L. TaX t°h n e° A&E? Edit ° r ° Robert E. Woodson, Jr BOARD OF TRUSTEES President Robert Brookings Smith Vice-President Leicester B. Faust Howard F. Ba Volume XL VIII Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden SEPTEMBER, 1961 Preliminary Revision of the Genus Dryrnaria . James A. Duke 173-268 Sanango : New Amazonian Genus of Loganiaceae ..... George S. Bunting and James A. Duke 269-274 pub: Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden A quarterly journal containing scientific contributions fi Missouri Botanical Garden and the Henry Shaw School of Be Washington University in affiliation with the Missouri B Beginning with Volume 45, 1958: Subscription Price._ _^ $12.00 per volume Single Numbers 3.00 each Contents of previous issues of the Annajls of the Missouri Botanical kbdes are listed in the Agricultural Index, published by the H. W. Wilson Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden PRELIMINARY REVISION OF THE GENUS DRYMARIA JAMES A. DUKE le days of DeCandolle, a revision of all the known species of Dnnunu is The genus Drymaria comprised four species at the time of its establishment by Willdenow (in Roem. & Schult. Syst. Veg. 5:406. 1819). Less than 150 years later the number of names has multiplied more than thirty-fold, with most of the novelties being described before the turn of the present century. No complete revision has been attempted since this prodigious multiplication of epithets. Wiggins (in Proc. Cal. Acad. 4 35 :189. 1944) has completed an able revision of the genus as represented in the vicinity of the Sonoran Desert. His conclusions were quite sound, and the only consequential differences expressed in the present In addition to Wiggins, the most important recent American studies on Dry- maria have been pursued by Fosberg, who has clarified many of the problems created by M. E. Jones, proposed a few new taxa, and made several appropriate reductions, both in the literature and in various herbaria. Macbride's account in the Flora of Peru, although promulgating a few errors, has been a forward step toward under- standing the genus in an unusually complicated region, where speciation in Dry- maria has run rampant. I. M. Johnston's studies in the equally perplexing Coahuilan Desert have resulted in the description of some of the most bizarre species of Drymaria. The major contributor from Europe has been the late Dr. Mattfeld whose discerning work has been responsible for the recognition of several new South American species, all of them herein maintained. He has also clarified some of the errors stemming from the work of his predecessor Briquet, who described several new Mexican species, two of which were probably based upon Pavon's (173) 174 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Gross Morphology An amazing array of characters is exhibited in the genus, and will doubtless tempt the description of minor variants. The petals, for example, are nearly as variable as those of Silene. Almost every portion of the plant has been utilized as a taxonomic tool at one place or another in the genus. Various habits are assumed by members of the genus. Perhaps most common is the clambering and sprawling habit exhibited by D. cordata, which occasionally roots at the nodes. Erect suffrutescent perennials are not uncommon, and may raise an eyebrow on those not intimately familiar with the genus. Depressed sub- cespitose forms such as occur in some varieties of D. effusa recall some species of Arenaria, while delicate subvirigate annuals such as D. lepiophylla may suggest Stipulicida. Too often, the duration has been used as a key character, but the duration of a plant is frequently a function of the environment. Plants grown in more xeric habitats often exhibit more attributes of a perennial. Although the leaves of most species are of an ovate type and often cordate at the base, every extreme, from linear and subsucculent to reniform and membrana- ceous, is found in one species or another. The leaves are usually entire, but undula- tions occur in the leaf margins of some South American species. The opposite arrangement prevails, but in a few series pseudoverticillate leaves are common. Venation of the leaves is usually obscure and rarely of taxonomic significance, but the texture and pigmentation occasionally aid in identification. The petioles may be as long as the blades or completely obsolete. Most species have stipules which may be entire, bifid, or irregularly lacerate, and the nature of the division is of occasional importance as a taxonomic criterion. Indumental variations are often called upon for specific delimitations. Septate or moniliform hairs occur in several species. Forms of D. villosa may be hirsute or villose in nature; forms of D. ovata are best described as lanose; stipitate or sessile glands are present in many species. In D. cordata the glands commonly take the form of a conspicuous farinose girdle on the pedicels. The indument is usually more or less translucent, but is not uncommonly white, or even reddish or yellowish. Completely glabrous species occur, and some of the xeromorphic and halophytic species are decidedly glaucous. Predominating in the genus is a terminal cymose inflorescence, but here again, numerous departures from the norm exist. In most species with the leaves pseudo- verticillate, the flowers reflect this arrangement. Rarely the flowers may be solitary or clustered in the axils of barely modified leaves, but more commonly each flower is subtended by more or less scariose bracts. Many inflorescences show racemose tendencies; in D. anomala, the first and sometimes the second branches of the inflorescence are dichasial, but subsequent branching tends to be monopodial. Pro- portionate lengths of bracts, pedicels, peduncles and flowers, as well as relative variations in their induments, have been used in distinguishing species. Almost invariably there are five sepals in a flower, but aberrant flowers are known with four or six sepals. The sepals are most commonly lanceolate or ovate but in some they are nearly orbicular and in others nearly deltoid. One to nine nerves may traverse each sepal, the 3 -nerved sepal being most prevalent. In some DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 175 few species the venation is more or less dendritic and in others so obscure as to be difficult of interpretation. Occasionally the sepals are conspicuously carinate or cucullate. Shape, apex, nervation, indument and comparison of the sepals are Petals are usually five in number, but three is characteristic of certain species, and the petals are absent or drastically reduced in D. apetala and in forms of D. villosa and D. xerophylla. Typically the petal is bifid for about half its length, but this basic construction is hard to visualize in some of the members of the first few series whose ornate petals are so bizarre as to defy terse terminology to describe them. The lobes in some more easily described forms are merely basally auriculate, 5 nature of the i lobes. Most of the bilobed petals are tapered directly to a narrow claw, some members (e.g. in Series fasciculatae) there is a longer or shorter trunk interpolated between the lobes and the claw. In some forms (e.g. Series holo- steoides) the trunk never narrows to a claw; such forms are herein referred to as exunguiculate. The lobes of the bilobed petals are 1 -many-nerved, the 1 -nerved condition being characteristic of the Series cordaTae, and certain species in other Less constant in number than the petals are the stamens, which are occasionally reduced to two in number. In species with the reduced stamen number, the anthers are often abortive, and tend to be more orbicular than in those species possessing the higher number of stamens; in pentandrous flowers the anthers are usually oblong. Not infrequently the filaments are shallowly connate into a cup, and such a cup. Rarely, as in D. stipitata, there are conspicuous saccate staminodia. In the Series frutescentes occasionally floral dimorphism suggests that monoecism is in the early stages of evolution. Offering little in the way of systematic clues is the gynoecium. In a few species the ovary is borne at the summit of a rather prominent stipe, the presence of which does not seem to be necessarily constant. Some species, which are also characterized by the development of staminodia, have a rather prominent stylopodium atop the ovary. In most species, there are three styles, but occasionally there may be two or four. Such numerical variations have been observed in a single inflorescence. The degree of fusion of the styles on the other hand seems to be a more reliable taxonomic criterion, the styles being fused to a greater or lesser degree in most species. Only with hesitancy do I use the word fused; it would seem to be just as well to speak of one style with three branches as to speak of three styles partially fused. For the sake of tersity, I have often described the style as being bifid or trifid half its length, when it might have been more correct morphologically to say that there were two or three styles fused for half their length. Interestingly the two or three styles are almost completely free in D. cordata, a species which has the most reduced androecium, and a species which I would judge to be one of the most advanced in the genus. The capsule may be three-valved or two- or four-valved, correlated with the number of styles. Rarely the size of the capsule may be diagnostic. Inside the 176 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN capsule, 1-many of the campy lotropous ovules may mature into seeds, and the seeds have proven very valuable in the taxonomy of the group. The number, shape, color and sculpture of the seeds all play some part in species determination. Most species are characterized by many-seeded capsules, but in the Series cordatae, some occasionally mature only one seed per capsule. The seeds may assume any of several shapes. Perhaps most common is the cochleate, or snail-shaped seed, characteristic of Series cordatae. Foetiform seeds, shaped much like the human foetus, are found in the Series holosteoides, and the vestiges of this shape are retained in some subsequent groups. Ampulliform, or retort-shaped, seeds occur in D. debilh and this shape is approached by a few species of other sections. The seeds of D. viscosa are unusual not only in being lacrimiform, but also in being smooth, dull and yellowish. Many members of the earlier series have hippocrepiform seeds and species of the Series lyropetala have hairs on the hump of the horseshoe. Seeds of most species are characterized by various kinds of sculpture. In the earlier series the seeds are merely granular, if we exclude the hairs of Series lyropetala from the realm of sculpture. Later sections, especially in the Series villosae are endowed with species whose seeds are ornate indeed. For example the tubercles in D, villosa are stellate in outline, those in its subsp. palustris are often capitate, those in D. divaricata var. stricta are secondarily tuberculate. On the other hand, forms of D. ovata have smooth and lustrous black seeds. Usually the seeds are reddish-brown, but in D. viscosa they are yellow; occasionally seeds of some species Seeds have turned out to be rather critical indicators of a species' systematic position in Drymaria. It should be pointed out however, that in working with Spergula, J. K. New (in Ann. Bot. 23:23. 1960) has found variations in the number of papillae on the seed coats to be environmentally induced. Furthermore she has found no genetic correlation between the variations in seed-coats and in hairiness. Species of Drymaria, whose seeds are highly viable a year after collection and germinate rapidly in the greenhouse, should prove interesting subjects for similar Geography Departing somewhat from the "typical" picture of the Caryophyllaceae, Dry- maria is largely a subtropical genus. Of the forty-eight species herein maintained, all but two are strictly American, and only one subspecies does not occur in America. As a whole in America the genus ranges from the western United States through Central and South America to Argentina and Chile, the large majority of the species occuring on the western halves of the continents. Florida, Surinam and Brazil, on the eastern shore, seem to possess only the pantropical D. cordata. For a geographical tabulation of species, the reader is referred to the citation of specimens which terminates this paper. Of particularly geographical interest is D. cordata, whose varietal potential and geographical distribution has been studied in some detail by Mizushima (in Jour. Jap. Bot. 32:69. 1957). Almost all material from continental Asia belongs to the subspecies diandra (maintained as a species by Mizushima), a subspecies completely DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 177 lacking in America (excl. Hawaii). rather distinct variety pacifica occu large. In Africa however, there are about as many intermediates as there are pure representatives of the two subspecies. A second species occurs in Malaysia and, to judge from the literature, has been introduced there only within the present century. Of course there is the more remote possibility that it has merely been overlooked until this century. The species, D. villosa, is so distinct that I prefer to believe that it is a recent introduc- tion from the Americas. Several interesting disjunctions are apparent in the genus. Most striking is that illustrated by D. ladewii, known only from two collections in Bolivia, but repre- sented by bountiful material from Guatemala and southern Mexico. More easy of interpretation are several vicarious disjunctions between Baja California and main- land Mexico, e.g. D. holostcoidcs & D. pacbyphylla; D. arcnarioides ssp. peninsidaris & D. arenarioides ssp. arenarioides; D. gracilis ssp. carina ta & D. gracilis ssp. gracilis. Economics Often a conspicuous element in the herbaceous vegetation, Drymaria probably plays in the subtropics the insignificant role played by the chickweed in temperate North America, fairly well known, but hardly a topic for conversation. Drymaria cordata, and perhaps others, which spread radially and root at the nodes forming rather lush mats, have been planted as ground covers. In Ecuador various species are used as curatives for liver and kidney ailments. In Mexico, species are reputedly used to cure "yaza" and in the Orient, infusions are purportedly used to alleviate headaches. One should be careful of the plant, especially as an oral administration. Drymaria pacbyphylla (and probably related species) is seriously toxic to livestock, and all measures should be taken to prevent its spread in the arid West, where palatable fodder is at a minimum. Fortunately the seeds alone of D. pacbyphylla are so distinctive (see Fig. 1C) as to separate it from any other species. In the course of this study I have been fortunate enough to study all or most of the material of the Gray Herbarium, the University of California, the New York Botanical Garden, the Field Museum, the Pomona College Herbarium, the Missouri Botanical Garden, the Rijksherbarium, the Leningrad Herbarium, the Herbarium of the University of Glasgow, the Botanisches Museum of Berlin, the Botanische Staatssammlung at Munich, the Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle at Paris, and the University of Michigan. Critical material has also been loaned by the curators of the herbaria at Kew, Prague, Stockholm, Lija, Lund, Geneva, Gottingen, the University of Brazil, and the California Academy of Sciences. Dr. Ramon Ferreyra has forwarded many interesting Peruvian specimens for determination. To him and to the curators and my correspondents at all the aforementioned , I express my sincere gratitude for making their time and efforts avail- To my colleagues here at the Missouri Botanical Garden, I am indebted 178 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN for their suggestions and comments. * Special thanks are extended to my wife, Peggy, who has been kind enough to prepare the illustrations. DRYMARIA Willd. Drymaria Willd. ex Roem. & Schult. Syst. 5:31. 1819. Pinosia Urban, in Arkiv. Bot. 23A 5 :70. pi. 2. 1930. Mollugopbytum M. E. Jones, in Extr. Contr. West. Bot. 18:3 5. 1933. Annual or perennial, glabrous or pubescent herbs, occasionally subligneous below, prostrate, spreading or erect. Leaves opposite or pseudoverticillate, glabrous to villose or glandular, sessile to long-petiolate, usually with persistent or fugaceous small stipules. Flowers few to many in dichasial cymes, rarely in pseudoverticils, racemes, or solitary or clustered in the leaf axils. Sepals 5, not connate. Petals (0-) 3-5, white, usually 2-cleft, occasionally appendiculate in the sinus, often auriculate. Stamens 2-5, the anthers versatile, 2-celled, the flattened filaments slightly connate at the base, rarely alternating with prominent staminodia. Ovary superior, slightly stipitate; carpels mostly 3, the 3 styles more or less united below; ovules few to many, campylotropous on free central placentae. Capsule ovoid to spheroid, usually dehiscing into 3 entire valves; seeds 1 to many, cochleate, foeti- form, hippocrepiform, or ampulliform, usually tuberculate, the embryo curved about the perisperm. As here conceived the genus consists of 48 species, all but two of them exclu- sively American. Since the genus has never been monographed in its entirety, and no supraspecific classification has been elaborated, I would like to propose the following informal series, most of which seem to be rather homogeneous. Follow- ing a tabular presentation of the series is an artificial analytic key to all species. Following this is a systematic key to the series. The latter key, although not assuredly phylogenetic, is so set up that species with the more elaborate floral characters, often correlated with certain vegetative factors, come first, and the species with simpler floral construction come later. I am not prepared to say whether evolution in the genus has been a matter of reduction or amplification Supraspecific Classification A. Series holosteoides D. Series arenarioidi 1. D. holosteoides 2. D. pachyphylla 8. D. molluginea 9. D. arenarioides B. Series lyropetala 4. D. subumbellata 5. D. suffruticosa 6. D. lyropetala U. D.barkleyi 12. D. poly car poide 13. D.viscosa C. Series stipitatae F. Series ortecioides 7. D. stipitata 14. D. ortegioides could not be used to full advantage. cindly rev, Dr. Fosber iewed an early draft of this pa DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA N. Series villosae D. hypericifolia D. longepedunc L. Series debiles 29. D. debilis M. Series ] 30. D. laxiflora ', D. glaberrh , D. monticol Q. Series 44. D. gn 45. D. «/, Artificial Key ■ 4. Sepals 7.5-9.0 mm. long; Pe. 2. Sepals obtuse r polylacerate apically: ANNALS OF THE BOTANICAL GARDEN tracts clearly different Manes glandular; petals . Sepals and petals 4-7 . Sepals and petals 2.8- ' with 4 lobes; sepals Sepals withont stipitate glands; continental No 21. Leaves ell.pnc lepals acute or strongly 3 -ribbed, if obtuse, the fl .Sepals obtuse (D.effusa): 23. Bract* mostly shorter than the pedicels: s mostly longer than the pedicels; plat ides stipitate-glandular; pedicels (i Plants rarely suffruticose; No 34. Sepals all obtuse, often c DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA Peduncles and pedicels stipitate-glandular 18: . Cyanic glaucous perennials of the Coahuilan Des Pedicels mostly longer than t 49. Sepals acuminate, glabrous. . Petals with a definite claw, the t Leaves broadest below S3. Sepals 4.5 mm. long 182 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN ; seeds with simple or c . Seeds with ornate tubercles; sepals no more t 61. Sepals glabrous, obtuse 62. Sepals obtuse; Venezuela and Colombi . Sepals oblong to orbicular, ob ciliate auricles; tubercles of the st entire; Chiapas, Guatemala; Bolivia..., I mm. long, the tubercles rectanguloid, DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA . Sepals glandular or villosulous: 78. Petals clearly exerted, the r rarely carinate, the i, Sepals rarely carinat viscid-glandular; 184 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Sepals and herbage subglabrous to 1 flowers at anthesis broader, terete; lc 43d. D. DIVARICA! Leaves long-petiolate; sepals basally saccate >7. Sepals strongly nerved, cannate; leaves often crenulate Key to the Series of Drymaria or hippocrepiform, not dorsally hispid Series A: I pseudoverticillate, stipulate; seeds, if foetiform, dorsally hispid: inear; plants upright perennials; petals with many distal lobes; seeds foetiform, t foetiform, not dorsally hispid: ■i-r linear, <- c : - • • ,- . ■. own, facially transparent, revealing the yellowish embryo. Baja California e or glandular; seeds tuber- DURE REVISION OF DRYMARIA imbricate. Cuba. , Large-flowered suffrv . Small-flowered delica . Glabrous to villose plants wit!, the lobes sometime crrni rinate or auriculate; stamens 2-5, if unequal, the ' exauri.-ulaic/ Western U. S. to Central America. .. ..." .....'....'. m. Trunk of the petals shorter than the claw (except D. glaberrima), the seeds stellate, cylindric or capitate; North an'd S o. Petals exaur .1 - i not ciliatc: tul cycles of the seeds or mammiliform auricles; leaves short- to long- membranaceous, net densely villose Series P: . Lobes of the petals 1 -nerved (except D. glandttlosa \ ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Leaves elliptic, pseudoverticillate, estipulate, often somewhat glaucous and succulent. Flowers in pseudoverticils. Sepals obtuse, often somewhat cucullate, the venation subdendritic. Seeds foetiform or hippocrepiform, merely granular, occasionally gibbose and umbonate. Two halophytic species of western United States and Mexico, both probably toxic to cattle. Fig. 1. Leaves and stems often stipitate-glandular; exceeding the sepals; seeds often strongly v icous, rarely stipitate-glandular, often tinted with s sepals usually longer; seeds rarely gibbose HOLOSTEOIDES Drymaria holosteoides Benth. Bot. Voy. Sulph. 16. 1844. (hc at Magdalena Bay; Kl; isotypes at GH & LE.) Drymaria veatchii Curran, in Proc. Cal. Acad. 2 1 :227. 188 1888 on Cedros Island, UC!) Mollugophytum holosteoides M. E. Jones, Extr. Contr. West. Bot. 18:3 5. 1933. Radially spreading herbaceous to lignescent annuals to as much as 40 cm. long, branching at nearly every node, stipitate-glandular to glabrescent, the internodes mostly much longer than the leaves, with a caducous rosette of spatulate leaves. Cauline leaves pseudoverticillate, the blades glabrous or scantily glandular, occasion- ally somewhat glaucous, narrowly to broadly elliptic, apically rounded or acutish, basally acute, 4-12 mm. long, 2-7 mm. broad, the petioles glabrous to stipitate glandular, 2-8 mm. long; stipules absent. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary contracted umbelloid cymes, subtended by both normal foliage leaves and scariose ovate bracts 1-2 mm. long; pedicels 2-6 mm. long, glandular or stipitate-glandular. Sepals 5, glandular or stipitate-glandular, broadly oblong, obovate or suborbicular, apically obtuse and often cucullate, 3-4 mm. long, 1.6-3.0 mm. broad, the venation obscure, dendritic; petals 5, 2.8-3.5 mm. long, bifid for about half their length, with 4-6 laciniae in the cleft, these about half as long as the oblong lobes, the trunk suborbicular, denticulate or crenulate, cordate or truncate to the minute claw; stamens 5, ca. 3 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.6 mm. long; ovary at anthesis globose, the styles attaining the anthers, bifid or trifid less than a third of its length. Capsule subglobose, 1.5-3.0 mm. long, 6-20-seeded, the seeds foeti- form, basally umbonate, laterally gibbose and often dorsally flanged, granular, 0.5- . D. holosteoides var. holosteoide: >X. B. D. bolosteoides var. rr« pachyphylla (holotype) petal, 10! 1.0 mm. long, nearly or quite as broad as long. Fig. 1A (Holotype of D. veatchii). Sandy soils of Baja California, Mexico, mostly north of Cape San Lucas. The isotype at Leningrad has unusually long styles to 2 mm. long which are divided less than one-third their length, a character more frequent in the var. crassi folia. Indeed the type is in some other respects (as well as aspect) inter- mediate between these closely related varieties but by far the majority of its characteristics are those of the more northern populations. Among other inter- mediate specimens which forced me to reduce the following species to a variety may be cited Constance 3185, which in its strongly gibbose seeds and stipitate- glandular stems approaches the typical variety. However the specimen seems to possess more characteristics of var. crassifolia, e. g. the petals are much shorter than the sepals, the internodes are relatively short and the plant is obviously a , crassifolia (Benth.) J. Duke comb. & Drymaria crassifolia Benth. Bot. Voy. Sulph. 16. 1844. (ho " Cape San Lucas; K !; isotypes at GH, LE !) Mollugophytum crassifolium M. E. Jones, Extr. Contr. West. ] 188 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Subcespitose herbaceous to lignescent perennials verticillately branching but rarely branching at every node, glabrous or very rarely stipitate-glandular, to as much as 20 cm. long, some of the internodes occasionally shorter than the leaves, with a caducous rosette of spatulate leaves, the taproot to 8 mm. broad. Cauline leaves pseudoverticillate, the blades glabrous, carnose, glaucous, often cyanic, narrowly to broadly elliptic, 4-12 mm. long, 3-8 mm. broad, the petioles 4-12 mm. long, glabrous or glandular; stipules absent. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary contracted umbelloid verticils subtended by normal foliage leaves and by bracts 1-2 mm. long; pedicels 5-12 mm. long, glabrous to stipitate-glandular. Sepals 5, glabrous to scantily sessile-glandular, broadly oblong to elliptic, apically obtuse and often cucullate, 3.0-4.5 mm. long, 1.5-2.5 mm. broad, the venation obscure, dendritic; petals 5, 2.0-3.5 mm. long, bifid for about half their length, with 4-6 laciniae in the cleft, these about half as long as the main lobes; trunks ovate, denticulate, cordate or truncate to the minute claw; stamens 5, ca. 3 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.6 mm. long; ovary at an thesis subglobose, the styles attain- ing the anthers, bifid or trifid less than a third of their length. Capsule subglobose to ovoid or ellipsoid, 3-5 mm. long, 7-20-seeded, the seeds hippocrepiform, granular, scarcely umbonate or gibbose, 0.8-1.0 mm. broad, nearly or quite as long as broad. Fig. IB. (Holotype). Saline soils around Cape San Lucas, Baja California, Mexico. Wooton & Standi, in Contr. U. S. Nat Herb. 16: Wooton 405, dry plains south of the White Sands, N. Mex., US; isotypes at F, GH, MO, UC, etc.!) Glaucous subsucculent annuals, the vegetative branching largely confined to radially diverging branches from a slender yellowish rootstock or to terminal pseudoverticillate branch systems, the elongate spreading internodes much exceed- ing the terminally crowded leaves. Leaves pseudoverticillate, glaucous, subsuccu- lent, wrinkling in drying, broadly elliptic to suborbicular, apically obtuse or acutish, basally tapering to the petiole, 4-14 mm. long, 4-12 mm. broad, the glabrous petioles 4-8 mm. long; stipules absent, the petioles clasping. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary contracted umbelloid verticils subtended by normal foliage leaves and bracts 0.5-1.5 mm. long, the pedicels 1-5 mm. long, the bracts ovate, obtuse, scariose and almost nerveless. Sepals 5, subequal, glabrous, glaucous, ellipsoid, obtuse, 2.5—3.3 mm. long, 1.5-2.0 mm. broad, obscurely 3— 5 -nerved, the central portion green, the margins scariose; petals 5, 2.5-3.0 mm. long, bifid about half their length, with 2 oblong laciniae in the cleft, the trunk serrulate, tapered to the base, the claw not clearly delineated; stamens 5, 1.0-1.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.5 mm. long; ovary at anthesis subglobose, the short style bifid or trifid more than half its length, slightly exceeding the anthers. Capsule sub- globose, 3-4 mm. long, mostly exceeding the sepals, 15-25-seeded, the seeds vermiculiform, facially gibbose, more or less tessellate, 0.8-1.8 mm. long, ca. twice as long as broad. Fig. 1C (Holotype). Heavy saline soils in denudated or ruderal sites, often as a pioneer on bare areas, western U. S. A. and northern Mexico. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 189 Although certain authorities have regarded this species as synonymous with D. holosteoides, there seems to be no justification for such a conclusion, as the mainland species differs constantly in many respects from the preceding species of Baja California. The seed alone would suffice to distinguish this species from all other species of Drymarra. Little (in Ecology 18:416. 1937), who regards D. pachyphylla as a synonym of D. holosteoides, presents some very interesting information about the ecology and toxicity of this serious weed. All the aerial portions of the plant are toxic to cattle and sheep. To complicate matters, the xeromorphic nature of the leaves is responsible for a degree of resistance to drought and to chemical sprays. Campbell (in Journ. Agr. Res. 43:1027. 1931) has shown the species to be a pioneer in plant succession on clay soils such as the adobe soils of portions of our western ranges. B. Series lyropetalae Leaves linear, pseudoverticillate, estipulate or with entire caducous stipules. Flowers in pseudoverticils or in cymes. Sepals obtuse or acute, the venation sub- dendritic. Petals apically 6-14-lobed, laterally denticulate, minutely unguiculate. Seeds hippocrepiform or foetiform, dorsally hispidulous, etuberculate. Four gypso- phytic species of the Coahuilan Desert of northeastern Mexico. Fig. 2. a. Inflorescence pseudoverticillate, compact, the bracts mostly contiguous; petals mostly 6-8- lobed, the lobes lance-deltoid, attenuate, about half as long as the trunk, the trunk occa- . Sepals 3.0-4.5 mm. long, often glandular long, the ligular staminodia 0.2-0.5 mm. Sepals 5-6 mm. long, glabrous or bull; dSinlilir/bra^ts °Q*".5 mm/long" plan" glLZlll^"—'..^!... T!"Z. dTyrotetala 3. Drymaria elata I. M. Johnston, in Jour. Arn. Arb. 21:68. 1940. (holo- type: I. M. Johnston 7823-, 10 km. s. of Laguna del Rey, locally abundant in gypsum silt; Coahuila. GH!) Upright lignescent perennials, the branches opposite or pseudoverticillate, glabrous or glaucous to stipitate-glandular, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, the tap root to 1 cm. thick. Leaves opposite or pseudoverticillate, glabrous or glaucescent, succulent, obscurely veined, linear, apically obtuse, 1-7 cm. long, 0.5-1.5 mm. broad. Inflorescences of terminal contracted 5-13-flowered umbelloid cymes, the peduncles mostly 5-8 cm. long, glabrous; bracts 0.5-1.0 mm. long, 190 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 191 , the mature pedicels 4-7 mm. long, puberulent or stipitate-glandular, the outer ones spreading or deflexed. Sepals 5, 3.0-4.5 mm. long, 2-3 mm. broad, stipitate-glandular or glabrate, broadly ellipsoid to suborbicular, apically obtuse, the venation obscure, with 7-9 veins arising from the base, all but the midrib dichotomizing; petals 5, 2.5-3.5 mm. long, with about 6 subequal apical laciniae, these lance-deltoid, falcate, attenuate, and denticulate, the trunk longer than the laciniae, apically bilinguate, laterally lacerate, ca. 1.5 mm. broad, basally cordate, the claw binute; stamens 5, 2-3 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.5-0.8 mm. long; staminodia conspicuous, flap-shaped, 0.4 mm. high, 0.8 mm. broad; ovary at anthesis ovoid, the style slightly exceeding the anthers, trifid less than one-fourth of its length. Capsule subglobose, exceeding the sepals, 3.0-4.5 mm. long, 10- 20-seeded, the seeds hippocrepiform, 1.0-1.5 mm. long, densely hispidulous dorsally, ventrally slightly umbonate, the facies merely puncticulatc. Fig. 2A. (Holotype). Known only from saline soils in the vicinity of Sierra del Rey and Laguna del Rey in Coahuila, Mexico. The petals are completely unlike those of any other species and suggest the dorsal profile of a beetle. This peculiar aspect is approached, but only slightly, by the petals of the following species. 4. Drymaria subumbellata I. M. Johnston, in Jour. Arn. Arb. 31:188. 1950. (holotype: 7. M. Johnston 84.8Q, s. end of Canada Oscuro near Tanque la Luz, confined to gypsum beds on the escarpment, western Coahuila; GH!) Upright or ascending lignescent perennials to as much as 25 cm. high, the branches mostly opposite, the internodes longer or shorter than the leaves, glabrous or glaucescent, the taproot to 1 cm. thick. Leaves opposite or pseudoverticillate, the blades 1.5-4.0 cm. long, 0.5-1.0 mm. broad, glabrous or glaucescent, succulent, linear, apically obtuse, attenuate to the sessile base; true. stipules absent. Inflores- cences of terminal subumbelloid 3-9-flowered cymes, the peduncles 4-8 cm. long, the bracts mostly imbricate, lance-ovate, 2.5-4.0 mm. long; mature pedicels 3-7 mm. long, glabrous, the outer ones spreading. Sepals 5, 5-6 mm. long, 2-3 mm. broad, glabrous or bullate, broadly ovate, apically obtuse or acutish, the margins involute, the venation obscure, with 7-9 veins arising from the base, all but the midrib dichotomizing; petals 5, 4.5-6.0 mm. long, with 6-8 subequal apical laciniae, these lance-deltoid, attenuate, falcate, denticulate, the trunk longer than the laciniae, laterally lacerate, basally truncate to rounded, 1.0-2.0 mm. broad; stamens 5, 3.5-4.0 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.8-1.0 mm. long; staminodia obsolescent; ovary at anthesis ovoid, the style slightly exceeding the anthers, bifid or trifid less than one-fourth its length, nearly as long as the ovary. Capsule subglobose, 5-6 mm. long, exceeding the sepals, 10-20 -seeded, the seeds hippo- crepiform, 1.2-1.5 mm. long, dorsally provided with dense white hairs to 0.5 mm. long, ventrally umbonulate, the facies smooth or puncticulate. Fig. 2B. (Holotype). Known only from the type collection. In the nature of the inflorescence and the petals, this bizarre species is inter- mediate between D. elata and the other two species in this homogeneous series. 192 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 5. Drymaria suffruticosa A. Gray ex S. Watson, in Proc. Am. Acad. 17:328. 1882. (holotype: Palmer 74; San Lorenzo de Laguna, Coahuila; GH!; isotypesatUS,MO,UC,etc!) Upright suffrutescent glabrous perennials to as much as 30 cm. tall, the leaves often fascicled at the geniculate nodes, the taproot to as much as 8 mm. thick. Leaves pseudoverticillate, glabrous or glaucescent, somewhat succulent, linear, obtuse, 10-25 mm. long, ca. 1 mm. broad, basally tapering to the stem; stipules apparently lacking. Flowers globose in few-flowered terminal cymes, the peduncles and pedicels glabrous; bracts lanceolate, 3-5 mm. long, about equaling the pedicels. Sepals 5, 5-6 mm. long, 3-4 mm. broad, broadly ellipsoid, apically rounded but with a minute acumen, strongly venose throughout, the small scariose margins involute; petals 5, 4.5-5.5 mm. long, ca. 2 mm. broad, with 10-14 subequal apical laciniae, laterally lacerate, basally truncate or tapered to the minute claw; stamens 5, 4-5 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 1 mm. long; staminodia cupular, minute; ovary at anthesis renoid, the minute bifid style slightly exceeded by the anthers. Capsule broadly ellipsoid, ca. 6 mm. long, often capped by a stylopodium, many-seeded, the seeds hippocrepiform, ca. 0.9 mm. broad, dorsally provided with a row of stiff hairs to 0.5 mm. long. Fig. 2C. (Holotype). Known only from the Coahuilan Desert of Mexico. 6. Drymaria lyropetala I. M. Johnston, in Journ. Arn. Arb. 21:68. 1940. (holotype: 7. M. Johnston 7594.; 3.5 km. s. of Cedral, gypsum plain, locally common, GH!) Drymaria lyropetala var. coahuilana I. M. Johnston, in Jour. Arn. Arb. 31:189. 1950. (holotype: R. N, Stewart 567 [cited as Johnston 567 in original description]; 2 km. s. of Santa Elena, Sierra de las Cruces, Gypsum Ridge, Coahuila, GH!) Upright or ascending glandular or glabrous perennials to as much as 30 cm. high, branching mostly at the base, the internodes shorter to longer than the leaves, apparently elongating belatedly, the taproot to 1 cm. thick. Leaves opposite or pseudoverticillate, 3-15 mm. long, 0.5-1.2 mm. broad, glabrous or glandular, glaucescent, succulent, linear, apically obtuse, attenuate to the sessile base, the upper leaves minutely stipulate. Inflorescences of terminal lax 3- 9-flowered cymes, the peduncles 4-60 mm. long, glabrous to stipitate-giandular, the bracts 0.5-3.5 mm. long, remote, the mature pedicels 3-6 mm. long, glabrous or glandular, not recurved. Sepals 5, 3-5 mm. long, 1.5-3.0 mm. broad, glabrous to stipitate-giandular, ovate, apically obtuse, the venation obscure, with 7-9 veins arising from the base, all but the midrib dichotomizing; petals 5, 3.2-5.2 mm. long, with 10-12 unequal apical laciniae, these linear, obtuse, crenulate, the outer- most as long as or longer than the trunk, the trunk laterally lacerate, basally cordate to truncate, 1-2 mm. broad; stamens 5, 3-6 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.7-1.0 mm. long; staminodia cupular, to 0.4 mm. high; ovary at anthesis sub- cylindric, the style about as long, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, trifid about one-fourth its length; stylopodium well-developed. Capsule globose, 3.0-3.5 mm. long, 3- 24-seeded, the seeds hippocrepiform, 1.0-1.5 mm. broad, ventrally umbonulate, DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA dorsaliy hispid, the hairs 0.2-0.3 (-0.5) mm. long, scanty and spreading. Fig. (Holotype of var. lyropetala) ; Fig. IE (Holotype of var. coabuilana). Local on gypsum soils of the Coahuilan Desert of Mexico. The two varieties of this species may be separated by the following key: a. Bracts 2-3.3 mm. long; leaves 5-15 mm. long, shorter than the internodes; plants glabrous Johnston erred very slightly in his description of the more southern var. lyropetala, stating that it was glabrous, the glandulosity occurring only in the northern variety. The type of var. lyropetala has a few scattered glands. It should be noted here that the UC isotype has leaves which are mostly longer than the internodes while the converse is true of the holotype, which incidentally is less conspicuously C Seri 7. Drymaria stipitata Fosberg, in Lloydia 4:281. 1941. (holotype: C. H. Muller 3301; Mun. de Sierra Mojada, Sierra Mojada, Canon de San Salvador; common in high oak chaparral; Coahuila; US!) Upright suffrutescent perennials to as much as 20 cm. high, glabrous below, becoming stipitate-glandular above. Leaves opposite, the blades 5-15 mm. long, 1.5-5.5 mm. broad, glabrous, somewhat carnose, almost veinless, narrowly ovate to elliptic, apically acute, basally acutely tapering to the petiole, the petiole 1-2 mm. long; stipules apparently lacking. Inflorescences of few-flowered terminal cymes, the axes glandular-puberulent, locally densely so; bracts lance-ovate, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, apically acuminate; pedicels mostly 3-5 mm. long. Sepals 5, subequal, lanceolate to ovate, apically acuminate, basally umbonate, 5-6 mm. long, 1.5-2.5 mm. broad, transparent save for the 3 ribs; petals 5, 5.0-5.5 mm. long, apically and laterally lacerate, the laciniae linear, often dichotomous, some of the lateral laciniae directed downwardly; stamens 5, 5.0-5.5 mm. long, the broadly oblong anthers ca. 0.8 mm. long, alternating with 5 clavate staminodia to as much as 2.2 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, much shorter than the style, the style trifid for ca. one-fifth its length, exceeding the anthers. Capsule ca. 4 mm. long, 6-8 -seeded, the seeds 0.8-1.0 mm. long, symmetrically hippocrepiform, the surfaces irregularly corrugated. Fig. 3 A (Holotype). Coahuila, Tamaulipas and probably Nuevo Leon, Mexico. D. Series arenarioides Leaves linear to narrowly ovate, opposite or pseudoverticillate, subsessile, stipu- late. Flowers in cymes, racemes or solitary in the axils of slightly reduced foliage leaves. Sepals mostly obtuse and weakly nerved. Petals 2-8-lobed, the trunk much longer than the claw, entire or denticulate. Seeds hippocrepiform and dorsaliy sulcate or lacrimiform, nearly smooth or granular. Five species in western U. S., northern Mexico and Baja California. Figs. 3B, 3C, 4. 194 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN (Lag.) Didr. in Linnaea 29:738. 1859. (hold- type: "Lagasca 1806" annotated by De Candolle in the De Candolle Her- barium; G. n. v.; photograph and drawing of type at GH!) Alsine molluginea Lag. Gen. & Sp. 13. 1815. Arenaria ? molluginea Ser. ex DC. Prodr. 1:400. 1824. Drymaria sperguloides A. Gray, PI. Fendler 11. 1849. (holotype: Fendler 55; New Mexico, GH!; isotypes at US, UC, F, Mo, etc.) Lepigonum molluginea Fries, Ind. Hort. Sem. 1856. Mollugophytum sperguloides (A. Gray) M. E. Jones, Extr. Contr. West. Bot. 18:3 5. 1933. Slender erect virgate or dichotomously branched annuals to as much as 20 cm. high, the internodes shorter to longer than the leaves, glabrous or with sessile glands, the tap root ca. 1 mm. thick. Leaves mostly pseudoverticillate, glabrous or scantily glandular, 9-25 mm. long, 0.5-2.0 mm. broad, linear, apically obtuse, attenuate to the sessile base, the stipules lance-deltoid, 1-2 mm. long. Inflores- cences of terminal cymose racemes, only the first 1 or 2 branches cymose, subse- quent branching tending to be racemose, the peduncle 8-30 mm. long; bracts 1.0-2.5 mm. long, the pedicels 2-5 mm. long, glabrous to minutely stipitate- glandular. Sepals 5, 2.5-3.5 mm. long, glabrous or minutely glandular, oblong, apically obtuse and often cucullate, only the midrib prominent; petals 5, 1.7-2.5 mm. long, 0.4-0.7 mm. broad, apically provided with usually 4 lacinae, the outer one- third to one-half as long as the trunk, the inner occasionally absent or reduced to mere dentations, the trunk subdeltoid, laterally denticulate, truncate or tapered to the minute claw; stamens 5, 1.5-2.0 mm. long, the oblong to suborbicular anthers 0.4-0.5 mm. long; staminodia absent; ovary at anthesis globose, ca. 2 mm. long, the style 2-3 -cleft nearly to the base, less than 1 mm. long; stylopodium absent. Capsule subglobose, 2-3 mm. long, exceeding the sepals, 3-17-seeded, the seeds 0.9-1.4 mm. broad, dark brown or purplish in age, hippocrepiform, dorsally flat, scarcely umbonate ventrally, minutely corrugated or tuberculate, the tubercles broader than long. Fig. 3B (Holotype of D. sperguloides) ; Fig. 3C ("D. molluginea Fenzl"atLE). -REVISION OF DRYMARIA 195 Sandy soils, Arizona to western Texas, U. S. A.; south to Puebla, Mexico. The specimen from Leningrad (Fig. 3C) apparently from the Ledebour her- barium, and labeled "Drymaria violluginca Fenzl" lacks the inner laciniae of the petals. I doubt that this feature has any taxonomic significance. A close parallel is exhibited by D. arenarioides ssp. peninsularis where the form which lacks the two central laciniae has been described as D. johnstonii. In both D. mollugitica and D. arenarioides ssp. peninsularis specimens have been examined in which 1 or 2 of many flowers dissected had the inner laciniae reduced to mere dentations or apparently completely lacking. ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 9a. Drymaria arenarioides s Drymaria arenarioides Humb. & Bonpl. atP!) Drymaria frankenioides HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 6:21. pi. 515. 1823. Prostrate radially spreading herbaceous or lignescent perennials to as much as 20 cm. long, branching mostly at the base, the internodes shorter to longer than the leaves, stipitate-glandular, the taproot to as much as 5 mm. thick. Leaves opposite or pseudoverticillate, stipitate-glandular, the blades linear-oblong to narrowly elliptic, apically obtuse, obscurely 1 -nerved, 5-15 mm. long, 1-3 mm. broad, basally tapered to the petiole, the petiole ca. 1 mm. long; stipules lance-deltoid, 1.0-2.5 mm. long, entire. Flowers, except the first formed, solitary in the axils of slightly and gradually reduced foliage leaves, the mature pedicels 3—15 mm. long, stipitate-glandular, the subtending leaves stipulate. Sepals 5, 4-7 mm. long, 1-3 mm. broad, stipitate-glandular, oblong to broadly elliptic, the venation obscure, subdendritic, the inner sepals shorter, broader and less glandular; petals 5, 4.0-6.5 mm. long, apically (4-) 6-8-lobate, the outer lobes slightly longer and broader, about as long as the trunk, the inner lobes linear, equal, the trunk laterally denticu- late, 0.8-1.5 mm. broad; stamens 5, ultimately 3-5 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.8-1.2 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, the style bifid or trifid less than half its length, slightly exceeding the stamens; stylopodium often conspicuous. Capsule ovoid, 3-5 mm. long, 15-25-seeded, the seeds hippocrepiform, dorsally flattened or sulcate, exumbonate, minutely tuberculate, 0.8-1.2 mm. broad. Fig. 4A. Sonora, Chihuahua, Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi, Guanajuato and Hidalgo, Mexico, usually in sandy soils. It would appear that Humboldt and Bonpland or Kunth had some reason for changing the name D. arenarioides to D. frankenioides as Roemer and Schultes cited the name as follows: "D. arenarioides Humb. et Bonpl. . . . Reliqu. Willd. MS". I would judge that Willdenow had written the name "D. arenarioides Humb. & Bonpl." on his herbarium specimen and that Roemer and Schultes were the first to publish the name, probably furnished earlier by Humboldt and Bonpland. Two other names in Drymaria seem to have the same history, i.e. D. ovata and D. stel- larioides. The question then arises whether the name should bear the authority "Humb. & Bonpl. in Roem. & Schult.", "Humb. & Bonpl.: Willd. ex Roem. & Schult." or "Willd. ex Roem. & Schult." Most publications appear to make use of the latter, but I feel it more proper to credit the name to Humboldt and Bon- pland as did Willdenow in his herbarium. At any rate, D. arenarioides and D. frankenioides are names based on the same specimen (typonyms). In its diminished leaves, sepals and petals, Parry # Palmer 49 from San Luis Potosi, approaches D. arenarioides subsp. peninsularis, but the petals, which seem to possess more constant characters, are like those of typical arenarioides, i.e. two larger outer lobes and two basally dichotomous inner lobes, the linear divisions of the inner lobes being nearly as long as the oblong outer lobes. The very long style of this specimen further corroborates its determination as D. arenarioides ssp. arenarioides. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 198 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 9b. Drymaria arenarioides ssp. peninsularis (S. F. Blake) J. Duke comb. & F. Blake, in Jour. Wash. Acad. 14:285. 1924. (H< Purpus 423; Cape Region, Baja California, US!; isotypes at UC, F, GH, MO) Jobm Radially spreading or ascending annuals or suffrutescent perennials to as much as 25 cm. long, branching mostly at the base, the internodes shorter to longer than the leaves, stipitate-glandular, the taproot to as much as 1 cm. thick. Leaves opposite or pseudoverticillate, stipitate-glandular, linear, obtuse, obscurely veined, 4-25 mm. long, 0.5-1.0 mm. broad, attenuate to the sessile base, the stipules lance- deltoid, entire, 0.5-1.5 mm. long. Flowers, except the first formed, solitary in the axils of slightly and gradually reduced foliage leaves, the mature pedicels 4-12 mm. long, stipitate-glandular, the subtending leaves stipulate. Sepals 5, 2.8-4.5 mm. long, 1.0-2.2 mm. broad, stipitate-glandular, oblong to broadly elliptic, obtuse, the venation obscure, subdendritic, the inner sepals shorter, broader and less glandular; petals 5, 2.8-4.0 mm. long, apically 4(-8)-lobate, the outer lobes longer, about as long as the trunk, the inner about half as long as the outer, the trunk laterally denticulate, basally truncate or tapered to the minute claw; stamens 5, ultimately 2-3 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.5-0.8 mm. long; ovary at anthesis obovoid, stipitate, the minute style slightly exceeded by the anthers. Capsule globose, 2.5-4.0 mm. long, the style less than 1 mm. long, trifid about half its length, the seeds 10-20, hippocrepiform, dorsally flattened or sulcate, scarcely umbonate ventrally, reticulate or minutely tuberculate, 0.6-1.0 mm. long. Fig 4B (Holotype of D. peninsularis) 5 Fig. 4D (Holotype of D. johnstonii). Sandy soils; Cape Region of Baja California, Mexico. Unquestionably this subspecies is intimately related to ssp. arenarioides. The two subspecies are nicely separated by the Gulf of California in addition to the diagnostic characters listed in the key. I have seen many specimens of both subspecies, and intermediates are few indeed. Craig 738 and Hoivell 10576 appear to represent intermediates with many of the petals similar to those of the typical subspecies. Other features, coupled with the geography, seem to justify their relegation to ssp. peninsularis. 10. Drymaria axillaris Brandegee, in Univ. Cal. Publ. Bot. 4:178. 1911. (holotype: Purpjis 4526; Sierra del Rey, Coahuila, UC!; isotypes at GH, US, F, MO, etc.) Upright glandular-pubescent, cyanic glaucous perennials to 10 cm. high with many suffrutescent branches arising near the base, the taproot to 6 mm. in diameter. Leaves opposite, cyanic, glaucous, densely glandular-pubescent with capitate hairs to 0.7 mm. long, broadly ellipsoid, apically obtuse to acutish, basally subcordate or tapered to the petiole, 3-12 mm. long, 2.5-8.0 mm. broad; veins not apparent; petioles 0.5-2.0 mm. long, the stipules entire, broadly deltoid, 0.5-1.0 mm. long. Flowers solitary in the axils of reduced leaves, the glandular-pubescent pedicels DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 199 ebracteate, 1.5-3.0 mm. long. Sepals 5, subequal, subsucculent, glandular- pubescent, broadly lanceolate to ovate, slightly concavo-convex, obtuse to acutish, 4-5 mm. long, 1.5-2.0 mm. broad; venation obscure, the margins scariose; petals 5, 3.5-4.0 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes obtuse, ca. 0.6 mm. broad, exappendiculate, the claw 0.5-1.0 mm. broad; stamens 5, 3.0-3.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.8 mm. long; ovary at anthesis broadly ellipsoid, the style bifid about one-third its length, slightly exceeding the anthers. Capsule bivalved, ca. 2.5 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds hippocrepiform, merely reticu- late or puncticulate, ca. 0.7 mm. broad. Fig. 4C (Isotype). Known only from the type locality in Coahuila, Mexico. 11. Drymaria barkleyi J. Duke and Steyermark sp. nov. Plantae annuae graciles ramis paucis internodis glaucis quam foliis longioribus radice non viso. Folia opposita laminis glabris glaucis bullatisque 4-10 mm. longis, 1.0-2.5 mm. latis, ellipticis apice obtusis subsessilibus stipulis minutis deltoideis caducis apice saepe bifidis. Flores solitarii in axillis foliorum vix reductorum pedi- cellis glabris 4-8 mm. longis. Sepala (4-) 5, 3.0-4.5 mm. longa ca. 1 mm. lata glabra oblongo-elliptica obscuriter venosa; petala 5, 2.5-3.5 mm. longa ultra medium bifida vel rariter trifida lobis oblongis obtusis emarginatisve denticulatis basi acutis unguibus minutis; stamina (4-) 5, 3 mm. longa antheris oblongis 0.8- 1.0 mm. longis; ovarium oblongum, 1-2 mm. longum saepe 10-ovulatum stylis ca. 1.5 mm. longis (3-) 4-lobis minutis. Capsulae non visae. Fig. 4E (Holotype [except seed] ) . Coahuila: low pointed hill, almost destitute of soil, apparently a limestone shale, 25 mi. sw. of Monterrey, Warnock & Barkley 148 26 M. (holotype: F, isotype at US) . Fortunately another specimen with mature capsules is referable to the new species. Hernandez, Kowell tf Barkley 16M531, collected on talc-like limy soil and shaly limestone, (in Nuevo Leon) , 1 1 mi. w. of Santa Catarina differs only in having a few sessile glands on the herbage. The capsule is yellow, 3-4-toothed, 2.5-3.0 mm. long, 4—8 seeded. The seeds are lacrimiform, ca. 0.7 mm. in diameter, minutely and remotely tuberculate. Apparently the closest related species is the preceding with which the new species shares the cyanic tinting, solitary axillary flowers, and minute deltoid stipules. The differences far outnumber the strictly superficial similarities however. The sharply pointed long-beaked seed is slightly reminiscent of D. debilis. 12. Drymaria polycarpoides A. Gray, PI. Fendl. 12. 1849. (holotype: Gregg s. *.; valley of Bolson de Mapimi, Mexico; GH!) Prostrate or ascending profusely branching perennials to as much as 10 cm. long, branching mostly from the base, the nodes geniculate, fragile, the internodes mostly shorter than the leaves, glabrous or quite glaucous, the taproot to as much as 1 cm. thick. Leaves opposite, carnose, glaucous, often cyanic, elliptic, apically acute to obtuse, basally tapered, 5-12 mm. long, 2-5 mm. broad, weakly if at all nerved; petioles 0.5-1.5 mm. long, exceeding the minute, entire, lance-deltoid 200 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN stipules. Flowers in few-flowered strongly dichotomous cymes, the pedicels 1-4 mm. long, the bracts deltoid, obtuse, not scariose, 0.8-1.5 mm. long. Sepals 5, 3.5-5.0 mm. long, 1.5-2.0 mm. broad, glaucous, oblong to ovate, apically obtuse and often cucullate, the scariose margin as broad as or broader than the central 3 -nerved portion; petals 5, 3.5-4.5 mm. long, bifid little more than half their length, the lobes broadly oblong, apically obtuse, 1-3 -nerved, merging imper- ceptibly with the trunk, the trunk 1.0-1.5 mm. long, nearly as broad, exunguicu- late or subexunguiculate; stamens 5, the anthers 0.8-1.0 mm. long, the filaments 1.5-2.5 mm. long, devoid of staminodia; ovary at anthesis ovoid, equaled or exceeded by the style, the style trifid for less than one-fourth its length. Capsule ellipsoid to oblongoid, 2.0-2.5 mm. long, few-seeded, the seeds lacrimiform, not circinate, umbonulate ventrally, smooth, yellowish- brown. Fig. 4F (Holotype [except seed]). Known only from the Coahuilan Desert of Mexico. E. Series viscosae 13. Drymaria viscosa S. Watson ex Orcutt, in West. Am. Sci. 2:57. 1886. nomen nudum. S. Watson in Proc. Am. Acad. 22:469. 1887. (holotype: Orcutt 1330, Socorro ("Socono"), n. Baja California, GH!; isotypes at UC, D, F, US, MO, NY, etc.) Prostrate radially spreading or ascending diffusely branched viscid annuals, the branching below the inflorescence mostly dichotomous, the taproot to as much as 5 mm. thick. Leaves pseudoverticillate or opposite, glandular-puberulent, linear, apically obtuse, basally tapering to the clasping petiole, 3-15 mm. long, 0.5-1.5 mm. broad, the petiole 1-3 mm. long; stipules acicular, caducous, 1.0-1.5 mm. long. Flowers campanula te in 1-5 -flowered cymes, the peduncles mostly glabrous; bracts deltoid, marginally ciliolate, 0.5-1.0 mm. long, the pedicels 0-3 mm. long, all but the central equaled or exceeded by the bracts. Sepals 5, 2.3-3.0 mm. long, 1-1.5 mm. broad, glandular-puberulent, oblong, obtuse, obscurely 3 -nerved, the midrib subapically excurrent; petals 5, 1.8-2.2 mm. long, bifid about two-thirds their length, the lobes oblong, obtuse, tapered to the unguiculate base, exappendicu- late; stamens 5, ca. 2 mm. long, the broadly oblong anthers ca. 0.4 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, about equaled by the style, the style trifid about half its length, barely exceeding the anthers. Capsule 2.0-2.5 mm. long, equaling or exceeded by the sepals, 5-1 5 -seeded, the seeds cochleate, nearly smooth, 0.5-0.6 mm. broad, dorsally brown, facially transparent and colorless, the yellowish embryo visible. Fig. 5 A (Isotype). Sandy soils of Baja California, Mexico. In habit, this plant is not unlike D. molluginea as pictured in Fig. 3D. 14. Drymaria ortegioides Griseb. Cat. PL Cub. 21. 1866. (holotype: 2019; Cuba occ, GOET!; isotypes at F, GH, MO, US, etc.) Pinosia ortegioides (Griseb.) Urban, in Ark. Bot. 23A5:71. 1930. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 201 Upright sparsely dichotomizing glabrous or glandular perennials to as much as 20 cm. high, the internodes much longer than the leaves, the tap root to 5 mm. thick. Leaves opposite, glabrous, linear to elliptic, apically acute to obtuse, attenu- ate to the subsessile base, 3-12 mm. long, 1.0-3.5 mm. broad, the stipules lance- deltoid, 0.3-0.8 mm. long, entire. Inflorescences of terminal condensed 5-21- flowered dichotomous cymes; peduncles 1.5-3.5 cm. long, the bracts 1-2 mm. long, imbricate or subimbricate, the glabrous pedicels 1.5-4.0 mm. long. Sepals 5, 2.5- 3.5 mm. long, glabrous, ovate to obovate, acute to obtuse, the venation obscure, dichotomous and reticulate; petals 3, 2.3-3.2 mm. long, twice dichotomous, the lobes oblong, obtuse, nearly as long as the trunk, exappendiculate, the trunk merging gradually with the claw; stamens 3, the oblong anthers ca. 0.5 mm. long; ovary subglobose, the styles 0.5-1 mm. long. Capsule globose, 1.5-2.0 mm. long, shorter than the sepals, 1-4-seeded, the seeds hippocrepiform, scarcely if at all umbonulate, closely tuberculate, 1.0-1.5 mm. long, dark brown. Fig. 5B, 5C. Sandy savannas of Cuba. Leaves deltoid-ovate to reniform, opposite, stipulate. Flowers long-pedicel' in lax cymes. Sepals acute or obtuse, trinerved. Petals bifid, the lobes thcmsel dichotomizing, ciliate-auriculate at their bases. Seeds cochleate, tuberculate, tubercles domical or substellate. 3 species in Mexico. Fig 5 D-F. 15. Drymaria hypericifolia Briq. in Ann. Cons. & Jard. Geneva 14:369. 1911. (holotype: Jurgenson 38, de Lecambre de Yolotepeque a Juquilla, au sud- ouest d'Oaxaca; Mexicum G!; isotype at K) Erect or ascending perennials (?) to as much as 25 cm. high, the internodes about as long as the leaves, stipitate-glandular. Leaves opposite, 8-22 mm. long, 5-14 mm. broad, narrowly deltoid-ovate, glabrous or minutely glandular-puberulent below, apically acute, marginally somewhat undulate, basally obtuse to acute, plinerved; petioles 1-2 mm. long, the stipules entire or bifid, the divisions lance- deltoid, 0.5-1.2 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal 5-1 1-flowered cymes, the peduncles 2-3 cm. long, the bracts lanceolate, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, the pedicels stipitate-glandular, 4-6 mm. long. Sepals 5, 4.5-5.5 mm. long, lanceolate to narrowly ovate, apically acute, the outer sepals scantily stipitate-glandular, tri- nerved; petals 5, ca. 6 mm. long, four times dichotomous, the ultimate segments emarginate, the trunk laterally provided with deciduous cilia te auricles; stamens 5, ca. 4 mm. long, the anthers oblong, ca. 0.7 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, about equaled by the partially trifid style, the style slightly exceeded by the anthers. 202 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Capsule ellipsoid, ca. 5 mm. long, 3-valved, apically constricted, many-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.7-1.0 mm. long, irregularly corrugated or tuberculate; seeds immature. Fig. 5D (Holotype). Known only from two collections near Juquila in Oaxaca, Mexico. North American authors have confused Drymaria ladcwii with this species, probaWy because of certain vegetative resemblances. The flowers of the two species however contrast vividly. 16. Drymaria excisa Standi, in Field Mus. Bot. 8:11. 1930. (holotype: Mexia 174.8', Real Alto, trail to El Tajo de Santiago, 2500 m., Jalisco, F!; iso- typesatUC, GH, etc.) Drymaria grandis Bullock, in Kew Bull. 1936:389. 1936. (holotype: Hinton 5427, Los Hornos, Temascaltepec, 2500 m., Mexico, K!; isotypes at GH, MO, etc.) Robust spreading perennials, the procumbent or erect branches to 3 m. long (fide Bullock), the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glandular-puberulent, glabrescent. Leaves opposite, 5-25 mm. long, 5-30 mm. broad, glabrous or minutely glandular, the blades orbicular to obcordate, apically emarginate or apiculate, marginally entire, basally obtuse to truncate, 3-pli-nerved; petioles 5-25 mm. long, the stipules entire or apically lacerate, lanceolate, 2—4 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal lax 3 -many- flowered cymes, the peduncles 3-6 (-15) cm. long; bracts lanceolate to ovate, 3.0-4.5 mm. long, the pedicels 3-15 mm. long, stipitate-glandular, glabrescent. Sepals 5, 5.0-10.0 mm. long, 2.0-2.8 mm. broad, ovate, apically acute, weakly 3-ribbed; petals 5, 6-12 mm. long, 2— 3 -times dichotomous, the ultimate segments entire or emarginate, the trunk laterally provided with several deciduous ciliate auricles; stamens 5, 5.0-6.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 1 mm. long, the staminodia minute, semicircular; ovary at anthesis ovoid, about equaling the style, the style 1.5-3.0 mm. long, trifid about one-third its length. Capsule ellipsoid, apically constricted, 3.0-5.5 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds tightly cochleate, 0.9-1.2 mm. broad, evenly tuber- culate, the dorsal tubercles somewhat longer than broad, the facial tubercles polygonal (rarely substellate) in outline. Fig 5E (Holotype). Jalisco, Michoacan, Mexico, and Morelos, Mexico, usually above 2000 m. It is interesting to note that in none of the original descriptions of taxa refer- able to this species (or series) was any mention made of the poly dichotomous nature of the petals. This may be due to the fact that the foliage is so outstanding that the species can usually be determined without resorting to the tedium of dissection. 17. Drymaria 1890. (b jara, GH!; isotypes at UC, US, etc.) Laxly spreading or rarely erect annuals, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, villose with spreading jointed hairs or stipitate-glandular. Leaves opposite, 5-14 mm. long, 5-20 mm. broad, villose to glabrous, reniform to deltoid-ovate, apically rounded to acute and apiculate, marginally entire, basally truncate or 204 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN cordate, 3-7-pli-nerved; petioles 1-6 mm. long, stipules entire or bifid, the divisions filiform to narrowly lanceolate, 1.0-1.5 mm. long. Inflorescences of lax terminal 3-many-flowered cymes, the peduncles 1-10 cm. long; bracts lanceolate, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, the pedicels 5-25 mm. long, sparingly villose with glandular hairs occasionally admixed. Sepals 5, 4.2-5.5 mm. long, 1.7-2.7 mm. wide, glabrous to villose, narrowly to broadly ovate, the outer acute, villose, and weakly 3 -nerved, the inner rounded and glabrous; petals 5, 5.6-7.0 mm. long, once or twice dichotomous, the ultimate segments emarginate, the trunk laterally provided with several ciliate auricles; stamens 5, 4-5 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.8-1.0 mm. long; ovary at anthesis subglobose, 1-2 mm. long, the style 2.0-2.5 mm. long, trifid about one-third its length, exceeded by the anthers. Capsule 3.5-5.0 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds 0.7-0.9 mm. long, cochleate, evenly tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles conical, the facial tubercles elongate-stellate. Fig. 5F (Holotype). Jalisco, Michoacan, and Mexico, Mexico. Here the tendency toward a second dichotomy in the petals is often suppressed to the point that the petal is merely bilobed, but the lobes are emarginate, and the twice-dichotomous nature is still reflected in the venation. This species affords a good transition to the series villosae. McVaugh & Koeh 897 from Jalisco makes a marked approach toward D. multiflora, and may represent a hybrid. Indicative of hybrid tendencies are the broadly reniform leaves, the absence of villosity, and the weakly emarginate petals. The floral parts in general are a bit small for D. longepeduncnlata and come closer to the range of dimension exhibited by the flowers of D. multiflora. H. Seri Leaves linear, oblong or narrowly spatulate, subsessile, stipulate, the stipules usually entire. Flowers in bracteate cymes, the pedicels longer or shorter than the bracts. Sepals obtuse to acuminate, trinerved. Petals bilobed, unguiculate, exauriculate, the lobes 1 (-3) -nerved. Seeds cochleate, tuberculate, the tubercles not ornate. Two polymorphic intergrading delicate annual (or rarely perennial) species; western U. S. A. to Guatemala. Fig. 6. inflorescence; bracts mostly exceeding the subtended pedic< 1. Some or all of the sepals acute to acuminate; seeds tightly co DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA Peduncles and often the pedicels and sepals stipitate-glandular, the pedicels mostly >y or exerted from the calyx: 18a. Drymaria effusa var. effusa HI) Erect, delicate, sparsely branched annuals to as much as 25 cm. high, the inter- nodes mostly longer than the leaves, minutely glandular-puberulent or glabrate, the roots to ca. 1 mm. thick. Basal leaves pseudoverticillate, spatulate to orbicular; cauline leaves opposite, rarely pseudoverticillate, 5-25 mm. long, 0.5-1.2 mm. broad, minutely puberulent or glabrous, linear, apically obtuse or apiculate, sessile, the stipules entire, acicular, caducous, 0.5-1.0 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal multifloriferous cymes, the ultimate branches showing tendencies to become monopodial; peduncles 2-5 cm. long, stipitate-glandular; bracts ovate, 0.5-1.8 mm. long, the mature pedicels 1-5 mm. long, stipitate-glandular, usually exceeding the bracts. Sepals 5, 1.4—2.2 mm. long, the outer narrower, shorter, more obtuse and often cucullate, glandular, the inner more ovate, often acutish, all trinerved, the veins subapically confluent; petals 5, 2-4 mm. long, bifid half their length or more, the lobes linear to oblong, 1 -nerved, obtuse, tapering gradually to the claw, exap- pendiculate; stamens 5, 1.2-1.6 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.3 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, the style rather elongate, trifid about half its length, about attaining the anthers. Capsule ellipsoid, nearly equaling the sepals, the stigmata exerted; seeds 2-9, cochleate to lacrimiform, coarsely tuberculate, 0.5- 0.8 mm. broad. Fig. 6B (Holotype). Arizona, U.S.A.; Sonora and Sinaloa, Mexico, the Sinaloa specimens approach- ing D. leptophylla. 18b. Drymaria effusa var. confusa (J. N. Rose) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov. tr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 5:133. 1897. (holotype: , US!, isotypes at GH, MO, etc.) Delicate sparsely branching glabrous or subglabrous annuals to as much as 7.5 cm. high, scarcely branching at the base. Basal leaves glabrous, orbicular to broadly elliptic, 2.5-3.5 mm. long, 2.5-3.0 mm. broad, the petioles 1.5-2.5 mm. long; cauline leaves linear to oblong, obtuse, slightly narrowed to the clasping base, 10-20 mm. long, ca. 1 mm. broad, the stipules entire, acicular, 0.5-1.0 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal diffuse several-flowered cymes, the glabrous peduncles 10-25 mm. long; bracts ovate to narrowly lance-deltoid, 0.5-0.8 mm. long, scariose and transparent save for the darkened midrib; pedicels glabrous, 2-8 mm. long, at maturity usually longer than the flowers. Sepals 5, 1.5-2.2 mm. long, 0.5- 0.7 mm. broad, minutely glandular, broadly oblong, apically obtuse, transparent save for the 3 ribs; petals 5, 2.0-2.5 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes spatulate to narrowly oblong, trinerved, exappendiculate, merging imper- 206 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN ceptibly with the narrower claw; stamens (3?-) 5, ca. 2 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.4 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, slightly exceeded by the anthers, the slightly trind style exceeding the anthers. Capsule ca. 1.8 mm. long, few seeded, the seeds cochleate, minutely tuberculate, ca. 0.6 mm. long. Fig. 6C (Holotype). Chihuahua and Durango, Mexico. Nelson 4813 is determined as this variety only with some misgivings. All the sepals are obtuse and cucullat^ and many of the pedicels are exceeded by the sub- tending bracts, in these respects approaching var. depressa. Although suggestive of var. depressa, this plant's upright habit and obovate 3 -nerved petal-lobes deny this possibility. 18c. Drymaria effusa var. depressa (Greene) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov. Drymaria depressa Greene, Leafl. Bot. Obs. 1:153. 1905. (holotype: Metcalf 143O; open glades of the Black Range, alt. 9,500 ft., N. Mex., ND; isotypes at F, GH, MO, UC,US,etc!) Drymaria minuscula Standi. & Steyerm. in Field Mus. Bot. 23:52. 1944. (holotype: Steyermark 50243; on rocky limestone outcrops under Juniperus standleyi, alt. 3700 Guatemala, F!) Minute, subcespitose, glabrous to minutely puberulent annuals rarely to 5 cm. high, the branching largely confined to the base and the inflorescence. Rosette leaves orbicular to spatulate, 1.5-10.0 mm. long, 1-3 mm. broad; cauline leaves when present opposite, the blades oblong, 3-10 mm. long, 1-4 mm. broad, apically obtuse, basally tapered, subsessile, the stipules entire, 0.5-1.2 mm. long, acicular, caducous. Inflorescences of terminal lax (rarely condensed) several-flowered cymes, the bracts 1.5-2.0 mm. long, mostly longer than the pedicels, the pedicels and peduncles glabrous or glandular. Sepals 5, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, ca. 1 mm. broad, glabrous or glandular, oblong to ovate, apically obtuse, cucullate, 3 -ribbed, the ribs subapically confluent; petals 5, 1.5-2.8 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes linear to narrowly oblong, apically obtuse, usually 1 -nerved, gradually tapering to the claw; stamens 5, 0.7-1.7 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.2-0.3 mm. long; ovary at anthesis globose to obturbinate, the styles 2-3 -fid about half their length, about equaling the anthers. Capsule ellipsoid to subglobose, about equaling the sepals, 6-1 2 -seeded, the seed cochleate to lacrimiform, 0.5-0.7 mm. long, dorsally sulcate, minutely tuberculate. Fig 6A. (Isotype). High altitudes, New Mexico, Colorado and Arizona, U. S. A., south to Guate- As a rule this is quite a distinctive variety but it is probable that it hybridizes with other members of the series. Metcalfe 1428 strongly suggests that hybridiza- tion has occurred with D. leptophylla or one of its varieties. Except rarely, D. leptophylla and D. effusa var. depressa are quite distinct, the former being char- acterized by an elongate subvirgate habit, the capsules shorter than the inner acute sepals, and the deeply cleft style, the latter being differentiated by the dwarf subcespitose habit, the capsules about equaling the obtuse, cucullate inner sepals, and the shallowly cleft style. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 207 208 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN In correspondence with Dr. Steyermark, I have suggested to him that D. minus- cala probably represents an alpine reduction of what I here reduce to the var. depressa, and he tends to agree with this disposition of his diminutive species. The type from Guatemala has somewhat reduced nodes, leaves, sepals, etc., but such reductions also occur at the other end of the range of the variety, e. g. Colorado, and it seems doubtful that such diminutions are worthy of formal status. 19a. Drymaria leptophylla var. leptophylla Drymaria leptophylla (Cham. & Schlecht.) Fenzl ex Rohrb. in Linnaea 37:195. 1871. (holotype: Schiede 6 Deppe 511; ad radices montis Orizabae, B; n.v.) Arenaria Uptopby in Linnaea 5:233. 1830. Drymaria tenella A. Gray, Pi. Fendl. 12. 1849. (holotype: Fendler 56; eight miles west of las Vegas, New Mexico; GH!) Drymaria nodosa var. ? gracillima Hemsl. Diag. PI. Nov. 2:22. 1879. (holotype: Parry & Palmer 6o\ in regione San Luis Potosi, alt. 6000-8000 ped., Mexico, K n. v.; isotypes at MO, GH, etc.!) Drymaria gracillima (Hemsl.) J. N. Rose, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 5:132. 1897. Erect delicate, usually sparsely branched annuals to as much as 20 cm. high, the internodes much longer than the leaves, glabrous to minutely glandular, the taproot ca. 1 mm. thick. Leaves opposite, rarely pseudoverticillate, glabrous, linear to narrowly oblong, 5-25 mm. long, 0.5-1.0 mm. broad, often involute and circinate, apically obtuse or acute, tapered to the subsessile base; stipules entire, 0.2-0.8 mm. long, acicular, caducous. Inflorescences of terminal many-flowered dichasial cymes, the peduncles 1-5 cm. long, glabrous to minutely glandular; bracts ovate, 0.5-1.0 (-1.5) mm. long, equaling or exceeding the pedicels. Sepals 5, ovate, 1.5-3.5 mm. long, narrowly ovate, apically acute and often somewhat reflexed (the outer sepals obtuse and cucullate in some northern material) , 3 -ribbed, glabrous or with a few sessile glands; petals 5, 1.2-2.4 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes linear, obtuse or acute; stamens 5, 1.0-1.5 mm. long, the suborbicular anthers ca. 0.2 mm. long, the filaments basally and briefly connate; ovary at anthesis subglobose, the style about attaining the anthers, divided nearly to the base. Capsule 1.5-2.0 mm. long, 5-20-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.5- 0.7 mm. long, evenly tuberculate with domical tubercles. Fig 6G (Isotype of D. gracillima) . Arizona to Colorado, U.S.A., south to southern Mexico, and in Baja California. Toward the northern end of its range, the specimens belonging to the typical variety show frequent, but inconsistent, tendencies toward more obtuse, often cucullate, outer sepals and more pronouncedly coiled and contorted leaves. In the northern material the outer sepals are more frequently shorter than the inner, while the converse condition is more frequent toward the south. Although there is not enough material to justify any rigid hypothesis, I would guess that clinal variation is at work in this complex variety. 19b. Drymaria leptophylla var. cognata (S. F. Blake) J. Duke comb. & stat. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 209 Upright, diffusely branching, locally glandular-puberulent annual to as much as 15 cm. high. Leaves opposite, the blades 6-20 mm. long, 0.5-1.5 mm. broad, glabrous, lance-linear, apically acute, gradually tapering to the subsessile somewhat clasping base, veinless or obscurely 3 -nerved; stipules mostly entire, acicular, 0.5- 0.8 mm. long. Inflorescences of several-flowered, diffuse, trichotomous cymes, the axes locally glandular-puberulent; bracts lance-ovate to ovate, aristate, scariose save for the green excurrent midrib, 1-2 mm. long, usually shorter than the subtended pedicels, the pedicels 0.5-4.0 mm. long. Sepals 5, 3.3-4.5 mm. long, 0.8-1.3 mm. broad, glabrous or very sparsely glandular, lance-ovate, apically attenuate, 3 -ribbed, transparent save for the green ribbed area; petals 5, 3.0-3.5 mm. long, bifid slightly more than half their length, the sinus broad, the lobes narrowly oblong, obtuse, the trunk flaring before tapering rather abruptly to the claw; stamens 5, 2.0-2.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.5 mm. long; ovary at anthesis sub- globose, the style slightly shorter, trifid about half its length, slightly exceeding the anthers. Capsule ellipsoid, 2-3 mm. long, ca. 5-seeded, the seeds cochleate, ca. 0.8 mm. broad, minutely and regularly tuberculate. Fig. 6D (Holotype). Durango and Chihuahua, Mexico. 19c. Drymaria leptophylla var. nodosa (Engelm.) J. Duke comb. nov. Drymaria nodosa Engelm. in A. Gray, PI. Fer from seed collected by Wislizenius in the m Drymaria tcuclla var. nodosa (Engelm.) "Wiggir Drymaria gentryi Fosberg, in Proc. Biol. Soc. Wash. 62:147. 1949. (HOLOTYPE: Gentry 266g; transition pine slope, los Cascarones, Rio Mayo; Chihuahua; US!; isotypes at MO, UC, etc.) Erect delicate, sparsely branched annuals (or perennials?) to as much as 25 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, usually glandular-puberulent, the taproot to 2 mm. in diameter. Basal leaves spatulate to orbicular, opposite or pseudoverticillate, caducous; cauline leaves opposite, glabrous or minutely glandu- lar, 5-30 mm. long, 0.5-2.5 mm. broad, 1 -nerved, linear to narrowly elliptic, apically obtuse to apiculate, sessile; stipules entire, acicular, caducous, 0.5-1.5 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal many-flowered dichasial cymes, the peduncles 2-5 cm. long, stipitate-glandular; bracts lance-deltoid to ovate, acuminate, 0.7-2.5 mm. long, mostly shorter than the pedicels, the pedicels stipitate-glandular, 0.5- 5.0 mm. long. Sepals 5, subequal, 2.3-3.5 mm. long, 0.5-1.5 mm. broad, lanceolate to ovate, acuminate, basally or entirely stipitate-glandular, 3 -ribbed, the ribs distally confluent; petals 5, 2.0-3.5 mm. long, bifid slightly more than half their length, the lobes linear to oblong or narrowly spatulate, obtuse, mostly 1 -nerved, exappendiculate; stamens 5, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.4 mm. long, the filaments basally connate, often with inconspicuous staminodial flaps; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid to subglobose, the styles elongate, nearly as long as the ovary, bifid or trifid less than half their length, equaling or exceeding the anthers. Capsule ellipsoid, 1.5-2.0 mm. long, shorter than the sepals, 1-9-seeded, the seeds cochleate, the anterior end strongly recurved, minutely and regularly reticulate, 0.6-1.0 mm. broad. Fig. 6E (Holotype of D. nodosa), Fig. 6F (Holotype of D. gentryi) . 210 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Chihuahua, Sonora, Durango, San Luis Potosi and Hidalgo, Mexico. Gentry 2669, type of D. gentryi, stands out with its rather broad leaves, but examination of other specimens e.g. LeSueur 623, also from Chihuahua, shows that Fosberg's species cannot stand as distinct from D. leptophylla var. nodosa. Equally aberrant are S. S. White 418$ and 4776 from Sonora. In these speci- mens, the inflorescence is strikingly congested and the petal-lobes are broader than those of most specimens of the variety nodosa. In spite of the bizarre inflorescence, it seems best to retain them within the variety, with which they coincide in other fundamental characteristics. Leaves opposite, lanceolate, petiolate, stipulate, the stipules mostly lacerate. Flowers in monopodial or dichasial cymes, the pedicels longer or shorter than the bracts. Sepals acute, 1-3-nerved. Petals bifid, the lobes 1-5-nerved, unguiculate, exauriculate. Stamens 2-5. Seeds cochlea te, tuberculate, the tubercles not ornate. Two diffusely spreading annual or perennial Mexican species. Fig. 7. 20. Drymaria anomala S. Watson, in Proc. Am. Acad. 25:143. 1889. (holo- type: Pringle 2847, Carneros Pass, Coahuila, US!; isotype at GH) Upright or spreading annuals or perennials, much branched from below, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, stipitate-glandular, the taproot to 5 mm. thick. Cauline leaves opposite, 3-8 mm. long, 2-4 mm broad, glabrous to glandu- lar or puberulent, the blades lance elliptic, obscurely veined, apically acute, basally cuneate to acute, the petioles mostly less than 1 mm. long; stipules entire or bifid, lance-deltoid to acicular, persistent, 0.5-1.5 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal many-flowered cymes, the first branches dichasial, subsequent branches becoming monopodial; peduncles 2-5 cm. long, glabrous to stipitate-glandular; bracts 0.5- 2.0 mm. long, exceeding the pedicels, the pedicels stipitate-glandular or glabrescent. Sepals 5, 2-3 mm. long, 1.0-1.5 mm. broad, stipitate-glandular, broadly elliptic, apically acute, with 3 prominent veins, the outer submarginal, there being little or no scariose margin; petals 5, 1.5-2.0 mm. long, bifid a little over half their length, the lobes oblong, obtuse; stamens (2-) 3-5, 1.0-1.4 mm. long, the anthers oblong, ca. 0.3 mm. long; ovary at anthesis obturbinate, the style trifid about half its length, much shorter than the ovary, about attaining the anthers. Capsule about equaling the sepals, 5-9-seeded, the seeds cochleate, closely tuberculate, 0.6-0.9 mm. broad. Fig. 7 A (details from Holotype). Coahuila, Zacatecas, San Luis Potosi and Hidalgo, Mexico. 21. Drymaria tenuis S. Watson, in Proc. Am. Acad. 25:142. 1889. (holo- type: Pringle 2120; under ledges of the barranca near Guadalajara, Jalisco, US!; isotype at GH) DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA in Ann. Cons. & Jard. Bot. Gen. 13:374. 1911. Drymaria tenuis P var. jaliscana Briq. loc. cit. 374. 1911. (holotype: Pringle 4536; Civitas Jalisco, in declivibus altis prope Guadalajara, G; n. v.; isotypes at MO, US, Erect or clambering delicate annuals or perennials to as much as 50 cm. long, the internodes much longer than the leaves, glabrous or pilosulous, the root some- times lignescent, to as much as 6 mm. thick. Leaves opposite, glabrous, glandular or pilosulous, the blades lance-elliptic to ovate, apically and basally acute, 2.5-10.0 mm. long, 1-7 mm. broad, the petioles 0.5-5.0 mm. long; stipules lacerate, the the peduncles very elongate, glal 212 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN pedicels 2-7 mm. long, glabrous, usually much longer than the subtending bracts. Sepals 5, the outer ovate, apically obtuse, 2.0-2.5 mm. long, ca. 1 mm. broad, the mm. long; petals 5, 1-2 mm. long, bifid about two-thirds their length, the lobes oblong, apically obtuse or acutish, exappendiculate, gradually tapering to the linear claw; stamens 5, 1.0-1.3 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.2 mm. long, the filaments basally connate; ovary at anthesis subglobose, ca. 0.8 mm. long; style bifid or trifid about half its length, about attaining the anthers. Capsule ovoid, about equaling the sepals, 5-15-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.5-0.7 mm. broad, evenly tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles mostly longer than broad. Fig. 7B (Holotype of D. filiformis Robinson & Seaton) ; Fig. 7C (Holotype of D. tenuis). Michoacan, Jalisco, Guanajuato, Zacatecas and Veracruz, Mexico. The type of D. filiformis from Mt. Orizaba differs only in having shorter petioles and smaller, more obtuse petal lobes, differences possibly resulting from the alpine environment and probably of no taxonomic consequence. Unfortunately Briquet relied too heavily on Watson's description of D. tenuis as glabrous, and published the variety jaliscana, believing it to differ in being pubescent. Examina- tion of the holotype of D. tenuis reveals that Watson's description was erroneous; the type is locally villosulous with hairs up to 0.5 mm. long. Briquet's pubescent variety, collected very near the type locality of the typical variety, is probably no more pubescent than the typical variety. Leaves linear to lanceolate, opposite, occasionally pergameneous, sessile or briefly petiolate, stipulate or estipulate. Flowers, showing tendencies toward monoecism, in dichasial bracteate cymes. Sepals acute, 3-5-ribbed. Petals bifid, the lobes 3- 9-nerved, exauriculate, unguiculate or exunguiculate, the trunk entire or denticu- late. Sepals cochleate, tuberculate, the tubercles acute or obtuse. Four more or less erect suffrutescent perennial species of Peru and Ecuador. Fig. 8. '' d>" V lob t 'ir'S' ; ci;» 'horur' Sl» the ! trunk; seedi rv-u fafE "aftuberde!! - ^:r^:t'\z?stly 5-nerved; 22. Drymaria stellarioides Humb. & Bonpl. ex Roem. & Schult. Syst. Veg. 5: 406. 1819. (holotype: Humb. # Bonpl. s.n.; crescit prope Hambato, alt. 1380 hex. [Regno Quitensi]; probably destroyed; fragment and photograph at F! illustr. HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 6; pi. 516. 1823.) 214 Upright or ascending dichotomous lignescent perennials from a stout tap- root to 15 mm. thick, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves except on condensed lateral branches, glabrous to glandular-pubescent. Leaves opposite, glabrous or rarely glandular-puberulent, lanceolate to oblanceolate, apically acute, marginally entire, 3 -ribbed, 5-20 mm. long, 2.5-7.5 mm. broad, tapered to the sessile, clasping base; stipules entire, apparently fused or occasionally absent, 0.0- 2.5 mm. long. Inflorescences of lax to crowded 5-many-flowered cymes, the peduncles 1-8 cm. long; bracts lanceolate, 3-5 mm. long, intergrading with the foliage leaves; pedicels glabrous to densely glandular-puberulent, all but the central pedicel usually exceeded by the bracts. Sepals 5, narrowly to broadly lanceolate, glabrous to densely glandular-puberulent, strongly 3 -ribbed, apically acute, (4-) 5-9 mm. long, 2-3 mm. broad; petals 5, 5-10 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes oblong, obtuse, 4-8 -nerved, exauriculate, constricted slightly toward the trunk, the trunk rhombic to rectangular, truncate to the short claw; stamens 5, 3-6 mm. long, those of fertile flowers (destined to mature seeds) usually much shorter than those of infertile flowers; anthers 0.7-1.1 mm. long; filaments basally connate into a cup ca. 1 mm. deep; ovary (occasionally absent in flowers with long stamens) ellipsoid, multiovulate, those of fertile flowers about equaling the anthers; styles 1.5-3.0 mm. long, trifid for about one-fourth their length. Capsule ellipsoid, substylopodiate, 3-5 mm. long, 2-many-seeded, the seeds laxly circinnate, 0.8-1.2 mm. broad, tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles subspinulose, the facial tubercles tending to be polygonal. Fig. 8A. Pachano Q5 (Fig. 8A) and the isotype seem to differ from other representatives of this species in that the sepals and petals are unusually long and the petal lobes have more numerous veins. Seeds of this species, as illustrated in HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 6: pi. 516. 1823, appear to be constantly subspinulose-tuberculate. There is no indication in the aforementioned illustration however of the polygamous tendency which I believe characterizes this species. Although the material available for dissection has not been too copious, I feel that certain correlates exist in differ- ent types of flowers. Many of the ovaries bear aberrant ovules and in some flowers the ovary is completely lacking. In flowers which mature seed, the anthers rarely surpass the body of the capsule, while in those flowers with aberrant ovules, the filaments seem to have elongated so that the anthers equal or surpass the style branches. In some unnumbered specimens collected by Jameson near Cuenca and Loxa, there are flowers with long glandular sepals and others with shorter glabrous sepals; those with the shorter glabrous sepals proved to be fertile while some of those with longer glandular sepals were completely devoid of ovaries. 23. Drymaria stereophylla Mattf. in Notizbl. Bot. Gart. Berl. 13:436. 1936. (holotype: Kaimondi 2$02\ Peru. Dep. Junin: Prov. Jauja; Abhang am Fusse des Chacapalpa zwischen Huari und Jauja, B, n. v.; probably destroyed) OF DRYMARIA 215 Drymaria stereophylla /. 12. 1892. (holotype: Palmer 8lQ; Carmen Island; US!; isotypes at F, MO, US, NY, etc.) Drymaria polystachya var. diffusa (Rose) Wiggins, in Proc. Cal. Acad. 4 25 :198. 1944. Ascending or clambering, occasionally subscandent annuals or perennials, the tenuous, villose or glandular internodes shorter to longer than the leaves, the tap- root to as much as 15 mm. thick. Leaves opposite, the blades 3-20 mm. long, 3-20 mm. broad, villose or glandular, broadly ovate to reniform, apically acutish and apiculate, basally cordate, often drying with a yellowish tinge, the petioles nearly as long as the blades, the stipules mostly entire, filiform, 1-3 mm. long. Inflores- cences of terminal lax 3 -many-flowered cymes, the axes villose or glandular puberulent, the peduncles 1-10 mm. long; bracts narrowly to broadly ovate, scariose, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, much exceeded by the pedicels, the villose or glandular pedicels to as much as 25 mm. long. Sepals 5, 2.5-5.5 mm. long, 1.5-2.4 mm. broad, glandular to villose, oblong to elliptic or ovate, apically obtuse, emarginate or with the midrib occasionally excurrent, the venation obscurely dichotomous and reticulate; petals 5, 3.0-6.5 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes oblong, rounded to truncate at the apex, 1-2-nerved, gradually tapered to the claw; stamens 5, 1.0-3.5 mm. long, the filaments usually dimorphic, two or three being distinctly longer than the others, the anthers oblong 0.5-1.0 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, often stipitate, exceeded by the anthers, the style 1-2 mm. long, trifid to half its length. Capsule ellipsoid to ovoid, 1.0-3.5 mm. long, 6- DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 222 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 15-seeded, the seeds ampulliform, 0.6-1.0 mm. broad, the pointed anterior ends not strongly recoiled, the tubercles low, polygonal, rather remote. Fig. 10A (Holotype of D. polystachya) ; Fig. 10B (Holotype of D. diffusa); Fig. IOC (Holotype of D.debilis). Baja California, Mexico. This polymorphic species has generally been regarded as three separate species, the more or less sympatric differences purported to reside in the duration, pubes- cence, and the length and shape of the sepals and petals. I am more impressed by the homogeneity of certain other characters (e. g. the peculiar retort-shaped seeds, the inequality of the stamens, the venation of the sepals) than by the differences supposed to separate the three species. Particularly suspicious to me are keys in which the primary dichotomy is annual vs. perennial. Many Drymaria species, originally described as annual, have turned out to have perennial representatives. I prefer to think of D. debilis as a species embracing many contrasting character- istics, but with few, if any, correlated contrasts. M. Series laxiflores 30. Drymaria laxiflora Benth. PL Hartw. 73. 1839. (holotype: Hartweg 523; Guatemala; in rupibus Sunilo, BM? n. v.; isotypes at GL, F, LE, P, etc!) in Ann. Cons. & Jard. Bot. Gen. 13: 370. 1911. (holo- type: Pringle 331 ; M« us umbrosis prope Chihua- hua; G, n. v.; isotypes at F, GH, MO, NY, P, US, etc.!) Glabrous to densely stipitate-glandular diffuse to subcespitose perennials to as much as 30 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaf-blades, the taproot to as much as 6 mm. thick. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous to densely stipitate-glandular, ovate to reniform, 4-12 mm. long, 3-14 mm. broad, trinerved, apically obtuse to acute and mucronulate, marginally entire, basally acute to subcordate, the petioles 1-5 mm. long, the stipules bifid or trifid, rarely entire, the divisions setaceous, 0.5-3.5 mm. long. Inflorescences of lax few-flowered cymes, the peduncles 5-40 mm. long; bracts ovate, strongly 1 -ribbed, scariose, apiculate, 1.5-3.0 mm. long, transparent save for the midrib, mostly shorter than the pedicels, the pedicels subglabrous to densely stipitate-glandular, 2-6 mm. long. Sepals 5, 2.5-6.0 mm. long, 1.5-2.2 mm. broad, glabrous to densely stipitate- glandular, lanceolate to narrowly ovate, trinerved, acute, the midrib occasionally excurrent, the laterals often subapically dissipating; petals 5, 2.5-6.0 mm. long, bifid one-half to two-thirds their length, the lobes oblong, apically emarginate, with one dichotomous vein, exappendiculate, continuous with the trunk, the trunk as long as or longer than the claw; stamens 4-5, 2-4 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.3-0.8 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, exceeded by the anthers, the elongate style trifid one-third to one-half its length, slightly exceeding the anthers. Capsule 3-4-valved, 2-4 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds 0.5-0.7 mm. broad, evenly tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles conical, the facial tubercles substellate. Fig 10D (Isotype of D. chihuahuensis) ; Fig. 10E (Isotype of D. laxiflora). Texas through continental Mexico to Guatemala, to the south becoming less glandular and tending to have larger floral parts. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 223 Examination of several isotypes of Hartweg 523 from Guatemala reveals that the plant, although described as glabrous, possesses a few scattered stipitate glands. Bernoulli 6 Cario 3255 at Leningrad, collected in Quezaltenango, matches the types of D. laxiflora in all respects except that it is more glandular. Toward the northern end of the range, the species has some very glandular representatives whose seeds are nearly black, pleiochroistic and very ornately sculptured. In spite of the extreme variation, some of which appears to be along a north-south dine, only one species seems to be involved. Bourgeau 2Q46 and Rose & Hay 5676 from Mt. Orizaba have petals, the lobes of which are so deeply emarginate as to recall the twice dichotomous petals of D. longepedunculata, and it is here suggested that the Series laxiflores is genetically closely related to the Series excisae. Leaves opposite, stipulate, mostly long-petiolate, and ovate to orbicular, often villose. Flowers in few-many-flowered cymes, rarely subsolitary in the axils. Sepals acute or obtuse, 1-3-nerved. Petals (occasionally absent) merely bifid, the lobes usually ciliate-auriculate, 1-7-nerved, unguiculate. Stamens 3-5. Seeds cochleate, tuberculate, the tubercles stellate, cylindric or capitate. Four species of continental Mexico, Central and South America, one introduced in Malaysia. Figs. 11 and 12. 224 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 31. Drymaria multiflora Brandegee, in Zoe 5:232. 1906. (holotype: Purpus 1653; dry hills, Salto de Agua, Mexico, UC!; isotypes at F, GH, MO, US, etc.) Erect or ascending perennials to as much as 50 cm. tall, much branched, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glabrous to stipitate- glandular, rarely villosulous. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous, 4-22 mm. long, 4-25 mm. broad, broadly deltoid-ovate, orbicular or reniform, apically rounded to deeply emarginate, marginally entire, basally truncate to acute, not cordate, weakly 3-5 -nerved; peti- oles 2-20 mm. long, the stipules entire, lanceolate, 1.0-2.5 mm. long. Inflores- cences of terminal 3 -many-flowered cymes, the peduncles to as much as 10 cm. long, often stipitate- glandular; bracts ovate, 2.5-5.0 mm. long, the pedicels mostly 5-22 mm. long, glabrous or stipitate-glandular. Sepals 5, glabrous, unctuous, rarely with sessile glands, lance-deltoid to deltoid-ovate, apically acute, at least by extension of the midrib, 3-6 mm. long, 1.2-2.0 mm. broad, often saccate basally; petals 5, 2.5-7.0 mm. long, usually equaling or exceeding the sepals, bifid about two-thirds their length, the lobes apically rounded, oblong 2-5-nerved, basally provided with ca. 3 ciliate auricles; stamens 3-5, 2.0-3.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.3-0.5 mm. long; ovary at anthesis globose to ovoid, the style 1-2 mm. long, bifid or trifid about half its length. Capsule 2.0-3.5 mm. long, ovoid, 4-26-seeded, the seeds ca. 1 mm. broad, the dorsal tubercles longer than broad, the facial tubercles substellate. Fig. 11A (Isotype). Sinaloa, Mexico, to Costa Rica. Standley 834.78 from Quezaltenango is highly aberrant. Many flowers are apetalous; others have entire liguliform petals; two flowers had twice-dichotomous petals suggestive of D. longepedunculata. Drymaria conzattii J. Duke Plantae annuae erectae vel diffusae glanduloso-villosae usque ad 45 cm. altae internodis saepe quam foliis longioribus. Folia opposita glanduloso-villosa reni- forma apice vix acuminata basi cordata leviter 5-7 nervata, 5-20 mm. longa, 5-30 mm. lata, petiolis brevibus ad 2.5 mm. longis. Stipulae integrae vel laceratae lobis filiformibus quam petioli longioribus. Inflorescentiae terminales axillaresque in confertas 3-1 1-floriferes cymas dispositae rhachide glanduloso-villoso bracteis ovatis 3.0-4.5 mm. longis costis excurrentibus quam pedicellis longioribus. Sepala 5 externa minuta glanduloso-puberula angusto-ovata acuta conspicue 3-costata, 5.0-5.6 mm. longa, 1.8-2.0 mm. lata, interna paulo breviora paene glabrescentia; petala 5, 4.0-4.5 mm. longa 3/4-bifida lobis oblongis obtusis gradatim ad angusto- oblongis ca. 0.6 mm. longis anthesi subglobosis ca. 0.6 mm. longis; ovarium anthesi subglobosum ca. 1 mm. longum stylo subaequale, stylo vix divisio quam antheris breviore. Capsulae maturae non visae. Fig. 1 IB (Holotype). Mexico: Oaxaca: de Almoloya a Sta. Catarina, 1000 m., C. Conzatti 1688. holo- type MO; isotype US. Known only from the type collection. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 225 33. Drymaria malachioides Briq. in Ann. Cons. & Jard. Bot. Gen. 13:372. 1911. (holotype: Galeotti 4415; Mexicum: Cordillere d'Ario, 4000'; G!; isotypeatP!) Clambering or ascending herbaceous annuals to as much as 45 cm. high, the internodes longer than the leaves, villose with jointed hairs to as much as 1 mm. long. Leaves opposite, the blades reniform to deltoid-ovate, 1-3 cm. long, 1-3 cm. broad, apically rounded, marginally entire, obtuse to cordate basally, weakly iotype); petal, 7^X; sepal. 7 ' , V. : 226 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI 5 -nerved, scantily villose; petioles 1-20 mm. long, the stipules entire or bifid, the divisions lanceolate to filiform, 1-2 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal 3-many- flowered cymes, ultimately lax, the peduncles 1-6 cm. long; bracts 1.5-2.5 mm. long, the villose pedicels to as much as 12 mm. long. Sepals 5, 4.5-5.0 mm. long, 1.5-2.0 mm. broad, elliptic, apically acute, obscurely 3-nerved, with a few sessile glands; petals 5, 5-6 mm. long, bifid about two- thirds their length, the lobes spatulate, apically rounded to apiculate, several-nerved, basally provided with 4-6 ciliate auricles; stamens 5, 2-4 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.5-0.8 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ovoid, the styles longer than the ovary, trifid about half their length. Capsule ellipsoid, ca. 4 mm. long, several-seeded, the seeds ca. 0.6 mm. broad, cochleate, tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles filiform, the facial substellate. Fig. 11C (Holotype). Known only from the type collection, probably in Michoacan, and a few other collections near Tancitaro, Michoacan. Certain characteristics of the plant suggest that it might have been derived from D. villosa, perhaps through polyploidy, since most of the plant parts are proportionately larger than their equivalents in D. villosa. 34a. Drymaria villosa subsp. villosa Drymaria villosa Cham. & Schlecht. in Linnaea 5:232. 1830. (holotype: Schiede & Deppe 505; in aquosis prope Jalapam, B, probably destroyed; isotype at LE!) birsuta Bartl. in Presl, Rel. Haenk. 2:8. 1831. (holotype: Haenke s.n. Habitat in Peruviae montanis huanoccensibus, PR!) Drymaria cubensis Regel, in Otto & Dietr. Allg. Garten. 8:298. 1840. (No type indi- cated; horticultural) Drymori* ciUaris Hort. Berol. ex C. A. Mey. in Ind. Sem. Hort. Petrop. 9:71. 1843. (Hort.; no type indicated) Drymaria ciliata Hort. Berol. ex C. A. Mey. loc. cit. 9:71. 1843. (Hort.; no type indicated) Drymaria cordata var. pilosa Schlecht. in Linnaea 26:374. 1853. (no type indicated) Drymaria cordata var. 5 villosa (Cham. & Schlecht.) Rohrb. in Mart. Fl. Bras. 14 2 :260. 1872. Drymaria stylosa Backer, in Bull. Jard. Bot. Buitenz. 2 12 :15. 1913. (no type indicated) Drymaria tepicana M. E. Jones, in Contr. West. Bot. 15:124. 1929. (holotype: M. E. Jones 22847; Tepic, Nayarit, POM, !) Drymaria barrancae M. E. Jones, loc. cit. 18:65. 1931. (holotype: M. E. Jones 27051a; La Barranca, Guadalajara, POM!) Prostrate or ascending annuals to as much as 45 cm. long, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, villose to hirsute with septate hairs to as much as 2 mm. long. Leaves opposite, the blades scantily to densely villose or hirsute with cinereous or ochraceous hairs, orbicular to reniform, apically rounded to acute and apiculate, basally cordate to truncate, weakly 3 -7- veined, 5-15 mm. long, 5-15 mm. broad; petioles 1-10 mm. long, the stipules mostly entire, 0.5-1.5 mm. long, scarcely distinguishable from the indument. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary 5-many-flowered cymes, the ultimate branches often tending to be racemose; peduncles 1-5 cm. long; bracts 0.5-1.5 mm. long, the pedicels 2-20 mm. long, villose. Sepals 5, 2.0-3.6 mm. long, 1-2 mm. broad, narrowly to broadly ovate or elliptic, apically acute to obtuse, villose, occasionally glabrescent, weakly DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 227 cally reduced in IT.], 2.0-3.6 mm. long, bifid for half their length or more, the lobes apically acute to deeply emarginate, 4-nerved, basally provided with caducous filiform auricles, these variable in number and orientation; stamens usually 5, 2.0-3.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.3-0.5 mm. long, the filaments shallowly connate, devoid of staminodia; ovary at anthesis ovoid to globose, the style 1.0-1.5 mm. long, trifid to as much as half its length. Capsules ovoid to ellipsoid, 2.0-3.5 mm. long, equaling or exceeding the sepals, many-seeded (rarely as few as two in D. bar- rancae), the seeds cochleate, 0.5-0.9 mm. broad, tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles cylindric to capitate, the facial tubercles stellate. Fig. 11D (Holotypc of D. barrancae) ; Fig. 1 IE (Isotype of D. hirsuta) . Central Mexico through Central America along the western coast of South America to Peru; apparently introduced and rather widespread in the East Indies. Examination of adequate material from Mexico, type locality of D. lillosa, from Peru, type locality of D. hirsuta, and from Java, type locality of D. stylosa, clearly shows that these are conspecific. Indonesian material is marked although incon- stantly, by glabrous sepals and hirsute indument, in contrast to Mexican material, which is predominantly villose. I have seen no specimen representing this species from the West Indies, and believe very strongly that the epithet cubensis results from error or misconception. The contention seems to be supported by the following quote (from Ind. Sem. Hort. Petrop. 9:71. 1843): "1093. Drymaria ciliata. Eadcm planta, jam diu mis et D. ciliatae H. Berol. nomine culta, nunc sub nomine D. cubensis H. Berol. in hort. occurit. Num sit D. cubensis species a D. ciliata distincta? Ignoramus. — Nostra planta D. villosae est proxima et vix nisi pilis in caule et foliis rarioribus ad ilia differt. M." I have seen numerous horticultural specimens under these names from various European herbaria and they were all referable to (Cham. & Schlecht.) J. Duke comb. Drymaria palustris Chan Deppe 504; in palu tfDeppe 405, LE\) Drymaria pauciflora Bartl. in Presl, Rel. Haenk. 2 Drymaria cordata var. /3 palustris (Cham. & Schlecht.) Rohrb. in Mart. Fl. Bras. 14-:260. 1872. Drymaria townsendii Robinson, in Bot. Gaz. 30:58. 1900. (holotype: Towmend f$ Barber 231 ; on the Sierra Madre 8 km. southeast of Colonia Garcia, Chihuahua, GUI; isotypes at F, MO, US, etc.) Drymaria nummularia Briq. in Ann. Conserv. & Jard. Bot. Gen. 13:371. 1911. (holo- type: Galeotti 4416; Mexicum: Cordillere d'Ario, 4000', G!; isotype at K). Drymaria mbm UsVL T jonei in Contr. West. Bot. 15:125. 1929. (holotype: M. E. Drymaria sphagnophila Baehni & MacBride, in Field Mus. Bot. 13 2 :625. 1937. (holo- type: MacBride 1542; sunny sphagnum bog, Mito, Huanuco, Peru; F!) 228 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Prostrate annuals or erect perennials (in var. perennis J. Duke var. nov.*) shorter to longer than the leaves, glabrous, glandular, or rarely villose and glabres- cent, the prostrate forms often rooting at the nodes, the erect forms tending to become suffrutescent. Leaves opposite, the blades 2-15 mm. long, 2-15 mm. broad, deltoid-ovate to reniform, apically rounded to apiculate, marginally entire, basally obtuse to cordate, glabrous, glandular, or villose and usually glabrescent, weakly 3-7-nerved; petioles 0.5-6.0 mm. long, the stipules entire, (rarely lacerate in var. perennis) filiform to lance-deltoid, 0.5-2.0 mm. long. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary 1-many-flowered cymes, the peduncles 0-10 cm. long; bracts ovate, to elliptic, acute to obtuse, 0.5-2.0 mm. long, the pedicels glabrous, rarely glandular or villosulous, 1-15 mm. long. Sepals 5, 1.0-3.0 mm. long, 1-2 mm. broad, glabrous or with sessile glands, oblong to orbicular, apically obtuse and often cucullate, very obscurely trinerved, the midrib subapically dissipating, often distally saccate; petals 5 [absent in subsp. palustris forma townsendii (Robinson) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov.], 1-4 mm. long, bifid from half to nearly all their length, the lobes oblanceolate to oblong, apically acute to emarginate, 1- 2-nerved, the shallowly cleft petals exauriculate or with mere dentations, the deeply cleft petals usually with ciliate, downwardly directed auricles; stamens 2-5, 1.0-2.5 mm. long, the oblong to suborbicular anthers 0.2-0.4 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ovoid to globose, the styles 1.0-1.5 mm. long, bifid or trifid half their length or more, usually at least as long as the ovary. Capsule 2.0-3.5 mm. long, usually exceeding the sepals, occasionally twice as long, 5-24-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.6-1.1 mm. broad, densely tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles longer than broad, occasionally capitate, the facial tubercles usually stellate. Fig. 12A (Holotype of D. villosa ssp. palustris var. perennis) ; Fig. 12B (Isotype of D. nummularia) ; Fig. 12C (Isotype of D. pauciflora) ; Fig. 12D (Holotype of D. sphagnophila) ; Fig. 12E (Holotype of D. townsendii) ; Fig. 12F (Holotype of D. subsessilis). Mexico through Central America at high altitudes down western South Amer- ica to Peru. Bolivia. Three rather easily discernible elements may be distinguished in this subspecies. Firstly, there is typical ssp. palustris, which (if I am correct in assuming that Schiede S? Deppe 405 at Leningrad is the same as Schiede & Deppe 504, the holotype) has large petals cleft nearly to the base and provided with ciliate auricles. This is an annual plant, usually prostrate and often rooting at the nodes. I have seen no specimens from outside Mexico. Among Mexican specimens of this element are M. E. Jones 22848, Bell & Duke 16624, Rose & Hay 4800, H. E. Moore 2801, Hinton et al. 12233, and /. H. Maysilles 7782. By far the most common element is that prostrate form whose petals are not so deeply cleft and not so ornate, i.e. there are no ciliate auricles. In habit this is similar to the typical form and no other characters are discernably correlated. Potosi, Mexico, MO. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 230 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN To this more prevalent portion of the population, the following names have been applied: D. paucifiora, D. ..gnopbila. The third element seems to have received no name previously. To this belong erect perennial relatives which have little else in the way of differentia, except a more pronounced tendency to have subacute, somewhat cucullate sepals and glandular herbage. Representing specimens of the var. percnnis, which may have resulted from gene exchange with D. laxiflora or one of its relatives, are Palmer 356, and 187, Pringle 3265, I. M. Johnston 8965, M. T. Edwards 804B, H. E. Moore 1669, and Salinas, Kowell 8 Barkley 16M373. In Ecuador where the plants are considered medicinal, this, the "Drimaria llamba" is reputed to be the most potently therapeutic of the local species. 34c. Drymaria villosa subsp. paramorum (S. F. Blake) J. Duke comb. & stat. Drymaria paramorum S. F. Blake, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 20:521. 1924. (holotype: A. Jabn III; Paramo de la Cristalina, Trujillo, Venez.; alt. 2900 m.; US!) Prostrate or ascending annuals to as much as 20 cm. long, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, sparsely to densely villose with caducous septate hairs. Leaves opposite, the blades 5-10 mm. long, 4-8 mm. broad, broadly ovate, apically acutish, basally rounded to cordate, trinerved, sparsely to densely villose; petioles 0.5-3.0 mm. long, the stipules entire, scariose, lance-deltoid, ca. 1 mm. long. Inflorescences of lax 3-many-flowered cymes, the glabrous to villose peduncles to 4 cm. long; bracts scariose, ovate, acute, mucronulate, 1.0-2.5 mm. long, the glabrous to villose pedicels 2-6 mm. long. Sepals 4-5, subequal, 3.5-4.2 mm. long, 1.2-2.0 mm. broad, the outer villose, broadly oblong, obtuse, weakly trinerved, marginally scariose, the inner glabrous, almost nerveless, broader; petals 4-5, 3.5-5.0, bifid about half their length, the lobes oblong, 3-7-nerved, obtuse, exauriculate or with minute deltoid auricles at the base, tapered abruptly to the linear claw; stamens 4-5, 2-3 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.5 mm. long; ovary at anthesis subglobose, the style trifid about half its length, slightly exceeded by the anthers. Capsule equaling or exceeding the sepals, ca. 3.5 mm. long, 15- 34-seeded, the seeds 0.8-1.2 mm. broad, tuberculate, the tubercles stellate. Fig. 12G (Holotype; [seed from Vittier 13170]). Trujillo and Merida, Venezuela; also from the Cordillera Oriental in Colombia. Certain specimens of D. ovata from Ecuador (e. g. Fosberg & Giles 23225 and Rose 8 Rose 23225) seem to share some of the characteristics of this subspecies. O. Series grandiflores Leaves opposite, ovate to reniform, sessile or petiolate, entire or crenulate, stipulate, the stipules entire or lacerate. Flowers in lax or subcapitate terminal or axillary many-flowered cymes. Sepals acute or obtuse, weakly to strongly 3-7- nerved, the midrib often carinate. Petals bifid (absent in D. apetala), unguiculate (subexunguiculate in D. glaberimma) , exauriculate or with deltoid auricles, the lobes 2-15-nerved. Stamens 5. Seeds cochleate, tuberculate (smooth in forms of D. ovata) , the tubercles domical or conical, not stellate nor capitate nor cylindric. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 231 8 species from Colombia to Argentina, along western South America. Figs. 13 glabrous; inflorescences often long-pedunculate in iubexunguiculate, the lobes oblong. of the seeds secondarily tuberculate; trunk of the p ovate, glabrous to . g. Sepals more or less obtuse, sho g. Sepals acute, a f. Petals less than 6 to the claw; lea es ovate, glabr i. Petal-lobes oblong, tapered to the claw, slightly if at all exserted; inflore Sepals obtuse to acute, if carinate, then obtuse, 2.5-5.0 mm. long, glabrc slightly glandular; Peru and the Galapagos Islands, Ecuador and Bolivia: j. Sepals ellipsoid to orbicular, very obtuse, occasionally slightly glandular.... 35. Drymaria firmula Steyermark, in Field Mus. Bot. 28 1 :227. 1951. (holo- type: Steyermark 56536; Venezuela; Merida; Paramo de los Colorados, between El Molino & San Isidro Alto, 2745-2955 m. F!) Ascending or erect herbs to as much as 25 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, often cyanic. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous, sub- pergameneous, 3.0-8.5 mm. long, 2.5-7.0 mm., apically acute, marginally involute, basally cordate, subsessile or on petioles to 1.5 mm. long, the stipules lacerate, the divisions linear, caducous, equaling or exceeding the petioles. Inflorescences of lax terminal 3-7-flowered cymes, the axes glabrous to minutely glandular; bracts ovate, 1 -nerved, scariose, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, mostly equaling or exceeding the subtended pedicels. Sepals 5, subequal, glabrous, 3.8-4.8 mm. long, 1.4-2.0 mm., 232 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 233 narrowly ovate to oblong, obtuse, trinerved, the midrib of the outer, somewhat narrower, sepals often excurrent; petals 5, 4.5-5.0 mm. long, bifid slightly more than half their length, the lobes broadly oblong, obtuse, 1-4-nerved, ca. 1 mm. broad, gradually tapered to the claw, exappendiculate or unidentate; stamens 5, 3.0-3.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.6 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, the long style trifid for about one-third its length, about attaining the apex of the sepals. Capsule ovoid, 3-valved, 2 mm. long, 2-seeded, the seed cochleate, 1.2-1.5 mm. broad, dorsally tuberculate, the tubercles low and domical, facially merely reticulate, sublustrous. Fig. 13A (Holotype). Known only from the type collection. The lacerate stipules, small domical tubercles on the large seeds and the occa- sionally 1 -nerved petal-lobes suggest a close affinity with D. cordata. On the other hand, the size and shape of the petals, coupled with the subsessile, lubpergtmeneoui leaves, suggest a closer alliance with D. ovata, D. monticola and D. glaherrima, and these four poorly known species seem to form a closely knit group. hex. n.v.) Prostrate to rigidly ascending annuals or perennials to as much as 50 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glabrous, farinose, glandular- puberulent or densely villose. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous to villose, membranaceous to subpergameneous, deltoid-ovate to reniform, apically acute and apiculate to rounded, basally truncate to subcordate, 5-40 mm. long, 5-30 mm. broad, subsessile or the petioles to as much as 8 mm. long, the stipules mostly lacerate, the divisions filiform to lanceolate. Flowers broadly obconic, 1-many in lax terminal, rarely axillary, cymes, the peduncles to as much as 12 cm. long; bracts lanceolate, 2-5 mm. long, usually shorter than the glabrous to villose pedicels. Sepals 5, glabrous to villose, elliptic to ovate, 4.0-6.5 mm. long, apically acute to obtuse, marginally entire, 3-8-nerved, the inner broader, more obtuse and glabrous; petals 5, 4-7 mm. long, bifid one-half to three-fourths their length, the lobes narrowly oblong, 2-5-nerved, apically obtuse or emarginate, basally truncate or rarely tapered to the narrow claw, usually exappendiculate; stamens 5 (-6), the oblong anthers 0.4-1.0 mm., the filaments 2-5 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ovoid, the style 1-2 mm. long, bifid or trifid about half its length. Capsules 2.0-4.5 mm. long, 2-15-seeded, the seeds tightly circinnate, subdiscoid, 0.9-1.5 mm. broad, smooth or provided with low domical tubercles, often nearly black, lustrous. Fig. 13B (Lebmann6ll2). Along the Andes from Venezuela to northern Argentina. Exhibiting a confusing array of variation, this polymorphic species is difficult of definition, but a rather constant correlation of flower- and petal-shape seems to prevail. The lustre of the seeds, equaled nowhere else in the genus, is usually evident, even in those forms which have tuberculate seeds. The following con- trasting characteristics may be found in representative specimens: ovate vs. reni- 234 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN form leaves, sessile vs. petiolate leaves, membranaceou: petals tapered vs. truncate to the claw, and smooth this number of variables, and undoubtedly more exist, many combinations are possible, and I have seen many of them, but am unable to detect any correlations among these characteristics except that, south of Peru, all specimens have had smooth seeds and large leaves. Weberbajier 654$ from Peru differs in having subpergameneous leaves, 1-2-nerved petal-lobes, and a farinose girdle on the pedicels, characteristics suggesting that it might have resulted from hybridization with D. cordata. From Huanuco, Macbride & Featherstone 1714 has most of the features of D. cordata but the seeds are nearly smooth and lustrous, and the veins in the petal-lobes have several branches. Collections made by Prieto for W. W. Camp in Prov. Cariar and Azuay of Ecuador possessed the colloquial names "Drimaria del cerco" and "Drimaria macho" and the plants are utilized as treatments for liver and kidney ailments. 37. Drymaria apetala Bartl. in Presl, Rel. Haenk. 2:7. 1831. (h Haenke s. n. Habitat in Chile; PR! ) Stellaria virgata Seringe, in DC. Prodr. 1:396. 1824. not D. virgata Briq., type: patr. ign. "Alsine virgata Deless. herb.": G, n.v.) Drymaria nmcrautba A. Gray, Bot. 1 exped.s.n.- Obrajillo; US!) Drymaria virgata Briq. in Ann. Cons. & Jard. Bot. 13 :370. 1911. Virgate or sparingly branched suffrutescent perennials (?) to as much as 30 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, locally farinose. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous to minutely glandular, narrowly to broadly ovate, apically acute, basally cordate and somewhat clasping, 5-15 mm. long, 3-9 mm. broad; stipules mostly entire, deltoid, acuminate, caducous, 0.5-1.5 mm. long. Inflorescences of rather dense few-flowered cymes, the axes often densely glandular; bracts lanceolate, acuminate, strongly 1-ribbed, 2.5-4.0 mm. long; pedicels 2-10 mm. long. Sepals 5, subequal, rather densely glandular, 7.5-9.0 mm. long, narrowly ovate, apically acute with the midrib often excurrent as an apiculum, basally rather strongly trinerved; petals 5, reduced to mere vestiges or completely absent; stamens 5, 5.5-6.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers 1.8-2.0 mm. long; ovary at anthesis narrowly ellipsoid, the trifid style exceeded by the anthers. Capsule included, 5.5-6.5 mm. long, many-seeded, the submature seeds cochleate, rather sharply pointed at the hypocotylar end, dorsally sulcate, weakly tuberculate, the tubercles low and subhemispherical. Fig. 13C. Although attributed to Mexico, erroneously, and questionably to Chile, I have seen no specimens that were collected outside of Peru. The Pavon specimens from "Mexique" and from Peru, probably are duplicates of one collection. 38. Drymaria glaberrima Bart Haenke s. «.; habitat in Peru GOET) Procumbent or ascending lignescent annuals or perennials to high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves. Leaves < DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 235 glabrous, narrowly to broadly ovate or elliptic, apically acute, marginally entire or undulate, basally obtuse to truncate, 3-5-nerved, subsessile, the stipules filiform, caducous, usually exceeding the petioles. Inflorescences of mostly axillary 3-11 flowered cymes, the peduncles 1-8 cm. long; bracts lanceolate to ovate, 1.5-2.5 mm., all except those of the central flowers equaling or exceeding the glabrous subtended pedicels. Sepals 5, glabrous, narrowly ovate, apically acute to obtuse, weakly 3-5-nerved, 4.0-5.0 mm. long, the inner obtuse, with a broad hyaline margin, ca. 2 mm. broad; petals 5, 3.0-4.5 mm. long, bifid halfway or slightly more, the lobes oblong, obtuse, 3-7-nerved, ca. 0.5 mm. broad, the trunk ca. 1 mm. broad, truncate to a minute claw, or completely exunguiculate; stamens 5, ca. 3 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.6 mm. long, the filaments basally connate into a very shallow cup; ovary broadly oblongoid, the style ca. 1.5 mm. long, trifid ca. half its length. Capsule oblongoid, 2-10-seeded, the seeds tightly circin- nate, tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles longer than broad, often themselves second- arily tubercululate, the facial tubercles low and domical or slightly elongated. Fig. 13D (Isotype). Known from several stations, all in Peru. The material that I am citing for this species is heterogeneous indeed and it is possible that more than one taxon is involved. Intensive collecting and field studies will be needed to clarify this whole series, which is still full of problems. 39 Drymaria monticola Howell in Proc. Cal. Acad. 421:329. 1935. (holo- type: /. T. Hoivell 9243; Mt. Crocker, Indefatigable Island; CAS!) Decumbent or ascending perennials, to as much as 40 cm. high, the glabrous internodes exceeding the leaves, the roots to 4 mm. thick. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous, 3-5-nerved, ovate, acute, marginally undulate, basally truncate to subcordate, subsessile; the stipules mostly bifid, 1-2 mm. long, exceeding the petioles. Flowers in rather dense 5-9-flowered cymes, the peduncles 2-7 mm. long, glabrous, the bracts ovate, 1.0-1.5 mm. long, shorter or slightly longer than the glabrous pedicels. Sepals 4-5, glabrous, narrowly to broadly ovate, weakly 3 -ribbed 4.5-6.0 mm. long, 1.5-2.5 mm. broad, apically acute, the midrib subapically dissipating, the lateral ribs weak, with 2 intercalary veins; petals 4-5, 4-5 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes oblong, obtuse, 2-4-nerved, often basally auriculate, tapered to the linear claw; stamens 4-5, 3.5-4.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.7-0.9 mm. long, the filaments basally connate into a cup to as much as 0.7 mm. deep; ovary globose to ovoid, stipitate, the styles 1.5-2.0 mm. long, trifid a little more than half their length. Capsule 2.0-3.5 mm. long, 8- 16-seeded, the seeds tightly cochleate, ca. 1 mm. broad, tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles domical, slightly higher than broad, grading into the polygonal facial tubercles. Fig. 13E (Holotype). Known only from the Galapagos Islands. This species was likened by its author to D. apetala (D. macrantha) and in its sessile leaves it does somewhat resemble that species. A closer relative appears to be D. firviula from Venezuela which differs somewhat in its strongly three-ribbed sepals and exappendiculate petals. D. glaberrima also belongs in this relationship but differs in its tuberculate tubercles and obtuse inner sepals. 236 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN 40. Drymaria grandiflora Bartl. in Presl, Rel. Haenk. Haenke s. n. Habitat in Chile, et in Peruviae montanis huanoccensibus; PR!) Prostrate or clambering rarely ascending perennials, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, villose to glabrescent. Leaves opposite, the blades glandular- villosulous, rarely glabrous, narrowly to broadly ovate, weakly to strongly 3 -nerved, apically acute, marginally entire, basally rounded to truncate, usually clasping; the main leaves 10-30 mm. long and 5-20 mm. broad, those of the branches much smaller; stipules entire to lacerate 1.0-2.5 mm. long, usually longer than the petioles. Flowers narrowly to broadly campanulate in terminal, lax, few-flowered cymes, the peduncles 1-15 cm. long; bracts 2-5 mm. long, usually much exceeded by the pedicels, the pedicels usually densely glandular- villosulous, 3-25 mm. long. Sepals 5, glandular-puberulent to glabrous, ovate, weakly nerved, 6-8 mm. long, the outer sometimes carinate and acute, the inner flatter and often obtuse; petals 5, 7—12 mm. long, bifid about two-thirds their length, the lobes linear to oblong, apically obtuse, many nerved, to as much as 3 mm. broad, basally gradually merging with the poorly differentiated trunk and claw, exauriculate or rarely unilaterally unidenticulate; stamens 5, the anthers oblong 1.0-1.5 mm. long, the filaments 4-6 mm. long, connate into a cup as much as 1.5 mm. deep; ovary at anthesis ellipsoid, usually longer than the style, the style 2-3 mm. long, trifid about one-third its length. Capsule ellipsoid, 4-5 mm. long, 5-many-seeded, the seeds tightly circin- nate 1.2-1.6 mm. broad, coarsely tuberculate, the tubercles dorsally conical, some- what flattened, grading facially into polygonal tubercles. Fig. 13F. Peru; departments Huanuco, Cajamarca, and Lima; reported from Chile, but 41a. Drymaria Drymaria paposana Phi valle Tartal alisque locis ejusdem regionis crescit, SGO? n. v. photograph of isotype from destroyed Austrian herbarium; MO!) Upright or ascending annuals to as much as 25 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glandular-puberulent, the taproot to as much as 2 mm. thick. Leaves opposite, the blades narrowly to broadly ovate, apically acute, basally cuneate to subcordate, glabrous or scantily glandular-puberulent, the upper leaves sessile, 5-20 mm. long, 4-18 mm. broad, the stipules lacerate, the divisions filiform, mostly exceeding the petioles. Inflorescences of terminal subcapitate or monopodial cymes, the peduncles 1-30 mm. long, glandular-puberulent, the bracts ovate, usually longer than the glandular pedicels. Sepals 5, 3.5-5.0 mm. long, ellipsoid, glandular to glabrous, apically obtuse, weakly 3 -nerved, the midrib sub- apically dissipating, the outermost sepals occasionally carinate; petals 5, 3.5-4.5 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes oblong, rarely to 1 mm. broad, apically obtuse or emarginate, 2-3-nerved, tapered gently to the claw, exauriculate; stamens 5, 2.7-3.0 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.6 mm. long; ovary at anthesis ovoid, the style ca. 1.2 mm. long, trifid about half its length. Capsules 2.6-3.0 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.6-0.8 mm. broad, the tubercles conical, acute. Fig. 14D. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 237 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Northern Chile. Although I. M. Johnston lumped this with D. cordata, it is quite distinct from that species in many respects. 41b. Drymaria paposana var. weberbaueri (Muschl.) J. Duke comb. & stat. Drytnaria weberbaueri Muschl. in Engl. Bot. Jahrb. 45:451. July 25, 1911. (holotype: s. m.; B, n.v., probably destroyed; as lectotype may be designated Weberbauer 1657 Drymaria fenzliana Briq. in Ann. Cons. & Jard. Bot. Gen. 13:373. May 10, 1911. (holo- Erect or ascending annuals to as much as 3 cm. tall, the few internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glabrous to glandular-pubescent. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous to glandular-puberulent, narrowly to broadly ovate, 5-20 mm. long, 4-15 mm. broad, apically acute, basally cuneate to truncate or subcordate, usually sub- sessile, the lacerate stipules mostly longer than the petioles. Inflorescences of terminal, usually subcapitate, 3-many-flowered cymes, the peduncles 1-4 cm. long, the pedicels 0.5-3.0 (-5.0) mm. long, glandular-puberulent, usually exceeded by the ovate, occasionally dentate, bracts. Sepals 5, 3.5-7.0 mm. long, ovate, usually glandular, the outer acute and often carinate, 1-3 -nerved, the inner often broader, more obtuse, less glandular; petals 5; 5-7 mm. long, usually exceeding the sepals, bifid little more than half their length, the lobes broadly oblong to spatulate, to 2 mm. broad, 3-many-nerved, apically obtuse or emarginate, basally auriculate, often asymmetrically so, more or less truncate to the linear claw; stamens 5, 3.0- 5.0 mm. long, the oblong anthers 0.5-1.0 mm. long, the filaments shallowly connate; ovary at anthesis ovoid to ellipsoid, the style 1.0-2.5 mm. long, trifid for about one-third its length. Capsule ovoid, 3-valved, often stipitate, 2.5-4.0 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.5-1.0 mm. broad, tuberculate, the tubercles mostly domical and obtuse. Fig. 14B (Holotype of D. fenzliana); Fig. 14C (lectotype of D. weberbaueri) . Lomas of Peru from the departments of Lima to Arequipa. With its rather dense clover-like heads, this is perhaps the most handsome 'Drymaria. A nice photograph may be seen in Goodspeed and Stork (in Univ. Cal. Publ. Bot. 28: pi. 8. 1955). Although Briquet in his description of D. fenzliana believed it to be a Mexican species, it becomes apparent that the label on the Pavon specimen had suffered the same fate as those on some of his specimens of D. apetala, some of which were labeled as being from Mexico and others from Peru, although obviously belonging to the same collection. Toward the southern end of its range, this variety intergrades with the var. paposana and the newly described var. serrulata. 41c. Drymaria paposana var. serrulata J. Duke var. nov. Plantae perennes erectae vel glabrae sublignosae internodis quam Iongioribus, radice usque 1 cm. in diametro. Folio opposita laminis glabris anguste vel late ovatis apice acutis DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 239 marginibus conspicue crenulatis 5-nervatisque subsessilibus, stipulis laceratis quam petiolis longioribus. Flores 3 usque multi cymis terminalibus laxis aut vix con- fertis pedunculis 1-8 cm. longis, pedicellis minus 1 cm. longis rare divaricatis. Sepala 5, 5-8 mm. longa, 2.5-3.5 mm. lata minute granulosa angusto-ovata vel elliptica, apice acuta (externissimo carinato cum carinis saepe serrulatis) ; petala 5, 6-8 mm. longa, 2/3 -bifida lobis oblongis 4-6-nervatis exauriculatis vel auriculatis parvis vix ungue constricto; stamina 5, 4.5-6.5 mm. longa, antheris oblongis ca. 1.5 mm. longis; ovaria ovoidea vel ellipsoidea, stylo ca. 2 mm. longo, 3/4-trifido. Capsulae inclusae seminibus multis ca. 0.8 mm. latis crasse tuberculatis opacis. Fig. 14A. Peru: Dept. Arequipa, Prov. Caraveli; Lomas de Atiquipa (Taimara) ; falda arcillosa- pedregosa, 500-550 m.; Ramon Ferreyra 13490. (holotype MO). Not uncommon in the lomas from the departments of Arequipa and Moquegua, this unusual variety seems largely to replace var. weberbaueri, and although it resembles that variety in habit, the differences in their flowers are quite striking. Although the epithet applies to the carina of the outer sepals, the leaves themselves are often distinctively crenulate, so much so as to appear serrulate. See Fig. 14A. 42a. Drymaria rotundifolia var. rotundifolia Drymaria rotundifolia A. Gray, Bot. U. S. Expl. Exped. 123. 1854. (holotype: Wilkes Expedition s. n. Obrajillo, Peru US!) Upright annuals to as much as 20 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glabrous to glandular-puberulent. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous to minutely glandular, reniform, apically rounded or apiculate, basally clasping, 4-10 mm. long, 5-15 mm. broad; the stipules lacerate, caducous. Inflorescence of rather congested 3-1 1-flowered cymes, the peduncles glandular, 1-45 mm. long; bracts scarious, ovate, acute, 0.5-2.0 mm. long; pedicels mostly 1.5-3.0 mm. long, those of the central flowers to 8 mm. long; glandular. Sepals 5, glabrous or sessile- glandular, broadly ellipsoid, obtuse or rounded, subcucullate, weakly 3 -nerved, the midvein subapically dissipating, often carinate, marginally scarious and transparent, 2.5-3.5 mm. long, 1.2-2.8 mm. broad; petals 5, 3.2^.5 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes oblong, ca. 0.5 mm. broad, exappendiculate but somewhat flared before narrowing into the linear claw; stamens 5, about 3 mm. long, the oblong anthers about 0.6 mm. long; ovary at anthesis turbinate to ellipsoid, the style trifid about half its length, ca. 1.5 mm. long, exceeded by the anthers. Mature capsule ellipsoid, 2.5-3.5 mm. long, several-seeded, the seeds cochlea te, often dorsally sulcate, 0.6-0.8 mm. broad, tuberculate, the tubercles conical, obtuse or rarely acute. Fig. 14E (Holotype). Peru. Stewart 1 512 from the Galapagos Islands might just as well be included here as in var. nitida. The specimen has some of the characters of both varieties, and perhaps represents a new entity. 42b. Drymaria rotundifolia var. nitida (J. Ball) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov. Drymaria nitida J. Ball, in Jour. Linn. Soc. 22:31. 1887. (holotype: Peru: Ex saxosis Andium Peruviae juxta pagum Chicla, 12-13000' s. m. /. Ball s. n. K, n. v., isotype at GH!) 240 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Minute to rather large ascending annuals to as much as 1 5 cm. high, the inter- nodes glabrous, mostly longer than the leaves. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous, often somewhat fleshy, narrowly ovate to elliptic, 3-10 mm. long, 2-8 mm. broad, glabrous, apically acute to cuspidate, marginally hyaline, basally attenuate and clasping, the venation obscure; stipules entire, very fugaceous, acicular, less than 1 mm. long. Flowers campanulate, in rather dense few-flowered terminal cymes, the lowermost bracts merging with the leaves, often stipulate, ovate, ca. 1.5 mm. long; peduncles 4-7 mm. long, the pedicels glabrous, exceeded by or slightly exceeding the bracts. Sepals 5, glabrous, 2.5-3.0 mm. long, the outer broadly oblong and weakly carinate, the inner suborbicular, obtuse, to 2 mm. broad, obscurely nerved, the midnerve often subapically dissipating; petals 5, 3.2-4.0 mm. long, bifid about two-thirds their length, the lobes narrowly spatulate, apically obtuse, 2-3-nerved, exauriculate, acutely tapered to the claw; stamens 3—5, 2.5-3.5 mm. long, the anthers oblong; ovary at an thesis cordate, ca. 8 -ovulate, the style deeply trifid. Capsules subglobose, 3-8-seeded, ca. 2 mm. long, the seeds ca. 1 mm. broad, tuberculate, the tubercles subdendritic. Fig. 14F (Isotype). Peru, Ecuador and the Galapagos Islands. Although the type is a diminutive plant, other specimens that I refer to this variety attain a good size and in some respects approach D. glaberrima: e.g. Mandon Q48 from Bolivia. Characters in the flowers however suggest that it is closer allied to D. rotundifolia and D. paposana, especially its var. weberbaueri. Leaves opposite, petiolate, elliptic to reniform, stipulate. Flowers in cymes, the pedicels usually long and divaricate, exceeding the bracts. Sepals trinerved, acute, occasionally saccate basally. Petals bifid about half their length, with mamilliform auricles (except D. divaricata forms), the lobes (1-) 2-5-nerved. Stamens 4-5. Seeds cochleate, tuberculate, the tubercles domical conical, occasionally subdendritic or mamilliform. Five poorly defined varieties in Peru and Bolivia. Fig. 1 5 . a. Leaves broadly ovate to reniform, short- to long -petiolate, glabrous to villosulous; pedicels sepals; seeds with mar b - Sft? Zt£X^ : venly keeled, les of the seeds iscid-glandular: not basally saccate d. Sepals and herbage subg.abrc ,u, to vilU»u1o us; pedicels diva™ :at C ; . Leaves e'ln ttSArs rs, glabrous; se t, glabrous; pedi« pals glabrous; lorn; Is strongly auri, alpine plants.... DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI Drymaria divaricata HBK. Nov. Gen. & Sp. 6:24. 1832. (holotype: Humb. 6 Bonpl. s. n. Crescit ad litora Oceani Pacifici, prope Lima Peruvianorum, P n. v.) Laxly spreading annuals, the internodes much longer than the leaves, to as much as 10 cm. long, minutely glandular-puberulent. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous or minutely puberulent or villosulous, narrowly to broadly deltoid-ovate, 6-12 mm. long, 6-15 mm. broad, apically acute, marginally entire, basally trun- cate; the distally alate petioles 2-5 mm. long, the stipules filiform, caducous, mostly entire, 1.0—1.5 mm. long. Inflorescence of very lax terminal cymes, the flowers many, squarely campanula te; the glandular-puberulent peduncles to 10 cm. long; bracts oblong to lance-linear, ca. 1 mm. long; the pedicels glandular- puberulent, to as much as 35 mm. long. Sepals 5, glandular-puberulent to glabrous, unctuous, triangular-ovate, apically obtuse to acutish, and often cucullate, basally saccate, 3.0-4.5 mm. long; petals 5, 5-9 mm. long, bifid about two-thirds their length, the lobes narrowly spatula te, weakly 2-5 -veined, apically obtuse, basally merging gradually with the linear claw, exauriculate to minutely denticulate; stamens 5, 3.5-5.0 mm. long, the anthers oblong 0.3-0.6 mm. long. Ovary at anthesis ovoid, the style trifid one-fourth to one-half its length 1.5-2.5 mm. long. Capsule ovoid, 2.5-3.5 mm. long, ca. 8-seeded, the seeds tightly circinnate, 0.8-1.5 mm. broad, coarsely tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles longer than broad, sub- dendritic. Fig. 15B (Pennell 14560). Province of Lima, Peru. Since I have not seen the type of D. divaricata, I sent specimens of all the varieties herein recognized to Dra. Lourteig for comparison with the Humboldt and Bonpland specimen in the Historical Herbarium at Paris. After comparison with the various specimens sent, she selected Ferreyra 3460 as the best match for D. divaricata HBK. Also representing the typical variety is Pennell 14560 which is illustrated in Fig. 15B. This has quite long petals proportionately much longer than those of Ferreyra 3460. Both specimens have peculiar dwarf flowers in the axils of some of the unusually small bracts. Both were collected at altitudes higher than 2700 meters, which might seem incompatible with the type locality, the description of which would at least suggest that D. divaricata might be a loma 43b. Drymaria divaricata var. stricta (Rusby) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov. Drymaria stricta Rusby in Phytologia 1:55. 1934. (holotype: G. H. H. Tate 160. Pongo de Quime Bolivia, alt. 12,000 ft. NY!) Drymaria agapatensis Baehni & Macbride, in Field Mus. Bot. 13:619. 1937. (holotype: Lechler 1947% Pnno, Agapata, G!; isotype at UPS, F, MO, P, etc.) Upright or ascending lignescent annuals or perennials to as much as 30 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, minutely but obviously glandular-puberulent. Leaves opposite, glandular-puberulent, the blades ovate to reniform, apically acute, marginally entire or undulate, basally truncate to cordate, 5-14 mm. long, 5-20 mm. broad, the petioles often alate, 2-6 mm. long, stipules lacerate, the laciniae filiform to acicular, 1.5-2.0 mm. long. Inflorescence of OF DRYMARIA 243 mostly terminal lax, several-flowered cymes, the peduncles 1-6 cm. long, glandular- puberulent, bracts oblong to lance-deltoid, 1-2 mm. long, mostly exceeded by the pedicels, these 1-10 mm. long, sepals 5, glandular-puberulent, ovate, basalb nccatt but not carinate, apically acute to shortly acuminate, subcucullate, 4.5-5.5 mm. long, weakly 3-4-nerved; petals 5, 4.5-5.5 mm. long, bifid for 2-3 mm., the lobes linear, obtuse to emarginate, narrowed to the linear claw, 1 -nerved, usually auriculate; stamens 5, the anthers often aberrant, oblong to orbicular, ca. 0.3 mm. long; ovary at an thesis ovoid, the style about as long, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, trifid about half its length. Capsule 2.5-3.5 mm. long 2-8 -seeded, the seeds tightly circinnate, 0.8-1.0 mm. broad, densely tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles secondarily tubercululate, the facial irregularly polygonal. Fig. 15C (Isotype of D. agapatensh) . Peru and Bolivia. The seeds of this variety are among the most bizarre in Drymaria. Some speci- mens are referred here only reluctantly as they approach D. glaberrima, a species which shares the unusual tuberculation of the seeds. 43c. Drymaria divaricata var. viscidula (A. Gray) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov. Upright annuals to as much as 35 cm., the internodes mostly longer than the leaves. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrescent, broadly ovate, apically acute and mucronulate, basally subcordate, 5-8 mm. long, 6-10 mm. broad, the veins very obscure; petioles 1-2 mm. long, glabrescent; stipules entire or bifid, the divisions linear, deciduous, 1.0-1.5 mm. long. Inflorescences of 3-9-flowered cymes, the peduncles rather densely glandular-pubescent; bracts linear, 1.0-2.5 mm. long, gradually reduced; pedicels 1.0-2.5 mm. long. Sepals 5, subequal, the outer glandular, broadly lanceolate, acute, strongly 3 -nerved, 3-4 mm. long, ca. 1 mm. broad, the inner flatter, obtuse, 1.0—1.5 mm. broad, with scariose margins outside the 3 ribs; petals 5, 3.5-4.0 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes oblong, ca. 0.5 mm. broad, basally auriculate, the auricles obtusely deltoid, the claw gradually tapering to the auricle; stamens 5, ca. 3.2 mm. long, the anthers oblong, ca. 0.5 mm. long; ovary at an thesis subglobose, exceeded by the anthers, the style trifid more than half its length, slightly exceeding the anthers. Capsule ovoid, 2.8-3.5 mm. long, maturing ca. 6 seeds, the seeds cochleate, ca. 0.7 mm. broad, dorsally tuberculate with low rounded tubercles broader than long, facially flattened or sulcate, merely lineolate. Fig. 15D (Holotype). Peru, at rather high elevations. Although in some respects (especially the seeds) suggestive of D. glanduhsa, I think a perusal of the plate depicting the Series divaricatae will convince one that the var. viscidula is more properly aligned here. 43d. Drymaria divaricata var. divergens J. Duke var. nov. Herbae annuae graciles diffusae glanduloso-pilosulosae internodis saepe quam foliis longioribus. Folia opposita laminis reniformibus apice rotundatis vel obtusis 244 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN mucronatisque basi truncatis aut rotundatis, 5-12 mm. longis, ea in ramis lateral- ibus saepe reducta petioli saepe in longitudine laminae foliorum aequales stipulis lanceolatis frequenter quam petiolis brevioribus. Flores in cymas terminales pleures dispositi pedicellis saepe divergentibus frequenter 2-4 X in longitudine pluribus quam floribus bracteis lanceolato-linearibus usque ad 3 mm. longis. Sepala 5, 3.5-4.5 mm. longa ovata acuta 3-nervata vix stipitato-glandulosa; petala 5, sepalis aequalia ut vix plus, bifida lobis angusto-spatulatis obtusis vel truncatis 3-5- nervatis basi auricula tis ungue lineari; stamina 5 quam petala brevioria, antheris oblongis ca. 0.6 mm. latis. Capsulae inclusae seminis cochlea tis. Ca. 0.8 mm. latis tuberculatis tuberculis dorsalibus latis quam longioribus. Fig. 15E (Holotype). Peru: Dept. Lima, prov. Pativilca; Lomas de Pacar, alt. 150-700 m. O. V. Nunez 2320 (HOLOTYPE, US). If I have erred in my interpretation of the typification of D. divaricata HBK, this variety of the Peruvian lomas would be my second choice, and indeed were it not for the kind assistance of Dra. Lourteig, I believe this new variety would be masquerading under the name D. divaricata HBK. The similarities of the two concepts are strong, but the slight morphological differences plus the ecologic 43e. Drymaria divaricata var. reflexiflora J. Duke var. no v. Drymaria divaricata Auct. Am. non HBK. Plantae parvae ascendentes ad 25 cm. altae internodis quam foliis saepe longi- oribus glabris. Folia opposita glabris, eis in rostellam aggregatis spatulatis longe petiolatisque gradatim foliis caulis anguste ad late ovatis vel elliptico-ovatis acutis basi truncatis saepe undulatis (in marginibus) mixtis, eisdem etiam secundum breves alatos petiolos attenuatis, petiolis saepe quam stipulis brevioribus stipulis saepe trifidis lobis filiformibus, 1.0-2.5 mm. longis. Flores campanulata in laxas evidenter trichotomas cymas foliis veris ovatis bracteis conmixtis; bractea 2-4 mm. longae, acutae vel acuminatae, prope aequales vel praestantes divaricatis glabris pedicellis. Sepala 5, glabra ovata vel elliptica, 3.0-4.5 (-5) mm. longa evidenter 3-costata basim umbonata vix saccata exteriora acuta, interiora obtusa vel acuta; petala 5, vix exserta 3.0-4.5 mm. longa, 2/3 -bifida lobis angusto-spatulata apice obtusa 3-7-nervata, basi auriculata vel biauriculata turn in unguem linearem con- stricta; stamina 5 antheris fertilibus saepe reductione 3 oblongis filamentis 3.0-3.5 mm. longis; ovarium ovoideum, 2.5-3.5 mm. longum, stylo 1.0-1.8 mm. longo, 1/2-fido trilobato. Capsule ovoideae, 15-25-seminiferes semini circinatis ca. 0.6 mm. latis tuberculis dorsalibus latis quam longioribus sc superficie tuberculis conicis vel ellipsoideis munitis. Fig. 15A (Holotype). Peru: Dept. Lima, Prov. Chancay; Lomas de Chancay, 500-600 m.; Ferreyra I. (holotype, MO). Although long confused with typical D. divaricata HBK., also reputed 1 a loma plant, there is little doubt that this variety is distinct, morphologically possibly ecologically. Plants representing this new variety bear little resemb to var. divaricata, as depicted in a photograph of the type. OF DRYMARIA Q. Serie Leaves opposite, ov Sepals mostly acute, 1-3-nerved. Petals bifid (occasionally ligular in D. xero- phylla), unguiculate, exauriculate (poorly defined auricles occasionally present in D. gracilis), the lobes 1 -nerved (except D. galeottiana) . Stamens 2-5, the anthers orbicular to oblong. Styles 2-3, free or basally united. Seeds 1-many, cochleate, tuberculate, the tubercles domical or rectanguloid, contiguous to remote. Five species, 1 more or less pantropical, 1 ranging from western U. S. A. to Argentina, the others confined to Mexico and vicinity. Figs. 16, 17, 18. itico and r tubercles more or less domical and robe r lacerate: f. Leaves deltoid-ovate, the stipules entire; secondary veins forming a crinkled inter- rupted reticulum; stamens 4-5 I tor half their length or more; southern Mexico, Guatemala and Bolivia 47. D. ladewii mm. broad; Old World Tropics .' ' 48b. D. cordata ssp. DIANDRA 44a. Drymaria gracilis ssp. gracilis Drymaria gracilis Cham. & Schlecht. in Linnaea 5:232. 1830. (holotype: Schiedc & Deppe 503; prope Jalapa. B, n. v. isotype at GOET!) Drymaria cordata var. 7 gracilis (Cham. & Schlecht.) Rohrb. in Mart. Fl. Bras. 14 2 :260. 1872. Erect or ascending perennials to as much as 45 cm. tall; the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glabrous or minutely stipitate-glandular; leaves opposite, the blades glabrous, rarely villosulous or punctate, deltoid-ovate (narrower upwards), 5-15 mm. long, 3-15 mm. broad, apically acute to rounded and apiculate, mar- ginally entire, basally truncate 3-5 -nerved, the petioles 1-8 mm. long; the stipules 246 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI GARDEN bifid or trifid, 1.0-2.5 mm. long, the divisions filiform. Inflorescences of lax terminal, many-flowered cymes, the peduncles 2-6 cm. long; bracts ovate, carinate, 0.5-1.5 mm. long; pedicels 3-6 mm. long, glabrous, divaricate. Sepals 5, ovate, glabrous, 2.0-2.7 mm. long, apically acute, 1-nerved, carinate; petals 5, 2.0-2.7 mm. long, bifid at least two-thirds their length, the lobes obtuse to emarginate, basally entire to auriculate, divaricate, tapered or truncate to the minute claw; stamens 5, rarely fewer, 1.8-2.2 mm. long, the anthers oblong, 0.4-0.5 mm. long, briefly connate into a shallow cup; ovary at anthesis globose, the styles elongate, bifid or trifid less than half their length, exceeding the ovary; capsule globose, equaling or exceeding the sepals, 1.8-2.5 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.5-0.6 mm. broad, coarsely tuberculate, the dorsal tubercles domical, the facial tubercles polygonal, approximate. Fig. 16B. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 247 Hidalgo to Vera Cruz, Mexico. Specimens in the Lund Herbarium, and the herbaria at Leningrad and the Field Museum, although labeled as grown from seeds of D. divaricata, are clearly refer- able to D. gracilis. Somewhere a mixup in labels must have occurred. For that reason, I sent a specimen of this species to Dra. Lourteig for comparison with the type of D. divaricata. As mentioned in the discussion of D. divaricata previously, she cited the Peruvian Ferreyra 3460, very different from the Mexican D. gracilis, as comparable to D. divaricata HBK. 44b. Drymaria gracilis ssp. carinata (Brandegee) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov. la Laguna, Baja Calif. UC!) Drymaria carinata var. perennis Wiggins, in Proc. Cal. Acad. Sci. 4 25 :197. 1944. (holo- type: Gentry 441$; La Laguna, Sierra Laguna UC!) Prostrate to ascending annuals or perennials to as much as 40 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glabrous. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous, narrowly to broadly deltoid-ovate, 5-20 mm. long, 2-15 mm. broad, apically rounded to acute, marginally entire, basally truncate, 3-nerved, petioles 1-10 mm. long, the stipules entire, 1-2 mm. long, filiform. Inflorescences of terminal lax 3-many-flowered cymes, the peduncles 2-6 cm. long; bracts ovate, carinate, 1.0-1.5 mm. long, the pedicels 2-12 mm. long, glabrous. Sepals 5, ovate, glabrous, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, apically acute to acuminate, 1 -nerved and carinate; petals 5, 1.5-3.0 mm. long, bifid at least two-thirds their length, the lobes apically obtuse to emarginate, 1 -nerved, divaricate, basally auriculate to entire, abruptly 0.3-0.4 mm. long, shallowly connate into a cup; ovary at anthesis globose, the style trifid one-half to five-sixths its length. Capsule globose, 1.5-2.0 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.4-0.6 mm. long, minutely and remotely tuber- culate. Fig. 16C (Isotype). Baja California, Mexico. This subspecies shares with the typia niality. Probably separated for some ti subspecies exhibit an interesting disjuncti 45a. Drymaria glandulosa Drymaria glandulosa Presl, Rel. Haenk. 2:9. 1831. (holotype: Haenke s. «.; habitat in Mexico, Pr!) Drymaria rar, nnaea 12:206. 1838. (holotype: Hegewiscb s. n., prope urbem Mexico, GOET (?) n. v.) Drymaria kptoclados Hemsl. Diag. Pi. Nov. 2. 1878. (holotype: Bernoulli 240, Guate- mala; Camino del Sapote; K!; isotype at NY) Drymaria fendleri S. Wats, in Proc. Am. Acad. 17:328. 1882. (holotype: Fendler 60, New Mexico, GH!) Drymaria leptoclados var. peruviana J. Ball, in Journ. Proc. Linn. Soc. 22:32. 1885. (holotype: /. Ball s.n.-.i * < ?) at GH!) Drymaria blasiana M. E. Jones, Contr. West. Bot. 15:125. 1929. (holotype: M. E. Jones 22845; in open places, San Bias, Sinaloa; POM!) Drymaria fendleri var. perennis M. E. Jones, Extr. Contr^ West. Bot. 18:65 1933. E. Jones 27050, Laguna Mtns., Baja Cal. POM!; isotypes at UC, etc.) 248 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Drymaria glandulosa var. fendleri (S. Wats.) Fosberg, in Morton, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 29:96. 1945. Drymaria glandulosa var. perennis (M. E. Jones) Fosberg, loc. cit. 29:96. 1945. Sparingly to densely stipitate glandular upright or ascending annuals or peren- nials, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, the taproot to 1 cm. thick. Leaves opposite, the blades sparingly to densely glandular-puberulent, ovate to reniform, 5-12 mm. long, 5-20 mm. broad, apically rounded and apiculate, basally cordate, marginally entire, the petioles 1-8 mm. long; stipules lacerate, the divisions lance- linear to filiform. Inflorescences of terminal and rarely axillary lax to dense 5 -many- flowered cymes, the peduncles (0-) 2-8 cm. long (the peduncles often axillary and abbreviated in var. fendleri); bracts lanceolate-aristate 2.5-5.0 mm. long, often exceeding the pedicels (especially in var. fendleri), lanceolate, weakly to strongly 3 -ribbed, the ribs subapically confluent, the mid-rib often excurrent, the outer sepals frequently conspicuously shorter than the inner and more attenuate at the apex, 3.0-4.6 mm. long; petals 3-5, 1.2-3.0 mm. long, bifid about half their length, the lobes linear, apically acute to emarginate, 1 -nerved, basally auriculate or entire; stamens 2-5, the anthers oblong, 0.2-0.4 mm. long, the filaments 1-2 mm. long; ovary at anthesis subglobose, longer than the style, the style bifid or trifid about half its length; capsule 1.5-2.8 mm. long (2-) 4-20-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.5-0.8 mm. broad, minutely but regularly tuberculate, the dorsal tuber- cles domical, the facial tubercles rectanguloid or lineolate, remote. Fig. 16D (Holotype D. leptoclados); Fig. 16E (Holotype D. fendleri). Baja California; Arizona through western South America along the Andes to Argentina; apparently skipping southern Central America. Fosberg (in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 29:96. 1945) recognizes three varieties of D. glandulosa, a variable species indeed. The varieties are separated on basis of varying vegetative characters, var. fendleri having subglabrous leaves and var. perennis being perennial. Var. fendleri also tends to have cinereous less cordate leaves and more dense inflorescences. Although the type of D. glandulosa was described as being an annual, the root is apparently perennial and nearly 3 mm. thick. Since the perennial habit occurs in both the subglabrous and the densely pubescent forms and all possible combinations of the characters can be found throughout the range of the species I see little reason for their recognition. Some of the forms are only with difficulty separated from D. cordata, but the seeds of the two have markedly different sculpture. Drymaria glandulosa is also marked by longer anthers and proportionately longer inner sepals, and the inflores- cence is more obviously cymose with a conspicuous central leader. The perennial habit, frequently encountered in D. glandulosa, is rarely if ever encountered in D. cordata. Mandon 950 from the Andes of Bolivia (2600-2700 m.) dept. Larecaja, referred tentatively by Ball (Kew Bull. 22:32) to D. leptocladus var. peruviana is obviously D. glandulosa, and in its tendency toward glabrescence it does resemble D. leptocladus. Berlandier 999 and 1122 from Mexico are distinctive in that the petals have pli-nerved veins and subcylindric tubercles thus suggesting intergression with a member of the Series villosa. DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 249 45b. Drymaria glandulosa var. galeottiana (Briq.) J. Duke comb. & stat. Drymaria galeottiana Briq. in Ann. Conserv. & Jard. Bot. Gen. 13:373. 1911. (holotype: Galeotti 4408; near Oaxaca, Mexico, G!; isotypes at K [sub 4416] and L.) Rather delicate erect annuals to as much as 20 cm. high, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glandular-puberulent, the roots fusiform. Leaves opposite, the blades glandular-puberulent and glabrescent, broadly ovate to reniform, apically obtuse and apiculate, marginally entire, basally truncate to subcordate, subsessile, the stipules bifid or trifid, 1-2 mm. long, about equaling the petioles. Flowers obconic, in rather dense terminal cymes, the peduncles 1-2 cm. long, glandular- all but the central pedicels which may be up to 6 mm. long. Sepals 5, subequal, glandular-puberulent, 3.0-3.6 mm. long, 1.5-2.8 mm. broad, ovate to broadly oblong, 3 -nerved, the midrib sometimes prominent and excurrent, the inner sepals obtuse, the outer acute, transparent save for the nerves; petals 5, 2.5-3.2 mm. long, bifid ca. half their length, the lobes oblong, obtuse, 2-4-nerved, tapering gradually to the claw, exappendiculate; stamens 3-5, 1.5-2.2 mm. long, the anthers sub- orbicular, 0.2-0.3 mm. long; ovary at anthesis subglobose, the style ca. 1 mm. long, trifid ca. half its length. Mature capsule subglobose, 2.5-3.0 mm. long, many-seeded, the seeds cochleate, about as long as broad, ca. 0.6 mm. broad, the dorsal tubercles low and domical, the facial tubercles rectangular, somewhat remote. Fig. 16A (Holotype). Known only from few scattered collections in Oaxaca and Hidalgo, Mexico. At Kew, the specimen labeled 4416 is called D. galeottiana and that labeled 4408 is called D. nummularia, so apparently the labels have been crossed. This variety is a misfit in this series because of the petal nervation and it may prove to represent a mere hybrid. The seeds, sepals, and pubescence suggest D. glandulosa whereas the nervation of the petals and to some extent their shape and size, recall D. laxiflora. These two are the most likely candidates for the parents if indeed the plant is a hybrid. A. Gray, PL Wright. 2:18. 18 5: Conifer 722) . Ascending perennials profusely branched from the base, the internodes longer or shorter than the leaves, glabrous. Leaves opposite, the blades broadly to nar- rowly ovate, glabrous, strongly 3-7-nerved, 5-10 mm. long, 3-10 mm. broad, apically acute and apiculate, marginally entire, basally rounded to obtuse, subsessile; the stipules lacerate, the divisions lance-linear to filiform, exceeding the petioles. Inflorescences of dense axillary cymes, or fascicles, the lanceolate acuminate bracts longer than the glabrous peduncles and pedicels, 1.5-2.5 mm. long. Sepals 5, oblong, apically acute to obtuse, strongly 3 -nerved with the nerves subapically confluent, basally umbonate, 3-4 mm. long, glabrous to scantily stipitate-glandular; petals 3-5, entire and Iigulate or bifid for half their length, the lobes apically ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN denticulate or entire, 1-nerved, 1.0-1.8 mm. long; stamens 3, ca. 1 mm. anthers oblong, the filaments basally connate into a shallow cup; ovary ai subglobose, the style about as long, bifid or trifid about half its length, ellipsoid, 3-valved, 1-3-seeded, the seeds cochleate, 0.7-0.8 mm. broad, tuberculate or merely reticulate on the fades. Fig. 17. San Luis Potosi to Oaxaca, Mexico. Rusby, in Phytologia 1:54. 1934. ; Nequejahuira; alt. 8000 ft. NY!) Drymaria hyperidfolia Diffusely spreadin leaves, strongly divar DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 251 deltoid-ovate, apically rounded to acute and apiculate, marginally entire, basally more or less truncate; stipules entire, more or less lanceolate; larger leaves to 2.8 cm. long, 2.5 cm. broad, trinerved, with the secondary veins forming an obvious but interrupted reticulum, the leaves as the rather long petioles strongly reduced upwardly. Inflorescences of terminal and axillary 5-many-flowered cymes, the axes glandular-puberulent, the bracts lanceolate, 1.5-3.0 mm. long, exceeded by the long, divaricate pedicels, the pedicels to 12 mm. long. Sepals 5, lance-oblong, 2-3 mm. long, apically obtuse or acute by extension of the midrib, weakly 1-3 nerved, the midrib often distally subcyanic; petals 5, about equaling the sepals in length, bifid about three-fourths their length, the lobes obtuse, exaunculate, subdivancate, weakly 2-5 -nerved, the claw carnose, subcylindric; stamens 5; 1.5-2.5 mm. long, the oblong anthers ca. 0.5 mm. long, the filaments basally connate into a more or less carnose ring; ovary at anthesis turbinate, the style trifid ca. half its length, about attaining the anthers. Capsule turbinate, 3-valved, included (seeds rarely mature in the specimens at hand), 1-5-seedcd, the seeds similar to those of D. cor data. Fig. 18 A. Southern Mexico, Guatemala, Bolivia. After scrutiny of the copious Guatemalan material and the scanty Bolivian material (2 specimens, one from the O. Kuntze herbarium, the other the type; [the second specimen cited by Rusby, in his description of the species, apparently is a hybrid with D. cordata or some related species and must be excluded from D. laden H] ) , I am unable to find the slightest differences between them. Asserting rather strongly that there is no obvious difference between the Guatemalan and Bolivian material, I am quite at a loss to explain the peculiar disjunction exhibited n.v.) Holosteum cordatum L. Sp. PI. 88. 1753. Holostcum diandrum Sw. Prodr. 27. 1788. (holotype: habitat in Jamaica, S!) Drymaria diandra MacFadyen, Fl. Jam. 1:52. 1837. not Blume, 1825. Drymaria cordata /3 diandra (Sw.) Griseb. Fl. Brit. W. Ind. 56. 1859. Drymaria cordata p puberula Tr. & Pi. in Ann. Sci. Nat. 4 17 :148. 1862. (holotype Triana s. «.; Bogota alt. 2600 m., P, n. v.; isotype at NY!) Drymaria procumbent J. N. Rose, in Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 1:304. 1895. (holotype Palmer 1165, near water about Colima, Mex., US!; isotype at GH) Drymaria adenophora Urban, in Fedde, Repert. Sp. Nov. 21:213. 1925. (holotype Ekman 12978, Cuba; prov. Pinar del Rio prope Cortez, B?; isotype at G, S, NY!) Stellaria adenophora (Urb.) Leon in Leon & Alain, Flora de Cuba 2:154. 1950. Drymaria cordata var. pacifica Mizushima, in Jour. Jap. Bot. 32:78. 1957 (holotype Svenson 65; Academy Bay, Indefatigable Island, Galapagos Islands, 100 ft. alt.; GH.) Glandular-puberulent to glabrate ramifying annuals, prostrate and spreading 01 erect, the internodes mostly longer than the leaves, glabrous to densely glandular often rooting at the nodes. Leaves glabrous to scantily puberulent, orbicular tc reniform, apically rounded and occasionally mucronulate, basally rounded t< cordate, 5-25 mm. long, 5-30 mm. broad, the petioles 2-15 mm. long; stipule stly lacerate, rather persis Inflorescences ( 252 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN axillary few-many-flowered dichasial cymes, (flowers rarely solitary in the axils) the bracteate pedicels locally girdled with a dense band of glandular pubescence, rarely subglabrous, 2-15 mm. long, much exceeding the subtending bracts. Sepals 5, lanceolate to ovate, acute, glandular-puberulent to glabrous, obscurely to strongly 3-nerved, 2.5-4.0 (-5.0) mm. long, the borders translucent; petals 5, 2-3 mm. long, deeply bifid, the lobes linear, acute, rarely obtuse, 1 -nerved, basally exauricu- late but rarely subdentate; stamens 2-3 (-5), the flattened filaments 2.0-2.5 mm. long, the anthers suborbicular, 0.2-0.3 mm. long; style 0.5-1.0 mm. long, bifid or DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 253 trifid from half to its entire length; ovules few to many, campylotropous on free central placentae. Capsule ovoid, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, the 3 valves entire; seeds 1-many, 1.0-1.5 mm. broad, cochleate, dark reddish brown, tuberculate in lines, all the tubercles low and domical, closely approximated or contiguous. Fig. 18B (Holotype of var. pacifica) ; Fig. 18C (Holotype of D. procumbent). A nearly pantropical species, in America ranging from Florida and Mexico through the West Indies and Central America to Argentina. Mizushima (in Jour. Jap. Bot. 32:69. 1957), studying the varietal potentials of this polymorphic species, described var. pacifica, which differs from typical cordata in having glabrous sepals, more seeds, and a tendency to have a greater number of stamens and the styles divided completely to the ovary. This rather striking variety seems to be lacking in continental North America. Occuring in both var. pacifica and var. puberula, for those who wish to recognize them, are variants in which the flowers are subsolitary in the axils (e.g. Hoi ton 733 from Colombia). Surprisingly and fittingly these have as yet received no taxonomic status. Drymaria adcnophora Urban represents a more or less viscid form with diminutive leaves and flowers and apparently is very similar to specimen 109-1 in the Linnaean herbarium. A similar reduction is exhibited by the type of Holosteum Ji.in.hu>-: Sw. generously loaned by Stockholm. Mosen 40 5 at Lund from Brazil with the sepals to as much as 5.2 mm. long represents the opposite extreme of D. adcnophora, which I believe is typical D. cordata. Perhaps the strangest aberration is that represented by the flowers of the type of D. procumbens, here considered to represent only a monstrosity. The petals are bilobed but one of the lobes is clearly staminal in nature (see Fig. 18C), the other lobe being normal and petaloid. I have seen a similar aberration in one specimen of D. paposana var. weberbaueri, perhaps lending weight to Pax's interpretation of the petals as staminodia. 48b. Drymaria cordata ssp. diandra (Blume) J. Duke comb. & stat. nov. Drymaria diandra Blume, Bidjr. Fl. Nederl. Ind. 62. 1825. (lectotype: after Mizu- Drymaria retusa Wallich, ex Wight & Arnott, Prodr. Fl. Ind. Or. 3 59. 1834. as synonym. (? type?: Wight 152, G, L, !) Drymaria cordata forma indica Miquel, in Junghuhn, Pi. Jungh. 395. 1855. Drymaria externa Wallich, ex Edgeworth, & Hook. f. in Hook. f. Fl. Brit. Ind. 1 2 :244. 1874. (?type?: Wallich 647, Gl) Drymaria gerontogea F. Muller, Descr. Papuan PL 1:87. 1877. Prostrate or ascending annuals, the internodes longer than the leaves, glabrous to stipitate-glandular. Leaves opposite, the blades glabrous, rarely minutely puberulent, deltoid-ovate to orbicular or subreniform, apically rounded and often apiculate, marginally entire, basally truncate to obtuse, rarely cordate, 5-25 mm. long, 3-20 mm. broad, 3-7-nerved; the petioles 2-8 mm. long usually exceeding the stipules; the stipules lacerate, the segments filiform, 1-3 mm. long. Inflorescence a terminal lax to dense 3-many-flowered cyme, the peduncles 1-12 cm. long, glabrous or glandular-puberulent; bracts lanceolate, 2-5 mm. long; pedicels evenly glandular-puberulent; 1-8 mm. long. Sepals 5, narrowly obovate, 2.0-4.5 mm. long, the outer glandular-puberulent, strongly carinate, strongly three-ribbed, the 254 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN ribs protrusive and often connected by cross- veins; petals 3-5, 1.5-3.0 mm. long, bifid one-half to two-thirds their length, the lobes oblong, 1 -nerved, apically obtuse to emarginate, basally tapered to the linear claw. Stamens 2-3 (-4), 1.6-2.2 mm. long, the anthers suborbicular, the filaments basally connate into a shallow cup (the cup often carnose in African forms). Ovary at anthesis globose, the styles short, bifid or trifid from half to all their length. Capsule 2-3-valved, 1.5-2.5 mm. long, 1-2 -seeded, the seeds cochleate, 1.4-2.0 mm. broad, rather densely tuberculate. Fig. 18D (type of D. retusa ?) ; Fig. 18E (lectotype of D. diandra). Tropical Africa, Australia, and Tropical Asia (China, S. & W.; India, Indo- china, Malaysia, Formosa, Ryukyu Archipelago), Oceania, Hawaii, Philippines, New Guinea, Celebes. Mizushima (in Journ. Jap. Bot. 32:69. 1957), after a detailed study of the variation of D. cordata, reinstated D. diandra, long lost in synonymy under D. cordata, to specific status. Intermediates do occur between the two, especially in Africa. The absence of the taxon from the New World when weighed with the characters enumerated in the key, none of them invariably constant, suggest that reduction to a subspecies more truly reflects the hierarchial relationships. African forms are very perplexing and differ from the typical material in the large sepals and petals, higher number of stamens, with prominent, often carnose, staminodial cups. The flowers often lack the pyriform shape which so frequently differentiates ssp. diandra from ssp. cordata. Description of these variants as formal Species Excludendae D. filiformis Benth. = Stellaria filiformis (Benth.) Mattf. D. idiopoda S. F. Blake = Stellaria sp. D. mairei Leville rz Cerastium sp. D. palmeri Hemsl. = Stellaria sp. D. rotundifolia Harriot = Stellaria rotundifolia Poir. fide Kew Index Species non Satis. Notae D. adiantoides Muschl. (type: Sodiro I2QI) ex char. = D. villosa} D. grandi flora Schlecht. non Bartl. May be Stellaria} D. megalantha Steud. " " D. oxalidea Pax (type: Schaffner 827) ex char. veg. = D. excisa}}} D. peruviana Muschl. (type: Weberbatter 2601) ex char. veg. — D. divaricata? D. sessili flora Fiori (Descr. non viso) ex geogr. — D. cordata COMBINATIONES ET TaXA NOVAE D. holosteoides var. crassi folia (Benth.) J. Duke D. arenarioides ssp. peninsularis (S. F. Blake) J. Duke D. barkleyi J. Duke & Steyermark D.conzatti J. Duke D. effma var. confusa (J. N. Rose) J. Duke DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA D. effusa var. depressa (E. L. Greene) J. Duke D. leptopbylla var. cognata (S. F. Blake) J. Duke D. leptopbylla var. nodosa (Engelm.) J. Duke D. engleriana var. devia (Baehni & MacBride) J. Duke D. villosa ssp. palustris (Cham. & Schlecht.) J. Duke D. villosa ssp. palustrh forma tounscndii (Robins.) J. Duke D. villosa ssp. pahistris var. perennis J. Duke D. i7'//ostf ssp. t'/7/ostf forma tepicana (M. E. Jones) J. Duke D. villosa ssp. paramorum (S. F. Blake) J. Duke D. paposana var. serrulata J. Duke D. paposana var. weberbaueri (Muschl.) J. Duke D. rotundi folia var. nitida (J. Ball) J. Duke D. divaricata var. s/r/c/a (Rusby) J. Duke D. divaricata var. viscidula (A. Gray) J. Duke D. divaricata var. divergens J. Duke D. divaricata var. reflexiflora J. Duke D. gracilis ssp. carinata (Brandegee) J. Duke D. glandulosa var. galeottiana (Briq.) J. Duke D. con/*/* ss£. i& Barkley 16M699 ). barkleyi J. Duke & Steyermark Hernandez, Rowell & Barkley 16M53 1 Warnock & Barkley 148 26M (type) DUKE REVISION OF D. \UVa Mom. ugh WIS^IOMT? 7 idulosa Presl : !-v. ar 1782 e 513; 595; 2295 (a Ikrh> idier 677; 841; 1122 eau 283; 552; 592a Fisher 44293 Johnston 44293 Lloyd 370 Lundell 5095 Pringle 5089; 7122 Rose & Hay' 5511 Rose & Painter 6617; 6775; 708 var. galeottiana) 7755 Rose, Standley & Russell 12697 :Barkley 17M- itrncr 332b Sesse, Mocino e Wynd & Mueller Fenz iphylla (Cham. 1. ex Rohrb. Barlow 30 Coulter 697 Gentry 8474 McVaugh 131 05 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Woot. & Standi. J. Duke Gentry 571M; 18 gentryi) Hartman 13 8 Knobloch 5522; 5i LeSueur 258; 623 Muller 3426 Pringle 581; 716; Schaffner 5 Townsend & Barbe Tucker 2457 D. stipitata Fosberg Johnston & Muller 241 Marsh 1571 Stewart 567 (type: va Hinton 15505 (?) Bourgeau 553 Leavenworth 595 (?) Kenoyer A-457 McVaugh 16795; 177 >. molluginea (Lag.) Didr. Pringle 2120 (type); Arsene 1616 var. jaliscana) 7648 ; 11928 Griffiths 6749 Scharlner 363; 416 Mearns 2248 Seaton 267 (type: D . filiformis) Pringle 1192; 1571; 6481 Sesse, Mocino et al. 44 8, 466; 467; 5184 Sesse, Mocino et al. 984 D. villosa Cham. & Schlecht ». mui^exora Brandegee A f 8 To 5129 p ' p,; ' 1214; p. p.; 5281; Arsene 5309; 6710 Bell & Duke 16648 Botteri 350; 944 Hinton 1549; 2596; 6578; 12167; 12489; 15050; 15263 McVaugh 12962; 13441; 13442; 14066; Fischer 2092 16524 Galeotti 1726; 4414 McVaugh &Koelz 1264 Hinton 1384; 5152; 5 Jones, M. E. 22847 (type: D. Purpus 1653 (type) : D. barrana Rose & Painter 6517; 6773 p. p.; 6774; Leavenworth & Hoogstraal 1295 7219 Matuda 4752 Miiller 120; 575a DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA Parry & Palmer 56 Pringle 1501; 7296 Rose & Hay 4800 Townscnd & Barber 23 Rose, Standley & Russell 14145 & 143 86 townsendii) (both f. tepicana) Schiede & Deppe 505 (type) J. Duke Sezaya, Paxon & Barkley 16M833 Edwards 804B Sumichrast 1568; 1945 VILLOSA SS Kenoyer 2449 (appr. laxiftora) Palmer 187 (type); 356 (Cham. &' Schlecht.) J. Duke Arsene 16; 5191; 5391; 5416; 5911 Pringle 3265 Balls B4568;B5 504 Barkley et al. 7489 D. xerophylla A. Gray Frye & Frye 2606 Arsene 46 Coulter 722 (type) McVaugh 16793 Jones, M. E. 90 (type: D. svBsessilis) LeSueur 1322 (f. toivtisendii) Pringle 6910 Leavenworth 525 Maysilles 7782 Roseetal. 9679 McVaugh 13415; 16159 Schaffner 525 Moore 2801; 2955 Sesse, Mocirio et al. 5003 Baja California . ARENARIOIDES SSp. PENINSULARIS (S. F. D. gracilis ssp. carinata (Brandegee) J. Blake) J. Duke Duke Carter et al. 2257 Brandegee 34 (type) Craig 73 8 Jones, M. E. 24193 Howell 10576 Johnston 3972 (type: D. johnstonii) Purpus 337; 423 (type); 496 Rose 16357 Bryant 1888 (type: D. veatchii) . debilis Brandegee Carter et al. 1935; 2474 Brandegee 3 5 (type: D. polystachya) ; Carter & Kellogg 3089; 3221 s.n. Feb. 13, 1889 UC (type) Chambers 837 Constance 3135 Carter & Ferris 3709; 3812; 4093 Carter & Kellogg 2922 Hinds s.n. (type) ixney & Kempton 157; 211 Johnston 3048; 3949; 4263 Dawson 1095 Jones, M. E. 24076 Gentry 3751 Mason 1908 Palmer 4; 819 (type: D. diffusa) Palmer 570 Reed 6156; 6255 Rose 16268; 16528 . GLANDULOSA Presl Shreve 7053; 7095 Carteret al. 2379; 2447 Wiggins 5456; 5531; 7898; 11350 Carter & Ferris 3774; 3907 Jones, M. E. 24149; 24190; 24191; D. holosteoides var. crassifolia (Benth.) 27050 (type: D. fendleri var. perennis) Purpus 469 Carter et al. 2255 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Nelson 3706 Stanley 58398; 59961; 61978; 65477; 67942; 68554; 80175; 80683; 83275; 83294; 83823; 85147; 85599; 85827; 17158; 17541; 19236; 20236; 21557; 22502; 22650; 22714; 23493; 24022; 44268; 53336; 66994; 72489; 75828; 76914; 87923; 88760; 89508 Standley & Elias 2542; 2687 ). laxiflora Benth. Bernoulli & Cario 3 255 Hartweg 523 (type) Steyermark 50243 ( lernoulli 240 (type: D. leptoclados) tandley 58053; 59111; 59852; 60343; 60837; 60874; 60893; 61235; 62818; 62897; 63790; 64317 p. p.; 64427; 66095; 66170; 67287; 77390; 80085; 83193'; 83247^ 83512^ 83884J 84704; 3639; 3651; 3652 DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 261 Standley 1897; 11000; 11873; 12155; Williams & Molina 10076; 12016 12330; 13284; 13324; 15488; 21136 Woodson, Allen & Seibert 1162; 1771 p. p.; 20257; 21730; 21786; 21827; p.p. 22048; 22194; 22651; 22713; 22715; Woodson & Sc he ry 710 23256; 24551; 25023; 29145; 56318; Yuncker, Dawson & Youse 5856 76602; 78213,' 80809; 8105o| 8224o| Dl vlLLOSA SS P- pa lustris 83258; 91341 (Cham. & Schlecht.) J. Duke Standley, Allen et al. 919 Muenscher 12428 Standley & Elias 2533 skutch 298 Standley & Jaime 6748; 6926 p. p. Standley 61036; 61054; 61553; 62663; Standley & Lindelie 7469 62855; 62969- 64316- 64697; 64709; Standley, Williams et al. 1225 659 i 5; 678 i 6 ; 82677 j 83746; 85203; Steyermark 29615; 29910; 35044 p. p.; 85816; 87192 50528 Standley & Elias 3170; 3649 Tonduz 749 Standley & Jaime 5503 von Tuerckheim 684 (appr. D. malachi- Steyermark 34454; 3 5044 p. p.; 3 5597; Jack 6254; 8066 Leon & Clement 64^ Leonard 8347; 9217 Leonard & Leonard Lloyd 405; 455 Brown 111 Clement 40! Cowell 776 Duss 1779; 3092 Eggers 436b } 5 3 s 4972. Proctor 17087 Rose, Fitch & Rt Shafer 53; 208; Stahl 779 Taylor 202 Thompson Heller 4577 Heller & Heller 175; Hodge 438; 439; 440 Hodge & Hodge 1519 Wright 24 Wright, Parry & OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN D. firmula Steyermark irk 56536 (type) Bonpland 222 St< Broadway 575 Farenholtz 554; 665 (var. pacific*] Fa Pit D. v: Pittier 9458; 9827; Vogl 253; 324 J*: Pil Colombia Cuatrecasas, Schultes & Smith Fosberg 19276; 19491, 20367 Gutierrez & Barkley 17C529 Lehmann 5997 i Pennell 1563 Pring 63 Schiefei Toro 15 Rusby & Pennell 622 ). villosa Cham. & Schlecht. Andre 4289 (appr. ssp. palust Arbelaez & Cuatrecasas 5260 Killip & Smith 16142 p. p.; IS Apollinaire 24 ). ovata Humb. Rusby & Pennell 644 ). VILLOSA SSp. PARAMOl (S. F. Blake) J. Du 70 (var. pacijica) Bonpl. ex Roem. appr. D. glaberrima) s Humb. & Bonpl. ex Roem. 22888; 23225 (appr. D. Rose, Pachano & Rose Rose & Rose 22227; :Rose 22952; 23183 f . & Schlecht. Camp E-1929; E-2624 Fosberg & Prieto 22689 Rose, Pachano & Rose 2; OF DRYMARIA Howell 9158; 9671 Svenson 65 (type: (var. pacifica) MacBride & Featherstc MacBride 391 Nunez, O. V. Weberbauer 6 (Bachni & Mac- Bride) J. Duke MacBride & Fcathcrstone Pennell 13462; 14655 ("n Tovar 1277B Ferreyra 7422 MacBride & Featherstoru glandulosa) ; 693 Haenke s. n. (type ). DIVARICATA Var. DIVERGENS J. Duke MacBride 3 506 Asplund, E. 13731 Woytkowski 34228 (???) SSTaSW* D. GRANDIELORA Bart ►. DIVARICATA Var. REFLEXIFLORA J. Duke Ferreyra 6245; 85 B7 (appr. D. glaber Ferreyra 3855 p. p.; 3958; 8695a; 11522 Nunez 2261; 3579; 3754; 3752; 3755; 3757; 3758; 4198; 4291 Pennell 14724 Vargas 1903 >. divaricata var. STRicTA(Rusby)J. Duke D * Thu A it.? umb " & Bonpl. ex Roem. 8 Ferreyra 763 (appr. D. glaberrima) ; Espinosa 199 MacBride & Feather: 1714 Lechler 1947 (type: D. agapatensis) Weberbauer 5327 (appr. D. glaberrima) D. PAPOSANA Phil. i. divaricata var. viscidula (A. Gray) J. Duke Ferreyra 6102 D. paposana var. tb 3ERBAUERI (Muschl.] MacBride & Featherstone 189? Pennell 14518, 14516 Stork 11456 8025; 8695;'9580 5; 3855; 6328 p. p. Wilkes Exped. s. n. (type) Grant 7441, 7468 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI Weberbauer 1657 Worth & Morrison paposana) closely resembles Ball ; Balls, E. K. 7021.B7021 Goodspeed, Stork & Horton I KilHp& Smith 22132; 22134 MacBride & Featherstone praecox Baehni & MacBride Duke Ball, J. s.n. in 1882 (TO Balls, E. K. 6789 Cerrate 150; 627; 1376 MacBric Poeppig 157! Vargas 2100 lam. & Schlecht. , (type: D. hirst* th 23212 Featherstone 154 Bang 233 X glandulosa Presl Bang 92 (appr. D. cordata) : Cardenas 609a; 2424 Eyerdam 24941; 24957 Fiebrig 2837 Hammarlund 404 ). ovata Humb. & Bonpl. Schult. Cardenas 2332; 3379 Herzog 2390 Duke Mandon 948 (appr. D. ovata) ). villosa Cham. & Schlecht. Buchtien 183 p. p. -REVISION OF DRYMARIA Burchell 1011; 9711 Lorentz & Hieronymu: Parodi 9080 Venturi 5104; (var. de Samp Segadas- Argentina Parodi 803! Bonpl. ex Roem. ). cordata (L.) Willd. pacifica); 8642 (appr. D. diandra) Bakhuizen 28a (var. pacifica) Buchtien 695, 795 (var. pacifica) Bunnemeyer 11072 Cid 20 (var. pacifica) > Oceania Edano 1 Flecker J Heller 2i ANNALS OF THE BOTANICAL GARDEN Nodi&Idjan 253 Posthumus 3459 (var. pacifica) Merrill 992; 4341 Purseglove 4322 (var. pacifica) >56; 1958; 1960; 1961 (var. Oldham 23 pacifica) Peekel 90 St. John 9938 Poilane P-M-21; 156C StJohn&Catto 17850 Pulle 1148 Steiner 34787 Ramos 3 0327 Topping 2999 Robinson 18233 VanRoyen 4312 Womersley & Van Royen 5911 (var. Rock 6419 pacifica) Savinierre 283 Womersley, Hoogland & Taylor 4909 Stewart 14437 (var. pacifica) Tanaka 5498 Thwaites 1091 >. cordata ssp. diandra (Blume) J. Duke Tsai 62067 Tsang 21658,25780 Tsang, Tang & Fung Bloembergen 3371 Tsiang 9221 Boeea 8482; 8653; 8921 Zollinger 892 ). villosa Cham. & Schlecht. Backer 5240; 5619; 10665; 12940 (t Griffith 339 Jacquemont 1523 Kajewski 2176 Kalkman 4526 Kanehira & Hatusim Kaudern 168 Schiffner 1952; 1957 Van Ooststrom 13 059: VanSteenis 10916; 11 DUKE REVISION OF DRYMARIA 1236 (appr. ssp. Systematic Index xepted, preexisting names; ital diandra MacFayden Drymaria adompbora 251 axillaris harklevi 21 3, 215 var. confusa .....2 !lX™ _ ! fendhrt . .... fenzliana conzattii 224 ^25 filiformis Benth. filiformis Robins. & Seaton frankenioides .. var -V vracilh 245 246 frutescens . . f. indica j var. pilosa _ /3 puberula ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN grandiflora Bartl. grandiflora Schlech coahuilana 232, 23 5 ssp. " n> l U " dlf nWda' G " y -—-237, spbagnopbila stellarioides ......212, stl pu« xsnpul ' .^..213, 193, K 'E,"3™I::::: : '"': :z 2 io; Vi ""p'' pal U „ris " 225, f. townsendii ...228, ■ Pinosia ortegioides Polycarpon englerianvm Stellaria adenopbora filiformis SANANGO: NEW AMAZONIAN GENUS OF LOGANIACEAE GEORGE S. BUNTING and JAMES A. DUKE .orge S. Bunting. James A. Duke, Mis Among recent collections of Felix Woytkowski from J men of a plant that appears to be intermediate between the families Loganiaceae and Scrophulariaceae! It is a fine example of the situation which has led to the wide- spread view that the Loganiaceae are an artificial group constituted primarily of genera excluded for one reason or another from other well-marked, natural families. There is still ample cause to argue this case, for there is no obvious "family resemblance" to guide us, and often the circumscription of the family is inadequate to positively include or exclude an unknown plant. A century ago George Bentham (Jour. Linn. Soc. Bot. 1:52-114. 1854) wrote: "There can be no doubt that Rubiaceae, Apocyneae, Gentianeae, and Scrophulari- neae are large independent orders indicated in nature, yet those genera now amalga- mated under the name of Loganiaceae bind them so firmly together, that some of these genera will be found even more closely allied to certain others of each of the above orders respectively than they are to each other." And he continues: "The Loganiaceae lie very near to some part or other of the vast family of Rubiaceae, but by their free ovary, they are absolutely, and by very few exceptions, clearly separated. The connecting genera with the Apocyneae, Gentianeae, and Scrophu- larineae are on the other hand, much fewer, but their union is much closer. With Scrophularineae in particular, although the general affinity is more remote, the few intermediate genera and species are intermediate in every respect, in habit as in technical characters. The main distinction, the presence of stipules in Loganiaceae, disappears very gradually, and the difficulty of drawing the line is the greater from there being no habit or family resemblance to unite the several members of the Loganiaceae." It is in this paper that Bentham discussed the similarity of the genus BuJdleja (previously included in Scrophulariaceae) to Logania, and concluded the necessity to place them together, along with the genus Polypremum, in the family Loganiaceae. Now we have discovered another plant that seems to stand nearly between the Loganiaceae and Scrophulariaceae. The fruiting specimen has a distinct aspect of Buddleja, but several technical features prevent its inclusion in that genus. It is equally, if remotely, allied to the genus Peltantbera. After thorough study of this plant, and consultation with N. Y. Sandwith at Kew, and J. J. Wurdack at Wash- ington, we are convinced that it represents an unnamed genus, and describe it 270 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Sanango Bunting et Duke, gen. nov. Arbores parvae ligno valde duro, f oliis oppositis petiolatis binis lineis c Flores in thyrsis bracteolatis, calyce ad medium lobato, segmentis lanceolatis sub- aequalibus, corolla 5-lobata, ± hypocrateriformi, gibbosa, segmentis rotundatis subaequalibus, aestivatione cochleari, staminibus 4 (!) sub sinibus prope tubi basim affixis, filamentis inflatis, antheris subrotundis singulatim 2-thecas ferentibus, introrsis versatilibus in linea ± hippocrepiformi aperientibus, staminodio parvulo, ovario globoso leviter 4-lobato biloculari disco cupuliformi circumdato placentis axillaribus multiovulatis, stylo brevissimo, stigmate capitato bilobato. Capsula polysperma septicidalis, utroque carpello iterum scisso. Sanango durum Bunting et Duke, sp. nov. Arbor 16 m. alta ramulis lenticellatis. Foliorum lamina 10-25 cm. longa 4-7 cm. lata elliptica vel anguste obovata ad apicem acuminata, ad basim cuneata vel attenuata, parce et inaequaliter denticulata praecipue in dimidio superiore, venis lateralibus utrinque 5-7 arcuatis ascendentibus, infra pallida venis strigulosis instructa; petiolus 0.5-1.0 cm. longus, ad basim latus, facie adaxiali velutina ferruginea. Inflorescentia 5-12 cm. longa terminalis vel axillaris ± secunda, pedunculo et pedicellis strigulosis, pedicello ca. 1 mm. longo; florum calyces ca. 3.5 mm. longi puberuli lobis 5 acutis 1.5-2 mm. longis; corollae albae aliquantum carnosae, ca. 1.2 cm. longae extus puberulae et glanduloso-puberulae, intus glanduloso-puberulae et etiam pilosae in tubi basi, lobis ca. 3-4 mm. longis; fila- mentorum staminalium partes liberae pilulosae vix 2.5 mm. longae antheris ca. 0.5 mm. latis brevioribus quam latis; staminodium parvulum vix 0.2 mm. longum; ovarium globosum ca. 1 mm. longum, disco cupuliformi tarn procero atque ovario; stylus crassus persistens, una cum stigmate magno ca. 1 mm. longus. Capsula ellipsoidea vel anguste obovoidea ca. 3.5-4.0 mm. lata parietibus osseis; semina orthotropa ± elongata fusiformia ca. 0.7 mm. longa recta vel sigmoidea. Type collection: Felix Woytkowski 5619, "tree 12 m. tall; no latex; flowers white; in forest, elev. 300 m.; Aramango, s. of Nazaret," depto. Amazonas, Peru; 2 April 1960 (holotype MO, isotype K, US). Distribution: Forests between 300 and 750 m. elevation, west central Ama- zonas and central Junin, Peru. These localities are separated by nearly 500 air miles. It seems plausible that the distribution may be more or less continuous between these points. Peru: Junin: Satipo, Aug. 1960, Woytkowski 5925 (MO). Vernacular name: "Sanango" (Amazonas). The generic name Sanango is the colloquial name furnished by the collector of this plant. It is a corruption of a Quechuan word, "sanangu", an Indian word applied also to species of Tabernaemontana, Rautvolfia, and Malpighia. The specific epithet refers to the hard wood to which Woytkowski called attention in his field blade when one attempts to cut 272 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Sanango belongs to the subfamily Buddlejoideae. Its nearest relatives appear to be Buddleja, Nuxia, and Peltantbera. It should be noted that Sanango has been collected only in localities that lie in the middle of the known range of Peltantbera. 1 Although the affinity is not strong, these latter two genera share the following characteristics: hippocrepiform dehiscence of the anthers, a disk between the ovary and corolla, multicellular hairs, and a lack of stipules. The combination of characters occurring in Sanango is unusual in Loganiaceae, but most of them occur singly in some other genus of the family. The hippo- crepiform mode of dehiscence of the stamens occurs also in the African genus Nuxia. There is a very well developed annular disk of firm texture in the flower of Sanango. In Peltantbera, a very short disk is present, conspicuous only in young flowers. In Nuxia, however, the disk is annular, and though membranous, very similar in form to that in Sanango. 2 Notwithstanding, the style and stigma of each of these three genera are extremely different. An approach to the Sanango-type pistil occurs in Buddleja, and in the herba- ceous genera Mitreola and Polypremum. In Mitreola, the style is short, the stigma smaller than in Sanango, and the ovary splits in two at the top as it develops. Even more similar is the fruit of Polypremum which splits into four segments at maturity as it does also in Buddleja. Multicellular hairs similar to the dendroid or branched type in Peltantbera have not been observed in Sanango, nor have we encountered the glandular, peltate type similar to those described by Solereder (Pflanzenfam. 4 (2) :23, fig. 12. 1892) and by Hunziker and Fulvio (op. cit. in footnote). Certain types of multicellular hairs are, however, common in Sanango on both vegetative and floral parts. The corolla is 5-lobed in some genera of Loganiaceae and 4-lobed in others. Indeed both conditions are known to exist in a single species of Buddleja. The loganiaceous flower typically has an equal number of stamens and corolla lobes. Sanango is unique 3 in the Loganiaceae in possessing a five-lobed corolla with only four stamens, the fifth one merely suggested by a very small appendage not apparent in all flowers. This characteristic is typical of such families as Verbenaceae and Scrophulariaceae. We feel, nonetheless, that Sanango is more closely allied to Loganiaceae than to any other. Such an opinion is dictated by the presence of a stipular line between the leaf bases of each leaf pair, and the strong similarity of the pistil and the fruits to Buddleja, which clearly is related to Logania. The more or less irregular nature of the corolla in aestivation, and the reduction of one stamen in Sanango decidedly suggest Scrophulariaceae. There is, llent paper on Peltantbera, Hunziker and Fulvio (Bol. i noted that the genus is known from Costa Rica, Pert udy we have encountered the collection of A. E. Lawr depto. Boyaca, Colombia) which clearly represents P. ft aper. The Colombian specimen agrees in all its floral m< : half the length of the ovary as is characteristic of the B f Nuxia ftoribunda Benth. is deeply two-lobed, which, ;estive of Rauwolfia and other Apocynaceae. in genus Usteria, three of the four stamens regularly aboi Aestivation of the flowers of this genus is cochlear, i.e., one corolla lobe is interior, one exterior, and the other three have one edge overlapping and exposed with the opposite edge hidden by the adjacent overlapping lobe (Fig. if). The corolla tube is gibbous near the base, and the flower appears to be oriented so that the interior corolla lobe and the gibbous side of the tube are uppermost (adaxial). The vestigial fifth stamen arises on the gibbous side, below one of the two sinuses adjacent to the interior corolla lobe (Fig. lc). The bud is distinctly zygomorphic, more so than in Peltanthera. It is impossible to ascertain from the dried material to what degree the open flower may show this character. We are unaware of an identical type of aestivation among the other Loganiaceae, though it is not uncommon among the dicots. The usual pattern in five-lobed corollas of this family is with two lobes external, two internal, and one imbricate. Vesture At least four types of multicellular hairs occur in Sanango. The largest are present on the adaxial face of the basal part of the petiole. These are composed of 3-5 elongate, hyaline cells, the basal one inflated, the terminal one attenuate (Plate IVa) . Very young stems and leaves are clothed with hairs of a similar type, a few of which persist on the veins on the lower surface of the mature leaves. The calyx bears hairs of similar structure, but very much smaller than those described above. In some, however, it appears that the terminal cell is slightly inflated (Plate IVb) . Both surfaces of the corolla are very hairy (Plate IVc). The outside is closely covered by very small, mostly 3 -celled attenuate hairs similar in form to those oi the leaves, and intermixed with these are some still shorter gland- tipped hairs (Plate IVe). The glandular tip cell is opaque, borne upon a greatly inflated, hyaline basal cell. The inside of the corolla bears 3-4-celled, gland-tipped hairs about twice as long as those on the outside of the corolla (Plate IVc). [The glandular tip may be composed of several cells arranged radially, but the small size of the structure has prevented us from ascertaining its exact nature. Some lobing is apparent in certain preparations.] In addition, there are many very long, slender hairs in the throat of the corolla that appear to have no cross walls dividing them into cells (Plate TVd). A pollen sample was sent to Dr. G. Erdtman for study. He reports that "the grains are small, uninteresting from a morphological point of view, and similar to those in Peltanthera ..." His diagnosis follows: "Pollen grains small, 3-coIporate (about 15 X 12.5). Colpi about 12 fx long. Ora about 2.5-3 n high. Exine thin. Sexine of about the same thickness as nexine. [No pattern or traces of bacula etc. could be seen even by means of an apochromatic objective with the numerical 274 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN aperture 1.40. The pollen grains in Peltanthera costaricensh are equally 3-colporate and measure about 15 X H /*; tne exme seems to be very minutely reticulate.]" Anatomical Considerations Dr. Stern, U. S. National Museum, plans to do a detailed anatomical study of the wood of this genus. We wish, however, to point out that there appears to be no included phloem in this species, which is the typical condition in the Buddlejoideae. This contrasts strongly with the intraxylary phloem present in members of the Loganioideae (Metcalfe and Chalk 2:931. 1950). The wood does not appear to differ strikingly from that of Veltanthera. Explanation of Plate PLATE IV Types of trichomes in Sanango a. from adaxial face of petiole b. on calyx c. on corolla, exterior (left) ; (right) [a-c all at same scale] d. enlargement of long hair on interior oi single short gland-tapped one at its base (note the apparent lobing of the glai e. enlargement of a single gland-tipped hair on exterior of corolla i MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Calavay H. Dodson, Robert L. Dressier, BOARD OF TRUSTEES Volume XL VIII Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden NOVEMBER, 1961 Two New Me Portraits of PI Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden School of Botany of Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden Vol. XL VIII NOVEMBER, 1961 RidgMHiaou. SU ' Introduction The genus Scolecopteris, founded by Zenker in 1837, is based upon silicified fructifications from the Lower Permian of Saxony. To date the following species have been described: S. elegans Zenker, Linnaea 11:509. 1837. (A more detailed description was given by Strassburger in 1874.) S. subelegans Grand'Eury, Acad. Sci. Inst. France, Mem. 24:72-73. 1877. S. ripageriensis Grand'Eury, ibid., p. 73. S. minor Hoskins, Bot. Gaz. 82:427-436. 1926. S. oliveri Scott, Journ. Linnean Soc. London, Botany, 49:1-12. 1932, and pp. 309- 321. 1933. S. tati folia Graham, Bot. Gaz. 95:456-458. 1934. Emend Mamay, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 37:425-428. 1950. S. radforthii Andrews, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 30:435-437. 1947. S. iowensis Mamay, Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 37:429-431. 1950. S. minor Hoskins, var. parvifolia Mamay, ibid., pp. 431-432. S. incisifolia Mamay, ibid., pp. 433-436. S. major Mamay, ibid., pp. 436-439. Scolecopteris is characterized by pecopterid pinnules bearing sporangia in sori on the abaxial surfaces. The sporangia composing a sorus are attached to a common pedicel, but are free above, and lack a common synangial sheath. The following account deals with two additional species that fit these charac- teristics and thus have been assigned to the genus Scolecopteris. Further evidence for placing them in this genus will be recorded under the description of each 276 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Materials Both species are based on fertile pinnules found in coal balls that were collected by Dr. Henry N. Andrews from a site two miles northeast of Berryville, Illinois. The outcrop lies in the upper part of the McLeansboro group of the Pennsylvanian of Illinois. The Carboniferous Marattiaceae Fructifications referable to the Marattiaceae are borne mostly on Pecopteris type foliage. They were borne on the under (abaxial) surface of the leaves, situated over a veinlet or between the veinlet tip and the margin, and unlike the living genera the majority of the fossils have radially symmetrical sori. Mamay (1950) included the following genera in the Carboniferous Maratti- 1. Cyathotracbus Watson, emend. Mamay: Synangia pedicellate; sporangia enclosed in a continuous synangial sheath; basal portion of synangium with central column; apical portion hollow and cup- like. Based on petrifactions. 2. Ptychocarpus Weiss: Synangia pedicellate; sporangia enclosed in a continu- ous synangial sheath, and fused to a central column extending through the entire length of the synangium. Based mainly on compressions. 3. Scolecopteris Zenker: Synangia pedicellate; sporangia attached to a central receptacle but free distally. Based mainly on petrifactions. 4. Sturiella Weiss: Synangia pedicellate; sporangia basally fused but free above; annul us present. Based mainly on petrifactions. 5. Acitheca Schimper: Synangia sessile; sporangia attached at their bases to a central column, with distal portions free; sporangial apices long and bristle-like. 6. Aster otheca Presl: Synangia sessile; sporangia attached to a receptacle, but free distally, their long axes parallel to the plane of the pinnule. Based mainly on 7. Eoangiopteris Mamay: Sori linear; sporangia arranged in two rows along fleshy receptacle; sori located along lateral veins; sporangia free. Monotypic. Based on petrifactions. Thus, the accepted criteria for separating the fossil genera are the following: 1. Sori linear or radial. 2. Synangia pedicellate or sessile. 3. Sporangia free above or enclosed in a continuous synangial sheath. 4. Central column present or absent in synangia. (It is important whether the central column extends through the full length of the synangium or not, as in distinguishing Cyathotracbus from Ptychocarpus.) Since the discovery of the pteridosperms, some paleobotanists have regarded certain of the supposed marattiaceous fructifications as more correctly referable to Pteridospermae. Kidston (1925) expressed this view in finding resemblances be- tween Acitheca and Telangium. However, Mamay (1950) concluded that upon the basis of the sizes of fructifications and spores, the arrangement of sporangia in son, and the superficial position of sori, this fossil group more closely resembles the living Marattiaceae than the pteridosperms. T TWO NEW MEMBERS OF SCOLECOPTERIS 277 Mamay (1950) considered the coenopterid fructification Chorionopterh to best fill the qualifications of a progenitor of the Marattiaceae. This evolution supposedly came about by means of a "phyletic slide" from marginal or terminal sori to superficial ones. He further proposed that those fossil genera with fused sporangia are most closely allied to the living genera Danaea and Chris tensenia, while those with free sporangia are most closely allied to the living genera, Angiopteris, Arch- angiopteris, and Macro glossum. Description of New Species Scolecopteris monothrix R. B. Ewart, sp. nov. (figs. 1-12). This fructification is distinguished by long slender sporangia each of which terminates in a single, unbranched, multicellular hair. These were borne on pecopterid pinnules with strongly inflexed and deeply incised margins in synangia consisting of four, sometimes five, or rarely three sporangia. One well-preserved specimen was discovered in coal ball WCB 1203. It con- sists of an ultimate rachis with about 15 attached pinnules. Several detached pinnules and synangia were found in the same coal ball. A second intact specimen was found in WCB 1238 along with more fragments. Nearly all synangia were found attached to pinnules and seem to have been preserved in their natural position. The morphology of the ultimate rachis and attached pinnules may be seen in the reconstruction in text-fig. 1. The average dimension of the pinnules and penultimate mid-rib are as follows: The penultimate or rachis midrib (fig. 7) shows no cellular detail except for the vascular supply which consists of a U-shaped strand with the concavity adaxial. The basal part is two or three tracheids in width while the arms narrow to one tracheid. Short multicellular hairs are found on the lower side. Figure 11 (A) shows some of these hairs on the longitudinally sectioned midrib. Some of them are as long as the diameter of the midrib. Figure 7 shows that these hairs are several cells in width and are irregularly spaced in contrast to the hairs found in the sporangia. As seen in fig. 11, the pinnules are joined laterally where attached to the rachis but become separate a short distance out from the rachis. They are of the pecopterid outline characteristic of the genus. The margins are so strongly flexed downward that they parallel and finally almost enclose the synangia as may be seen in fig. 10 (B). The pinnule is devoid of synangia along the distal third of its length and this portion is strongly flexed downward and inward toward the rachis midrib almost completely enclosing the synangia and the space directly below them. This space appears to be loosely filled with sporangial hairs which are oriented in the direction of the midrib. These hairs may be seen, mostly in t 278 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN fig. 10 (A). The pinnule margins are deeply incised and may be compared in structure to those of S. latifolia and S. incisijolia. Figure 12 (B) shows one of the marginal lobes in vertical section. A row of these lobes in transverse section- may be seen in figs. 8 and 1 1 (B) . In fig. 8 the cellular contents of these lobes may be seen. The lobes join laterally at about the level of the sporangial apices, but their vascular strands continue as discrete bundles. The only other cellular struc- ture of the lamina that is preserved is a layer of hypodermal cells below the upper epidermis; it is one or two cells in thickness and may be seen at the top of fig. 4 and in figs. 10, 11, and 12. The synangia form a single row of nine or ten sori on either side of the midrib of each pinnule. A synangium usually contains four sporangia, but those with five, such as the one in fig. 9, are also common and one has been found with three. The sporangia composing a synangium are arranged radially on a common pedicel. Due to the long slender nature of the synangia, it was not possible to find a good median longi- tudinal section showing both the pedicellate attachment and the apex bearing a portion of a sporangial hair. Thus, fig. 4 was prepared from three photomicro- graphs showing these features in their proper proportions: the upper shows the pedicellate attachment and the proximal half of two sporangia; the middle shows the distal half of two sporangia and their apices; and the third shows simply the basal portion of a hair characteristic of the species. The sporangia are long, slender and roughly cylindrical but are slightly wider near the base than at the apex; they are tightly appressed to one another and the synangia themselves are quite crowded. The apex of each sporangium, prior to dehiscence, is curved inward toward the center of the synangium and fits closely against the apices of the other sporangia (figs. 2, 4). Thus a central synangial cavity is formed which is completely enclosed. Dehiscence was accomplished by a longitudinal slit along the inner face of the sporangium (fig. 1 ) ; in fig. 8 a mass of spores may be seen discharging through the slit. This leads to the question of how the spores escaped from the enclosed synangial cavity. Figure 6 shows a synangium of S. monothrix at a later stage and is from a different specimen than that shown in most of the figures. The preservation is poor but it may be seen here that the sporangia have separated except where joined to the pedicel. This synangium, along with several empty ones, was attached to a fragment of a pinnule. In all probability the strongly curved pinnules to which these fructifications are attached straightened somewhat at maturity, decreasing the crowding of the synangia, and allowing the component sporangia to separate. In figs. 3 and 4 it may be seen that a single, long multicellular hair is attached on the outer periphery of a sporangium near the apex. It is likely that such a hair grew on most if not all sporangia of S. monothrix, but no sporangium has been observed to have more than one hair. No branching has been observed in these hairs nor has any deviation in position or structure been noted. In fig. 3, the "bulb" at the distal end of the hair is merely the point at which the hair leaves the plane of the section and is not the termination of the hair; the total length is much greater than is shown. By following the course of a cluster of hairs it EWART TWO NEW MEMBERS OF SCOLECOPTERIS is possible to estimate their length. The hairs in such a cluster all tend one direction, toward the rachis midrib. In fig. 10 (A), a cluster of ha seen in transverse section in the space below the sporangia. In fig. 12, hairs may be seen on either side of and pointing toward the rachis n where they terminate. It is almost certain that these hairs originate on 1 gia, as no trace of an attachment has been observed elsewhere. It is thus that the sporangial hairs are 2 or 3 times the length of the sporangia or A The average dimensions of a synangium are as follows: :te and bilateral with a length of 12 fi and a width of 9 /*. The smooth walls appear to be thick, but lack any markings of the exine, except where obviously due to damage. The only member of the genus with smaller spores is S. elegans with spores 10 /u. in diameter. Using the method described by Radforth (1939), the average number of spores per sporan- gium is estimated at 9,000. From the above description it may appear that S. monothrix has some rather striking characteristics for this genus. Some thought was given to the possibility of establishing a new genus but it was decided that this would not be necessary. The following are the reasons for placing this species in the genus Scolecopteris: 1. It seems most appropriate to refer it to the Marattiaceae on the basis of the nonindusial sori borne on the abaxial surface of pecopterid leaves. 2. The pedicellate, radial synangia limit it to Scolecopteris, Ptycbocarpus, or Cyathotrachus. 280 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL I 3. Lack of a continuous synangial sheath and central column limit it to Scolecopteris. 4. It is borne on pinnules with a morphological structure similar to those of S. latifolia and S. incisifolia and is believed to be closely related to these species. 5. Although it has a closed synangial cavity at maturity, this opens at a later stage causing the synangia to assume a more scolecopterid appearance. Other members of the genus, such as S. incisifolia, also have closely appressed sporangia. 6. Although hairs of the S. monothrix type are unique for the genus, S. major is known to have multicellular hairs on the sporangia. 7. Although S. monothrix has small spores and large sporangia, they do not represent the extremes of the genus. As mentioned above, S. elegans has smaller spores, while S. major has sporangia from 0.3 mm. to 1.1 mm. longer than those of S. monothrix. Scolecopteris monothrix may be differentiated from other members of the genus by the following characteristics: 1. No other member of the genus has a single, long, multicellular hair in a fixed position on the outer periphery of the apex of the sporangium. The synangial hairs of S. major are quite different. 2. S. oliveri and S. incisifolia are the only other species with bilateral spores. Of these two, only S. incisifolia compares to S. monothrix in having a smooth exine but the spores of the former are 22 X 14 fi while those of the latter are only 12 X9 p. 3. In sporangial length, S. monothri is 0.3 mm. to 1.1 mm. longer, and S. olive However, both of these species have a greater sporangial width than S. monothrix. The ratio of sporangial length to width is greater in S. monthrix than in any other member of the genus, being about 6:1. 4. The blunt connivent apices of S. monothrix further distinguish it from S. major, which has very acute apices. The specific name S. monothrix is proposed in reference to the unique sporangial Specific diagnosis: Synangia consisting of four, sometimes five, rarely three sporangia basally attached to a common pedicel. Sporangia 1.8 mm. in length and 0.35 mm. in width; apices blunt, connivent in synangia but separating after dehiscence; dehiscence by longitudinal clefts along inner sporangial wall. A single, unbranched, multicellular hair one cell in diameter located on the outer periphery of the apex of each sporangium, reaching a length two or three times the length of a sporangium. Pinnules averaging 6 mm. in length and 2.5 mm. in width (exclusive of inflexed margins), margins strongly inflexed and deeply incised, ultimate rachis with U-shaped vascular strand and thick multicellular hairs aver- aging 0.8 5 mm. in length. Spores monolete, averaging 12 yu, long and 9 /x wide, with thick walls and smooth exines. Age: McLeansboro Group, Upper Pennsylvanian. Locality: Berryville, Illinois. Holotype slides: Slides 2987-2995 (from WCB 1203). EWART TWO NEW MEMBERS OF SCOLECOPTERIS 281 Scolecopteris illinoensis R. B. Ewart, sp. nov. (figs. 13 and 15-26). This description is based upon specimens from WCB 1204 and WCB 1239, particularly the latter from which the type slides were chosen. The fructifications in these coal balls were found to be in an excellent state of preservation. They were found attached to pinnules which were in turn attached to pinnae midribs. By cutting WCB 1239 in two planes, it was possible to obtain peels which revealed the morphology and something of the anatomy of the specimens. Five or six sporangia are radially grouped on a short common pedicel to form a synangium. Of the 14 synangia seen in fig. 16, four contain six sporangia, seven contain five, while it is difficult to determine the numbers of the other three. Examination of other synangia has shown that those synangia with six sporangia are almost as numerous as those with five. As may be seen in fig. 16, the synangia form a single row on either side of the pinnule midrib. There are generally six or seven synangia per row. A vascular bundle branching from the pinnule midrib is found at the base of each synangium as seen in fig. 23 (C). The outer sporangial walls are thick and curved as seen in fig. 1 6, but are com- posed of but one layer of cells. The lateral walls are thinner and straight, but do not touch one another, except in synangia which, like the one at the bottom left of fig. 16, contain spores and are probably less mature than the others. It is likely that the sporangia in a synangium separate as they mature, like those in S. mono- thrix. Dehiscence occurs by means of a longitudinal slit along the inner wall of each sporangium. Most of the sporangia seen in this study had already dehisced but a few may be seen to contain spores (fig. 22). The sporangia are roughly ovate in vertical section with acute apices that curve inward toward the center of the synangium as seen in fig. 23 (B). The sporangial cavity does not extend into the distal part of the apex. Figure 1 3 shows a transverse section through the apices The average dimensions of the fructifications are as follows: Total length of synangium - 0.66 mm. Maximum diameter of sporangium 0.31 mm. Diameter of pedicel 0.16 mm. The spores are spherical in shape and have a crescent-shaped indentation in the exine at one point as indicated by the arrow in fig. 18. Examination of well pre- served spores leads to the conclusion that this may be regarded as a natural and constant character. The diameter of the spores averages 15 /x. The penultimate midrib may be seen in transverse section in fig. 23 (A). The vascular supply consists of a U-shaped line of tracheids, and extending from the free end on the right hand side is a small bundle of tracheids representing a pinnule trace just departing. Figure 24 represents an oblique longitudinal section of the vascular supply in an ultimate pinnule. The arrow indicates a branch of this trace. Following the trace distally, it may be seen that this is one of six such branches each of which passes into the pedicel of a synangium. One of these traces may be seen in trans- verse section in fig. 23 (C). 282 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN The pecopterid pinnules are alternately spaced along the rachis midrib as may be seen in fig. 15. The pinnule margins are minutely toothed (fig. 17) and reflexed downward (figs. 19-22). Following are the average dimensions of the rachis midribs and pinnules in these specimens: Pinnule length - 5.5 mm. Pinnule width _ 2.2 mm. Rachis midrib diameter 1.0 mm. Figure 19 shows a row of pinnules, each with a pair of sori, arranged along a rachis midrib and sectioned transversely. At the extreme left is the rachis midrib in oblique section. The anatomy of the pinnules is well shown in fig. 20. The upper epidermis is not preserved, but the underlying, large hypodermal cells (A), form a layer one or two cells thick. Below this layer is a zone of palisade parenchyma (B), consisting of one or two layers of narrow, tightly-packed, elongated cells. Underlying this is the spongy parenchyma (C) of loosely- massed rounded cells, and numerous air chambers. Bounding this is the lower epidermis (D). A notable feature of Scolecopteris illinoensis is the abundance of hairs on the lower surfaces of the pinnule midribs (figs. 24, 26). They are multicellular, un- branched, and one cell in diameter. Figure 21 shows that they extend beyond the apices of the sporangia. The hairs in transverse section may be seen between the two rows of synangia in fig. 16. Similar hairs have been observed attached to the synangial pedicel. In fig. 22, the arrow indicates a small outgrowth of the sporangial wall which may be the base of a hair, but these have not been seen on other sporangia. S. illinoensis clearly belongs in this genus but differs from other members of the genus as follows: 1. The only other species in which it is not rare to find six sporangia in a synangium is S. iowensis. S. minor rarely has six, but a comparison of that species in fig. 14 with S. illinoensis shows a distinct difference in numbers of sporangia. 2. This species differs from S. iowensis which has spores measuring 65-80 fi in diameter, four times the diameter of those in S. illinoensis. S. iowensis sometimes has a double series of synangia on each side of the pinnule midrib, while this has not been observed in the present species. 3. Although multicellular hairs are sparingly present on the lower side of rachis and pinnules of S. minor, no species has hairs on the pinnules that are as conspicuous .i- in S. illinoensis. Specific diagnosis: Synangia consisting of five or six sporangia basally attached to a common short pedicel. Sporangia 0.65 mm. in length and 0.31 mm. in width; apices acute and incurved; dehiscence by longitudinal cleft along the inner sporan- gial walls. Pinnules averaging 5.5 mm. in length and 2.2 mm. in width, with inflexed minutely toothed margins. Ultimate rachis with U-shaped vascular strand. Unbranched, multicellular hairs, one cell in diameter and reaching 0.7 mm. in length produced on pinnule midribs and synangial pedicels. Spores spherical, 15 ft c-shaped mark on exines. EWART TWO NEW MEMBERS OF SCOLECOPTERIS i Group, Upper Pennsylvanian. Locality: Berryville, Illinois. Holotype slides: Slides 2996-3005 (from WCB 1239). Two new species of Scolecopteris are recorded both of which were found in the Upper Pennsylvanian of Illinois. S. monothrix is distinguished by its long sporangia each of which has a distally attached long, multicellular hair. The tips of the com- ponent sporangia were tightly appressed when immature. The spores are very small and their number per sporangium high. S. illinoensis is characterized by having five or six sporangia per synangium, small spores, and conspicuous multicellular hairs on the underside of rachis and pinnules. This study was carried out in the laboratories of Washington University under the guidance of Dr. Henry N. Andrews, to whom the writer wishes to express his sincere thanks; it is a part of a paleobotanical research program aided largely by the National Science Foundation. Thanks are also extended to Dr. Tom L. Phillips for assistance with paleobotanical techniques and for aid in other ways. Literature Cited Roy. Soc. Edinburgh, i ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN PLATE V. Scolecopteris monothrix Fig. 1. Transverse section of a synangium sectioned in the plane 1-1 of fig. 4. Note spores passing into synangial cavity. Slide 2994. X 8 5. Fig. 2. Transverse section of apex of synangium sectioned in the plane 2-2 of fig. 4. Note that all four apices fit closely together. Also note the four celled base of a sporangial hair (arrow). Transverse section of several hairs from other sporangia may be Fig. 3. Longitudinal section of sporangial apex showing hair. "Bulb" at distal end langial hair indicating character- a? MBF.RS OF SCOLECOPTERIS O NEW MEMBERS OF SCOl I < up I 1 KIN EWART TWO NEW MEMBERS I Explanation of Plate PLATE VI. Scolecopteris monothrix Longitudinal Fig. 8. Transverse section thr ind inflexed pinnule ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Explanation EW ART— TWO NEW MEMBERS OF SCOLECOPTERIS EWART TWO NEW MEMBERS OF SCOLECOPTERIS 287 Explanation Fig. 16 Single pinnule from fig. ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN long hairs on midri -TWO NEW MEMBERS OF SCOLECOPTERIS 289 PLATE X. ScoL copteris illinoem Fig D Longitudinal 3. B. Incurvec Spore mass in section of fertile part of p porangium. Slide 2997. X Fig uln! Lon sill l^ "If" Fig 25. See ion showi ig pin a m drib with pinnul Fig 26. Ha rs on pinn ulc mi r>b. Slide 2999. X PORTRAITS OF PLANTS. A LIMITED STUDY OF THE "ICONES" ERNA RICE EISENDRATH Jude some portrayal of the habit of growth of the plant; that they be botarucally accu u n . Each of the "icones" must fulfill each .r oft-repeated use, and their exception to the Four genera of the Cw .. L„ffa) are chosen as limiting Garden discussed in relation to the criteria previously set up. The studs j 5 concluded with a of Botany, Washington University, St. Loot* 3 0, Missouri* Botanical Use of the Word "Icones" The word "icones" was taken into botanical parlance by Otto Brunfels in 1530. Its spelling in the title of his Herbarum vivae eicones still conveys a hint of orientalism just strong enough to tie in with its common meaning today; to the layman, an icon is (as it was, to the publishers of Webster's New International Dictionary of 1918) "a religious image in the Eastern church". For botanists, however, it is not the gilt on these distorted saints that glows when they speak reverently of "icones". Their enthusiasm is evoked by a kind of floral illustration which they automatically lump as "icones" in special sections of libraries; to which they readily refer as "icones" in conversation; of which they will confidently name names as true "icones"; but for which they hesitate to pronounce a definition. So, though everybody knows the special meaning of the word, there remains the prob- lem of establishing criteria by which to implement its definition; a later problem will be to list the books containing illustrations that satisfy the criteria. To start from an authoritative beginning I give you Benjamin Daydon Jackson, who in 1900 first published in London his most useful Glossary of Botanic Terms. To him, "icones" 3 are merely "pictorial representations of plants; botanic figures". In this sense which includes all botanical illustrations it was certainly used by Pritzel 4 in his Iconum Botanicarum oi 1855 and is also so used in the Latin title page of the Index Londinensis. For the purposes of this paper, however, I prefer basing my criteria on the last word of the last definition of "icon" given in the Oxford English Dictionary (Oxford, 1933): "esp. applied to 'figures' of animals, plants, etc. in books of Natural History. Obs." The use of "icon" to include all natural history illustra- tions is now obsolete; when botanists speak today of the "icones" it is with a 292 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN different connotation, not specifically stated in any source that I can find, implies more than scientifically accurate illustrations, and more t plant portrayal, falling some place between the two and partaking of both but, with a kind of hybrid vigor, better than either. Dr. Hugh Cutler bravely ventured to make the following brief but telling statement. "The 'icones'," he said, "may have nothing to do with the church exactly, but a great many botanists worship them." That is, apparently, about as far as educated angels dare to tread; this fool will now step in to define "icones" by establishing the criteria which distinguish them from other illustrations in botanical books. Criteria Distinguishing "Icones" After examining every lead to illustrations of the key 5 genera of Cucurbi- taceae available at the Missouri Botanical Garden library (some 157 volumes), I have set up four arbitrary criteria for "icones". The first is that the illustrations be full page 6 in size; the second, that they include portrayal of the habit of growth of the plant. The third is botanical accuracy, and the fourth artistic presentation. In many instances my first criterion is necessitated in order to eliminate illustra- tions used simply as elaborations of a text. According to Nissen (1951), "the documental botanical illustration should, for the co-investigator, replace the plant itself, be he distant in time or place". 7 So, too, must true "icones" be visual portraits of plants, dependent in no sense upon the written word. P. J. F. Turpin, the great French botanical artist, quite naturally believed that the brush was greater than the pen as a naturalist's tool, and wrote that he "who possesses only the latter loses perhaps the more significant" (Turpin, 1820). But the brush used to depict the plant must do so in considerable detail, and the portrait must be extremely accurate — so accurate as to compete with the botanist's dried herbarium specimen as a source material for study. (The possibility of this is recognized in the official acceptance, though rare, of such representations as type specimens.) Small figures of plants cannot possibly fulfill all of these requirements; hence the first criterion for true "icones": that they be full page illustrations. My second criterion for defining true "icones" is that they represent the habit of plants, and include both vegetative and reproductive organs. It is possible to object that this is unnecessary, since one can assume that generic characters are "given", and that only identifying specific characters need be depicted in plant portraiture. This objection I liken to a statement that a man's fingerprints identify him; certainly they will differentiate him from all other men, as certain characters of a species of plants will also differentiate it. Neither fingerprints nor selected characters, however, will give us portraits of the individual or the species, and, in defining today's usage of the word "icones", I insist that portrait is the proper synonym (if any is truly proper) . "Icones", then, must portray habit of growth, and here is another example of the need to pin a word to exact definition. What is "habit"? Webster (New EISENDRATH, A STUDY OF THE ICONES 293 Intern. Diet., 1918) gives as its eighth definition of the word, "Nat. Hist. Char- acteristic form or mode of occurrence or growth; as, elms have a spreading habit." Jackson, deriving "habit" from the Latin, gives, "The general i plant, whether erect, prostrate, climbing, etc." Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker, systematist, Director of Kew Gardens, and editor of volumes 91-130 of Curtis' Botanical Magazine, wrote, "Habit of a plant, of a species, a genus, etc., consists of such general characters as strike the eye at first sight, such as size, colour, ramifica- tion, arrangement of the leaves, inflorescence, etc., and are chiefly derived from the organs of vegetation" (Hooker, 1875-97). To this I append the requirement that either flower or fruit must be depicted; however, it is not always easy to decide where "habit" is illustrated and where it is not. I have, for instance, not listed among the "icones" pertinent plates (see plate XI) in Tournefort's Ins!: ; (1700), even though they are cited by Linnaeus (Species Plantarum, Stockholm, 1753, vol. 2, pp. 1010-1011) in his original description of the genus Cucurbit a. My reasons are that Aubriet illustrated for Tournefort only parts of plants — fruits (and with dissections, too! ) , seeds, flow- ers, peduncles, etc., but no idea of the appearance of the plant itself is given. Again, L. H. Bailey, in his Garden of Gourds (1937) , includes page after page of drawings, almost all of which show sections of the stem, flowers, fruits and leaves. Since they also show tendrils where tendrils exist, it is apparent that such plants would climb if given a chance to do so, and I have therefore listed a number of these illustrations among the "icones"; but I have eliminated such as that of the "Mock Orange" variety of Cucurbita Pepo, which depicts a pistillate flower, a fruit with peduncle attached, a tendril, a stem in cross-section, and enlarged dissections of the style and stigma, as well as of the anther column; but habit, no! — so it is not listed. illustrate the root. This is undoubtedly a loss to plant portrayal, and probably came about when interest in plants shifted to a taxonomic basis from the pragmatic approach of the rhizotomists and their followers. These predecessors of the herbal- ists performed magic and cures based on lore often dating from the Greek period, and generally associated, in popular folk ritual, with properties inherent in plant roots (Singer, 1928). Also worth noting is the rarity of portrayal of habitat along with habit. This is so important a factor in the systematics of botany, and was used so wonderfully by Audubon in his portrayals of birds and animals, that one wishes it were more often used as backdrop to "icones" of our flora. Nissen's (1951) statement, "Plant sociology ... is of recent date, and representation of it is prepared more and more with the camera," 8 very possibly explains this lack. If the portrait of a plant belongs at all within the field of botany, it must be scientifically accurate, my third criterion for "icones". The degree of precise detail will vary in each plant portrait, as it does in human portraiture. There is, however, a most important difference in the requirements of the two. A portrait of a man shows all the artist can tell us about a single individual, be he godlike or sickly earthling; but, to quote from Arber (1938), "the drawing which is ideal from the standpoint of systematic botany, avoids the accidental peculiarities of any indi- 294 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN vidual specimen, seeking rather to portray the characters fully typical for the species." This distinction is well illustrated in the very book that introduced the word we are trying to define, Brunfels' Herbarum vivae eicones: here we find that some of Weiditz' magnificent "living portraits" exhibit such "accidental peculiari- ties", probably as a result of an overly enthusiastic return to direct observation from nature. Note figure 1, of Weiditz' Arctium lappa L., in which the plant's poor wilted leaves add nothing except the information that it had been pulled from the earth too long before Weiditz got around to drawing it. He apparently did not itch, as Tournefort felt the true botanical artist should, to get his observations on to paper. "It frets a man", Tournefort wrote (quoted from Blunt, 1951) "to see fine Objects and not be able to take Draughts of them; for without this help of Drawing, 'tis impossible any account thereof would be perfectly intelligible." The requirements of accurate botanical illustration are that the characters of a species be accurately represented; fortuitous accident in the life story of the individual, such as its being attacked by voracious insects, is of no interest to anything or anybody but the insect and the plant. It is almost pedantic to add that accuracy is not impaired by the additional quality of aesthetic satisfaction, the fourth of my criteria. Among the "icones" the two are found in variable proportions, the balance being struck not only on the basis of the purpose for which the pictures were made, but also depending upon the date of their publication. The demands of fashion in taste and interest can be followed clearly throughout the centuries. Many flower illustrations of great decorative quality have no botanical value whatsoever, and quite correctly end their usefulness as lamp shades; this kind of work reached its nadir in the 19th century, when spinster ladies sentimentally painted charming bouquets on china, as well as any other available surface. When these illustrations appeared in books, they were usually accompanied by saccharine verse, under such titles as The Moral of Flowers (Marquand, 1947). 9 Today's floral illustrations represent the opposite extreme. We tend to file scientific data in compartments well isolated from all aesthetic consideration; for this reason we must beware of eyeing with suspicion the accuracy of figures that are pleasing. It is important to remember, as is subsequently discussed, that the "icones" include the work of Turpin, Fitch and many other extremely gifted artists, whose talents were exhibited in a field that demanded far more of them than simple art for art's sake. An aesthetic quality, then, is the last of four criteria set up for true "icones"; full page illustration, portrayal of habit and botanical accuracy have all been discussed above. Extremely few illustrations will pass all these tests; but who , the" 9th century. Linnaeus hims elf effused most colorfully: . beds, gloriously a 11 the greater so sified, Clasp with fond arms, and romK utch, Joseph Wood, The Ga tetter's World, New York, E.SENDRATH-A STUDY OP THE .CONES 296 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN knows better than a botanist that taxa must be elastic, and that no set of characters is invariably true for all the units that the taxon must include! "Icones" may be found in regional floras, de luxe tomes concerned only with the plants growing in a single garden, learned treatises on classification, serials pub- lished by scientific institutions or nurserymen's catalogues. All of these fall within the enormous body of illustrated botanical literature, of which the Index Londinensis lists well over 3000 titles, and for the purposes of this paper it was necessary to establish a limited approach. One could set up chronological barriers, choosing, as did Sit well and Blunt (1956), two centuries as a high point in botan- ical illustration. One could profitably discuss only the work of one great artist, such as Turpin, whose name appears several times on these pages. One could trace any of several aspects of the subject through the pages of Curtis' Botanical Magazine during its almost two hundred years of publication. Or, one can approach this loose aggregate of illustrated books with a particular subject as the tool by which to cut it down to workable proportions. This method has been used, with four genera of the Cucurbitaceae the limiting factor. Key Species of the Cucurbitaceae as Limiting Factors in This Study Various reasons may be cited for pursuing the study of "icones" through illus- trations of members of the Cucurbitaceae. As is later discussed, the family is generally distinguished by a fleshy fruit, a structure known as a "pepo"; but, whereas in many plant groups the fruits may be used to delimit various taxa, it cannot be said of the cucurbits that "by their fruits ye shall know them". There are "pepos" and "pepos", and the close relatives, among many cultivated forms, will produce offspring which exhibit tremendous differences. In size alone, the "pepo" may be as small, let us say, as a tangerine, or absolutely enormous, as witness the Hubbard squash or the long-as-a-man-is-tall Lagenaria. It is never possible con- veniently to mount (and seldom even to preserve) such fruits as herbarium mate- rial; therefore, since it is for the edible, decorative and useable fruits that the family is cultivated, illustrations of them are of great botanical importance. The flowers, too, present a problem in survival. Though they may be showy, they collapse dismally after one day of glory in the sun, a sad truism for the taxonomist, since they present most interesting morphological variations. (It may be due to the same truism that the work of many of the best known floral artists does not appear among "icones" of the Cucurbitaceae; an illustrator who attempts to draw them painstakingly from life will find that their lives are too brief to enable him to create the illusion of prolonging them! ) The choice of the key genera was made for several reasons: Fevillea because it is the primitive group in the family, serving as starting point for a number of phylogenetic series; Cucurbita, Lagenaria and Luff a because their distribution is so wide and varied as to insure their appear- ance in a variety of publications. The Cucurbitaceae include about one hundred genera (fide Lawrence, 1951). Not only the placement of the family in a natural system, but also the delimitation of generic characters have intrigued and baffled botanists over the years. This problem is, however, entirely beyond the scope of my study. EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 297 The Cucurbitaceae are generally tropical plants, with some species hardy enough to extend into the temperate zones. All, however, are frost-tender herbs, and sur- vive to fruit in chilly climates only because they grow very rapidly. Client hit a is native to the American tropics, and Luff a (with the exception of L. operculata, also New World) to the Old World tropics, whence Lagenaria probably also came, but this genus has been for a very long time universally distributed throughout the warm parts of the world. The same three genera are of interestingly varied economic importance. Cucur- bita is cultivated for its edible and decorative fruits, the pumpkins and squashes which traditionally are staples of the American diet, and archeologically are known to have been important long before the advent of the white man to either Amer- ican continent. Luffa's fruit has a fibrous interior when mature which, dried, becomes the "vegetable sponge" so widely used by masseurs; the young fruits (apparently less abrasive!) are edible. Lagenaria fruits in an incredible variety of forms; wherever it is grown, it teases the imagination to put the fruits to use as ladles, vases, pitchers, bird houses or merely decorations. A visitor to Georgia and Florida at the turn of the century (Odell, 1904-05) found that "hardly a domestic operation there is complete without the aid of the Gourd in some form". It was even used as a cradle for negro babies! Fevillea (tropical American) is neither widespread nor economic, but is included because it is not cultivated, which fact, along with its many primitive characters, presents interesting botanical contrasts to the other genera. In Fevillea, for instance, the corolla is distinctly polypetalous, as it is also in Lagenaria. In Luff a it is deeply lobed; in Cucurbita the five petals are joined in a floral tube. Again, in Fevillea five stamens with biloculate anthers of an unspecialized type stand perfectly free, alternating in position with the petals; in Luff a, as in the other three genera, there are usually basically only three stamens (because of the coherence by their filaments of two pairs of the original five), but they are borne free on the calyx tube. In Lagenaria the anthers of the stamens cohere lightly, but are not truly connate; in Cucurbita the filaments are connate (except that sometimes they are free at the very base) and the anthers are twisted so inextricably together in a column as to be almost indistinguishable. In none of the last three genera are the anthers primitively biloculate; they dehisce by a single longitudinal split. Of the books listed below, the following contain "icones" of Fevillea: Marcgrave-Piso, Plumier, The Botanical Magazine, Dictionnaire des Sciences Natu- relles, Descourtilz, Martius, Velloso, Engler and Rendle. Of these, all but the serial, the dictionary and the systematists concern plants of the Caribbean and South America, the earliest of them being Marcgrave's first edition in 1648. Lagenaria is illustrated, among the books listed below, by Fuchs, Dodoens, L'Obel, Dalechamps, Tabernaemontanus, Gerarde, Parkinson, Bauhin, Rheede, Rumpf, Oskamp-Zorn, Descourtilz, Velloso, Iinuma, Duthie and Fuller, Bettfreund and Bailey, indicating an early European knowledge of the plant, as well as its wide spread in tropical areas of the world. Luffa, rather strangely, is not pictured by those earlier herbalists who illustrated 298 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Lagenaria, though both genera are thought to have originated in the Old World tropics. Among the "icones" listed we find Luffa first in Vesling, illustrating Egyptian plants in 1638. It appears next in Commelin, illustrating the plants cultivated in the Physic Garden of Amsterdam in 1706; later, it is pictured by Rheede, Rumpf, Cavanilles, The Botanical Magazine, Velloso, Martius, Wight, Iinuma, Blanco, Duthie and Fuller, Lecomte, Engler and Bailey. This indicates a wide distribution indeed, although the plant was apparently not cultivated in Europe as early as was Lagenaria. Of the four genera considered in this study, Cucurbita is not only the best known and most widely cultivated today, but archeologically it is of great interest, being found in diggings where it can be used to trace the agriculture of early man in the so-called New World. Because of its tremendously variable fruits, seeds and other organs, Cucurbita also challenges the systematist and intrigues the geneticist; because its floral parts are large, it is useful to morphologists and physiologists and, because the cucurbits are easily grown, their large fruits can be retained for study, while their indeterminate growth permits flowering from maturity to frost. As a matter of fact, Cucurbita presents satisfying study material for most botanical specialists, though geneticists, pleased with the large pollen mother-cells, find diffi- culties in their miniscule chromosomes (Whitaker and Bohn, 1950). However, it is probably because of its edible and decorative fruits that we find among the "icones" more illustrations of Cucurbita than of the other three genera selected. The earliest "icones" of Cucurbita, the two appearing in the fabulous folio edition of Fuchs, 1542, are probably also the most beautiful. We find Cucurbita next in the 1552 Aztec herbal known as the Badianus Manuscript; and at short intervals from then on, mostly in pictures derived more or less from Fuchs, cucurbits appear in Matthiolus, Dodoens, L'Obel, Dalechamps, Tabernaemontanus, Gerarde, Parkinson and Bauhin. Original figures are found in Rheede, Rumpf, Buch'oz, Schkuhr, Vietz, Descourtilz, Chaumeton, Wright, Iinuma, Blanco, Duthie and Fuller, Bettfreund and Bailey. The list evidences a rapid and wide spread of knowledge about and interest in the plants. Earliest Illustrations of Key Species None of the titles in the list of "icones" of the selected genera predates 1542, the year of publication of Fuchs' De historia stirpium. This fact is significant because the historical background to a discussion of plant illustration is strangely poor. Though all of man's existence (along with that of other animals!) must of necessity have been ultimately dependent upon the flora of his world, relatively very few early examples of plant delineation are known, in comparison to those of fauna. Among the key genera, the earliest I find are chance reprints in modern books, all of Lagenaria. The first is printed by Behling (1957) , and is taken from the manu- script Tacuinum Sanitatis in the Austrian National Library. It is described as a page from the "Hausbuch der Cerutti, of upper-Italian origin, from the turn of the 14th to the 15th century. ... One sees the flask-shaped gourd (O, an excellent EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 299 The second reproduction is Arber's plate iii (1938). This is from Konrad von Megenberg's Das Puch der Natur, Augsburg, 1475, which contains the first printed plant illustrations. It shows, in the center of a group of plants, an unmistakeable Lagenaria fruit, pendulous on a terminal branch, the whole plant arising from a basal rosette of heart-shaped leaves. The third is in a 1940 facsimile of an Aztec herbal of 1552 (Codex Barberini, Latin 241, in the Vatican Library). Familiarly known, from the name of its translator, as the Badianus Manuscript, it was put together by Martin de la Cruz, described in the text as an "Indian physician . . . who is not theoretically learned, but is taught only by experience" (Arber, 1938). The colored illustration shows a Cucurbit* foetidissima, so identified as the leaves and root seem to belong to a perennial plant. In the herbal it is called the "Ayonel- huatl", translated as "calabash root", and is described as an ingredient of a complex concoction recommended to relieve the pain of childbirth. Fuchs' De historia stirpium Fuchs' beautiful Dc historu stirptum wi$ published in Basle in 1542, twelve years after Brunfels introduced "icones" as a botanical word. Like Brunfels', Fuchs' book is illustrated with portraits of plants made by artists who had actually looked Plant illustration in the herbals, prior to Brunfels and Fuchs, consisted of constantly recopied figures, derived from ancient originals, which in each reproduction lost more of their freshness and validity. Strangely, the invention (circa 1450) of movable-type printing, with its tremendous impact on the dissemination of all kinds of knowledge, did not immediately influence publishers to have their artists take a fresh look at plants. And this, despite the fact that illuminated manu- scripts of the period often include charmingly naturalistic flower paintings, and that such artists as the Van Eycks, Van der Goes, Jacopo Bellini and Botticelli painted flowers beautifully even before a magnificent high of superb flower por- trayal was reached in the work of Leonardo 10 (1452-1519) and Diirer (1471- 1528). Brunfels and Fuchs let fresh air into the musty chambers of illustration of the herbals, Fuchs leaving for us fine woodcuts of both Cucurbit a and Lagenaria; but it is from them (see below) that subsequent generations of herbalists were satisfied to derive their illustrations, thus slamming down the window once again. Fuchs shared with Brunfels the realization of the importance of drawing plants from life, but his artists, unlike Weiditz, (whose "living portraits", you will remember, were sometimes limited portrayals of individual plants) also understood the necessity of depicting plants typical of a species. From his own statement we know that Fuchs worked closely with the artists. ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN shadows, and other less necessary things, by which the delineators sometimes try to wm artistic glory." (Quoted from Arber, 193 8.) Fuchs was himself a physician, famed throughout Europe for his success: :atment of an epidemic disease that hit Germany in 1529, but his love of plai is more than a professional interest. Again in his preface, he wrote, Fuchs' great work represents the high point of the Renaissance herbal (Singer, 1928) ; the text has the botanical limitations of all herbals, but the illustrations are superb. The figures, fitted gracefully into the frame of the full folio page, do not thereby lose their naturalism. The lack of shading that Fuchs mentions sometimes makes the outlines appear thin, but this is much relieved by the presence of color, which the artists probably intended should be applied by hand, after printing (Blunt, 1951). The large folio plates of the key genera include two of Cucurbita Pepo, called by Fuchs "Cucumis Turcicus" and "Cucumer Marinus", and three of Lagenaria vulgaris, labeled respectively "Cucurbita Maior", "Cucurbita Minor" and "Cu- curbita Oblonga". In 1545 an octavo edition of Fuchs appeared which contained the same illus- trations of the plants under discussion, with exactly the same names given them, but in very much reduced size and mirror images of the larger cuts. 11 They were to have a long life indeed. These small-scale cuts from Fuchs, along with some from other sources, were used for over a hundred years by subsequent generations of herbalists. It would criteria set up for "icones"; but I feel they must nonetheless be included in this study, and I claim justification from the excellent authority of Dr. William Trelease, first director of the Missouri Botanical Garden. Dr. Trelease wrote, er of the plant figures of the herbalists are far frc : shall also see that others which my definition wot swish of the skirt, play important roles in Linnae EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 301 With Fuchs' "icones" well in mind, we now embark upon an unbelievably com- plex task, tracing from his and other true portraits of plants the often inadequate thumb-nail sketches used and reused by successive herbalists. Woodcuts Derived from One Source and Used by Several Authors Bailey (1929) identified Fuchs' "Cucumis Turcicus" as "undoubtedly a Cucurbita Pepo of the vegetable marrow kind", and Whitaker (1947) agrees. In 1563, in his Cruydeboeck, Dodoens reproduced the smaller cut as "Pepones magni", using it again in 1616, in his Stir pin »i historic pern p fades, as "Pepo maior ob- longus". In 1587, in his Historia generalis plantarum, Dalechamps, possibly using the same cut, called it "Cucurbita Indica longa", and in 1636 Gerarde, in The herball, described it as "Pepo maximus oblongus". The picture ends its career, as far as I know, as "Cucurbita foliis asperis sive Zucha, flore luteo, Ic. 11" in Johannes Bauhin's Historia plant arum of 1650. This last derivative from a magnificent original has been cut down to diminutive measurements (8/ 2 X 4/ 2 cms.); the tendrils of the plant are so stylized as to be almost indistinguishable organs, the character of the peduncle at the point of attachment is entirely lost, and the illustration becomes as far removed as possible from a portrait of a living plant. This series presents a good example, however, of the botanical significance of many of the small derived wood-cut figures of the herbals. Linnaeus in his defini- tion of Cucurbita (Species plantarum, 1753, vol. II, p. 1010) cited a variety /3 with Caspar Bauhin's Pinax as reference. Caspar, the son of John, did not illustrate his book, but referred to the pictures mentioned above, from Dodoens' work of 1616 and Gerarde's 1636 Herball, so Linnaeus' description is indirectly des- cended from a picture which may be described as a foster child of Fuchs'. Again, Fuchs' "Cucumer marinus" had a long and mostly unhappy history (see Figures 2, 3 and 4) . Matthiolus (Comment arii in libros sex Pedacii Dioscoridis de materia medica) in 15 58 printed as "Zucche Indiane" and in 1560 as "Cucurbita Indica" a plate which is certainly not a direct copy of Fuchs', but which almost as certainly was copied from his. Dalechamps in 1587 used Matthiolus' cut, in mirror image, as "Cucurbita Indica rotunda", and Linnaeus (Species plant arum, 1753, vol. II, p. 1010) cites Dalechamps as a reference for his Cucurbita Pepo. Bailey (1929) says of this cut that it represents In 1563 Dodoens printed a cut more exactly derived from Fuchs' octavo "Cu- cumer marinus", calling it "Pepones rotundi", and in 1616 Dodoens reused it, this time as "Pepo rotundus minor". By 1636, when Gerarde called it "Pepo minor sylvestris", the detail was considerably coarsened, but it is very possible that the same plate was used. In 1650 Bauhin printed another poor, small, derivative cut, this one "Cucurbita foliis asperis sive Zucha flore luteo, Ic. V." Fuchs' illustrations of Lagenaria, too, produced a motly swarm of progeny. His rbita oblonga" is in Dodoens, 1563, as "Cucurbita anguina , as "Cucurbita longa, folio molli, flore albo". Fuchs' "Ci . B.u;hi: 302 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN EISENDRATH— A STUDY OF THE ICONES Peponesrotundi. ftonfc $X(t><¥>(potn(tt. 304 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN reappears in Dodoens in 1563 as "Cucurbita cameraria maior", which Dalechamps also called it in 15 87. (His plate, however, is a reverse of Dodoens', with slightly different measurements.) Gerarde (1636) seems to have used Dodoens 5 block, calling it "Cucurbita lagenaria", and in 1650 Bauhin brings it to a small, inglorious end, again, as "Cucurbita latior folio molli, flore albo". Fuchs' third and last Lagenaria was called "Cucurbita minor", and Dodoens (1563) called it by the same name. In 1587 it became "Cucurbita cameraria minor" in Dalechamps, and in 1650 "Cucurbita lagenaria" in Bauhin. Obviously, there was some confusion in nomenclature! All of the Dodoens illustrations are approximately the same size as the cuts of Fuchs' 1545 edition, and possibly from the same blocks. Dalechamps' cuts are slightly smaller and all but the "Cucumer marinus" derivative in reverse of the above, so he cannot have used the originals; Gerarde's print is clearer than Dodoens', but may be from the same cuts. The cuts used by Bauhin are all smaller and far coarser than any of the others. However, not all the wood cuts used in the herbals of the period after Fuchs by Dodoens is used again by Gerarde in 1636 as "Pepo Indicus angulosus", and identified by Whitaker (1947) as "C. Pepo, possibly var. White Bush Scallop". Again, Dalechamps in 15 87 published a charming decorative print of "Cucurbita verrucosa" with a good deal of fine, accurate detail, identified by Whitaker as "evidently a warted variety of C. Pepo". The same material, cut down in size, in mirror image, with far less grace and detail, was published by Bauhin (1650) as "Cucurbita verrucosa" and cited by Linnaeus, in 1753, in Species plantarum in his definition of "Cucurbita verrucosa". (But Linnaeus added, in later editions, that the plant bore marked resemblances, in flowers and seeds especially, to C. Pepo.) This is another example of the enormous botanical value of even such a coarse, much-worried hand-me-down as Bauhin's figure, especially as, according to Bailey (1929) the Linnaean herbarium contains no specimen named "Cucurbita verrucosa" by Linnaeus. 12 In 1576 (Plantarum seu stirpium hhtoria) and 1591 (Icones stirpium) L'Obel published as "Pepo maximus Indicus compressus" a cut identified by Whitaker (1947) as the first illustration of Cucurbita maxima. In 1587 Dalechamps used the picture in mirror image, as "Pepo maximus Indicus, L'Obel"; his cut measures 12X7 cms., a bit smaller than the one used by L'Obel, by Dodoens as "Pepo rotundus maior" in 1616, and again in 1636 by Gerarde, as "Pepo maximus com- pressus". This cut (referred to L'Obel) is cited by Lamarck in his Encycfopedie, ii, 151 (1786). Bauhin is also cited by Lamarck, for his portrait of "Cucurbita aspera, folio non fisso, fructu maximo, albo sessili". In 1591 Tabernaemontanus published in his Neuw Kreuterbuch as "Pepo Indicus minor angulosus" a cut used by Gerarde in 1597 as "Pepo Indicus angulo- sus". The print is poor in Gerarde, but the detail in the cut is excellent and is identified by Whitaker (1947) as "probably C. Pepo, var. 'Table Queen'". As before, Bauhin has a mirror image of the same cut, in smaller size, and names it as EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 3 OS did Tabernaemontanus. The cut is un- usual among those of the period in that it does not show a root. The same authors use another cut, originally described by Tabernaemontanus as "Pepo Indicus minor clypeatus" and by Gerarde (1597) as "Pepo Indicus fungi- formis". Again Bauhin's use of it is in mirror image on a smaller scale; he calls it "Cucurbita clypeiformis cortice molli et ramosa" and Bailey (1929) says it is "un- doubtedly one of the forms of Cucurbita Pepo var. Melopepo" although tendrils are a conspicuous part of this figure, and Bailey himself (1954) describes var. Melopepo as "Plant covering small space, compact, not running or tendril-bearing". However, this last, negative character is not cited by all authorities. Again, Tabernaemontanus' "Cucur- bita capitata" appears in Gerarde (1597 and 1636) as "Cucurbita sylvestris fungi- formis" and in Bauhin (smaller and reversed) as "Cucurbita capitata Taber- nomontani sive clypeiformis". This, which bears no tendrils, Bailey (1929) again iden- tifies as Cucurbita Pepo var. Melopepo. Tabernaemontanus' "Melopepo clype- Fig Ure 4 "Cucurbita foliis asperis sive atus" becomes "Pepo maximus clypeatus" Zuch in Gerarde (1597) and (diminished in jjjjj^ ZJS^T^£wSil "**"'* size and reversed in image) "Cucurbita clypeiformis, sive Siciliana Melopepon latus a nonnullis vocata" in Bauhin. This cut is again without roots; it does, however, show exceptionally good detail of flower and fruit structure and is without tendrils. It is particularly important as it represents another definite citation by Linnaeus in his description of Cucurbita, this time "C. Melopepo". Bailey (1929) says "the plant is undoubtedly what we know as Bush Scallop squash". Bauhin used Tabernaemontanus' "Cucurbita longa" as his "Pepo Indicus minor, Tabern." and Gerarde in 1597 used Tabernaemontanus' "Melopepo compressus" as his "Pepo maximus compressus"; Tabernaemontanus' "Melopepoteres" as his "Pepo maximus rotundus"; and Tabernaemontanus' "Pepo maximus oblongus", as (for once not complicating the problem) "Pepo maximus oblongus". Gerarde, in 1636, had access to cuts used by L'Obel in 1576 and 1591. L'Obel's "Pepo oblongus vulgatissimus" (1576) became "Pepo oblongus" in 1591, but Icon 306 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Gerarde called it "Pepo maior sylvestris". L'Obel's "Pepo rotui Melonis effigie" retains its name in both his editions, but Gerarde calls it "Pepo Indicus minor rotundus", and Parkinson (Theatrum botankum) in a very coarse 1640 reprint, "Melo Indicus parvus". The last of the cuts of Cucurbit a, in Bauhin, makes a very poor print indeed, and must, like the others, have been cut down from another wood block, although I have not found it printed elsewhere. However, it is another important, though indirect, Linnaean reference. Bauhin called it "Cucurbita foliis asperis sive Zucha flore luteo, Ic. I." Linnaeus refers in his Hortus Cliffortianus™ and his Hortus Upsaliensis to Ray's Historia plantarum 14 which in turn refers to this cut in Bauhin. Bailey (1929) says, "This figure is again C Pepo as we know it". Gerarde in 1597 used three cuts of Lagenaria which had been used previously by Tabernaemontanus. The latter author's "Cucurbita Indica minor" became "Cucurbita anguina" in Gerarde; his "Cucurbita lagenaria minor", "Cucurbita lagenaria sylvestris". In 1636 Gerarde used cuts as "Cucurbita anguina" and "Cu- curbita lagenaria sylvestris" which had also been used before and were to be used again. L'Obel (1576 and 1591) had used the first as "Cucurbita sive Zuccha omnium maxima anguina" and Dodoens as "Cucurbita longior". Parkinson appar- ently used the same plate, in 1640, as "Cucurbita longa." L'Obel also in both his editions used the second of these as, simply, "Cucurbita lagenaria" and Dodoens as "Cucurbita prior". Again, Parkinson apparently used the same plate, this time as "Cucurbita lagenaria maior". The constant and confusing repetition of these figures is largely due to "pools" of botanical cuts made by the publishers of botanical books. Of these the best known is Christopher Plantin, the great printer of Antwerp. Plantin's firm con- tinued publishing for three hundred years, his place of business becoming a museum in 1876, when it was purchased by the city of Antwerp from the eighth generation of the family Moretus, direct descendants of Plantin's son-in-law, who was also his chief assistant. Plantin published L'Obel's work as well as the later writing of Dodoens. These two men, along with Charles de L'Ecluse (who apparently used no cuts of the key genera) were friends who worked so closely together that it is not possible to tell which or who was originally responsible for material or figures in their publications. In 1576 Plantin published Plantarum seu stirpium icones using L'Obel's name although many of the cuts had also been used to illustrate the herbals of Dodoens and de L'Ecluse. It is thought that it was this selection of woodcuts which Johnson bought to use in his editions of Gerarde's herbal in 1633 and 1636 (Arber, 1938). Arber (1938) believes this to be the last time the Plantin collection of blocks was used. Jacques Dalechamps, whose Historia generalis plantarum appeared at Lyons in EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 307 1587, and Jakob Tabernaemontanus, whose Ncnw Krcuterbuch was published in Frankfurt a few years later, both seem somehow to have had access to the Plantin "pool" of cuts, as is evident from the above tracing of relationships to the same figures found in Dodoens and L'Obel; or they used, as did so many others, the octavo blocks from Fuchs' 1545 edition. Arber (1938) says that Tabernae- montanus made a collection of blocks for himself, and that they were acquired from him by John Norton to be used in his 1597 edition (the first) of Gerarde's Herball. According to Bartlett (1949) this was based upon a translation of Dodoens' second herbal, begun by a Dr. Priest; Gerarde took over the work for Norton, the publisher, after the death of Dr. Priest, so the material is hardly original. Gerarde is particu- larly remembered as a horticulturalist, having supervised the care of several famous English gardens and having himself cultivated for twenty years a fine garden of his own in Holborn. Although John Parkinson also had a famous London garden, and was known as "Herbarist to Charles I", the examples of illustrations of my key genera found in his T heat rum botanicum leave much to be desired. Other Woodcuts in Herbals of Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries The search for "icones" of the key genera takes us now to Padua, where in 163 8, appeared a little book on the plants of Egypt. The woodcuts of Luffa used by Vesling (De Plantis Aegyptiis, 163 8) are highly stylized and poorly printed, and are not included as illustrations in Alpino's original (1592) edition of the book to which Vesling is supposedly only adding "observations et notae". However, Sims, who edited the 1814 volume of the Botanical Magazine, thought rather highly of Vesling's cut. "Professor Cavanilles", Sims wrote in connection with Plate 1638, "supposes that 'Momordica Luffa' of Linnaeus may probably belong to the same genus (Luffa) . Indeed these two plants appear to be extremely similar, as we judge from the excellent figures of Veslingius [sic], in his observations on Prosper Alpino". Most of the seventeenth century botanical books, however, differ from Vesling in that they reflect the stimulus which all the natural sciences received from the discovery of the New World. The earliest of these that falls within the limits of this paper appeared in Amsterdam in 1648, the Historia Nafuralis Brasiliae. The author of the section entitled Historia Rerum Naturalium was Georg Marcgrave, who had accompanied a Dutch expedition which conquered Brazil and took it briefly from the Portuguese. According to Wm. Swainson (1834), "Marcgrave 's work abounds with a vastness of new and original information, very different from what was to be found in the crude and verbose compilations of this period." He has left for us a small wood-cut of FeiiUea, and several other cuts which are apparently of members of the Cucurbitaceae, but are too crude and rough to be recognizable. The cut of Fevillea most certainly does not fit my definition of "icones", but like those of many of the herbalists it has value because of the time and place it was made. The same cut is found again in Piso's De Indiae ittrimquc, Amsterdam, 1658, actually the second edition of the volume listed above. The work of Marcgrave and Piso is so inextricably entangled that it is impossible to 308 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN know who is responsible for what. The editor of the 1648 edition gave credit to both (after Marcgrave's death), but Piso took all the credit for the second edition unto himself. The credit for the illustrations, however, is of dubious value, as Nissen (1951) writes, in his inimitable Teutonic verbosity, that "the cuts are in no way suitable to verify a doubt-free determination of a specific object". The decadence into which the botanical woodcut sank after reaching a high in Fuchs' herbal has been traced through a devious history; with the introduction of metal plate incision comes another breath of good fresh air. This introduction presents a second of the strange anachronisms in the history of botanical illustra- tion, comparable to the generally poor plant portrayals in the printed herbals during a period when beautiful flower paintings were being made. The technique of engraving on metal stems from the great goldsmith tradition of the artisans and was translated to the graphic arts sufficiently early to have reached a high point in the works of Martin Schoengauer, 1445-91. However, the earliest strictly botanical book com i anted from metal plates did not appear until a century after Schoengauer's death (Van Schaack, 1959). This was Fabius Columna's Phytobasanos; it contained no pictures of my selected Cucurbitaceae, nor have I found such pictures in books printed until a hundred years later still. This fact, however, gives a falsely exaggerated impression of delayed adaptation of the new technique to botanical illustration. After the publication of Columna's etchings, the makers of botanical prints finally recognized that the incision of metal plates permits a far more delicate line than does wood- cutting, and the genus flourished through the seventeenth century. Between 1678 and 1703 appeared the 12 folio volumes of Hortm mdictu jhuLi- baricus, copiously illustrated with double page copper engravings, by Heinrich Adrian van Rheede tot Draakestein, and containing "icones" of Cucurbita mos- chata, Lagenaria vulgaris (see plate XIV), Luff a acutangula and L. cyliudnca. Malabar lies on the west coast of southern India, and Rheede was governor of the province. Blunt (1951) feels that the author may himself have had a part in making the drawings of plants, though the plates were engraved by an Italian monk, Father Mathieu. The illustrations are sometimes of immature plants and sometimes (like those of Weiditz) picture in close detail the flaws of individual specimens, but their large size and strong calligraphic quality give them a vitality which many other plant illustrations lack. This is one of the best known of the pre-Linnean botanical books which reflect the stimulus of the introduction into Europe of new plants found during voyages of exploration or scientific inquiry. The works of Commelin, Rumpf and Plumier (see below) fit into this same category, Rheede, Commelin and Rumpf particularly pointing up, as Blunt (1951) reminds us, "the interest shown by the Dutch in the flora of their colonial Commelin's book, Horti medici Amstelaedamensis, con plants in this Physic Garden, with illustrations drawn frc Luff a operculata, typical of the stiff engravings taken f EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 309 and Maria Moninckx, to which originals Blunt (1951) claims that justice is not done. Caspar Commelin, the author, was a professor of botany and the nephew of Jan Commelin, who had been director of the Physic Garden. The next illustrations of the key genera appear in the 6 volumes of Georg Eberhard Rumpf 's Herbarium Amboinense published, again in Amsterdam, between 1741 and 1750. The story of the author's life is a series of mishaps so catastrophic that one can only wonder that his work was ever published. Rumpf became an employee of the Dutch East India Company in 1652, and settled at Amboina 1 "' where he indulged his love of nature until he died in 1702. However, fire, ship- wreck and blindness all tested Rumpf's patience and courage, so that one cringes from criticism of the illustrations of Cucurbita (C. Pepo and C. moschata), Lagenaria and Luff a (L. acutangula and L. cylindrica) in his book. Let me only say that their quality is extremely variable, due to the fact that Rumpf's drawings from which his descriptions were made, were burned and he became blind before he could make more. Hence several people, including his son, made the new set, in many of which the botanical detail is poor. However, the books remain im- portant because later authors have used his descriptions and figures as the types of many binomials of plants of the Malay flora (Merrill, 1917). Plantarn m americanarum listed hereafter as containing "icones" was published in Amsterdam between 1755 and 1760, and was edited by Burmann, a well-known professor of botany in that city. Burmann's "last labor" {General Biographical Dictionary, 1813) was to procure "engravings to be executed for the drawings of American plants left by Plumier, to which he added descriptions". Plumier, a member of a French religious order, had been sent to explore the French settlements in the West Indies, and succeeded so well that he was subsequently appointed botanist to the king {General Biographical Dictionary, 1813). He published many of his drawings in Paris in 1693, but these did not include the Fevilleas that give him entree to the list. His plant figures were drawn to large scale in bare, cold outline, and have little artistic merit; but they were often referred to by Linnaeus, who had access to a set of copies at the University of Groningen (Sitwell and Blunt, 1956). The next book {Histoire universale du regne vegetal by Pierre Joseph Buch'oz, 1775-80) containing an illustration {Cucurbita Pepo) that falls within the limits of this paper is the work of a botanical artist of mixed repute. Buch'oz' works are listed by Sitwell and Blunt, by Dunthorne and in most of the catalogues of exhibits of fine flower books, but the opinion in which he was held by contemporary botanists needs no elaboration beyond the specific epithet "foetida" which L'Heri- tier applied to a plant of the genus Buchozia. Nissen (1951) quotes Pritzel in a brief statement which shows no evidence of Buch'oz' reputation having soared posthumously. "Miserimus compilator", Pritzel called him, "fraude ac ignorantia aeque emineus". Pierre Joseph Buch'oz is credited with having written on all branches of natural science though understanding none, and with compiling some 300 volumes though remaining undistinguished himself! But his illustrations are very attractive indeed and Blunt (1951) grants him a few kind words because he intro- 310 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN duced into floral illustration "the decorative qualities which we always associate with Far Eastern art". Antonio Jose Cavanilles is quite something else again. Of great botanical inter- est, his 6 volume Iconcs et urn, concerning the plants that grew in Spain, either "spontaneously or cultivated in gardens", during his time, contain rather stiff engravings with no oriental charm whatsoever. These books were published at Madrid between 1791 and 1801, and among them is a clean cut of a Luff a acutangula. The engravings of Rheede, Rumpf, Plumier, Buch'oz and Cavanilles were all printed and published in fine, folio volumes, representing "the apogee of the art of botanical illustration, reached in the 18th century" (Mongan, 1952) . Next on my list is a group of smaller volumes, all published as handbooks to mec Influence of the Linnaean Sys* Christian Schkuhr published at Wittenberg, in 1791, 6 octavo volumes of his Botanisches Handbuch, the last 3 volumes consisting of an atlas of colored (in the Missouri Bot. Gard. copy) engravings. Nobody but Nissen and I seem to consider him worth mentioning, but I find the engravings both charming and carefully done, and Nissen gives Schkuhr credit for both the drawings and the plates. Schkuhr's Handbuch, post-Linnean, is the first of my list to exemplify the new spirit which entered the study of botany after the publication of the Species Plantarum in 1753. Linnaeus' binomial system stimulated revision of older means of plant description and classification, and "called for a new and different type of illustration which emphasized scientific accuracy in the delineation of flower, fruit, leaf and stalk" (Dunthorne, 1938). The wealth of diagnostic detail included in Schkuhr's plate of Cucurbita Pepo is an excellent example of this new and different type, and also illustrates Dunthorne's point that "the new scientific artists first appeared in Germany". The particular care taken in dissections of the androecium and gynoecium were of course important, because Linnaeus' 16 sexual system was based on the number of parts included in each of these floral organs. Mr. Nissen and I are joined by Sitwell and Blunt, and Dunthorne in listing the next entry, Johannes Zorn's 1 cones Pi ■;/, which also appears in Dutch translation by Dheoderich Leonard Oskamp as Afbeeldingin der Artseny- geuassen. The colored engravings of Lagenaria are identical in the two editions, and are quite charming. The next series chronologically on my list is mentioned by Nissen and Sitwell 16 Linnaeus' sexual system was introduced in his Systema Naturae of 1735; the genera were grouped Pistils. Cucurbita comes under Class 21, Monoecia, dcscr . fcmirw in eadem domo, sed diverso thalamo. Flores masculi et feminei in eadem planta sunt." Besides being . ncuerunt. Sta- EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 311 and Blunt. Published by Ferdinand Bernhard Vietz, 10 quarto volumes including 1086 hand-colored engraved plates, Icones plantarum medico-occonotnico-techno- logicarum, appeared at Vienna between 1800 and 1820. The plate of Cucurbita Pepo is large, printed on a folded double page, and has a great deal of charm. A Lagenaria plate is also ascribed to Vietz, but it is not included among the volumes (1-5) in the Missouri Botanical Garden library. I bring in Curtis' Botanical Magazine now because its earliest plate of one of the key genera fits chronologically into the list of "icones" at this point. Actually, ruptedly until the present day, practically all of its plates being hand-colored until as late as 1948! William Curtis, Praefectus Horti and Demonstrator to the Society of Apothe- caries at Chelsea, founded the magazine to describe and illustrate "the most Ornamental FOREIGN PLANTS", the illustrations to be "always drawn from the living plant". When Curtis died the editorship was taken over by his friend, J. Sims. Sims' plate 1638, published in 1814, gives (as mentioned above) Gavanilles as a reference for his Luff a acutangula, a lovely copper engraving, prob- ably by Sansom, from a drawing by Sydenham Edwards. Edwards is described by Blunt (1951) as "Curtis' own creation", as it was Curtis who recognized talent in the son of a Welsh schoolmaster, and brought him to London for instruction. Edwards remained practically the sole illustrator of the Botanical Magazine from the publication of the second volume in 1788 until 1815, some years after Curtis' death; he is credited with about 1650 plates! The only other of the key genera illustrated among the nearly 10,000 plates in the Botanical Magazine is a Fevillea cordifolia, plate 63 56, published in 1878. It presents an interesting contrast to the Luffa, as this was a period of low ebb in the printing arts; it is lithographed on poor quality paper, and has none of the charm or calligraphic quality of either earlier or later plates. At this time J. D. Hooker was editor, and it was under him that "the last traces of the Linnaean System vanished from the classification of plants in the Botanical Magazine" (Blunt, 1951). Sir Joseph Hooker is best known as an early champion of Darwin and for his botanical explorations, which contributed greatly to the knowledge of plant geography. W. Fitch, artist of the Fevillea plate, was "discovered" by William Hooker, father of Sir Joseph, while the to-be-Director of Kew Gardens was a professor of botany and the to-be-artist an apprentice designer of calico, both in Glasgow (Blunt, 1951). Sir Joseph Hooker, after inheriting this enormously prolific drafts- man, described him as an "incomparable botanical artist", with "unrivaled skill in seizing the natural character of a plant". Blunt (1951) finds his work too facile and insensitive, but adds that Fitch "remains the most outstanding botanical artist of his day in Europe", despite the fact that his drawings were made from dried plants. Blunt gives him additional credit as the first artist to be able to do this satisfactorily. Otto Stapf, editor of vols. 148-156 of the Botanical Magazine, has given a satisfying explanation of why this was possible: 312 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN certain generalization' in which the type of the species came to life and took the place of a This statement concerning Fitch's method 17 is of interest in relation to my earlier discussion of "icones" as essentially portraits of species rather than of individuals as were the woodcuts of Weiditz. Francois Pierre Chaumeton, "docteur en medecine", well understood the value of fine botanical illustration. "There are few sciences", he wrote in the preface to his Flore Medicale, 1814-20, "which demand more imperiously than botany, the help of painting. One would have to try very hard indeed to replace it with the most precise description". A doctor with such an opinion would also try very hard indeed to illustrate his book with the most precise drawings, and Chaumeton did just that. His two pictures of Cucurbita Pepo were made by P. J. F. Turpin, one of the great botanical draughtsmen of the day. Turpin worked with botanists of the highest caliber, Poiteau and de Candolle, as well as illustrating many of the American plants pictured in Humboldt, Bonpland and Kunth's publication con- cerning the expedition to the "regions equinoxiales du Nouveau Continent, 1799- 1804". 18 Turpin is described as being largely self-taught, but Blunt (1951) sees in his work "great indebtedness to the tradition of van Spaendonck and Redoute", both artists from whom no follower need feel shame to borrow. Elizabeth Mongan (1952) gives an excellent explanation for this: Two years after Chaumeton began publishing the various editions of his work (folio, quarto and octavo), publication began, under the general direction of Cuvier, 20 of the Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles. This was a most ambitious work, appearing in Paris between 1816-30 in 60 volumes of text, with 14 of atlas, and planned (according to the title page) to "treat methodically the various natural beings, from the point of view of our knowledge of them and also relative , D S b S' P t EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 313 to their use in medicine, agriculture, business and the arts". Dejussieu 21 was originally in charge of the botanical section; Turpin of the execution of the draw- ings and the general direction of the engraving. Unfortunately Turpin made only two plates among the key genera, both of Fevillea cordi folia (see plates XII and XIII). Turpin's drawings of botanical detail are generally acknowledged to be exceptionally fine, and these plates well illustrate the fact. One of the plates, for it from below: the androecium; a single stamen; and a view of // from the rear. Equally detailed dissections are made of a "fertile" (female) flower; and, need I add, the habit of the plant is also shown, all in one beautiful, colored, octavo page. In 1821, M. E. Descourtilz published in Paris his 8 volumes on the Flore Uiii- cale des Antilles, an assemblage made while he, a doctor, served in official capacity at Santo Domingo. Descourtilz used illustrations of several of the key genera (Cucurbita moschata, C. Pepo— both of which are pictured twice under different names; Fevillea cordifolia and Lagenaria vulgaris) ; these pictures have a good deal of charm, but are poor specimens of botanical illustration, despite the fact that the author claims to have drawn them from nature and to have watched his son cut them down in size before painting them with the greatest care. Though the father claims that his son Theodore was a pupil of the "celebre Wanspaendonck", the slipshod attempt at portrayal of detail is only a sort of casual acknowledgment of its desirability. In contrast to the works of Turpin, these are sad indeed. Lithographs The eleven large folio volumes of Velloso's Florae fluminensis icones, published in Paris in 1827-32, illustrate the flora of the region around Rio de Janeiro. Vel- loso was a native Brazilian who became one of the most zealous students of Domenico Vandelli, the Italian botanical explorer, and is thought to have supplied most of the plants described in Vandelli's works (Nissen, 1951). Velloso must have been an ardent botanist to collect so many plants, but the art work in his book leaves much to be desired. The de Candolles (1878) wrote that "the figures [of Florae fluminensis] like those of Plumier, are very bad. The safest thing is to class the species of these authors ... in a very doubtful category, which one can call inextricables". The figures do, however, play some part in the history of the graphic arts as they were lithographed by Senefelder, who discovered the process "almost accidentally" (Blunt, 1951) in 1797. The advantage of lithography, the technique employed in all the remaining "icones" on my list except those of Iinuma and Bailey, is that it permits subtle gradations of line; as is readily seen in his Fevillea trilobata, Luffa cylindrica and two Lagenarias, however, Velloso but drew in bold outline only. ;o illustrate Brazilian plants. Karl Friederich Philipp von Martius, a German botanist and traveler, was sent to Brazil in 1817 by the king of Bavaria. He returned to positions at the botanical garden and the university in Munich, where he began work on his Flora Brasiliensis in 1840. 314 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Fifteen volumes in 40 folio parts were published between that date and 1906 in Munich, Vienna and Leipzig, the later volumes, of course, edited by younger men. The 3000 lithographs in the series were made by a number of artists, and include a Fevillea trilobata and a Luff a operculata, both of which are drawn in unusually fine detail. Robert Wight's Icones plantarum Indiae orientalis, 6 quarto volumes of litho- graphs published in Madras between 1840 and 1856, contains some of the botan- ically finest "icones" on my list. The two-page spread of Cucurbita maxima includes an extraordinarily complete floral analysis; the Luff a cylindrica is done in such detail that one sees even the fine webbing at the edge of the leaf. The two plates, drawn by the Indian artist Rungiah and lithographed by Dumphy, are typical of the work of several generations of talented native artists who worked in India at about this time (Nissen, 1951). Wight, however, was not too happy about the way they were printed, especially in the early volumes. He apologizes in his preface with the explanation that lithography, still in its infancy in Europe, was even more of a fledgling in Madras, where inexperienced printers had not yet learned to compensate for the atmospheric difficulties which affected the success or failure of the plates. Hooker and Thomson (1855) in their Introductory Essay to the Flora Indica call Wight's works "the most important contributions not only to Botany, but to Natural Science, which have ever been published in India". Later Work in Various Techniques When discussing the botanical woodcuts of the 16th and 17th centuries, I expressed admiration for the manner in which Brunfels' and Fuchs' artists handled them, but welcomed warmly the increased grace and delicacy made possible by the technique of engraving. Now, in the last quarter of the 19th century, we find a series of woodcuts so beautiful and finely made that one is forced to realize (as one always is!) that a great artist in any field surmounts the limitations of his medium. These effusions are aroused by Yokusai Iinuma's Somoku-dzusetsu or "Illustrated Flora of Japan". The set at the Missouri Botanical Garden is the second edition, printed at Ogaki in 1874 on rice paper of the highest quality. The set consists of 20 quarto volumes in which the illustrations (Cucurbita Pepo, 2 Lagenaria vulgaris and Luff a cylindrica) of my key genera extend across two pages. In discussing the beautiful woodcuts of Fuchs, I pointed out that, in black and white, they sometimes appeared to be drawn in too thin outline, having obviously been designed with the intent that they be colored by hand. In these Japanese cuts the opposite is often true; the body of the figure is inked and the line, remaining white, is so fine as to seem almost impossible of achievement. In several of the plates I cite, the enlargements of the anther column and gynoecium are printed in color. Nissen, the verbose and usually all-seeing, only notes the Somoku-dzusetsu in a list for which he expresses gratitude to others; and, to my surprise, Blunt (1951) says only that it is illustrated with "effective woodcuts". Manuel Blanco, in the third edition of whose Flora de Filipinas we find a Cucurbita Pepo and two Luff as (L. acutangula and L. cylindrica) , was an Augus- tinian monk with no training whatsoever in botany, and a botanical library con- EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 315 sisting only of one volume of Linnaeus. Hooker and Thomson (1855) in their Introductory Essay call his first edition of 1837 a "botanical curiosity", a state- ment which covers its reception in Europe, though it met with great local acclaim. Neither the first nor the second edition was illustrated. The third is the work of Fathers Celestino Fernandez Villar and Andres Naves, whose only contribution, according to Merrill (1918), is their Latin translations which made Blanco's Spanish descriptions more generally accessible. The identifications of the plates (drawn by F. Domingo and lithographed by C. Verdaguer) show many errors, a large number of them referring to species which Blanco had never seen. None of the plates of the key genera falls within this category, however. Nissen (1951) goes so far as to damn the illustrations of this deluxe edition by praise so faint it hardly fits the definition. Neither the drawings nor their lithographic reproductions, he felt, compare with the quality of "the old work", but must be compared with their contemporaries, all, by inference, very bad indeed. Field and Garden Crops of Duthie and Fuller, published in Roorkee in 1882-93, is not mentioned by Blunt or Nissen, nor do its illustrations appear in any of the exhibition catalogues, but the lithographs of Cucurbita moschata, Lagenaria vulgaris and Luff a cylindrica, albeit utterly lacking in artistic pretension or value, merit place in my list through their other qualifications. The artist of the plates, H. Hormusji, a Parsee imported from the Bombay School of Art, drew the botanical details with great care, and, though they are not pretty, his pictures are surely portraits of living plants. J. F. Duthie was Superintendent of the Saharanpur Botanical Gardens; J. B. Fuller, Director of Agriculture and Commerce for the Northwestern Provinces and Oudh. Carlos Bettfreund's 3 octavo volumes, Flora Argentina, published in Buenos Aires between 1898 and 1901, deal with the "plantas vivas" of Argentina, and are illustrated in the manner of the period, with poorly colored lithographs of no artistic, but presumably some botanical value. These include a Cucurbita Pepo and a Lagenaria vulgaris. The same criticism may be leveled at F. Gagnepain's section on the Cucurbitaceae in Lecomte's Flore Generale de I'lndo-Chine, published in Paris in 1921. This contains a Luff a cylindrica drawn, according to the plate, by Miles. Vesque. I find no mention of this name elsewhere, presumably because the quality of work does not redound to the glory of the artists. My criteria for "icones" have had to be as much contorted to include the last two publications, as they were also to stretch across the post-Fuchsian herbals. Now they can return to their original shape, though they must, perhaps, still retain a fair amount of elasticity. Engler's Das Fffanzenreich would not be found on library shelves under the heading of "icones", nor would its many volumes find their way into the collection of a bibliophile. They do contain, however, besides the most universally accepted system of plant classification, a number of fine draw- ings of plants. Of the key genera, only a Fevillea trilobata appears on a full page and includes the habit of the plant, but I am grateful for it, because it is the best of its type of illustration, apparently the closest we will come, in our time, to fulfilling the criteria for "icones". The Fevillea plate contains precise and accurate botanical detail and, though not showy in the slightest lampshadish way, gives a 316 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN very pleasant impression of being a portrait of a living plant. This opinion is blessed by Blunt (1951), who points out that many of the illustrations used by Engler, the "greatest of German taxonomists" were unsigned works of Joseph Pohl, whose drawings were "conscientious, accurate, useful and in great quantity, but not on a high artistic level". Of even more significance in these, our troubled times, is the fact that they were made from specimens in the Berlin Herbarium, subsequently destroyed during World War II. A full-page illustration of Fevillea cordifolia in Rendle's Classification of Flow- ering Plants squeezes in among the "icones" by the same reasoning as does Engler's F. trilobata. The picture is in Rendle's second volume, which did not appear until 1925, although the first was published in 1904, at which time the material for the second was "almost finished" (Burkill, 1938). It is impossible, therefore, to know if I have placed the book in proper chronological sequence. For our purposes, however, it is only important that we have here again a carefully drawn plant portrait, containing details acceptable to a distinguished taxonomist. Rendle joined the Department of Botany at the British Museum at the age of twenty-three, in 1888, and remained there for fifty years, pursuing, according to his "keen concep- tion of his duty", his work in systematics. Burkill (1938) further describes him as one of those "ships which, as they leave port, have their course set for the whole voyage". He held many botanical posts of honor and responsibility, but his interest was always directed toward taxonomy. L. H. Bailey's Garden of Gourds, a quarto volume issued in New York in 1937, is illustrated with a number of zincograph black and white plates mechanically reproduced from pen and ink drawings. Again, they are of no artistic value, but are pleasing and contain fine botanical detail acceptable to the author, an acknowl- edged authority on cultivated plants. Of the many illustrations of key genera printed in Bailey's book, I have listed as "icones" only those which best give an impression of habit: "Wild Texas Gourd", "Egg Gourd", "Apple Gourd", "Big Bell Gourd" and "White Pear Gourd", all belonging to the species Cucurbita Pepo, var. ovifera; Lagenaria vulgaris or Luff a cylindrica. Conclusion Bailey's book contains the last of my "icones", representing well a type of illustration with which it seems that we must learn in these latter days to satisfy ourselves. Botanically they are, of course, authoritative, but they grade very low on the artistic scale, as do all the last group listed. Actually there have been very few on my list that rate high both artistically and botanically, but it must be remembered that this is probably because the key plants do not appeal as floral decor, and have not posed for most of the best-known botanical artists. Of the publications listed, only Fuchs in the 16th century and Rheede in the 17th contain "icones" that completely fulfill the requirements of my definition — size, habit, botanical accuracy and artistic value; Rumpf, Plumier, Buch'oz and Cavanilles in the 18 th century meet the criteria in varying degree, all being at the very least large, fine books from the bibliophile's point of view. Schkuhr, Zorn, Vietz, Curtis' Botanical Magazine, Chaumeton, the Diction- EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES 317 naire des Sciences Naturelles and Descourtilz are less pretentious publications of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, with the happy artistic addition of color, again complying with my requirements to some degree. Velloso and Martius return to the grand scale, but are more pretentious than beautiful, and poor Velloso is also not held in very high botanical esteem. From these two on, except for the Japanese work of Iinuma, the artistic measure must be dropped entirely, or my list would have to end. I cannot describe Bailey's book (more attractive at least than the others) by even so slight a word of praise as charming, and there is no more temptation to use his illustrations than Engler's or Rendle's on my lamps. This may be a good thing; if the paper is of decent quality, the bookworms stay away, and if anybody supports our libraries, the books may be preserved, as books, for posterity. Though beauty is no longer important in these publications, botanical accuracy is a sine qua non; for this reason and with the message of Dr. Trelease still in mind, we can feel sure that they will serve the purposes of mankind for a very long time to come. For the sake of consistency in the following indices I have employed the spelling of authors' names used by Nissen (1951), because his bibliography is the most complete I have found. This has led to one or two unfamiliar spellings, as "Karl von Linne" and "Rumpf". Consequently, I have used the name "Linnaeus" in the text, as it is the familiar form in American botany. Literature Cited v. ed. New York, 1949. Bartlett, H. H irom the botanical library of Mrs. Roy i (Clements Library, Bulletin LVII) Ann A plates) (Nissen 170) Colored lithographs. ich'oz, Pierre Joseph. Histoire universale du regne vegetal. Paris, 1 77 5-1 12 v. of plates (v. 1-9, 11, 12 of plates only at Missouri Bot. Gard.) 287; Dunthorne 59) Engravings. indolle,' Alphonse de, and Candolle, Casimir de, editors. Monographiae ph 318 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN . II. Leipzig, 1924. Lithographs. ae in Engler, A., Pflanzenreich IV. : e-Cucumerinae in Engler, A., Pflanzenre 60 v. of text and 15 v. of atlas. (Nisscn 2239) Colo :werp, 1563. (Pritzel 2345; Nissen 512) Small woodcuts, Encyclopedic methodique: Botanique. By J J. L. M. Poiret. Paris, 1789-1823. 13 i Engler, A. See under Cogniaux, A. [ndo-Chine. Edit. element 1938-5U. irarde, John. The herball, or generall historie of plantes. London, 1597. (Prit: eenough, J. B. (and others). Allen and Greenough's New Latin grammar. Bosto x>ker, J. D. The flora of British India. London, 1875-97. 7 v. mma, Yokusai. Some J flora of Japan"). 2d ed. Ogali i for the Royal Horticultura M. Taxonomy of vase See under Flore genera! Linne, Karl von. Hortus Cliffortianus. Amsterdam, 17: appendix by W. T. Steam 'and J. L. Heller. Londo. •L'Obd, Matthu Antwerp, 1591. correctly attributed to ( 1218) Small woodcuts. MacCurdy, E. The notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. N< EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES ttioli, Pier Andrea. Commentarii secundo aucti in libros sex Pedacii Dioscoi Odell.J. W. Gourds and. Oskamp.D. L. See under Oxford English dictionary *Piso, Willem and ] ndle, A. B. The classification of flowering plants. Cub, J,.. eede tot Draakestein, Hendrik Adrian van. Hortus Indicus mpf, Georg Eberhard. Herbarn C flower books, 1700-1900. Londt Tamaulipas. 'Amer.' Antiq. 22:352-358. 1957. Wight, Robert. Icones plantarum Indiae orientalis. Madras, 1840-53. 6 v. (Pritzel 10246; Nissen [Zorn, Johannes]. Afbeeldingen der artseny-gewassen. Translated into Dutch by D. L. Oskamp. Amsterdam, 1796-1S00. 6 v. (Nissen 2203) Colored engravings. 320 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Chronological Index of "Icones" of Key Species Cucurbita foetidissima: ^ucurbita maxima: 1576, L'Obd: "Pepo maximus Indicus compressus",j 159l' L'Obel: "Pepo maximus Indicus compressus", ] 1616, Dodoens: "Pepo rotundus maior", p. 666. 1840, Wight: C. maxima, vol. II, pi. 507 (double pa nd "Pepo rotundus compi ", vol. I, p. 616; "Cucurb n, Bettfreund: "Cue EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES Melopepon lati ,,1. II, p . 224. Feviltea cordifolia: 1755, Plumier: "Fevillea foliis cordatis", p. 203, pi. 209. 1816, Dictionnaire des Sciences Naturelles: "Fevillea hederacea, Poir.", vol. L 1925, RendU ,!. H, p. 222. Jillea trllobata: 1658, Piso: "Nhandiroba", Cap. LXVI, ; . vol. IV, . Dodoens: "Cucurbita prior", p. 668; "Cucurbita longior" a » lagen; -Schora", vol. VIII, pi. 1; "C ~ vol. VIII, pi. 5. U, Rumpf: "Cucurbita lagenaria", vol. V, p. 398, pi. 7, Velloso: "Cucurbita lagenaria", vol. X, pi. 98; "Cu 4, Iinuma: "Lagenaria Dasistemon Miq.", vol. XX, f XX, pi. 45. Duthie'and Fuller: I. acutan^. -... 322 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL ., Ser.", vol. XX, pi. 36. ", atlas II, pi. 334. .uffa Aegyptiaca", vol. 1 , Lecomte: L. n , linger: /. cylinJricu. vol. IV. . . Balicv. /.. rylmdrict, p. 105. Index, by Key Species, of Woodcuts Derived From One Source and Used by Several Authors Cucurbita maxima: I. 1576, L'Obel: "Pepo maximus Indicus compressus"; 7X13 cms. jchamps: "Cucurbita Indica longa"; 12 X 6 \' z cm,. eris sive Zucha flore luteo, Ic. II"; V/ 2 X^i X 7Yi cms. 7Vi cms. L'Obel: "Pepo oblongus L'Obel: "Pepo rotundus , Dalechamps: "< EISENDRATH A STUDY OF THE ICONES ! Bauhin: "Pepo Indicus minor, Tabern."; 8»/ a X 4J4 cms. , Tabernaemontanus: "Melopepoteres"; 12X7 cms. , Gerarde: "Pepo maximus rotundus"; 12X7 cms. , Tabernaemontanus: "Pepo maximus oblongus"; 11 1 / 2 X?Vi cms. , Fuchs: "Cucurbita maior"; fo lio page. . Fuchs: 'Cucurbita maior"; oc , Dodoens: "Cucurbita camerari , Bauhin: "Cucurbita latior folio molli, flo , Fuchs: "Cucurbita minor"; fo , Dodoens: "Cucn. L'Obel: "Cucurbita sive zucch , Gerarde: "Cucu: , Parkinson: "Cucurbita longa"; ' L'Obel: as above. Dodoens: "Cue Parkinson: "Cucurbita lagenar Tabernaemontanus: "Cucurbit Gerarde: "Cucurbita anguina" ; 12 X7«: Tabernaemontanus: "Cucurbit, Gerarde: "Cucurbita lagenaria sylvestris" EISENDRATH- ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOTWIOl K NANDTROBB a iouilles ^ Seed finely and si arply tuberculate, Seed coarsely and bluntly tubercu- Chromosome Number A number of chromosome counts have been made from material cultivated at souri Botanical Garden. These are given below, with the counts previously lished by Perry (1943). Voucher specimens are available for all those which Poinsettia cyathophora Dressier 1821 (Tamaulipas) Dressier 2271 (Tamaulipas) Dressier 2430 (Nuevo Leon) s. n. "Washington, Missouri s. n. Grey Summit, Missouri Dressier 2373 (Tamaulipas) Cultivated (Rex Pearce) Cultivated (Parke) s Euphorbia heterophylla) DRESSLER A SYNOPSIS OF POINSETTIA Dressier 2198 (Texas) s. n. Empalme Escobedo, Guanajuato 28 Perry, Clarke Co., Virginia Davis, Oklahoma Pleasant Hill, Missouri 14, 28 28 56 Poinsettia heterophylla Dressier 2136 (Tamaulipas) Dressier 2194 (Arizona) Dressier 2243 (Vera Cruz) Howard & Proctor 13 883 (Jamaica) Manning & Manning 531217 (Jalisco) s. n. Soledad, Cuba Gametic Semitic No. Moyer (cited by Perry) as E. geniculata 28 Poinsettia pulcherrima No. 28 From the above counts, one could consider 14 to genus, if it were not for Perry's record of a somatic r of P. dentata. It is at least conceivable that the pla chance haploid, but more counts are needed from the e je the base umber of nt studied astern Uni number for the 14 for one plant ed States, before this can be evaluated properly. There is no indication of polyploidy in P. hetero- phylla, but P. cyathophora and P. dentata both contain polyploids. These are discussed further in the next section. Patterns of Variation The most outstanding feature of the annual species of Poinsettia is their extreme polymorphism. Linear-lanceolate, ovate and deeply pandurate leaves may be found not only in the same population, but on the same individual. More frequently, however, extremely different leaf types are found on different individuals or on different stages of one individual. It would appear that there is an interaction of genetic and environmental control in such cases. The perennial species are less markedly polymorphic, but all of the adequately sampled species show some degree of foliar polymorphism. Even seed structure shows a good deal of variation in Poinsettia, though this feature is usually dependably stable in the Euphorbieae. In spite of the extreme polymorphism, some patterns of geographic or genetic variation are evident, and merit more detailed study. 1. Poinsettia cyathophora. This species is perhaps the most highly variable of the genus. The cultivated polyploids (n = 28) are coarse, somewhat weedy plants that show little polymorphism, and have somewhat coriaceous leaves. When col- lected in a dry, rocky arroyo, the plants of Dressier 2373 were relatively small, but when cultivated in St. Louis, they became large and coarse, very closely resembling the cultivated plants of the same chromosome number. Many of the more delicate 334 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN plants of lower chromosome number would seem to have greater ornamental potential than the polyploids now available. Collections from Oaxaca and Nuevo Leon have behaved as distinctly short-day plants, while one collection from Tamaulipas (Rancho del Cielo) has proven to be relatively day-neutral. The characteristic red bracts of this species are a surpris- ingly dependable key feature, but some plants of the Missouri Ozarks lack the red coloring. 2. Poinsettia dent at a. This species shows a good deal of geographic variation, which is complicated by polyploidy. The plants with n = 14 of southern Mexico are much branched and often decumbent, strongly pilose plants with very con- densed, nearly capitate inflorescence and cream or yellowish floral bracts. This is apparently the form described as Poinsettia schiedeana. These features become less marked to the north, suggesting a clinal pattern. One also finds erect, rather weedy plants with little or no bract coloration in Mexico. These are frequent in disturbed areas of central Mexico, and closely resemble the forms of this species which grow in Arizona and western Texas. It is probable that these weedy forms have entered Mexico from the north and are genetically isolated from the native form by their higher chromosome number. Some of the semi-desert forms from northern Mexico are striking because of their small, coriaceous leaves. The type of Engelmann's var. rigidia is not the 3. Poinsettia heterophylla. This tropical species shows less variation than its temperate counterparts. Occasional populations with whitish floral bracts, strongly dentate leaves or very pilose stems suggest introgression from P. dentata, and I suspect that these two do hybridize to a certain degree where P. heterophylla grows with a population of P. dentata having the same chromosome number. Taxonomy Poinsettia Graham, Edinb. New Philos. Jour. 20:412. 1836. Type: Euphorbia Pulcherrima Willd. Pleuradena Raf., Atl. Jour. 1(6):182. 1833, not Pleuradenia Raf., 1825. Type: Pleura- dena coccinea Raf. Cyathophora Raf., Fl. Tell. 4:117. 1838, not Cyathophora S. F. Gray, 1821. Type: Eu- phorbia heterophylla L. Woody or herbaceous, often perennial from a fleshy storage root; leaves alter- nate or opposite, stipules inconspicuous or absent, appearing glandular; inflorescence a condensed pleiochasium or dichasium, the branches becoming monochasial; involucral glands more or less cup-like, usually reduced in number (commonly 1) ; pollen grains thick- walled and coarsely reticulate; pistillate flower naked. SYNOPSIS OF POINSETTIA m. tall, flowering rt leafless stems, the vegetative ste ~ ^eloping '!•...' vkh the outer rim flaring and ::,:; wlut rct-.l...J ,-T " ' ' green glands red, yellow or green, the s . All leaves usually o II. Seeds finely and I 1. Poinsettia pulcherrima (Willd.) Grah., Edinb. New Philos. Jour. 20:412. Euphorbia pulcherrima Willd. ex Klotzsch, Allg. Gartenz. 2:27. 1834. Pleuradena coccinea Raf., Atl. Jour. 1 (6) :182. 1833, not Poinsettia coccinea Dressier Euphorbia erythrophylla Bertol., Nov. Comment. Acad. Scient. Inst. Bonon. 4:419, t. 41. 1840. Euphorbia fastuosa Sesse & Mocifio, Pi. Nov. Hisp. 81. 1888. Distribution. The familiar cultivated poinsettia occurs as a wild plant in the rocky canyons of western Mexico, in Nayarit, Jalisco and Colima. Dr. Rzedowski suggests (personal communication) that it may also occur further south, in Michoacan and Guerrero. The habit of the plant, with a fleshy storage root especially well developed in the seedling stage, is characteristic of the tropical deciduous forest of this area. 2. Poinsettia radians (Benth.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. Euphorbia stormiae Croiz., Rev. Sudam. Bot. 6:13. 1939 [Type: Storm s. n. AH!]. Distribution. Arizona through central Mexico to Oaxaca. z. t?$l7 (GH), Ctstmrn 1851 (GH), Meyer 3647 (GH) 336 ANNALS OF THE MISSO 3. Poinsettia restiacea (Benth.) comb. nov. Euphorbia restiacea Benth., Bot. Voy. Sulph. 162. 1844. Distribution. Western Mexico (Nayarit and Durango) . Superficially the plants of P. restiacea resemble some species of Agaloma, such as Euphorbia sphaerorbiza Benth., because of the slender stems, narrow white bracts and conspicuous white glands. Though the outer rim of the gland is flattened and somewhat petaloid, there is no sharp distinction between gland and appendage, such as characterizes the members of Agaloma. The type specimen (K) is very scrappy, but a photograph (MICH) indicates that it is probably the same species as the excellent material which Dr. McVaugh has collected in Nayarit. 4. Poinsettia strigosa (Hook. & Arn.) Arthur, Torreya 11:260. 1912. Euphorbia strigosa Hook. & Arn., Bot. Voy. Beech. 310. 1840. Poinsettia pedunculata Klotzsch, Seem. Bot. Voy. Herald 277. 1856. Distribution. Western Mexico (Nayarit and Jalisco). 5. Poinsettia colorata (Engelm.) comb. nov. Euphorbia colorata Engelm., Rep. U. S. & Mex. Bound. Surv. 2:190. 1859 [Type: Thurber rt&GHl]. Euphorbia tuberosa Rose, Contr. U. S. Nat. Herb. 1:111. 1891, not E. tuberosa L., 1753. Distribution. Northwestern Mexico (Sinaloa, Sonora and Zacatecas) . 6. Poinsettia coccinea sp. nov. Figure 2 Perennis, erecta, 40-70 cm. alta, radice tuberosa oriens, caulibus basi lignes- centibus, glabris; folia alterna, linearia vel anguste lanceolata, 1.5-6 mm. lata, 40- 120 mm. longa, subtus hispidula, ad basin barbellata, apice attenuata, basi attenuata vel breviter petiolata, marginibus serratis vel subintegris; cymarum bracteae coloratae, lineari-lanceolatae vel elliptico-lanceolatae, 3.5-7 mm. latae, 30-80 mm. longae; inflorescentiae compactae; involucra anguste campanulata, 3-3.5 mm. lata, 3.5-4 mm. longa, glandulis involucrum excedentibus, 1.5-2 mm. latis, marginibus externis crassioribus altioribusque; ovarium glabrum; styli ca. 1 mm. longi, basi breve connati, fere ad medium bipartiti; semina oblongo-ovoidea, ecarunculata, tuberculata, ca. 2.5 mm. longa. es of thickened Other collections from the laparral), peak of Cerro de Las Yucas, July 20, , but apparently this This species is related to P. colorata, but may be distinguished by the usually serrate leaves which are not markedly paler beneath and by the smaller green (rather than red) cyathia; the gland also is smaller and differently shaped. Poin- settia coccinea will more often be confused with the annual P. cyathophora. Under favorable conditions P. cyathophora may survive for two or more seasons, but it is DRESSLER A SYNOPSIS OF POINSETTIA 338 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN not known to form the fleshy "sausage-string" roots of P. coccinea. Crutchfield tf Johnston 5611A, from near Jaumave, Tamaulipas, is definitely a perennial, but appears to be P. cyatbophora (no roots were present on the specimen seen). Poinsettia coccinea is frequent in rocky oak scrub and open oak forest in the region of the type locality. In this area it is quite distinct from P. cyatbophora, which was found only in the polyploid form (n = 28). To the north of the Sierra de Tamaulipas other forms of P. cyatbophora occur (Crutchfield, Johnston Gf McMillan 6082, Graham & Johnston 4695, both near Padilla, Tamaulipas), and it is quite possible that introgression may occur between the annual and perennial species in this region. No satisfactory chromosome counts have been obtained for this species, but the slides which were made indicated approximately 12 to 15 1 this probably has n = 14. 7. Poinsettia cyathophora (Murr.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859: 253. 1859. Euphorbia cyathophora Murr., Comm. Gotting (Murr.) Moench, Meth. 667. 1794. Euph Boiss., DC. Prod. 15(2) :72. 1862. Euphorbia heterophylla forma cyathophora (Murr.) Voss, Vilmorin, Blumengartn. (ed. 3) 1:898. 1895. Euphorbia graminifolia Michx., Fl. Bor.-Am. 2:210. 1803. Poinsettia graminifolia (Michx.) Millsp., Field Mus. Pub. Bot. 2:3 04. 1909. Cyathophora picts. R.t., Fl. Tel!. 4:117. 183 8. Cyathophora ciliata Raf., Fl. Tell. 4:117. 183 8. Euphorbia barbellata Engelm., Rep. U. S. & Mex. Bound. Surv. 2:190. 18 59 [Type: Wright s.n., GH!]. Euphorbia heterophylla var. barbellata (Engelm.) Holzinger, Contrib. U. S. Nat. Herb. 1:216. 1892. Poinsettia barbellata (Engelm.) Small, Fl. Southeastern U. S. 722, 1334. 1903. Euphorbia be* ■ lia Engelm., Rep. U. S. & Mex. Bound. Surv. 2:190. 1859. 1859:104. 1860. Distribution. The eastern United States south through eastern Mexico to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec; west to Colima in Mexico. Possibly native in the Greater Antilles. Widely cultivated and often naturalized. There is a specimen from the Gottingen Botanical Garden (1794) in the Missouri Botanical Garden herbarium. While this was prepared after the descrip- tion of Euphorbia cyathophora, it probably represents the population described by Though this species is usually an annual, clonal material is easy to maintain by cuttings, which should facilitate the experimental study of its polymorphism. Under favorable conditions it may be a facultative perennial. I have seen specimens from northeastern Mexico and southern Florida which had over-wintered at least one season before collection. 8. Poinsettia dentata (Michx.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. 1859. Euphorbia dentata Michx., Fl. Bor.-Am. 2:211. 1803. Anisophyllum dentatum (Michx.) Haw., Syn. Pi. Succ. 162. 1812. Euphorbia herronii Riddell, Syn. Fl. W. States 32. 1835. DRESSLER A SYNOPSIS OF POINSETTIA 339 Euphorbia dentata p rigidia Engelm., Rep. U. S. & Mex. Bound. Surv. 2:190. 18 59 [Type- Wright 1837, MO!]. Euphorbia dentata 7 cuphosperma Engelm., Rep. U. S. & Mex. Bound. Surv. 2:190. 1859 [Type: Wright 1834, MO!]. Euphorbia cuphosperma (Engelm.) Boiss., DC. Prod. 15(2) :73. 1862. Poinsettia cuphosperma (Engelm.) Small, Fl. Southeastern U. S. 721, 13 34. 1903. Euphorbia dentata forma cuphosperma (Engelm.) Fern., Rhodora 50:148. 1948. biedeanaKl. & Gke., Abh. Akad. Berlin Phys. 1859:102. 1860. Euphorbia dentata p Jasiocarpa Boiss., DC. Prod. 15(2) :72. 1862. Euphorbia dental. -, '';, ,'.> I a^lni. a. li.mvJK. Pr.J. \^\Z\:71. 1862. Euphorbia dentata var. gracillima Millsp., Pittonia 2:90. 1890. Euphorbia dentata var. lancifolia Farwell, Am. Midi. Nat. 8:273. 1923. 9. Poinsettia pentadactyla (Griseb.) comb. nov. Euphorbia pentadactyla Griseb., Gott. Abh. 24:63. 1879. Distribution. Paraguay and northern Argentina. Annua, ramosa, 8-14 cm. alta, ramisque procumbens ad 12 cm. longa, caulibus ia vel ea basalia opposita, ovata vel elliptica, 8-16 mm. subtus sparse hispidula, apice acuta, basi cuneata, mar- ginibus leviter serratis et hispidulis, petiolis 2-6 mm. longis; cymae dichotomae, involucris late campanulatis, ca. 2 mm. longis, 1.2-2 mm. latis, glandulis 0.6-0.8 mm. latis, ostio oblongo; ovarium glabrum styli ca. 1 mm. longi, basi breve connati, fere ad basin bipartiti; semina quadrato-ovoidea, minute carunculata, sub-laevia, Peru. Dept. & Prov. Lima, Dist. Pachacamac; Atacongo; among rocks in arid valley, alt. 195 m., common, scattered, October 14, 193 5, Ynes Mexia 04044 (Type: MO, isotype GH, presumably also at UC). This is apparently a deep-rooted, spreading annual. The plant would pass superficially for a small delicate P. heterophylla, but the gland is quite different in shape, and the nearly smooth seed with an equatorial row of small, blunt tubercles, and fainter basal and distal rows, is unlike that of any other species of Poinsettia. 11. Poinsettia heterophylla (L.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859: 253. 1859. Euphorbia heterophylla L., Sp. PI. 453. 1753. Tit • (L.) Haw., Syn. PL Succ. 141. 1812. Cyathophora heterop> 4:117 1838. ^Euphorbia elliptica Lam., Encyc. Meth. Bot. 2:425. 1788. Euphorbia heterophylla var. elliptica (Lam.) O. Ktze., Rev. Gen. 2:605. 1891. U, Symb. Bot. 2:53. 1791. Euphorbia heterophylla var. hmfolta (Vahl) O. Ktze., Rev. Gen. 2:605. 1891. Euphorbia geniculata Ortega, Hort. Mat. Dec. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. (Ort.) Gomez, Anal. Hist. Nat. Madrid 23 Euphorbia prunifolia Jacq., Hort. Schoenb. 3: (Jacq.) Haw., Syn. Pi. Succ. 143. 1812. Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. 1859. 340 ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Euphorbia frangulaefolia HBK., Nov. Gen. et Sp. 2:62. 1817. Poimettia frangulae folia (HBK.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. 1859. Euphorbia trachyphylla A. Rich., La Sagra, Hist. Cuba 9:198. 1850. Euphorbia morisoniana Kl., Seem. Bot. Voy. Herald 100. 1853. Poimettia morisontana (KI.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. 1859. ■• kad. Berlin Phys. 18 59:102. 1860. , DC. Prod. 15(2) :73. 1862. a Mull. Arg., Mart. Fl. Bras. 11(2):694. 1874. Euphorbia frvn . Mart. Fl. Bras. 11(2) :695. 1874. Euphorbia zonosperma Mull. Arg., Mart. Fl. Bras. 11(2) -.696. 1874. Euphorbia heterophylla Pelt: O. Ktze., Rev. Gen. 3 (2) :286. 1898. Poimettia havanemis Small, Fl. Southeastern U. S. 722, 1334. 1903. Euphorbia aureocincta Croiz., Jour. Arnold Arb. 24:181. 1943 [Type: Rojas 3379, AH!]. Distribution. From Arizona and Tamaulipas southward throughout the Amer- ican tropics. As a weed throughout the tropics. Naturalized in Louisiana and Texas and to be expected elsewhere. Excluded Species Poimettia eriantha (Benth.) Rose & Standley, Contrib. U. S. Nat. Herb. 16:13. 1912. = Euphorbia (Agaloma) eriantha Benth. This species, E. (A.) exstipulata Engelm., £. (A.) jaliscensis Rob. & Greenm., and E. (A.) lacera Boiss. are all closely related. All of these species have small but distinct petaloid appendages on the glands and have seeds which are unlike those of Poimettia. In E. (A.) eriantha, at least, the pollen grains are very unlike those of Poimettia. Euphorbia heterophylla var. eriocarpa Millsp., Proc. Cal. Acad. II 2:230. 1889. The type (F!) is not a Poinsettia, but appears to be an Agaloma with reduced gland appendages, or possibly a Tithymalus. It is probably unnamed as a Poimettia imulana (Veil.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. 1859. = Euphorbia (Agaloma) imulana Veil. This and the following two species are closely related, if not conspecific. Poimettia land folia (Schlecht.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. 1859. = Euphorbia (Agaloma) lancifolia (Schlecht.) Poinsettia oerstediana Kl. & Gke., Abh. Akad. Berlin Phys. 1859:103. 1860. = Euphorbia (Agaloma) oerstediana (Kl. &Gke.) Boiss. Poinsettia punicea (Sw.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. 1859. = Tithymalus puniceus (Sw.) Haw. Poinsettia xalapensis (HBK.) Kl. & Gke., Monatsb. Akad. Berlin 1859:253. 1859. = Euphorbia (Agaloma) xaUpensis HBK. References dorsal view of seed ) I of pis in bold face type; synonyms a italics; and all other matter, in GENERAL INDEX TO VOLUME XLVIII w combi, Adenogramma oppositifolia, Adenonema, 97 Agathophytum, 2 Aizoaceae of Panama, 80 Albersia, 13; gracilis, 14 Allaganthera forskalli, 39 Allochlamys, 9 Uternanthera, 3 8; achyranth., 41; amoena, crucis, 42; denticulata, 39; ficoidea, 41; ficoidea, 40, var. flavogrisea, 42, 7 halimi- folia, 42; flavogrisea, 42; halimifolia, 42; laguroides, 44; lehmannii, 45; linearis, 33; mexicana, 45, 46; nodi flora, 39; panamen- sis, 45, 46; paniculata, 34; paronychioides, 40; parviflora, polygonoides, 4 :< Lim iC Amblogyna, Ambrina, 2; ambrosioides, 5; andicola, 5; anthelmintica, 5; chilensis, denudata, 5 Anemopsis calif ornica, 107, 709, I/O, 7/J, Anisopbylhim dcutat An thy His, 104 Aphanathe, 73 Arctium lappa, 295 ItfS, 92; ./,■-,■ - lanuginosa subsp. guatemalensis, 93, 94, subsp. lanuginosa, 92, subsp. saxosa, 93, var. longipedunculata, 92, [var.] diffusa, 92, p diffusa, 92, a genuina, 92; leptophylla, 208; mearnsii, 93; wo««- g/wea, 194; nemorosa, 92, £ novograna- 17, C /J««o ... 6, var. hybridus, 16; ffatt, 18; dubius, 16, D leptostachys, 16, :^c«j, 16; hybridus, 15, var. hypocondri- ANNALS OF THE BOTANICAL GARDEN var. paniculata, 54, var. viscosa, 54; dis- hides, 3 color, 52; erecta thornberi, 52; Ixodes, cola var 54; laxa, 54; paniculata, 54, /3 subacuta, phylloid* 52; polymorph*, 54; sonorae, 54; virgata, 5; *<»»*«■ i2; tiscosa, 54, [var.] apiculaU 52; caribaea, 54; diandra, 5' 53, 54; */o»g«/*, 52; erecta, 5 M/a, 54; ramulosa, 54; squamat fi. ,w7;h, WW, 2; leptophyllum var. fe£*o- s, 3; murale, 2, /3 albescens, 2, \enense, 2, [var.] spissidentatum, turn, 5; petiolare var. leptophyl- pratericola, 3, 4, subsp. prateri- L-ht», Ckytoniap ;:7; Mr;«, Cucurbit: spathulatum, 5; s«#r«- • 302, 305, 305, 324 fj/rtl, 33 8; heterophylla, Bunting, George S., & J achyranthoides, 27, 7 >; rotuinlirolia var. nitida, 237, rancae, 102, 226; blasiana, 247; carinata, folia, 254; •.■■.■/,■.'•..;. 254; sperguloides, 247, var. pereimis, 24"; cbibuabuensis, 194; spbagnopbiL: 222; aliarh, 226; ciliata, 226; cognata, 213; stereophylla, 214, var. exsnpul.ua, 208; confusa, 205; conzattii, 224, 225; 27J, 215, var. stereophylla, 213, 215; cordata, 103, 251, 252, subsp. cordata, stipitata, 193, Jpjj rfric/*, 251, 252, subsp. diandra, 252, 253, var. 102, 226; subsessilis, 227; subumbellata, 7 gracilis, 245, var. pacifica, 103, 251, 190, 707; suffruticpsa, 190, 192; rew//a, var. j3 palustris, 227, var. #/om, 102, 226, 208, var. nodosa, 209; tenuis, 210, 211, var. 5 villosa, 102, 226, (3 Diandra, 103, a var. genuina, 211, ^ var. ?«& 251, y3 puberula, 103, 251, f. *« 247; leptophylla var. cognata, 207, 208, ««, 339; eriantha, 340; fryJ var. leptophylla, 207, 208, var. nodosa, 33 5; exstipulata, 340; fastuosa, 335; 207, 209; longepedunculata, 202, 203; frangulae folia, 340; geniculata, 339; lyropetala, 192, var. coahuilana, 700, 193, gramini folia, 338; hermmi, 338; hetero- 234; mairei, 254; malachioides, 225; 3 3 8, var. brasiliensis, 340, var. cil:pi:c.i. megalantha, 254; mmuscula, 206; mol- 339, var. eriocarpa, 340, var. gramini- luginea, 194, 795; monticola, 2J2, 235; /o/w, 338, var. linifolia, 339, ry^tf- multiflora, 224, 225; «*/«/*, 239; nodW, /or*, 338, *//#/«•* f. hirticaulis, 340, 209, var. gracillima, 208; nummularia, t geniculata, 3 39, 8 ™/«or, 340, f. ry- 227; ortegioides, 200, 203; ovata, 2J2, athophora, 338; insulana, 340: 233; oxalidea, 254; pachyphylla, 7#7, 340; lacera, 340; lancifolia, 340; lini- 188; palmeri, 254; / 1//, /ri . 227; papo- /oto, 339; morisoniana, 340; oerstediana, sana var. paposana, 236, 237, var. serru- 340; pentadactyla, 339; prunifolia, 339, lata, 2J7, 23 8, var. weberbaueri, 237, var 7 angusti folia, 340, var. a n-pW*, 230; pauciflora, 227; 340; pulcherrima, ' " " 25A; 3 36: ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN bieae: key to New World genera, Honkenya, 90 Houttuynia cordata, 107, lOp, HO, 112, 117 1 gracih fr, 14, 7 Hueber, Francis M.: Hepaticites devonicus, A New Fossil Liverwort from the De- R. Bradley: Two N< :w Members of vonian of New York, 125 jenus Scolecopteris, 2; F Hyala, 104 Hylebia, 97 I i cordifolia, 32$, 326 of the word, 291; chronological index of e, G. P., & C. H. Dodson: Prelimi- icones of key species, 320; distinguishing of the Cucurbitaceae as \h :chniques, 314; lithographs, Glomeraria, \2 llleccbrun ad. Gomphrena, 47; aggregata, 36; crassifolia, 36; decumbens f. roseiflora, 47; dispersa, polygonoide. 48; ficoidea, 41; decumbens, 47, 48, var. carinata, 48, var. genuina, 48, var. grandi- Index of Orch folia, 48, f. albiflora, 47; globosa, 49, var. 7rp;/m, 3 1 -19; ixnimcnm, 48; pauiculata, 29, var. 7 angustifolia, hookeriana, 28; perennis subsp. pseud 0- 34, var. eri, decumbens, 48, f. simplex, 48; polygo- 36 eriophora, 3 34; gossypi Gossypianthus decipiens, 28, hookerianus, 28 hassleriana, -iophylla, phylla, 3- 34; gra ana, 31, J2; havanen Phylla, 31; Gymnotheca < 107; involuc 107, no Gypsophytum, H Hagaea, 104 hEZ,91 Hebanthe, 27; , 2S 28; panicula, ta, 29;vin 29 Lepto, • - Lepyrodiclis,9\ Lestibudesia, 11 Leucodanium, 95 Leucostemma, 97 Lipandra, 2 Litanum, 86 ■mculihi, 3 6 Loganiaceae: New Genus, 2 Lopboxera, 11 M P rbombifolia%\T(n>ata, 74 ° Mitscherlichia, 57 Mohringia, 90 Moenchia, 95 Mo//«, 104; spadicea, 105 Mollugo, 80; arenaria, 81; ax/' dichotoma, 81; ,/#»», 81; 81; hoffmannseggiana, 81; ja schrankii, 81; spergulaefolia, phylla, 81; verticellata, ;Va, 105; densiflora 105; jifc/o&t, 105; Jtt8; reichenbachii, nfracta, 170; aurea, 170; bicolor, 171; bucephalus, 143, 165, 170; calceolata, 169; calceolus, 169; Candida, 169; cavendisbii, 170; cirrhata, 74<5, 169; connata, 757, 169; conioluta. 169; costaricensis, 170; cymbiformis, 170, 169; ecornuta, 745, 169; elegantula, 170, expansa, 170; /fcv<*, 170; florida, 171; fregeana, 171; fuerstenbergiae, 171; gib- W. ;•■/.■- 171; 170; impressa, 171; tnodora, 1 nis, 75ua, 17-..; . 169; 169; '5-A 169; rwr&eri, 171; russelliana, 171; cata, 7(5/, 170; schilleriana, 171; shuttle- worthii, 171; stenochila, 169; ttutvis, 169; tricornis, 742, 7^p, 169; tigrina, 75p, 170; uncinata, 171; *•*/***, 170; violacea, 171; W/««, /*,-. 170; xytriophc Stellaria, 96; adenophor baJdwini, ! pidata, 97; cuspidata, '. filiformis, 254; f ranch, >, 99, 100; lanuginosa, '. ; octandra, 77; polyandra, ) MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN Frits W. Went U R, . . Dodge, Robert I BOARD OF TRUS